Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Observation and Control of Chiral Spin Frustration in BiYIG Thin Films

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims chiral DMI frustration in Pt-capped BiYIG yields four degenerate zero-field spin states switchable unidirectionally by magnons, with the switching direction determined by the magnon source.

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of four chiral states and unidirectional magnon switching; the 'degenerate ground state' label is not earned by the hysteresis evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06858 v1 pith:6CRP5KTX submitted 2025-08-09 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-ph

Jinlong Wang , Hanchen Wang , Zhewen Xu , Artim L. Bassant , Junfeng Hu , Wenjie Song , Chaozhong Li , Xiangrui Meng
show 12 more authors
Mengqi Zhao Song Liu Guozhi Chai Peng Gao Wanjun Jiang Desheng Xue Dapeng Yu William Legrand Christian L. Degen Rembert A. Duine Pietro Gambardella Haiming Yu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords chiralspinfrustrationDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionmagnontorqueBiYIGthinfilmspumpingnitrogen-vacancymagnetometryunidirectionalswitchingdegeneratemagneticstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's claim is that magnetic frustration need not come from lattice geometry: the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, which prefers one handedness of neighboring spins, can itself be frustrated in a simple collinear chain. In Pt-capped BiYIG films the authors identify four zero-field spin configurations—an in-plane macrospin between two out-of-plane spins—and show that all four are energetically degenerate. Propagating magnons switch these states at about 0.2 mW, and the switching is unidirectional: magnons from the left flip one state, magnons from the right flip it back. If the interpretation holds, it is the first observation of multi-state DMI frustration and a new mechanism for controlling spin textures with magnons.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is chiral spin frustration: the DMI energy $H_{\mathrm{DMI}} = -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j} \mathbf{D}_{i,j}\cdot(\mathbf{S}_i\times \mathbf{S}_j)$ between an in-plane macrospin and two out-of-plane neighbors cannot be minimized simultaneously when the two neighbors demand opposite chiralities. The paper combines scanning NV magnetometry to resolve the stray-field patterns of the four states with nonlocal spin pumping and the inverse spin Hall effect to read the central spin's $m_x$, and a three-macrospin model with exchange, anisotropy, and DMI to compute the magnon torque. The sign of $V_{\mathrm{ISHE}} \propto \mathbf{j}_s \times \mathbf{m}_x$ provides the state readout, and the a

What would settle it

Prepare the film by field-cooling from saturation with the field along several directions and count the resulting zero-field states over many cycles. If all four states appear with similar frequency and identical switching thresholds, the degeneracy claim is supported; a persistent bias toward states aligned with the preceding field would instead indicate history-dependent metastability.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In magnetization-compensated BiYIG partially capped by Pt, the capped region remains in-plane while adjacent uncapped regions saturate out-of-plane. Interfacial DMI then couples each out-of-plane spin to the central in-plane macrospin with a specific chiral preference; when the two sides prefer opposite orientations, the DMI cannot be satisfied and the configuration is frustrated. The paper reports four such states, labeled DRD, DLD, URU and ULU, each observable at zero field after an appropriate field sweep, and images them with scanning NV magnetometry. Nonlocal spin pumping shows magnons arriving from one side switch the central spin, while magnons from the opposite side do not, and the p

