Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Theory of spin Seebeck effect activated by acoustic chiral phonons

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chiral phonons turn heat into spin current.

desk verdict A clean, honest derivation of the chiral-phonon spin Seebeck formula; the 'microscopic foundation' claim outruns the acoustic-phonon-only, no-J-estimate calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23083 v2 pith:6B2N3PJI submitted 2025-05-29 cond-mat.mes-hall

Naoki Nishimura , Takumi Funato , Mamoru Matsuo , Takeo Kato This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 72.25.-b63.20.-e85.75.-d
keywords chiralphononspinSeebeckeffectcurrentgyromagneticcouplingvorticitycaloritronicschiralityangularmomentum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives a microscopic formula for spin current generation at a junction between a structurally chiral insulator and a normal metal under a temperature gradient. The mechanism is gyromagnetic coupling: acoustic chiral phonons produce a microscopic lattice rotation, or vorticity, that couples directly to electron spins in the metal. The predicted spin current is proportional to the temperature difference divided by the average temperature and vanishes unless the crystal lacks parity symmetry, so that the two circular phonon branches have different frequencies. This provides a foundation for the chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect that does not require magnetism or spin-orbit interactions, and it explains how the signal depends on sample length, thermal conductivity, interfacial heat conductance, and average temperature.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective interfacial Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{e-ph}} = -\sum_{p q \lambda} J_{q,p}(\Omega^+_{q\lambda} \hat{s}^-_{-p} + \Omega^-_{-q\bar\lambda} \hat{s}^+_p)$ (Eq. 3), taken from prior work, in which the vorticity of chiral phonons (the curl of the lattice displacement rate, $\Omega = \nabla \times \dot{u}$) directly flips electron spins at the interface. The vorticity's Fourier component $\Omega_{q\lambda} = \sqrt{\hbar\omega_{q\lambda}/2\rho V_{CI}} (q \times e_{q\lambda})(a_{q\lambda}-a^\dagger_{q\lambda})$ carries the chirality through $q \times e_{q\lambda}$ and the frequency splitting $\omega_{q+} \neq \omega_{q-}$. The argument then combines this coupling with the spin susceptibility of the metal, the phonon spectral function, and a Boltzmann-determined nonequilibrium phonon distribution to produce the spin-current formula, with a material factor $g(T)$ and a geometric factor $h(L)=G_h/(L G_h+\kappa S)$ that determines whether the temperature drop happens in the bulk or at the interface.

