Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Turbulence Model Development based on a Novel Method Combining Gene Expression Programming with an Artificial Neural Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.07293 v1 pith:6CY6B57F submitted 2023-01-18 physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.comp-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords modelsgepnnmethodcombiningexpressiongenenetworkneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Data-driven methods are widely used to develop physical models, but there still exist limitations that affect their performance, generalizability and robustness. By combining gene expression programming (GEP) with artificial neural network (ANN), we propose a novel method for symbolic regression called the gene expression programming neural network (GEPNN). In this method, candidate expressions generated by evolutionary algorithms are transformed between the GEP and ANN structures during training iterations, and efficient and robust convergence to accurate models is achieved by combining the GEP's global searching and the ANN's gradient optimization capabilities. In addition, sparsity-enhancing strategies have been introduced to GEPNN to improve the interpretability of the trained models. The GEPNN method has been tested for finding different physical laws, showing improved convergence to models with precise coefficients. Furthermore, for large-eddy simulation of turbulence, the subgrid-scale stress model trained by GEPNN significantly improves the prediction of turbulence statistics and flow structures over traditional models, showing advantages compared to the existing GEP and ANN methods in both a priori and a posteriori tests.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools