pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13561 · v1 · pith:6DWQSPZ4new · submitted 2026-06-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lone-Pair-Induced Lattice Softness Enables Ultralow Thermal Conductivity in Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Perovskite GuaPbI₃

Rudra P. Singh , Shantanu Pathak , Saswata Bhattacharya , R Lakshmi Narayan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hybrid perovskitelone pairthermal conductivitylattice softnessthermoelectricsGuaPbI3phonon suppressiondensity functional theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lone-pair chemistry softens the GuaPbI3 lattice to produce ultralow thermal conductivity of 0.088 W m^{-1} K^{-1} while keeping electronic pathways active.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that lone-pair-rich organic cations in hybrid perovskites create a chemically soft lattice that scatters phonons very effectively. A machine-learning screen identifies GuaPbI3 as a candidate, and mechanochemical synthesis delivers a room-temperature thermal conductivity of 0.088 W m^{-1} K^{-1}. Electrical and impedance data confirm that bias-dependent bulk conduction survives the phonon suppression. Density-functional calculations tie the softness to charge redistribution and weakly dispersive bands induced by the lone pairs. A sympathetic reader cares because the approach separates heat flow from charge flow by a simple chemical choice rather than by nanostructuring or morphology control.

Core claim

Lone-pair-rich hybrid frameworks generate soft and electronically heterogeneous lattice environments that suppress phonon transport while preserving electronically accessible states, demonstrated by the ultralow lattice thermal conductivity measured in crystalline GuaPbI3 together with the supporting transport and DFT results.

What carries the argument

lone-pair-induced lattice softness, the chemically driven softening of the hybrid framework that produces soft phonon modes and localized electrostatic microenvironments from charge redistribution.

If this is right

  • Crystalline hybrid perovskites can reach thermal conductivities below 0.1 W m^{-1} K^{-1} without nanostructural engineering.
  • Carrier transport remains strongly sensitive to chemical potential near the band edges.
  • The Lorenz number deviates from conventional Wiedemann-Franz behavior near the band edges.
  • Bulk-dominated electronic transport can coexist with extreme phonon suppression.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same lone-pair strategy could be tested in other hybrid families for thermal-barrier or thermoelectric applications.
  • The valence-conduction asymmetry may be exploited by doping to raise the thermoelectric figure of merit.
  • Thin-film or device measurements would check whether the bulk phonon suppression and electronic pathways translate to practical geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The ultralow thermal conductivity arises specifically from lone-pair effects on lattice dynamics rather than from defects or other artifacts of the mechanochemical synthesis.

What would settle it

Synthesis and thermal-conductivity measurement of an analogous hybrid perovskite that lacks lone-pair-active cations on the A-site and yields a value substantially above 0.088 W m^{-1} K^{-1}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13561 by R Lakshmi Narayan, Rudra P. Singh, Saswata Bhattacharya, Shantanu Pathak.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: XRD pattern of obtained GuaPbI3 sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Electrical transport scaling under high bias [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature–frequency dependent impedance response of GuaPbI3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thermoelectric cooling efficiency is fundamentally constrained by lattice thermal conductivity, yet conventional inorganic thermoelectrics have approached a performance plateau despite extensive nanostructural engineering. Organic thermoelectrics possess intrinsically low thermal conductivity but often suffer from limited and morphology-sensitive charge transport. Here, we introduce a lone-pair-driven materials design strategy based on chemically induced lattice softness in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. A physics-guided symbolic-regression-based machine-learning framework identifies a lone-pair-dominated compositional regime associated with suppressed lattice thermal conductivity and selects GuaPbI3 as a candidate material. Mechanochemical synthesis yields crystalline GuaPbI3 with an ultralow room-temperature thermal conductivity of kappa = 0.088 W m^-1 K^-1. Electrical measurements reveal electronically active, bias-dependent bulk conduction pathways despite strong phonon suppression, while impedance spectroscopy confirms bulk-dominated transport. Density functional theory calculations indicate weakly dispersive valence bands, valence-conduction asymmetry, and localized electrostatic microenvironments from charge redistribution within the lattice. Calculated transport coefficients suggest strong sensitivity of carrier transport to chemical potential, while Lorenz-number analysis indicates deviations from conventional Wiedemann-Franz behavior near the band edges. These results support a picture in which lone-pair-rich hybrid frameworks generate soft and electronically heterogeneous lattice environments that suppress phonon transport while preserving electronically accessible states. This work establishes chemically induced lattice softness as a design principle for ultralow-thermal-conductivity hybrid materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a physics-guided symbolic-regression ML framework identifies a lone-pair-dominated compositional regime in hybrid perovskites, selecting GuaPbI3 as a candidate that exhibits chemically induced lattice softness. Mechanochemical synthesis produces the material with measured room-temperature lattice thermal conductivity of 0.088 W m^{-1} K^{-1}. Electrical and impedance measurements indicate bulk-dominated, bias-dependent conduction, while DFT reveals weakly dispersive valence bands, valence-conduction asymmetry, and localized electrostatic microenvironments. These elements together support the design principle that lone-pair-rich frameworks suppress phonon transport while preserving electronically accessible states for potential thermoelectric applications.