What would settle it

Measure the spin current in a chiral-insulator/normal-metal junction (for example, $\alpha$-quartz or a chiral organic film) as a function of sample thickness $L$ and temperature $T$, comparing enantiomers and an achiral control. The theory predicts the signal vanishes when the two phonon circularities are degenerate, flips sign between enantiomers, and follows the length dependence $1/(L+L_0)$; a signal that persists in the racemic control or deviates from the predicted $g(T)$ temperature dependence would falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a temperature gradient applied across a chiral insulator–normal metal junction generates a spin current in the metal, with magnitude $\langle \hat{I}_s \rangle = \pi \hbar^3 \nu_F^2 N_N^2 |J|^2 / (\rho k_B T) \cdot (G_h / (L G_h + \kappa S)) \cdot (\Delta T / T) g(T)$, where $g(T)$ sums the chiral phonon contribution over wavevectors and circularities. The spin current is nonzero only when the phonon dispersion lacks parity symmetry, $\omega_{q+} \neq \omega_{q-}$, i.e., when the material is structurally chiral. The derivation starts from an interfacial Hamiltonian in which the phonon vorticity $\Omega$ couples to the electron spin with a constant coupling $J$, proceeds through Keldysh perturbation theory with phonon and spin spectral functions, and closes the temperature gradient using a Boltzmann-equation phonon distribution and heat-current continuity. It also notes that spin current can appear even in achiral materials if the two chiral phonon modes are excited unequally.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the effective interfacial Hamiltonian from prior work, in which phonon vorticity couples to electron spin with a single constant strength $J$, describes the real interface; if that coupling is weak, momentum-dependent, or dominated by spin-orbit mechanisms, the derived spin-current formulas would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, spin current generation from heat should be observable in non-magnetic chiral insulators made only of light elements, matching the reported chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect.
  • The sign of the spin current should reverse when the crystal chirality (enantiomer) is reversed, because the sum over circularities in $g(T)$ changes sign.
  • The spin current's dependence on sample length should switch between $1/L$ for thick samples and length-independent for thin samples, controlled by the characteristic length $L_0 = \kappa S/G_h$.
  • The theory predicts that the spin current tracks the temperature profile: both the bulk gradient and the interfacial temperature drop contribute, so tuning interfacial thermal conductance changes the signal.
  • Because the mechanism needs no spin-orbit coupling, it should work in organic or molecular chiral layers, not just inorganic crystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implicit testable extension is to drive the same gyromagnetic coupling with circularly polarized terahertz light instead of a thermal gradient: population imbalance between $\omega_{q+}$ and $\omega_{q-}$ modes should produce a spin current even in an achiral host, as the paper's Appendix formula suggests.
  • The theory is restricted to acoustic phonons; if optical chiral phonons couple through the same vorticity term, the room-temperature signal could be much larger, and extending the calculation to optical modes would give a quantitative comparison with experiment.
  • The constant-$J$ assumption for the rough interface could be relaxed; a momentum-dependent coupling would modify the $q$-sum in $g(T)$ and could be probed by comparing different metal overlayers or interface qualities.
  • A direct connection to chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) is left open; if the same gyromagnetic mechanism operates in molecular junctions, the spin Seebeck signal and CISS might share a common origin.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory of thermal spin current generation at a junction between a structurally chiral insulator and a normal metal. Starting from the effective interfacial Hamiltonian of Ref. [64], in which phonon vorticity couples to electron spin via the gyromagnetic effect, the authors derive a linear-response formula for the spin current (Eq. (5)), combine it with a Boltzmann description of the phonon distribution, and obtain a closed expression Eq. (14) with the temperature-dependent factor g(T) in Eq. (15). They show that in a thermal gradient the spin current is proportional to ΔT/T, changes sign with crystal chirality, and depends on sample length through the interfacial thermal conductance. The Appendix presents a Keldysh derivation of the response formula. The paper concludes that this mechanism provides a microscopic foundation for the chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect without magnetism or spin-orbit interactions.