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on interpreting the zero-field states reached after different magnetic-field sequences as true degenerate ground states; if they are merely metastable states trapped by the field history, the central claim of intrinsic frustration-based degeneracy does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The four states survive at zero field without an external bias, so frustration alone can store information in the central spin's orientation.
  • Magnon-direction selectivity gives a built-in right/left addressing scheme: writing ULU to URU uses the left port, URU to ULU uses the right port, without changing the magnetic field.
  • The roughly 0.2 mW threshold indicates that compensated-ferrimagnet frustration devices can be switched by very weak magnon currents, compatible with low-power magnonic logic.
  • Since the torque also arises from frustrated antiferromagnetic exchange, the switching mechanism should generalize beyond DMI systems to other frustrated collinear chains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive extension would be to test the degeneracy claim by field-cooling from saturation along several directions and tallying the resulting states: true ground-state degeneracy predicts all four appear with comparable probability, while metastability would bias the histogram toward states aligned with the last field.
  • Because the torque formula involves $\pm DJ$, flipping the DMI sign (for instance by changing the heavy-metal cap) should reverse the unidirectional preference; measuring that reversal would confirm the chiral origin of the selectivity.
  • The reported 75° angle between the central magnetization and the $x$-axis means the full three-dimensional texture is not resolved by the two readout techniques; vector stray-field imaging could test whether the switching torque depends on the $m_y$ component.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experimental observations in 4-nm BiYIG films partially capped with Pt, where an in-plane (IP) macrospin is coupled via Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) to two out-of-plane (OOP) macrospins on either side. The authors identify four zero-field states (DRD, DLD, URU, ULU) using scanning NV magnetometry and nonlocal spin-pumping (ISHE) measurements, and show that magnons injected from one side can switch the central IP spin only when the incoming magnon direction is 'favored' by the chirality of the frustrated bond. They propose a three-macrospin model and derive a magnon-torque expression (Eq. 1) that rationalizes the unidirectional switching. The paper claims these four states are 'energetically degenerate ground states' and introduces this as 'chiral spin frustration', a new form of frustration based on noncollinear DMI rather than geometric exchange frustration.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this would be the first demonstration of multiple degenerate zero-field states stabilized by DMI-based frustration, and a new magnon-driven switching mechanism with potential for low-power spintronic and neuromorphic devices. The experimental work combines two complementary techniques (NV magnetometry and spin pumping), reports a clear power threshold in the switching, and uses independently measured DMI constants. The theoretical model, while qualitative, is grounded in the same DMI exchange energy that defines the frustrated states. However, the significance is critically dependent on the demonstration that the four states are true degenerate ground states rather than metastable configurations selected by field history.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Figs. 2(a)–(d); sentence: 'All four states ... are therefore energetically degenerate ground states'] The central claim of degeneracy is inferred solely from the observation that all four states can be stabilized at zero field after specific field sweeps or tilt angles. This is not sufficient evidence for thermodynamic ground-state degeneracy. History-dependent stabilization is the hallmark of metastable states separated by energy barriers. To support the 'chiral spin frustration' claim, the authors need direct evidence: zero-field-cooled statistical weights, relaxation measurements, torque/calorimetric data, or a micromagnetic energy calculation showing equal energies. As written, the data are equally consistent with a unique ground state plus three metastable states. Since the novelty rests on degeneracy, this is load-bearing and should be either buttressed or the language substantially softened.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Fig. 4; theoretical model] The magnon-torque expression (Eq. 1) is presented without derivation in the main text and is used to argue that the torque is large when the DMI bond is frustrated and small otherwise. This explains the observed unidirectional switching, but it is a rationalization: the model assigns large torque to the frustrated bond because that bond has high DMI energy, so the asymmetry is built in rather than independently predicted. The authors should show explicitly that the same Hamiltonian that defines the frustration also produces this torque asymmetry, and provide the derivation in the main text or a clear summary with the assumptions. In addition, the relation between the torque direction (y) and the switching of mx is not explained; a reader cannot see why a y-torque reverses the IP spin from left to right.
  3. [§2 and §4: terminology and definition of 'chiral spin frustration'] The phrase 'energetically degenerate magnetic states frustrate the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction' is imprecise. Frustration is a property of the interaction network when competing terms cannot all be simultaneously satisfied; the states do not 'frustrate' the DMI. Moreover, the claim 'This feature is distinct with [sic] the frustrated states studied previously [19,57] that do not stabilize at zero field and show no degeneracy' is not substantiated—the cited works involve different physics, and the comparison is unclear. Clarify the definition and distinguish between the degeneracy of the DMI bonds and the thermodynamic ground-state manifold.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'geometry constrains' should be 'geometry constraints'.
  2. [§3, NV magnetometry] The simulation of stray fields assumes a domain-wall width of 160 nm, which is a free parameter. Please state how this value was determined and how sensitive the assignment of DRD/DLD/URU/ULU is to this choice.
  3. [§2, '75° angle'] The quantitative spin Seebeck measurement gives an estimated 75° angle of magnetization with respect to the x-axis. This is important for the three-dimensional texture, but the sentence 'As both techniques are insensitive to m_y, the comprehensive three-dimensional spin texture is not fully resolved' is a significant limitation. Please discuss whether the 75° angle affects the interpretation of the four states.
  4. [End Matter, Fig. 5] The switching threshold is described as 'progressively' starting around -8 dBm and complete near -5 dBm. Please clarify whether the intermediate values indicate partial switching, multi-domain states, or averaging effects.
  5. [Eq. (1)] The symbols K, J, D, and A are not all defined in the main text. Define them inline or refer clearly to the SM section with their values used in the model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the experimental state assignment and the torque model are self-contained; the degeneracy inference is an overinterpretation but not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: (i) The DMI constant is measured by BLS, an external spectroscopic technique; the NV/SP state assignment uses forward stray-field simulations of the four candidate textures, not a fit of the switching outcome. (ii) The unidirectional switching asymmetry is explained by a three-macrospin model with exchange and DMI (Eq. 1). The torque formula is parameterized by measured or standard material constants (A, J, K, D); the paper does not fit the switching data, and the sign of the torque is attributed to the model Hamiltonian (SM), not to the observed switching direction. Thus the theory is post hoc but not circular: it does not reduce to the observation by construction. (iii) The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [40], [60]) are for established measurement techniques and prior DMI/chirality results; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or to forbid alternative explanations. The paper's own limitation statement--'As both techniques are insensitive to m_y, the comprehensive three-dimensional spin texture is not fully resolved'--is a correctness caveat, not a circular step. The only load-bearing inference that is weakly supported is the leap from 'All four states ... can be stabilized at zero field (depending on different field hysteresis) and are therefore energetically degenerate ground states'; history-dependent stabilization is more naturally evidence of metastability. This is a logical/evidential gap, not a circular reduction: the degeneracy claim is inferred from the same experiment rather than derived from the model, and it is not used as an input to predict the same observation. Hence circularity score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper invokes no new microscopic entities. The main fitting parameters are the domain-wall width used in NV image simulation and the in-plane angle estimated from spin Seebeck. The material parameters (DMI, exchange, anisotropy) are taken from measurements or literature, not fitted to the switching data.

