Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Classification Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.13156 v2 pith:6EI75NIQ submitted 2020-07-26 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords mtscalgorithmsseriesunivariatebeenclassificationmultivariateproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Time Series Classification (TSC) involved building predictive models for a discrete target variable from ordered, real valued, attributes. Over recent years, a new set of TSC algorithms have been developed which have made significant improvement over the previous state of the art. The main focus has been on univariate TSC, i.e. the problem where each case has a single series and a class label. In reality, it is more common to encounter multivariate TSC (MTSC) problems where multiple series are associated with a single label. Despite this, much less consideration has been given to MTSC than the univariate case. The UEA archive of 30 MTSC problems released in 2018 has made comparison of algorithms easier. We review recently proposed bespoke MTSC algorithms based on deep learning, shapelets and bag of words approaches. The simplest approach to MTSC is to ensemble univariate classifiers over the multivariate dimensions. We compare the bespoke algorithms to these dimension independent approaches on the 26 of the 30 MTSC archive problems where the data are all of equal length. We demonstrate that the independent ensemble of HIVE-COTE classifiers is the most accurate, but that, unlike with univariate classification, dynamic time warping is still competitive at MTSC.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Temporal cross-validation impacts multivariate time series subsequence anomaly detection evaluation

    stat.ML 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Sliding-window cross-validation yields higher and more stable AUC-PR than walk-forward for subsequence anomaly detection on two small CAN fault datasets.

Pith tools