REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Symbolic Rules for Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent progress in deep reinforcement learning (DRL) can be largely attributed to the use of neural networks. However, this black-box approach fails to explain the learned policy in a human understandable way. To address this challenge and improve the transparency, we propose a Neural Symbolic Reinforcement Learning framework by introducing symbolic logic into DRL. This framework features a fertilization of reasoning and learning modules, enabling end-to-end learning with prior symbolic knowledge. Moreover, interpretability is achieved by extracting the logical rules learned by the reasoning module in a symbolic rule space. The experimental results show that our framework has better interpretability, along with competing performance in comparison to state-of-the-art approaches.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Survey of Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Targets, Methods and Needs
A survey of 250+ explainable-reinforcement-learning papers proposes a What/How taxonomy and reports that sequence-level explanations are rare (11 works) compared with policy-level (175) and action-level (89) ones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.