Significance. If substantiated, the work would establish lone-pair-induced lattice softness as a chemically tunable route to ultralow thermal conductivity in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites, offering a design strategy that complements nanostructuring approaches. The integration of ML-guided candidate selection, experimental synthesis and transport measurements, and DFT analysis of band structure and electrostatics provides a multi-pronged assessment of the mechanism, with the reported κ value and noted deviations from Wiedemann-Franz behavior near band edges representing concrete, testable outcomes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (ML framework paragraph)] Abstract (ML framework paragraph): The symbolic-regression framework is presented as identifying the lone-pair-dominated regime responsible for suppressed lattice thermal conductivity and selecting GuaPbI3. No cross-validation scores, held-out test performance, feature-ablation results, or explicit comparisons to non-lone-pair control compounds are referenced. This is load-bearing for the central claim because all subsequent synthesis, κ measurement, and DFT analysis rest on the framework having isolated a genuine causal mechanism rather than rediscovering known low-κ hybrids via correlations in the training distribution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The thermal conductivity is reported as kappa = 0.088 W m^{-1} K^{-1}; ensure that the symbol, units, and any temperature dependence are defined consistently in the main text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the presentation of the machine learning framework in the abstract below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (ML framework paragraph)] Abstract (ML framework paragraph): The symbolic-regression framework is presented as identifying the lone-pair-dominated regime responsible for suppressed lattice thermal conductivity and selecting GuaPbI3. No cross-validation scores, held-out test performance, feature-ablation results, or explicit comparisons to non-lone-pair control compounds are referenced. This is load-bearing for the central claim because all subsequent synthesis, κ measurement, and DFT analysis rest on the framework having isolated a genuine causal mechanism rather than rediscovering known low-κ hybrids via correlations in the training distribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as currently written, does not explicitly reference the quantitative validation metrics of the symbolic regression model. The full manuscript provides these details in the Methods and Results sections, including the model's performance metrics and comparisons. To address this concern directly, we will revise the abstract to include a concise statement on the cross-validation and test performance, as well as a note directing readers to the supplementary information for feature ablation and control compound comparisons. This revision will better substantiate the framework's role in identifying the causal mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The visible abstract and context describe an ML framework selecting a candidate, followed by independent synthesis, kappa measurement, electrical/impedance data, and DFT calculations. No equations, self-citations, or fitted-parameter renamings are quoted that reduce any load-bearing claim to its own inputs by construction. The ML step is presented as input to experiment rather than a fitted output renamed as prediction. This matches the default expectation of no significant circularity when no explicit reduction can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the ML model correctly linking lone pairs to thermal conductivity suppression and on the assumption that measured properties reflect intrinsic bulk behavior rather than synthesis artifacts; no free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The symbolic-regression ML framework accurately maps composition to suppressed lattice thermal conductivity via lone-pair effects
    Invoked to select GuaPbI3 as candidate

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5806 in / 1258 out tokens · 20995 ms · 2026-06-27T06:00:01.097763+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Here we introduce a materials-discovery strategy based on chemically induced lattice softness and implement it using a physics-guided symbolic-regression machine-learning framework to identify candidate hybrid perovskites. Rather than functioning as a quantitatively predictive model, the machine- learning approach acts as a compositional scre...

  2. [2]

    Machine Learning Model The symbolic-regression framework converged to a stable analytical expression across multiple independent runs

    Results 3.1. Machine Learning Model The symbolic-regression framework converged to a stable analytical expression across multiple independent runs. The resulting ranking function is: 𝐹 𝑄𝑀,𝐺𝑀,𝐿𝑍 = 23.882 + 𝐺𝑀 + 𝑒𝐿𝑍 − 𝐿𝑍 ∗ 𝑄𝑀 1 3 (9) Higher values of 𝐹 correspond to compositions statistically associated with lower lattice thermal conductivity. Rather than p...

