Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 60 references

SWAN: Synergistic Wavelet-Attention Network for Infrared Small Target Detection

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SWAN fuses wavelet frequency bands with spatial attention to detect infrared small targets and reports gains over earlier detectors on benchmarks.

desk verdict Plausible-looking IRSTD architecture, but the body text is corrupted and the SOTA claim is unverifiable from what is readable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01322 v1 pith:6CGA3HVS submitted 2025-08-02 eess.IV cs.CV

Yuxin Jing , Jufeng Zhao , Tianpei Zhang , Yiming Zhu This is my paper
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords infraredsmalltargetdetectionHaarwaveletconvolutionfrequency-domainfeaturesspatialattentionchannelIRSTDdeeplearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Infrared small targets occupy only a few pixels and are usually buried in bright, textured clutter, so detectors that rely only on local spatial patterns confuse targets with background. This paper argues that the frequency domain carries a separable signal: small targets concentrate energy in high-frequency wavelet subbands while much of the clutter is low-frequency, and a network can exploit that separation. To test the idea it builds SWAN, built around a Haar Wavelet Convolution that decomposes feature maps into approximation and detail subbands, a Shifted Spatial Attention module that gathers long-range context with linear complexity, and a Residual Dual-Channel Attention module that reweights channels. The paper reports that SWAN surpasses prior methods on infrared small-target detection benchmarks, with the largest margins in complex cluttered scenes. If the claim holds, it gives a practical recipe for making small-target detectors more robust without quadratic attention cost.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the Haar Wavelet Convolution (HWConv): it applies the Haar transform to feature maps, producing a low-frequency approximation and horizontal, vertical, and diagonal detail subbands, then applies separate learnable convolutions to each subband and reconstructs the output. This is what gives the network explicit access to frequency energy that ordinary convolution only sees implicitly. Two further modules carry the rest of the design: Shifted Spatial Attention (SSA) gathers long-range dependencies with linear complexity by shifting and attending over spatial positions, and Residual Dual-Channel Attention (RDCA) recalibrates feature channels to amplify target signals and suppress background. Together they instantiate the paper's thesis that small-target detection is a cross-domain problem, not purely a local pattern-matching problem.