Significance. If the central formula is correct, the paper's contribution is significant: it gives a concrete, symmetry-based mechanism for phonon-mediated spin current in non-magnetic chiral insulators, with experimentally testable predictions for chirality, geometry, and temperature dependence. The derivation is largely self-contained, the central result does not reduce to the assumed input, and the paper is honest about its limitations (acoustic phonons only, no quantitative estimate of J, no comparison with spin-orbit mechanisms). However, the quantitative relevance to the room-temperature experiment [10] is not established, and the unquantified coupling J is a load-bearing input. The paper would be strengthened by an estimate of J or by a more measured claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.11)-(A.12)] The step from Eq. (A.11) to Eq. (A.12) is not shown and appears to replace the difference f^ph_{qλ} - f^ph_{-q\barλ} (or the analogous combination after summation) with f^ph_{qλ} - f0(ω,T). In a temperature gradient f^ph_{-q\barλ} differs from f0 already at first order, so this is not a trivial simplification. Please provide the intermediate steps that justify Eq. (A.12), or state explicitly if an approximation is being made and under which condition.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (15)] The main result Eq. (14) introduces g(T) in Eq. (15) with the factor d_λ q_z^2, but the preceding expression Eq. (10) contains q_z [q · Im(e* × e)]. For a generic transverse circular phonon with wavevector q, Im(e* × e) is parallel to q̂, so q_z [q · Im(e* × e)] = d_λ q_z |q|, not d_λ q_z^2. The replacement (or an angular integration that produces it) is not justified in the text. Because g(T) controls the temperature and angular dependence of the predicted spin current, this needs a derivation or an explicit quasi-1D/cylindrical assumption.
  3. [Abstract, Discussion, Summary] The abstract claims a 'microscopic foundation' for the chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect. The calculation, however, relies on the effective Hamiltonian Eq. (3) from Ref. [64] with an unestimated coupling J, and the Discussion and Summary concede that no quantitative amplitude estimate and no comparison with spin-orbit-based mechanisms (Refs. [37,39,67]) are given. Since the motivating experiment [10] was performed at room temperature and the present treatment is acoustic-phonon-only, the claim as stated overreaches. Please either provide an order-of-magnitude estimate of J (or of the resulting spin current) or soften the claim so that it refers to a symmetry-allowed mechanism rather than a validated microscopic explanation of the experiment.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (5)] In Eq. (5), the electron distribution function is written f^m_k(ω), but the spin index in the susceptibility is p; use f^m_p for consistency.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.12)] Eq. (A.12) writes q · Im(e*_{qλ} ∗ e_{qλ}); the symbol ∗ should be × to match Eq. (5).
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (15)] The notation for ∂ω^4_{qλ}/∂q_z in Eq. (15) is typeset ambiguously; please write it explicitly.
  4. [Section 3, Eqs. (10) and (14)] The factor of 1/2 that converts the prefactor 2π in Eq. (10) to π in Eq. (14) when the q-sum is restricted to q_z>0 should be pointed out, since the text does not comment on it.
  5. [Section 3, after Eq. (15)] The sentence that spin current is generated only for structural chirality should be qualified in light of the Discussion's remark that unequal excitation of the two circular modes in achiral materials can also produce a spin current (Eq. (A.12)).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: predicted spin current is derived from a previously derived interface Hamiltonian and is not fitted to the target experiment.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained once the interface Hamiltonian H_e-ph of Eq. (3) is accepted. That Hamiltonian is imported from the authors' prior PRL [64], but it is a parameter-free tunneling-Hamiltonian derivation of spin-microrotation coupling with stated assumptions (second order in tunneling, first order in microrotation coupling, constant J for a rough interface); it does not contain the temperature-gradient spin Seebeck result and is not fitted to the experimental target. Equations (5), (10), and (14) follow algebraically from H_e-ph via Keldysh perturbation theory and a Boltzmann-equation phonon distribution, with no parameter fitted to the predicted spin current. The chirality condition omega_{q+} != omega_{q-} is an output of the sum in Eq. (15), not an input. The paper explicitly concedes in the Summary that it provides no quantitative amplitude estimate and no comparison with spin-orbit mechanisms, and that optical phonons may dominate at room temperature; these are external validation gaps, not circular reductions. No equation is identical to an input by construction, so no circular step is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the gyromagnetic spin-phonon coupling Hamiltonian, which is imported from the authors' prior work rather than derived here. The model also assumes standard transport approximations (relaxation time, linear temperature profile) and leaves the coupling constant and phonon lifetimes as unspecified free parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • J (spin-phonon coupling constant) = unspecified
    Assumed constant for a rough interface (Section 2, after Eq. 5); the spin current is proportional to |J|², so the magnitude is undetermined.
  • τ_{qλ} (phonon relaxation time) = unspecified
    Enters g(T) and the thermal conductivity κ (Eqs. 15-16); depends on scattering processes, no form or value given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The gyromagnetic spin-phonon coupling Hamiltonian H_e-ph = -Σ J (Ω+ s^- + Ω- s^+) is valid for the CI/NM interface.
    Taken from the authors' prior PRL [64]; not re-derived here. Underlies Eq. (3) and all subsequent results.
  • domain assumption The NM spin susceptibility is given by the free-electron low-frequency form (1/π)Σ_p Im χ^R_p(ω) = ν_F² N_N² ℏω.
    Eq. (9); assumes a clean paramagnetic metal and small phonon frequencies relative to Fermi energy.
  • domain assumption Phonon distribution is described by the Boltzmann equation in the relaxation time approximation to first order in ∇T.
    Used to obtain Eq. (10); standard for weak temperature gradients.
  • domain assumption Temperature is uniform in the NM and has a constant gradient in the CI, with a temperature drop at the interface given by heat-flux continuity.
    Section 2 and Eqs. (11)-(13); assumes a thin CI and large NM thermal conductivity.
  • ad hoc to paper The interface coupling J is momentum-independent (rough interface).
    Stated 'for simplicity' in Section 2; simplifies the sums but is not generally true for smooth interfaces.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theory of spin Seebeck effect activated by acoustic chiral phonons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6B2N3PJI

@misc{pith2026250523083,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theory of spin Seebeck effect activated by acoustic chiral phonons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6B2N3PJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23083}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically explore the generation of spin current driven by a temperature gradient in a junction between a chiral insulator and a normal metal. Based on the gyromagnetic response induced by microscopic acoustic-phonon-mediated lattice rotation, we derive a formula for the spin current when a finite temperature difference is imposed between two ends of the sample. We clarify how the phonon-mediated spin current depends on the sample geometry, the thermal conductivity, the heat conductance at the interface, and the average temperature. Our formulation provides a microscopic foundation for the chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect without relying on magnetism or spin-orbit interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23083 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) The conventional spin Seebeck effect in a junction composed of a ferro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature variation in the sample. and the regions of the CI and NM are 0 < z < L and L < z, respectively. We impose a temperature difference ∆T between the ends of the sample, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Schematic picture of dispersion of chiral phonons. (b) Schematic picture of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [64]

    Funato, M

    T. Funato, M. Matsuo, T. Kato, Chirality-Induced Phonon-Spin Con- version at an Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 236201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.236201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.236201 2024

  2. [10]

    K. Kim, E. Vetter, L. Yan, C. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Sun, Y. Yang, A. H. Comstock, X. Li, J. Zhou, L. Zhang, W. You, D. Sun, J. Liu, Chiral- phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect, Nat. Mater. 22 (2023) 322–328. doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01473-9

    doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01473-9 2023

  3. [1]

    G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, B. J. van Wees, Spin caloritronics, Nat. Mater. 11 (2012) 391–399.doi:10.1038/nmat3301. 13

    doi:10.1038/nmat3301 2012

  4. [2]

    Hoffmann, S

    A. Hoffmann, S. D. Bader, Opportunities at the Frontiers of Spintronics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 4 (2015) 047001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4. 047001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.4 2015

  5. [3]

    Uchida, R

    K.-i. Uchida, R. Iguchi, Spintronic Thermal Management, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90 (2021) 122001.doi:10.7566/JPSJ.90.122001

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.122001 2021

  6. [4]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Observation of the spin Seebeck effect, Nature 455 (2008) 778–781. doi:10.1038/nature07321

    doi:10.1038/nature07321 2008

  7. [5]

    C. M. Jaworski, J. Yang, S. Mack, D. D. Awschalom, J. P. Heremans, R. C. Myers, Observation of the spin-Seebeck effect in a ferromagnetic semiconductor, Nat. Mater. 9 (2010) 898–903.doi:10.1038/nmat2860

    doi:10.1038/nmat2860 2010

  8. [6]

    Slachter, F

    A. Slachter, F. L. Bakker, J.-P. Adam, B. J. van Wees, Thermally driven spin injection from a ferromagnet into a non-magnetic metal, Nat. Phys. 6 (2010) 879–882. doi:10.1038/nphys1767

    doi:10.1038/nphys1767 2010

Show all 75 references
  1. [7]

    Uchida, H

    K. Uchida, H. Adachi, T. An, T. Ota, M. Toda, B. Hillebrands, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Long-range spin Seebeck effect and acoustic spin pumping, Nat. Mater. 10 (2011) 737–741.doi:10.1038/nmat3099

    2011 doi

  2. [8]

    C. M. Jaworski, R. C. Myers, E. Johnston-Halperin, J. P. Heremans, Giant spin Seebeck effect in a non-magnetic material, Nature 487 (2012) 210–213. doi:10.1038/nature11221

    2012 doi

  3. [9]

    Adachi, K.-I

    H. Adachi, K.-I. Uchida, E. Saitoh, S. Maekawa, Theory of the spin Seebeck effect, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 036501. doi:10.1088/ 0034-4885/76/3/036501

    2013

  4. [11]

    L.D.Barron, FromCosmicChiralitytoProteinStructure: LordKelvin’s Legacy, Chirality 24 (2012) 879–893.doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ chir.22017. 14

    2012

  5. [12]

    Kishine, H

    J.-i. Kishine, H. Kusunose, H. M. Yamamoto, On the Definition of Chi- rality and Enantioselective Fields, Isr. J. Chem. 62 (2022) e202200049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.202200049

    2022 doi

  6. [13]

    J.Fransson, TheChiralInducedSpinSelectivityEffectWhatItIs, What It Is Not, And Why It Matters, Isr. J. Chem. 62 (2022) e202200046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.202200046

    2022 doi

  7. [14]

    Zhang, Z

    S. Zhang, Z. Huang, M. Du, T. Ying, L. Du, T. Zhang, The chirality of phonons: Definitions, symmetry constraints, and experimental observa- tion, arXiv:2503.22794 (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.22794

    2025 doi

  8. [15]

    T. T. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Miao, S. Murakami, New Advances in Phonons: From Band Topology to Quasiparticle Chirality, arXiv:2505.06179 (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.06179

    2025 doi arXiv

  9. [16]

    Zhang, Q

    L. Zhang, Q. Niu, Angular Momentum of Phonons and the Einstein– de Haas Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 085503. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.112.085503

    2014

  10. [17]

    S. V. Vonsovskii, M. S. Svirskii, Phonon Spin, Sov. Phys. Solid State 3 (1962) 1568

    1962

  11. [18]

    D. A. Garanin, E. M. Chudnovsky, Angular momentum in spin-phonon processes, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 024421.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92. 024421

    2015 doi

  12. [19]

    J. J. Nakane, H. Kohno, Angular momentum of phonons and its ap- plication to single-spin relaxation, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 174403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.174403

    2018 doi

  13. [20]

    R. M. Geilhufe, Dynamic electron-phonon and spin-phonon interac- tions due to inertia, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022) L012004.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.L012004

    2022

  14. [21]

    R. M. Geilhufe, W. Hergert, Electron magnetic moment of transient chiral phonons in KTaO3, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) L020406.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevB.107.L020406

    2023

  15. [22]

    Basini, M

    M. Basini, M. Pancaldi, B. Wehinger, M. Udina, V. Unikandanunni, T. Tadano, M. C. Hoffmann, A. V. Balatsky, S. Bonetti, Terahertz 15 electric-field-driven dynamical multiferroicity in SrTiO 3, Nature 628 (2024) 534–539. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07175-9

    2024 doi

  16. [23]

    C. S. Davies, F. G. N. Fennema, A. Tsukamoto, I. Razdolski, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, Phononic switching of magnetization by the ul- trafast Barnett effect, Nature 628 (2024) 540–544. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07200-x

    2024

  17. [24]

    I. H. Choi, S. G. Jeong, S. Song, S. Park, D. B. Shin, W. S. Choi, J. S. Lee, Real-time dynamics of angular momentum transfer from spin to acoustic chiral phonon in oxide heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 19 (2024) 1277–1282. doi:10.1038/s41565-024-01719-w

    2024 doi

  18. [25]

    D. M. Juraschek, N. A. Spaldin, Orbital magnetic moments of phonons, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 (2019) 064405.doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials. 3.064405

    2019 doi

  19. [26]

    Xiong, H

    G. Xiong, H. Chen, D. Ma, L. Zhang, Effective magnetic fields induced by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 144302. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.106.144302

    2022

  20. [28]

    Streib, H

    S. Streib, H. Keshtgar, G. E. W. Bauer, Damping of Magnetization Dynamics by Phonon Pumping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 027202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.027202

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    H. Chen, W. Wu, J. Zhu, Z. Yang, W. Gong, W. Gao, S. A. Yang, L. Zhang, Chiral Phonon Diode Effect in Chiral Crystals, Nano Lett. 22 (2022) 1688–1693. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04705

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Suzuki, S

    Y. Suzuki, S. Sumita, Y. Kato, Theory of phonon angular momentum transport across smooth interfaces between crystals, arXiv:2409.08874 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.08874

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hamada, E

    M. Hamada, E. Minamitani, M. Hirayama, S. Murakami, Phonon angu- lar momentum induced by the temperature gradient, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 175301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.175301. 16

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Zhang, N

    H. Zhang, N. Peshcherenko, F. Yang, T. Z. Ward, P. Raghuvanshi, L. Lindsay, C. Felser, Y. Zhang, J. Q. Yan, H. Miao, Measurement of phonon angular momentum, Nat. Phys. (2025). doi:10.1038/ s41567-025-02952-3

    2025

  25. [33]

    Zhang, Q

    L. Zhang, Q. Niu, Chiral Phonons at High-Symmetry Points in Mono- layer Hexagonal Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 115502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.115502

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    H. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Niu, L. Zhang, Chiral phonons in two- dimensional materials, 2D Materials 6 (2018) 012002. doi:10.1088/ 2053-1583/aaf292

    2018

  27. [35]

    Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, Q. Niu, Phonon Magnetic Moment from Electronic Topological Magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 186403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.186403

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    Saparov, B

    D. Saparov, B. Xiong, Y. Ren, Q. Niu, Lattice dynamics with molecu- lar Berry curvature: Chiral optical phonons, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 064303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.064303

    2022 doi

  29. [38]

    D. Yao, S. Murakami, Chiral-phonon-induced current in helical crystals, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 184412.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.184412

    2022 doi

  30. [39]

    D. Yao, M. Matsuo, T. Yokoyama, Electric field-induced nonreciprocal spin current due to chiral phonons in chiral-structure superconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124 (2024).doi:10.1063/5.0207915

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    Y. Kato, Y. Suzuki, T. Sato, H. M. Yamamoto, Y. Togawa, H. K. Kusunose, J.-i. Koshine, Chirality-dependent spin polarization in dif- fusive metals: linear and quadratic responses, arXiv:2408.04450 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.04450

    2024 doi arXiv

  32. [41]

    A. G. McLellan, Angular momentum states for phonons and a rotation- ally invariant development of lattice dynamics, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21 (1988) 1177.doi:10.1088/0022-3719/21/7/009. 17

    1988 doi

  33. [42]

    Božovic, Possible band-structure shapes of quasi-one-dimensional solids, Phys

    I. Božovic, Possible band-structure shapes of quasi-one-dimensional solids, Phys. Rev. B 29 (1984) 6586–6599. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 29.6586

    1984 doi

  34. [43]

    Tatsumi, T

    Y. Tatsumi, T. Kaneko, R. Saito, Conservation law of angular momen- tum in helicity-dependent raman and rayleigh scattering, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 195444. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195444

    2018 doi

  35. [44]

    Zhang, S

    T. Zhang, S. Murakami, Chiral phonons and pseudoangular momentum in nonsymmorphic systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022) L012024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L012024

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    Komiyama, T

    H. Komiyama, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, Physics of phonons in systems with approximate screw symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 184104. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.184104

    2022 doi

  37. [46]

    A. Kato, H. M. Yamamoto, J.-i. Kishine, Chirality-induced spin filtering in pseudo Jahn-Teller molecules, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 195117.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.195117

    2022 doi

  38. [48]

    Kato, J.-i

    A. Kato, J.-i. Kishine, Note on Angular Momentum of Phonons in Chiral Crystals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92 (2023) 075002.doi:10.7566/JPSJ.92. 075002

    2023 doi

  39. [49]

    Tateishi, A

    T. Tateishi, A. Kato, J.-i. Kishine, Electron–Chiral Phonon Coupling, Crystal Angular Momentum, and Phonon Chirality, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94 (2025) 053601. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.053601

    2025 doi

  40. [50]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C. Yang, R. Kaindl, L. L.J., Y. Wang, Z. X., Observation of chiral phonons, Science 359 (2018) 579. doi:10.1126/science.aar2711

    2018 doi

  41. [51]

    S. G. Jeong, J. Kim, A. Seo, S. Park, H. Y. Jeong, Y.-M. Kim, V. Lauter, T. Egami, J. H. Han, W. S. Choi, Unconventional interlayer exchange couplingviachiralphononsinsyntheticmagneticoxideheterostructures, Sci. Adv. 8 (2022) eabm4005.doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm4005. 18

    2022 doi

  42. [52]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Mu- rakami, J.-i. Kishine, T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons inα-HgS, Nat. Phys. 19 (2023) 35–39.doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01790-x

    2023 doi

  43. [53]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, K. Kobayashi, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, H. Kusunose, J.-i. Kishine, T. Satoh, Chiral phonons: circularly polarized Raman spectroscopy and ab initio calculations in a chiral crystal tellurium, Chi- rality 2023 (2023) 23544.doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.23544

    2023 doi

  44. [54]

    S. J. Barnett, Magnetization by Rotation, Phys. Rev. 6 (1915) 239. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.6.239

    1915 doi

  45. [55]

    Einstein, W

    A. Einstein, W. J. de Haas, Experimental proof of the existence of Am- père’s molecular currents, KNAW proc. 18 I (1915) 696

    1915

  46. [56]

    G. G. Scott, Review of Gyromagnetic Ratio Experiments, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34 (1962) 102.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.34.102

    1962 doi

  47. [57]

    Kobayashi, T

    D. Kobayashi, T. Yoshikawa, M. Matsuo, R. Iguchi, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Y. Nozaki, Spin Current Generation Using a Surface Acous- tic Wave Generated via Spin-Rotation Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 077202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.077202

    2017 doi

  48. [58]

    Kurimune, M

    Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, Y. Nozaki, Observation of gyromagnetic spin wave resonance in nife films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 217205.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.217205

    2020 doi

  49. [59]

    Tateno, Y

    S. Tateno, Y. Kurimune, M. Matsuo, K. Yamanoi, Y. Nozaki, Einstein– deHaasPhaseShiftsinSurfaceAcousticWaves, Phys.Rev.B104(2021) L020404. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L020404

    2021 doi

  50. [60]

    Takahashi, H

    R. Takahashi, H. Chudo, M. Matsuo, K. Harii, Y. Ohnuma, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Giant spin hydrodynamic generation in laminar flow, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 3009.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16753-0

    2020 doi

  51. [61]

    Tabaei Kazerooni, G

    H. Tabaei Kazerooni, G. Zinchenko, J. Schumacher, C. Cierpka, Elec- trical voltage by electron spin-vorticity coupling in laminar ducts, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (2021) 043703.doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.043703

    2021 doi

  52. [62]

    Tabaei Kazerooni, A

    H. Tabaei Kazerooni, A. Thieme, J. Schumacher, C. Cierpka, Electron Spin-Vorticity Coupling in Pipe Flows at Low and High 19 Reynolds Number, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 (2020) 014002.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.14.014002

    2020

  53. [63]

    Zolfagharkhani, A

    G. Zolfagharkhani, A. Gaidarzhy, P. Degiovanni, S. Kettemann, P. Fulde, P. Mohanty, Nanomechanical detection of itinerant electron spin flip, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (2008) 720–723. doi:10.1038/nnano. 2008.311