    2000

  3. [3]

    The underlying premise is that chemical composition itself can reveal intrinsic lattice softness capable of strongly suppressing phonon transport

    Discussion Rather than investigating whether thermoelectric performance can be enhanced through engineering approaches such as nanostructuring or interface scattering to reduce lattice thermal conductivity, the present study addresses a different question: whether materials possessing intrinsically low lattice thermal conductivity (𝜅𝑙) can be identified p...

  4. [4]

    Acknowledgement The authors would like to acknowledge CRF IIT Delhi for providing the required experimental facilities

  5. [5]

    D. Zhao, G. Tan, Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 66, 15

    2014

  6. [6]

    Thermoelectric cooling materials | Nature Materials,

    “Thermoelectric cooling materials | Nature Materials,” can be found under https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-020-00852-w, n.d

  7. [7]

    Typical thermoelectric materials: Progress and prospects - ScienceDirect,

    “Typical thermoelectric materials: Progress and prospects - ScienceDirect,” can be found under https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037596012500060X, n.d

  8. [8]

    Zheng, T

    Y. Zheng, T. J. Slade, L. Hu, X. Y. Tan, Y. Luo, Z.-Z. Luo, J. Xu, Q. Yan, M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 9022

    2021

  9. [9]

    Mehdizadeh Dehkordi, M

    A. Mehdizadeh Dehkordi, M. Zebarjadi, J. He, T. M. Tritt, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2015, 97, 1

    2015

  10. [10]

    X. Qian, J. Zhou, G. Chen, Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1188

    2021

  11. [11]

    Advanced Thermoelectric Design: From Materials and Structures to Devices | Chemical Reviews,

    “Advanced Thermoelectric Design: From Materials and Structures to Devices | Chemical Reviews,” can be found under https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00026, n.d

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00026

  12. [12]

    H. Alam, S. Ramakrishna, Nano Energy 2013, 2, 190

    2013

  13. [13]

    Organic thermoelectric materials for energy harvesting and temperature control | Nature Reviews Materials,

    “Organic thermoelectric materials for energy harvesting and temperature control | Nature Reviews Materials,” can be found under https://www.nature.com/articles/natrevmats201650, n.d

  14. [14]

    “Anisotropic and Ultralow Phonon Thermal Transport in Organic– Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites: Atomistic Insights into Solar Cell Thermal Management and Thermoelectric Energy Conversion Efficiency - Wang - 2016 - Advanced Functional Materials - Wiley Online Library,” can be found under https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.201600284, n.d

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.201600284 2016

  15. [15]

    Carrier recombination in CH3NH3PbI3: why is it a slow process? - IOPscience,

    “Carrier recombination in CH3NH3PbI3: why is it a slow process? - IOPscience,” can be found under https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6633/ac4be9/meta, n.d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac4be9/meta

  16. [16]

    M. A. Haque, S. Kee, D. R. Villalva, W.-L. Ong, D. Baran, Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903389

    2020

  17. [17]

    Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskites (HOIPs): Opportunities and Challenges - Berry - 2015 - Advanced Materials - Wiley Online Library,

    “Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskites (HOIPs): Opportunities and Challenges - Berry - 2015 - Advanced Materials - Wiley Online Library,” can be found under https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201502294, n.d

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201502294 2015

  18. [18]

    Y. Jung, W. Lee, S. Han, B.-S. Kim, S.-J. Yoo, H. Jang, Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2204872

    2023

  19. [19]

    W. Li, Z. Wang, F. Deschler, S. Gao, R. H. Friend, A. K. Cheetham, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 1

    2017

  20. [20]

    W. Tian, H. Zhou, L. Li, Small 2017, 13, 1702107

    2017

  21. [21]

    D. A. Egger, A. M. Rappe, L. Kronik, Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 573

    2016

  22. [22]

    T. M. Brenner, D. A. Egger, L. Kronik, G. Hodes, D. Cahen, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 1

    2016

  23. [23]

    Papadimitriou, I

    I. Papadimitriou, I. Gialampoukidis, S. Vrochidis, I. Kompatsiaris, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 235, 112793

    2024

  24. [24]

    J. Cai, X. Chu, K. Xu, H. Li, J. Wei, Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 3115

    2020

  25. [25]

    Machine learning in materials science - Wei - 2019 - InfoMat - Wiley Online Library,

    “Machine learning in materials science - Wei - 2019 - InfoMat - Wiley Online Library,” can be found under https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inf2.12028, n.d

    work page doi:10.1002/inf2.12028 2019

  26. [26]

    Y. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Ju, S. Shi, J. Materiomics 2017, 3, 159

    2017

  27. [27]

    Angelis, F

    D. Angelis, F. Sofos, T. E. Karakasidis, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, 30, 3845

    2023

  28. [28]

    Quade, M

    M. Quade, M. Abel, K. Shafi, R. K. Niven, B. R. Noack, Phys. Rev. E 2016, 94, 012214

    2016

  29. [29]

    Y. Wang, N. Wagner, J. M. Rondinelli, MRS Commun. 2019, 9, 793

    2019

  30. [30]

    Orzechowski, W

    P. Orzechowski, W. La Cava, J. H. Moore, in Proc. Genet. Evol. Comput. Conf., Association For Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018, pp. 1183–1190

    2018

  31. [31]

    Joblib: running Python functions as pipeline jobs — joblib 1.4.2 documentation,

    “Joblib: running Python functions as pipeline jobs — joblib 1.4.2 documentation,” can be found under https://joblib.readthedocs.io/en/stable/, n.d

  32. [32]

    Welcome to gplearn’s documentation! — gplearn 0.4.2 documentation,

    “Welcome to gplearn’s documentation! — gplearn 0.4.2 documentation,” can be found under https://gplearn.readthedocs.io/en/stable/, n.d

  33. [33]

    H. Xie, S. Hao, J. Bao, T. J. Slade, G. J. Snyder, C. Wolverton, M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 9553

    2020

  34. [34]

    Behera, M

    D. Behera, M. Manzoor, R. Sharma, M. M. Salah, I. Stich, S. K. Mukherjee, Crystals 2023, 13, 408

    2023

  35. [35]

    T. Kaur, M. M. Sinha, Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 101741

    2021

  36. [36]

    S. A. Mir, D. C. Gupta, J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 854, 156000

    2021

  37. [37]

    X. Song, X. Shai, S. Deng, J. Wang, J. Li, X. Ma, X. Li, T. Wei, W. Ren, L. Gao, Y. Fu, H. Wang, C. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 11751

    2022

  38. [38]

    M. A. Ali, S. A. Dar, A. A. AlObaid, T. I. Al-Muhimeed, H. H. Hegazy, G. Nazir, G. Murtaza, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 159, 110258

    2021

  39. [39]

    X. Wang, Y. Zhao, S. Zeng, Z. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Ni, Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 014310

    2022

  40. [40]

    M. A. Ali, T. Alshahrani, G. Murtaza, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2021, 127, 105728

    2021

  41. [41]

    K. Chen, C. Li, M. Hu, X. Hou, C. Li, Z. Chen, Materials 2017, 10, 362

    2017

  42. [42]

    Maiti, M

    T. Maiti, M. Saxena, P. Roy, J. Mater. Res. 2019, 34, 107

    2019

  43. [43]

    Wu, X.-L

    H. Wu, X.-L. Shi, W.-D. Liu, M. Li, H. Gao, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Y. Wang, Q. Liu, Z.-G. Chen, Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 130668

    2021

  44. [44]

    Saxena, T

    M. Saxena, T. Maiti, J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 710, 472

    2017

  45. [45]

    Effect of Halogen Ions on the Low Thermal Conductivity of Cesium Halide Perovskite | The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,

    “Effect of Halogen Ions on the Low Thermal Conductivity of Cesium Halide Perovskite | The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,” can be found under https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08324, n.d

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08324

  46. [46]

    R. Wang, A. Yang, L. Bao, M. Peng, Y. Duan, Vacuum 2022, 202, 111146

    2022

  47. [47]

    Mukherjee, Bull

    R. Mukherjee, Bull. Mater. Sci. 2020, 43, 197

    2020

  48. [48]

    S. A. Khandy, D. C. Gupta, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 458, 176

    2018

  49. [49]

    E. I. Marchenko, S. A. Fateev, A. A. Petrov, V. V. Korolev, A. Mitrofanov, A. V. Petrov, E. A. Goodilin, A. B. Tarasov, Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 7383

    2020

  50. [50]

    K. A. Parrey, S. A. Khandy, I. Islam, A. Laref, D. C. Gupta, A. Niazi, A. Aziz, S. G. Ansari, R. Khenata, S. Rubab, J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 3615

    2018

  51. [51]

    X. Song, J. Wang, Y. Zhao, J. Ni, S. Meng, Z. Dai, Phys. Lett. A 2022, 456, 128550

    2022

  52. [52]

    A. Ali, A. Karim, M. Rashid, A. I. Aljameel, H. Albalawi, M. Morsi, S. Bouzgarrou, Q. Mahmood, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 159, 110295