What would settle it

Train SWAN and an otherwise identical network in which the Haar Wavelet Convolution is replaced by a standard convolution of the same output shape and parameter budget, using the same data, loss, and training schedule; if detection metrics on the infrared benchmark datasets do not drop, the central frequency-domain claim is not what carries the result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that fusing spatial and frequency-domain representations at the feature level improves infrared small target detection beyond what conventional convolutional backbones achieve. SWAN's Haar Wavelet Convolution performs the 2D Haar transform on input features, splitting them into one low-frequency approximation and three detail subbands; learnable convolutions process each subband before reconstruction, so the network can suppress smooth background energy while preserving point-target signatures. The Shifted Spatial Attention module then models long-range dependencies across the image at linear computational cost, and the Residual Dual-Channel Attention module adaptively emphasizes target-related channels and suppresses clutter. The paper's reported experiments on benchmark datasets are offered as evidence that this combination outperforms existing methods, particularly in complex backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the frequency information extracted by the wavelet convolution is what produces the reported detection gains, rather than the extra parameters or training details, and that the benchmark comparisons treat earlier methods fairly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported results hold, SWAN provides the new reference point for infrared small-target detection on the tested benchmarks, with higher intersection-over-union and lower false alarms than earlier detectors.
  • Because SSA runs at linear complexity, the architecture can be applied to larger infrared frames or higher-resolution inputs without the quadratic cost of full self-attention.
  • The wavelet branch gives a concrete mechanism for suppressing low-frequency clutter, so gains should be most visible in scenes with heavy background texture.
  • The network's channel reweighting should reduce false positives from background structures that resemble small targets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The frequency-domain rationale is not infrared-specific; the same wavelet attention block could be transferred to other point-target tasks, such as tiny aerial object detection or hot-spot detection in thermal video, which the paper does not test.
  • A controlled comparison with a plain-convolution baseline matched in parameter count and training budget would isolate how much of the gain comes from the wavelet decomposition itself rather than from added capacity.
  • SSA's linear complexity suggests a straightforward temporal extension: applying the shifted-attention pattern across video frames could exploit target motion while still avoiding quadratic cost.
  • One could build a synthetic test set of point targets with known spatial frequency content to verify directly that the wavelet branch responds to the target's high-frequency signature and not merely to local contrast.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes SWAN, a neural network for infrared small target detection (IRSTD) that combines a Haar Wavelet Convolution (HWConv), a Shifted Spatial Attention (SSA) module with claimed linear complexity, and a Residual Dual-Channel Attention (RDCA) module. The abstract states that extensive experiments on benchmark datasets show SWAN surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods in detection accuracy and robustness. However, the submitted full text is unreadable: all sections after the abstract consist of mojibake, making the method description, experiments, ablations, and comparisons inaccessible. Only the abstract can be evaluated, and it provides no quantitative results, dataset names, or baseline comparisons. The central empirical claim is therefore unverifiable in the current submission.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper would offer a plausible contribution to IRSTD by integrating frequency-domain wavelet features with attention mechanisms, potentially improving detection in cluttered backgrounds. The proposed modules are conceptually reasonable: HWConv could exploit frequency separation, SSA models long-range dependencies, and RDCA recalibrates channel responses. No internal contradiction is apparent in the abstract. However, because the full text is corrupted, I cannot assess novelty relative to prior work, correctness of the architecture, or validity of the experimental evidence. The manuscript provides no machine-checked proofs, no reproducible code, and no falsifiable quantitative predictions in the readable portion. Thus the significance is entirely contingent on a legible resubmission that makes the method and results available for scrutiny.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full text (all sections after Abstract)] The body of the submitted manuscript is unreadable: the text after the abstract consists of mojibake with no legible equations, tables, figures, or experimental results. The central claim in the Abstract—'Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that SWAN surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods'—is therefore entirely unsupported in the submitted file. Because the paper's contribution is an empirical architecture claim, this is a load-bearing defect: the reader cannot check the architecture implementation, the training protocol, the datasets, the evaluation metrics, or the comparison baselines. The authors must supply a properly encoded manuscript before the paper can be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Even the readable abstract does not provide the minimum quantitative information needed to assess the headline claim: no datasets are named, no evaluation metrics are given, no baseline results are quoted, and no numerical improvements are reported. A statement of 'significant improvements' without numbers is not verifiable, and in the absence of a readable experimental section it leaves the central claim unsupported. The revision should report concrete results (e.g., IoU, Pd, Fa, or mIoU on standard IRSTD benchmarks such as NUAA-SIRST and IRSTD-1k) either in the abstract or in a fully legible experiments section.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'addresses the challenge of precisely IRSTD' is ungrammatical; it should read 'addresses the challenge of precise IRSTD' or 'of precisely detecting IRSTD'.
  2. [Abstract] The verb tense in 'we proposed' is inconsistent with the rest of the abstract; it should be 'we propose'.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'the frequency energy and spatial details of small target' should use the plural 'small targets'.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'for a deep, cross-domain fusion' is awkward; consider 'for deep cross-domain fusion' or 'enabling deep cross-domain fusion'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular dependency found: the paper reports an empirical architecture evaluation, with no equation, self-citation, or fitted-parameter step that reduces the claimed result to its inputs.

full rationale

The readable portions of the manuscript describe an empirical method: SWAN combines Haar wavelet convolution, shifted spatial attention, and residual dual-channel attention, and the abstract claims state-of-the-art benchmark performance. There is no derivation chain in which an output quantity is defined in terms of the claimed result, no parameter fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem. The benchmark claim is an empirical assertion whose support would normally live in experimental tables and ablations; those sections are corrupted in the provided text, so the claim is unverifiable from this input, but unverifiability is not circularity. No specific equation or passage can be quoted that exhibits a reduction of the claimed outcome to its own inputs. Accordingly, the honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Because the full text is corrupted, the ledger cannot be populated. In a normal review, the architecture's hyperparameters (wavelet decomposition depth, number of attention heads, channel sizes, loss weights) would be listed as free parameters, and the assumption that wavelet frequency features separate targets from clutter would be a domain assumption. None of these are extractable from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SWAN: Synergistic Wavelet-Attention Network for Infrared Small Target Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CGA3HVS

@misc{pith2026250801322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SWAN: Synergistic Wavelet-Attention Network for Infrared Small Target Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CGA3HVS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01322}
}
read the original abstract

Infrared small target detection (IRSTD) is thus critical in both civilian and military applications. This study addresses the challenge of precisely IRSTD in complex backgrounds. Recent methods focus fundamental reliance on conventional convolution operations, which primarily capture local spatial patterns and struggle to distinguish the unique frequency-domain characteristics of small targets from intricate background clutter. To overcome these limitations, we proposed the Synergistic Wavelet-Attention Network (SWAN), a novel framework designed to perceive targets from both spatial and frequency domains. SWAN leverages a Haar Wavelet Convolution (HWConv) for a deep, cross-domain fusion of the frequency energy and spatial details of small target. Furthermore, a Shifted Spatial Attention (SSA) mechanism efficiently models long-range spatial dependencies with linear computational complexity, enhancing contextual awareness. Finally, a Residual Dual-Channel Attention (RDCA) module adaptively calibrates channel-wise feature responses to suppress background interference while amplifying target-pertinent signals. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that SWAN surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods, showing significant improvements in detection accuracy and robustness, particularly in complex challenging scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. A. Sobrino, F. Del Frate, M. Drusch, J. C. Jim \'e nez-Mu \ n oz, P. Manunta, and A. Regan, ``Review of thermal infrared applications and requirements for future high-resolution sensors,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2963--2972, 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    H. Deng, X. Sun, M. Liu, C. Ye, and X. Zhou, ``Small infrared target detection based on weighted local difference measure,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 4204--4214, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    T. Wu, B. Li, Y. Luo, Y. Wang, C. Xiao, T. Liu, J. Yang, W. An, and Y. Guo, ``Mtu-net: Multilevel transunet for space-based infrared tiny ship detection,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1--15, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    C. Hu, X. Dong, Y. Huang, L. Wang, L. Xu, T. Pu, and Z. Peng, ``Smpisd-mtpnet: Scene semantic prior-assisted infrared ship detection using multi-task perception networks,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Y. Sun, J. Yang, and W. An, ``Infrared dim and small target detection via multiple subspace learning and spatial-temporal patch-tensor model,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 3737--3752, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Y. Zhu, Y. Ma, F. Fan, J. Huang, K. Wu, and G. Wang, ``Towards accurate infrared small target detection via edge-aware gated transformer,'' IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    H. Zhu, J. Zhang, G. Xu, and L. Deng, ``Balanced ring top-hat transformation for infrared small-target detection with guided filter kernel,'' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 3892--3903, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Z. Lu, Z. Huang, Q. Song, K. Bai, and Z. Li, ``An enhanced image patch tensor decomposition for infrared small target detection,'' Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 23, p. 6044, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    L. Deng, G. Xu, J. Zhang, and H. Zhu, ``Entropy-driven morphological top-hat transformation for infrared small target detection,'' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 962--975, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    L. Deng, J. Zhang, G. Xu, and H. Zhu, ``Infrared small target detection via adaptive m-estimator ring top-hat transformation,'' Pattern Recognition, vol. 112, p. 107729, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Bai and F