free parameters (2)
  • Domain-wall width between IP and OOP domains = 160 nm
    Assumed in NV stray-field simulations to match observed images; not independently measured.
  • Magnetization angle relative to x-axis = 75 degrees
    Estimated from spin Seebeck measurements; used to interpret the NV and SP signals.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption BiYIG/Pt interface has a DMI with constant D = 5.0 ± 0.4 µJ/m², measured by BLS
    Central to the frustrated state coupling; measured by Brillouin light scattering.
  • domain assumption Interfacial Rashba effect induces an in-plane anisotropy in the Pt-capped BiYIG region, keeping it in-plane under moderate OOP fields
    Required for the IP macrospin; supported by cited prior work (refs 43, 44).
  • ad hoc to paper A three-macrospin model (one IP spin coupled to two OOP spins) captures the relevant physics; the magnon torque formula Eq. (1) holds
    Simplified model introduced for this paper; derivation deferred to SM, not verifiable from main text.
  • standard math NV stray-field sensing formalism (van der Sar et al.) accurately maps magnetization to measured B_z
    Used to simulate and assign the four states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation and Control of Chiral Spin Frustration in BiYIG Thin Films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CRP5KTX

@misc{pith2026250806858,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation and Control of Chiral Spin Frustration in BiYIG Thin Films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CRP5KTX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06858}
}
read the original abstract

Chiral interactions within magnetic layers stabilize the formation of noncollinear spin textures, which can be leveraged to design devices with tailored magnetization dynamics. Here, we introduce chiral spin frustration in which energetically degenerate magnetic states frustrate the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. We demonstrate magnon-driven switching of the chirally frustrated spin states in Bi-substituted yttrium iron garnet thin films. These states are defined by an in-plane macrospin neighboring two out-ofplane spins on either side with opposing chirality. Using scanning nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry and spin pumping, we identified four degenerate frustrated states and achieved their controllable switching via magnon spin torque. Crucially, the switching is unidirectional, with selectivity determined by the incoming magnon direction. This mechanism provides a powerful approach to manipulate frustrated spin states with magnons. Chiral spin frustration unlocks the geometry constraints of conventional frustration, and therefore opens new horizons for frustrated magnetism, paving the way for energy-efficient spintronic devices based on frustratio

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Kurumaji, T

    T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular- lattice magnet, Science365, 914 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Sheng, J

    J. Sheng, J. Mei, L. Wang, X. Xu, W. Jiang, L. Xu, H. Ge, N. Zhao, T. Li, A. Candiniet al., Bose–Einstein condensation of a two-magnon bound state in a spin-1 triangular lattice, Nat. Mater.,24544 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    R. F. Wang, C. Nisoli, R. S. Freitas, J. Li, W. McConville, B. J. Cooley, M. S. Lund, N. Samarth, C. Leighton, V. H. Crespiet al., Artificial ‘spin ice’ in a geometrically frus- trated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands, Nature 439, 303 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    J. C. Gartside, K. D. Stenning, A. Vanstone, H. H. Holder, D. M. Arroo, T. Dion, F. Caravelli, H. Kure- bayashi, and W. R. Branford, Reconfigurable training and reservoir computing in an artificial spin-vortex ice via spin-wave fingerprinting, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 460 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Lendinez, M

    S. Lendinez, M. T. Kaffash, O. G. Heinonen, S. Gliga, E. Iacocca, and M. B. Jungfleisch, Nonlinear multi-magnon scattering in artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun.14, 3419 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, L. Ye, H. C. Po, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelskyet al., Topological flat bands in frustrated kagome lattice CoSn, Nat. Commun.11, 4004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    V. S. Bhat, S. Watanabe, K. Baumgaertl, A. Kleibert, M. A. W. Schoen, C. A. F. Vaz, and D. Grundler, Magnon Modes of Microstates and Microwave-Induced Avalanche in Kagome Artificial Spin Ice with Topological Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 117208 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Shannon, T

    N. Shannon, T. Momoi, and P. Sindzingre, Nematic Or- der in Square Lattice Frustrated Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 027213 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Binasch, P

    G. Binasch, P. Gr¨ unberg, F. Saurenbach, and W. Zinn, Enhanced magnetoresistance in layered magnetic struc- tures with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange, Phys. 6 Rev. B39, 4828 (1988)

    1988

  4. [12]

    M. N. Baibich, J. M. Broto, A. Fert, F. Nguyen Van Dau, and F. Petroff, Giant Magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr Magnetic Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2472 (1988)

    1988

  5. [13]

    S. S. P. Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P. M. Rice, B. Hughes, M. Samant, and S. Yang, Giant tunnelling mag- netoresistance at room temperature with MgO (100) tun- nel barriers, Nat. Mater.3, 862 (2004)

    2004

  6. [14]

    N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, X. Yu, S. Gao, K. Shibata, M. Hirschberger, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, L. Penget al., Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet, Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 444 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    S. Yang, Y. Wang, B. R. Ortiz, D. Liu, J. Gayles, E. Derunova, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Chen, S. S. P. Parkinet al., Giant, unconventional anomalous Hall effect in the metallic frustrated magnet candidate, KV3Sb5, Sci. Adv.6, eabb6003 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, G. Ji, R. T. Scalettar, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, Frustration-and doping-induced magnetism in a Fermi–Hubbard simula- tor, Nature620, 971 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    M. L. Prichard, B. M. Spar, I. Morera, E. Demler, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Directly imaging spin polarons in a kinetically frustrated Hubbard system, Nature629, 323 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    H¨ alg, W

    M. H¨ alg, W. E. A. Lorenz, K. Y. Povarov, M. M ˚ ansson, Y. Skourski, and A. Zheludev, Quantum spin chains with frustration due to Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac- tions, Phys. Rev. B90, 174413 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Z. Luo, T. P. Dao, A. Hrabec, J. Vijayakumar, A. Kleib- ert, M. Baumgartner, E. Kirk, J. Cui, T. Savchenko, G. Krishnaswamyet al., Chirally coupled nanomagnets, Sci- ence363, 1435 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Z. Luo, A. Hrabec, T. P. Dao, G. Sala, S. Finizio, J. Feng, S. Mayr, J. Raabe, P. Gambardella, and L. J. Hey- derman, Current-driven magnetic domain-wall logic, Na- ture579, 214 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Petti, S