    2021

  53. [53]

    A. Mera, T. Zelai, S. A. Rouf, N. A. Kattan, Q. Mahmood, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 24, 5588

    2023

  54. [54]

    Chik, Mater

    A. Chik, Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 3985

    2022

  55. [55]

    Al-Qaisi, M

    S. Al-Qaisi, M. Mushtaq, S. Alomairy, T. V. Vu, H. Rached, B. U. Haq, Q. Mahmood, M. S. Al-Buriahi, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 150, 106947

    2022

  56. [56]

    Sun, C.-L

    H.-L. Sun, C.-L. Yang, M.-S. Wang, X.-G. Ma, Y.-G. Yi, Mater. Today Energy 2021, 19, 100611

    2021

  57. [57]

    Singh, H

    J. Singh, H. Kaur, G. Singh, S. K. Tripathi, Mater. Today Energy 2021, 21, 100820

    2021

  58. [58]

    van Roekeghem, J

    A. van Roekeghem, J. Carrete, C. Oses, S. Curtarolo, N. Mingo, Phys. Rev. X 2016, 6, 041061

    2016

  59. [59]

    Ullah, M

    R. Ullah, M. A. Ali, A. Khan, G. Murtaza, A. Mahmood, S. M. Ramay, Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 134, 111112

    2021

  60. [60]

    Y. Zhao, S. Zeng, G. Li, C. Lian, Z. Dai, S. Meng, J. Ni, Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 224304

    2021

  61. [61]

    Y. Xiao, P. Sui, Y. Zhao, J. Ni, S. Meng, Z. Dai, Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 13687

    2022

  62. [62]

    Tahiri, S

    N. Tahiri, S. Dahbi, I. Dani, O. El Bounagui, H. Ez-Zahraouy, Comput. Theor. Chem. 2021, 1204, 113421

    2021

  63. [63]

    Z. Nabi, B. Benichou, M. Ramzan, T. Bellakhdar, B. Bouabdallah, Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103393

    2022

  64. [64]

    S. A. Khandy, D. C. Gupta, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 239, 121983

    2020

  65. [65]

    Jong, C.-J

    U.-G. Jong, C.-J. Yu, Y.-H. Kye, S.-N. Hong, H.-G. Kim, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 075403

    2020

  66. [66]

    S. A. Khandy, D. C. Gupta, J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 300, 122196

    2021

  67. [67]

    T. I. Al-Muhimeed, A. Shafique, A. A. AlObaid, M. Morsi, G. Nazir, M. mana AL-Anazy, Q. Mahmood, Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 19645

    2021

  68. [68]

    H. Saci, B. Bouabdallah, N. Benseddik, Z. Nabi, B. Bouhafs, B. Benichou, T. Bellakhdar, A. Zaoui, Comput. Condens. Matter 2023, 35, e00791

    2023

  69. [69]

    Haque, M

    E. Haque, M. A. Hossain, J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 748, 63

    2018

  70. [70]

    Y. He, G. Galli, Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5394

    2014

  71. [71]

    Ahmed, M

    T. Ahmed, M. Roknuzzaman, A. Sultana, A. Biswas, Md. S. Alam, M. Saiduzzaman, K. M. Hossain, Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 29, 102973

    2021

  72. [72]

    A. Doi, S. Shimano, M. Kriener, A. Kikkawa, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2022, 23, 858

    2022

  73. [73]

    Z. Tong, Y. Zhang, A. Pecchia, C. Yam, L. Zhou, T. Dumitrică, T. Frauenheim, Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2205934

    2023

  74. [74]

    C. Lee, J. Hong, A. Stroppa, M.-H. Whangbo, J. Hoon Shim, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 78701

    2015

  75. [75]

    X. Song, Y. Zhao, X. Wang, J. Ni, S. Meng, Z. Dai, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 5776

    2023

  76. [76]

    Abdullah, D

    D. Abdullah, D. C. Gupta, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2023, 569, 170474

    2023

  77. [77]

    S. A. Khandy, D. C. Gupta, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 135, 109079

    2019

  78. [78]

    Mahmood, M

    Q. Mahmood, M. Hassan, N. Yousaf, A. A. AlObaid, T. I. Al-Muhimeed, M. Morsi, H. Albalawi, O. A. Alamri, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 137, 106180

    2022

  79. [79]

    M. Nabi, D. C. Gupta, RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 15852

    2019

  80. [80]

    Alhodaib, J

    A. Alhodaib, J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 309, 123015

    2022

Showing first 80 references.