    X. Bai and F. Zhou, ``Analysis of new top-hat transformation and the application for infrared dim small target detection,'' Pattern Recognition, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2145--2156, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    H. Li, Q. Wang, H. Wang, and W. Yang, ``Infrared small target detection using tensor based least mean square,'' Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 91, p. 106994, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Ru, and C. Wu, ``Infrared small target detection based on gradient correlation filtering and contrast measurement,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1--12, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    K. Ren, C. Song, X. Miao, M. Wan, J. Xiao, G. Gu, and Q. Chen, ``Infrared small target detection based on non-subsampled shearlet transform and phase spectrum of quaternion fourier transform,'' Optical and Quantum Electronics, vol. 52, pp. 1--15, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    C. P. Chen, H. Li, Y. Wei, T. Xia, and Y. Y. Tang, ``A local contrast method for small infrared target detection,'' IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 574--581, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Y. Wei, X. You, and H. Li, ``Multiscale patch-based contrast measure for small infrared target detection,'' Pattern Recognition, vol. 58, pp. 216--226, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Z. Qiu, Y. Ma, F. Fan, J. Huang, and L. Wu, ``Global sparsity-weighted local contrast measure for infrared small target detection,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1--5, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Z. Qiu, Y. Ma, F. Fan, J. Huang, and M. Wu, ``Adaptive scale patch-based contrast measure for dim and small infrared target detection,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1--5, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Y. Xu, M. Wan, X. Zhang, J. Wu, Y. Chen, Q. Chen, and G. Gu, ``Infrared small target detection based on local contrast-weighted multidirectional derivative,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1--16, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Z. Lu, Z. Huang, Q. Song, H. Ni, and K. Bai, ``Infrared small target detection based on joint local contrast measures,'' Optik, vol. 273, p. 170437, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Dai and Y

    Y. Dai and Y. Wu, ``Reweighted infrared patch-tensor model with both nonlocal and local priors for single-frame small target detection,'' IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 3752--3767, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    Zhang, L

    L. Zhang, L. Peng, T. Zhang, S. Cao, and Z. Peng, ``Infrared small target detection via non-convex rank approximation minimization joint l 2, 1 norm,'' Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1821, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Zhang and Z

    L. Zhang and Z. Peng, ``Infrared small target detection based on partial sum of the tensor nuclear norm,'' Remote Sensing, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 382, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Zhong, H

    S. Zhong, H. Zhou, X. Cui, X. Cao, F. Zhang et al., ``Infrared small target detection based on local-image construction and maximum correntropy,'' Measurement, vol. 211, p. 112662, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    B. Li, C. Xiao, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Lin, M. Li, W. An, and Y. Guo, ``Dense nested attention network for infrared small target detection,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 32, pp. 1745--1758, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Zhang, R

    M. Zhang, R. Zhang, Y. Yang, H. Bai, J. Zhang, and J. Guo, `` ISNET : Shape matters for infrared small target detection,'' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 877--886

    2022

  19. [27]

    Y. Dai, Y. Wu, F. Zhou, and K. Barnard, ``Attentional local contrast networks for infrared small target detection,'' IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 9813--9824, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Zhang, L

    T. Zhang, L. Li, S. Cao, T. Pu, and Z. Peng, ``Attention-guided pyramid context networks for detecting infrared small target under complex background,'' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 4250--4261, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Y. Bai, R. Li, S. Gou, C. Zhang, Y. Chen, and Z. Zheng, ``Cross-connected bidirectional pyramid network for infrared small-dim target detection,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1--5, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    X. Wu, D. Hong, and J. Chanussot, ``Uiu-net: U-net in u-net for infrared small object detection,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 32, pp. 364--376, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Ronneberger, P

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, ``U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,'' in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention--MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18...

    2015

  24. [32]

    C. Hu, Y. Huang, K. Li, L. Zhang, C. Long, Y. Zhu, T. Pu, and Z. Peng, ``Datransnet: dynamic attention transformer network for infrared small target detection,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Zhong, B

    Y. Zhong, B. Li, L. Tang, S. Kuang, S. Wu, and S. Ding, ``Detecting camouflaged object in frequency domain,'' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2022, pp. 4504--4513

    2022

  26. [34]

    F. Liu, C. Gao, F. Chen, D. Meng, W. Zuo, and X. Gao, ``Infrared small and dim target detection with transformer under complex backgrounds,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 32, pp. 5921--5932, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Zhang, Y

    T. Zhang, Y. Zhu, J. Zhao, G. Cui, and Y. Zheng, ``Exploring state space model in wavelet domain: An infrared and visible image fusion network via wavelet transform and state space model,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18378, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S. Yuan, H. Qin, X. Yan, N. Akhtar, and A. Mian, ``Sctransnet: Spatial-channel cross transformer network for infrared small target detection,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    J. Han, K. Liang, B. Zhou, X. Zhu, J. Zhao, and L. Zhao, ``Infrared small target detection utilizing the multiscale relative local contrast measure,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 612--616, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    C. Gao, D. Meng, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, X. Zhou, and A. G. Hauptmann, ``Infrared patch-image model for small target detection in a single image,'' IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 4996--5009, 2013

    2013

  31. [39]

    Y. Dai, Y. Wu, F. Zhou, and K. Barnard, ``Asymmetric contextual modulation for infrared small target detection,'' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp. 950--959

    2021

  32. [40]

    M. Xiao, Q. Dai, Y. Zhu, K. Guo, H. Wang, X. Shu, J. Yang, and Y. Dai, ``Background semantics matter: Cross-task feature exchange network for clustered infrared small target detection with sky-annotated dataset,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20078, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Y. Zhu, S. Tang, Y. Jiang, and R. Kang, ``Dau-net: A regression cell counting method,'' in ISCTT 2021; 6th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em VDE, 2021, pp. 1--6

    2021

  34. [42]

    Zhang, J

    T. Zhang, J. Zhao, Y. Zhu, and G. Cui, ``Wife-fusion: Wavelet-aware intra-inter frequency enhancement for multi-model image fusion,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03555, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    W. Yang, B. Chen, Y. Shen, and L. Yu, ``Wavecnns-at: Wavelet-based deep cnns of adaptive threshold for signal recognition,'' Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 23, pp. 28\,819--28\,831, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    X. Zhao, P. Huang, and X. Shu, ``Wavelet-attention cnn for image classification,'' Multimedia Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 915--924, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun, ``Squeeze-and-excitation networks,'' in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 7132--7141

    2018

  38. [46]

    S. Woo, J. Park, J.-Y. Lee, and I. S. Kweon, ``Cbam: Convolutional block attention module,'' in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 3--19

    2018

  39. [47]

    Vaswani, N

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, . Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, ``Attention is all you need,'' Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  40. [48]

    Z. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Cao, H. Hu, Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, ``Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,'' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10\,012--10\,022

    2021

  41. [49]

    S. E. Finder, R. Amoyal, E. Treister, and O. Freifeld, ``Wavelet convolutions for large receptive fields,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Springer, 2024, pp. 363--380

    2024

  42. [50]

    Y. Qin, L. Bruzzone, C. Gao, and B. Li, ``Infrared small target detection based on facet kernel and random walker,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 7104--7118, 2019

    2019

  43. [51]

    J. Han, S. Moradi, I. Faramarzi, H. Zhang, Q. Zhao, X. Zhang, and N. Li, ``Infrared small target detection based on the weighted strengthened local contrast measure,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1670--1674, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Zhang, Q

    Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, and Y. Wang, ``Road extraction by deep residual u-net,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 749--753, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    H. Sun, J. Bai, F. Yang, and X. Bai, ``Receptive-field and direction induced attention network for infrared dim small target detection with a large-scale dataset irdst,'' IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1--13, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Q. Hou, Z. Wang, F. Tan, Y. Zhao, H. Zheng, and W. Zhang, ``Ristdnet: Robust infrared small target detection network,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1--5, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    J. Han, S. Moradi, I. Faramarzi, C. Liu, H. Zhang, and Q. Zhao, ``A local contrast method for infrared small-target detection utilizing a tri-layer window,'' IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1822--1826, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Rosenfeld, Digital picture processing

    A. Rosenfeld, Digital picture processing. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Academic press, 1976

    1976

  49. [57]

    Unser, ``Texture classification and segmentation using wavelet frames,'' IEEE Transactions on image processing, vol

    M. Unser, ``Texture classification and segmentation using wavelet frames,'' IEEE Transactions on image processing, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1549--1560, 1995

    1995

  50. [58]

    M. N. Do and M. Vetterli, ``Wavelet-based texture retrieval using generalized gaussian density and kullback-leibler distance,'' IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 146--158, 2002

    2002

  51. [59]

    Cohen, I

    A. Cohen, I. Daubechies, and J.-C. Feauveau, ``Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets,'' Communications on pure and applied mathematics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 485--560, 1992

    1992

  52. [60]

    M. J. Shensa, ``The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a trous and mallat algorithms,'' IEEE Transactions on signal processing, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2464--2482, 2002

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.