Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Minimizing FLOPs to Learn Efficient Sparse Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.05665 v1 pith:6D2OKJW7 submitted 2020-04-12 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords representationssparseembeddingslearnlearningoperationsapproachcompact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep representation learning has become one of the most widely adopted approaches for visual search, recommendation, and identification. Retrieval of such representations from a large database is however computationally challenging. Approximate methods based on learning compact representations, have been widely explored for this problem, such as locality sensitive hashing, product quantization, and PCA. In this work, in contrast to learning compact representations, we propose to learn high dimensional and sparse representations that have similar representational capacity as dense embeddings while being more efficient due to sparse matrix multiplication operations which can be much faster than dense multiplication. Following the key insight that the number of operations decreases quadratically with the sparsity of embeddings provided the non-zero entries are distributed uniformly across dimensions, we propose a novel approach to learn such distributed sparse embeddings via the use of a carefully constructed regularization function that directly minimizes a continuous relaxation of the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) incurred during retrieval. Our experiments show that our approach is competitive to the other baselines and yields a similar or better speed-vs-accuracy tradeoff on practical datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. UEmbed: Unified Sparse and Dense Multimodal Embeddings

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UEmbed uses 16 special tokens over a partitioned vocabulary to make a decoder-only multimodal model emit dense and sparse embeddings in one forward pass; the 9B model scores 71.8 dense / 71.0 sparse on MMEB-v2.

  2. Learning Sparse Representations of Multimodal Content for Enhanced Cold Item Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sparse content embeddings with a pre-sparsification alpha-entmax activation outperform dense embeddings for cold-start item recommendation at lower storage cost, especially for users with multiple interests.

  3. Why Advanced Encoders Lag on Sparse Retrieval? The Answer and an Approach to Bridging Vocabulary Gaps

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Transferring modern encoders to normalized (lowercased) vocabularies via geometric embedding initialization and activation calibration closes the performance gap in learned sparse retrieval, achieving 52.4 nDCG on BEIR.

  4. ERU-KG: Efficient Reference-aligned Unsupervised Keyphrase Generation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ERU-KG uses reference-trained SPLADE term importances plus neighbor-document noun phrases to generate present and absent keyphrases without keyphrase labels, and reports strong benchmark and retrieval results.

Pith tools