    2008 doi

  54. [65]

    Callaway, Model for Lattice Thermal Conductivity at Low Temper- atures, Phys

    J. Callaway, Model for Lattice Thermal Conductivity at Low Temper- atures, Phys. Rev. 113 (1959) 1046–1051.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.113. 1046

    1959 doi

  55. [66]

    J. M. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phe- nomena in Solids, reissue Edition, Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  56. [67]

    K. Ohe, H. Shishido, M. Kato, S. Utsumi, H. Matsuura, Y. Togawa, Chirality-Induced Selectivity of Phonon Angular Momenta in Chiral Quartz Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 056302. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.056302

    2024

  57. [68]

    Naaman, H

    B.Göhler, V.Hamelbeck, T.Z.Markus, M.Kettner, F.Hanne, Z.Vager, R. Naaman, H. Zacharias, Spin Selectivity in Electron Transmission Through Self-Assembled Monolayers of Double-Stranded DNA, Science 331 (2011) 894. doi:doi/10.1126/science.1199339

    2011 doi

  58. [69]

    Naaman, D

    R. Naaman, D. H. Waldeck, Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity Effect, J. Phys. Chem. 3 (2012) 2178–2187.doi:10.1021/jz300793y

    2012 doi

  59. [70]

    Michaeli, N

    K. Michaeli, N. Kantor-Uriel, R. Naaman, D. H. Waldeck, The electron’s spin and molecular chirality – how are they related and how do they affect life processes?, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 6478–6487.doi:10. 1039/C6CS00369A

    2016

  60. [71]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, D. H. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the electron spin, Nat. Rev. Chem. 3 (2019) 250–260. doi:10.1038/ s41570-019-0087-1. 20

    2019

  61. [72]

    Mishra, A

    S. Mishra, A. K. Mondal, S. Pal, T. K. Das, E. Z. B. Smolinsky, G. Sili- gardi, R. Naaman, Length-Dependent Electron Spin Polarization in Oligopeptides and DNA, J. Phys. Chem. C 124 (2020) 10776–10782. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02291

    2020 doi

  62. [73]

    R. Sano, T. Kato, Chirality-induced spin selectivity by variable-range hopping along DNA double helix, arXiv:2404.19000 (2024). doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2404.19000

    2024 doi arXiv

  63. [74]

    Miyajima, Chirality-induced effective magnetic field in a phthalocya- nine molecule, Appl

    S.Miwa, K.Kondou, S.Sakamoto, A.Nihonyanagi, F.Araoka, Y.Otani, D. Miyajima, Chirality-induced effective magnetic field in a phthalocya- nine molecule, Appl. Phys. Express 13 (2020) 113001.doi:10.35848/ 1882-0786/abbf67

    2020

  64. [75]

    Kondou, M

    K. Kondou, M. Shiga, S. Sakamoto, H. Inuzuka, A. Nihonyanagi, F. Araoka, M. Kobayashi, S. Miwa, D. Miyajima, Y. Otani, Chirality- induced magnetoresistance due to thermally driven spin polarization, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 7302–7307.doi:10.1021/jacs.2c00496

    2022 doi

  65. [76]

    Kondou, S

    K. Kondou, S. Miwa, D. Miyajima, Spontaneous spin selectivity in chiral molecules at the interface, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 585 (2023) 171157. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171157

    2023

  66. [77]

    S. Miwa, T. Yamamoto, T. Nagata, S. Sakamoto, K. Kimura, M. Shiga, W. Gao, H. M. Yamamoto, K. Inoue, T. Takenobu, T. Nozaki, T. Ohto, Spinpolarizationdrivenbymolecularvibrationsleadstoenantioselectiv- ity in chiral molecules, arXiv:2412.03082 (2024).doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2412.03082

    2024 doi arXiv

  67. [78]

    Bruus, F

    H. Bruus, F. Flensberg, Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics — An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2004. 21

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.