    D. Petti, S. Tacchi, and E. Albisetti, Review on magnon- ics with engineered spin textures, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55, 293003 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    H. Yu, J. Xiao, and H. Schultheiss, Magnetic texture based magnonics, Phys. Rep.905, 1 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Qiu, J. Chen, S. Wu, H. Wang, I. A. Malik, M. Cai, M. Wu, P. Gao, C. Huaet al., Switchable long- distance propagation of chiral magnonic edge states, Nat. Mater.24, 69 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    V. V. Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43, 264001 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    B. Lenk, H. Ulrichs, F. Garbs, and M. M¨ unzenberg, The building blocks of magnonics, Phys. Rep.507, 107 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 1114 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    J. C. Slonczewski, Initiation of spin-transfer torque by thermal transport from magnons, Phys. Rev. B82, 054403 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    P. Yan, X. S. Wang, and X. R. Wang, All-Magnonic Spin- Transfer Torque and Domain Wall Propagation, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 177207 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    J. Han, P. Zhang, J. T. Hou, S. A. Siddiqui, and L. Liu, Mutual control of coherent spin waves and mag- netic domain walls in a magnonic device, Science366, 1121 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Y. Fan, M. J. Gross, T. Fakhrul, J. Finley, J. T. Hou, S. Ngo, L. Liu, and C. A. Ross, Coherent magnon-induced domain-wall motion in a magnetic insulator channel, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 1000 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Y. Wang, D. Zhu, Y. Yang, K. Lee, R. Mishra, G. Go, S. Oh, D. Kim, K. Cai, E. Liuet al., Magnetization switching by magnon-mediated spin torque through an antiferromagnetic insulator, Science366, 1125 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Baumgaertl, and D

    K. Baumgaertl, and D. Grundler, Reversal of nanomag- nets by propagating magnons in ferrimagnetic yttrium iron garnet enabling nonvolatile magnon memory, Nat. Commun.14, 1490 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    F. Wang, G. Shi, D. Yang, H. R. Tan, C. Zhang, J. Lei, Y. Pu, S. Yang, A. Soumyanarayanan, M. Elyasiet al., Deterministic switching of perpendicular magnetization by out-of-plane anti-damping magnon torques, Nat. Nan- otechnol.19, 1478 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Mucchietto, K

    A. Mucchietto, K. Baumgaertl, and D. Grundler, Magnon-assisted magnetization reversal of Ni 81Fe19 nanostripes on Y 3Fe5O12 with different interfaces, ACS Nano18, 8641 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Caretta, S

    L. Caretta, S. Oh, T. Fakhrul, D. Lee, B. H. Lee, S. K. Kim, C. A. Ross, K. Lee, and G. S. D. Beach, Relativis- tic kinematics of a magnetic soliton, Science370, 1438 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Balasubramanian, I

    G. Balasubramanian, I. Y. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al- Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hemmer, A. Kruegeret al., Nanoscale imaging magne- tometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions, Nature455, 648 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Kajiwara, K

    Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashiet al., Transmission of electrical signals by spin-wave interconversion in a magnetic insulator, Na- ture464, 262 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    d’Allivy Kelly, A

    O. d’Allivy Kelly, A. Anane, R. Bernard, J. Ben Youssef, C. Hahn, A. H. Molpeceres, C. Carr´ et´ ero, E. Jacquet, C. Deranlot, P. Bortolottiet al., Inverse spin Hall effect in nanometer-thick yttrium iron garnet/Pt system, Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 082408 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    J. Wang, H. Wang, J. Chen, W. Legrand, P. Chen, L. Sheng, J. Xia, G. Lan, Y. Zhang, R. Yuanet al., Broad-Wave-Vector Spin Pumping of Flat-Band Magnons, Phys. Rev. Applied21, 044024 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    See Supplementary Material for transmission electron mi- croscopy image, characterization of compensated mag- netic anisotropy, ferromagnetic resonance, device fabri- cation, details of nonlocal spin pumping and magnon switching, measurements of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya inter...

  34. [42]

    Soumah, N

    L. Soumah, N. Beaulieu, L. Qassym, C. Carr´ et´ ero, E. Jacquet, R. Lebourgeois, J. Ben Youssef, P. Bortolotti, 7 V. Cros, and A. Anane, Ultra-low damping insulating magnetic thin films get perpendicular, Nat. Commun.9, 3355 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    A. J. Lee, A. S. Ahmed, B. A. McCullian, S. Guo, M. Zhu, S. Yu, P. M. Woodward, J. Hwang, P. C. Hammel, and F. Yang, Interfacial Rashba-Effect-Induced Anisotropy in Nonmagnetic-Material–Ferrimagnetic-Insulator Bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 257202 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    B. H. Lee, T. Fakhrul, C. A. Ross, and G. S. D. Beach, Large Anomalous Frequency Shift in Perpen- dicular Standing Spin Wave Modes in BiYIG Films In- duced by Thin Metallic Overlayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 126703 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, and P

