REVIEW
Trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals
read the original abstract
We obtain an array of consistency results concerning trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals $\kappa$, updating some classical constructions in the process. This includes models of $\mathsf{CSR}(\kappa^{++})\wedge \mathsf{TP}(\kappa^{++})$ (both with and without $\mathsf{AP}(\kappa^{++})$) and models of the conjunctions $\mathsf{SR}(\kappa^{++}) \wedge \mathsf{wTP}(\kappa^{++}) \wedge \mathsf{AP}(\kappa^{++})$ and $\neg \mathsf{AP}(\kappa^{++}) \wedge \mathsf{SR}(\kappa^{++})$ (the latter was originally obtained in joint work by Krueger and the first author \cite{GilKru:8fold}, and is here given using different methods). Analogs of these results with the failure of $\mathsf{SH}(\kappa^{++})$ are given as well. Finally, we obtain all of our results with an arbitrarily large $2^\kappa$, applying recent joint work by Honzik and the third author.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.