    D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, and P. Landeros, Influence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction on the spin-wave spec- tra of thin films, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter25, 156001 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    J. Moon, S. Seo, K. Lee, K. Kim, J. Ryu, H. Lee, R. D. McMichael, and M. D. Stiles, Spin-wave propagation in the presence of interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac- tion, Phys. Rev. B88, 184404 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    H. T. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, M. Weiler, E. Ju´ e, and T. J. Silva, Linear relation between Heisenberg ex- change and interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in metal films, Nat. Phys.11, 825 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Kuepferling, A

    M. Kuepferling, A. Casiraghi, G. Soares, G. Durin, F. Garcia-Sanchez, L. Chen, C. H. Back, C. H. Marrows, S. Tacchi, G. Carlotti, Measuring interfacial Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction in ultrathin magnetic films, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015003 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Husain, N

    S. Husain, N. F. Prestes, O. Fayet, S. Collin, F. Godel, E. Jacquet, T. Denneulin, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, A. Thi- aville, M. Bibes,et al., Field-free switching of perpen- dicular magnetization in an ultrathin epitaxial magnetic insulator, Nano Lett.24, 2743 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Ciubotaru, T

    F. Ciubotaru, T. Devolder, M. Manfrini, C. Adelmann, and I. P. Radu, All electrical propagating spin wave spec- troscopy with broadband wavevector capability, Appl. Phys. Lett.109, 012403 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Saitoh, M

    E. Saitoh, M. Ueda, H. Miyajima, and G. Tatara, Con- version of spin current into charge current at room tem- perature: Inverse spin-Hall effect, Appl. Phys. Lett.88, 182509 (2006)

    2006

  44. [52]

    V´ elez, J

    S. V´ elez, J. Schaab, M. S. W¨ ornle, M. M¨ uller, E. Gradauskaite, P. Welter, C. Gutgsell, C. Nistor, C. L. Degen, M. Trassinet al., High-speed domain wall race- tracks in a magnetic insulator, Nat. Commun.10, 4750 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    T. Zhu, J. Rhensius, K. Herb, V. Damle, G. Puebla- Hellmann, C. L. Degen, and E. Janitz, Multicone dia- mond waveguides for nanoscale quantum sensing, Nano Lett.23, 10110 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Rohner, J

    D. Rohner, J. Happacher, P. Reiser, M. A. Tschudin, A. Tallaire, J. Achard, B. J. Shields, and P. Maletinsky, (111)-oriented, single crystal diamond tips for nanoscale scanning probe imaging of out-of-plane magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett.115, 192401 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    van der Sar, F

    T. van der Sar, F. Casola, R. Walsworth, and A. Ya- coby, Nanometre-scale probing of spin waves using single electron spins, Nat. Commun.6, 7886 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Z. Xu, M. L. Palm, W. Huxter, J. M. Abendroth, K. Bouzehouane, O. Boulle, M. S. Gabor, J. U. Lar- ranaga, J. Morales, G. Puebla-Hellmann,et al., Minimiz- ing sensor-sample distances in scanning nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry, ACS Nano19, 8255 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    B. B. Vermeulen, M. Gama Monteiro, D. Giuliano, B. Sor´ ee, S. Couet, K. Temst, and V. D. Nguyen, Magnetization-Switching Dynamics Driven By Chiral Coupling, Phys. Rev. Applied21, 024050 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    G. E. W. Bauer, P. Tang, M. Elyasi, Y. M. Blanter, and B. J. van Wees, Soft magnons in anisotropic ferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. B108, 064431 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Br¨ acher, O

    T. Br¨ acher, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, and P. Pirro, Creation of unidirectional spin-wave emitters by utilizing interfa- cial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B95, 064429 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    H. Wang, J. Chen, T. Liu, J. Zhang, K. Baumgaertl, C. Guo, Y. Li, C. Liu, P. Che, S. Tu,et al., Chiral Spin-Wave Velocities Induced by All-Garnet Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Ultrathin Yttrium Iron Garnet Films, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 027203 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    W. Hu, Z. Zhang, Y. Liao, Q. Li, Y. Shi, H. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. Niu, Y. Wu, W. Yu,et al., Distinguishing artificial spin ice states using magnetoresistance effect for neuromorphic computing, Nat. Commun.14, 2562 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Saccone, F

    M. Saccone, F. Caravelli, K. Hofhuis, S. Parchenko, Y. A. Birkh¨ olzer, S. Dhuey, A. Kleibert, S. van Dijken, C. Nisoli, and A. Farhan, Direct observation of a dynami- cal glass transition in a nanomagnetic artificial Hopfield network, Nat. Phys.18, 517 (2022). END MA TTER App...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.