Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Mixed-state phase transitions in spin-Holstein models

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a spin-Holstein cluster model, tracing out phonons gives exactly a bit-flip channel, and two conditional-mutual-information diagnostics put the SPT-to-trivial transition at $g/\omega \approx 0.352$ and $\approx 0.4694$, while the…

desk verdict Clean derivation of a microscopic bit-flip channel and a careful Rényi-2 CMI study, but the key quantitative predictions rest on an unverified factorization ansatz and the von Neumann result is imported rather than computed. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02733 v1 pith:6ES2XLQH submitted 2024-12-03 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Brett Min , Yuxuan Zhang , Yuxuan Guo , Dvira Segal , Yuto Ashida This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph PACS 03.65.Ud03.67.Mn71.38.-k
keywords mixed-statephasesspin-Holsteinmodelsymmetry-protectedtopologicalorderconditionalmutualinformationpolarontransformationbit-flipchannelclusterstatedecoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a 2D cluster Hamiltonian locally coupled to phonon modes and asks whether the symmetry-protected topological order of the cluster state survives arbitrarily strong spin-phonon coupling. It shows that the standard pure-state route, which decouples spins and phonons with a polaron transformation and projects onto the phonon vacuum, always reproduces the same cluster ground state and therefore misses the expected transition. The authors then trace out the phonons entirely and find the spin state becomes the cluster state acted on by a product of local bit-flip channels, with error rate $p = \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - e^{-2(g/\omega)^2}\right]$ fixed by the microscopic coupling. Using two conditional-mutual-information diagnostics, they argue the mixed state undergoes SPT-to-trivial transitions at $g/\omega \approx 0.352$ (von Neumann Markov length) and $g/\omega \approx 0.4694$ (Rényi-2 Markov length), reflecting slightly different definitions of mixed-state phase.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the polaron disentangling unitary $\hat{U}_p = \prod_i \exp\left[\frac{g}{\omega} X_i (\hat{b}_i^\dagger - \hat{b}_i)\right]$, together with the factorization assumption that the ground state in the rotated frame is $|\tilde{\Psi}_{GS}\rangle \otimes |0\rangle$. Acting with this transformation and tracing out the phonons turns the pure cluster state $\rho_1$ into $\rho_2$ through a product of local bit-flip channels, with error rate $p = \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - e^{-2(g/\omega)^2}\right]$. The phase diagnostics are the von Neumann and Rényi-2 conditional mutual informations, whose exponential decay length (the Markov length) diverges at the transition; analytically these map to a random-bond Ising model and to a single-flavor Ising model, respectively.

What would settle it

Compute the exact ground state of Eq. (1) on a finite Lieb lattice with tensor networks, trace out the phonons, and test whether the resulting spin density matrix equals the bit-flip channel Eq. (8); any deviation, such as correlated multi-qubit errors or unequal off-diagonal coherences, would falsify the channel derivation, and the von Neumann and Rényi-2 Markov lengths could then be computed from the actual reduced state to locate the true transitions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the reduced spin state obtained by tracing out the phonons in the spin-Holstein cluster model is exactly the pure cluster state passed through a site-wise bit-flip channel: $\rho_2 = \prod_i \left[(1-p)\rho_1 + p X_i \rho_1 X_i\right]$ with $p = \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - e^{-2(g/\omega)^2}\right]$. This identification converts the microscopic spin-phonon coupling problem into a decoherence problem with a known statistical-mechanics mapping. The von Neumann conditional mutual information then maps to the free energy of a two-dimensional random-bond Ising model, whose critical point predicts a transition at $p_{vN} \approx 0.11$ ($g/\omega \approx 0.352$), while a numerically-exact tensor-network computation of the Rényi-2 CMI locates the transition at the 2D Ising critical point $p_c \approx 0.178$ ($g/\omega \approx 0.4694$). The gauge-sector contribution shows no meaningful transition, since its fitted critical point is $p = 0.5$, the infinite-temperature limit.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the simple bit-flip channel assumes that after the polaron rotation the ground state factorizes exactly into the cluster spin state and the phonon vacuum; any residual phonon correlations beyond this single coherent displacement would invalidate the channel form and the predicted critical couplings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The phonon bath acts as a local $X$-noise channel whose error rate $p = \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - e^{-2(g/\omega)^2}\right]$ is fixed by the microscopic coupling, so increasing $g/\omega$ is exactly equivalent to increasing bit-flip decoherence.
  • Because the pure-state polaron analysis always returns the original cluster Hamiltonian with positive coefficients, it cannot detect the destruction of SPT order in this model, and mixed-state diagnostics are necessary.
  • The von Neumann and Rényi-2 Markov lengths identify distinct critical couplings ($g/\omega \approx 0.352$ and $\approx 0.4694$), showing that 'mixed-state phase transition' is defined by the chosen equivalence relation.
  • The numerical Rényi-2 CMI can be computed exactly for systems up to $92 \times 92$ with tensor networks, making the divergence of the Markov length a practical diagnostic for decohered SPT states.
  • Both critical couplings are of the same order as the phonon frequency $\omega$, so the predicted SPT-to-trivial transition is expected in parameter regimes accessible to strongly coupled spin-phonon systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This channel derivation suggests a general recipe: any spin-phonon model whose coupling is mediated by the symmetry generator of an SPT state will trace out to a convex combination of the state and symmetry-flipped copies, with the channel structure determined by how the symmetry generator enters the coupling.
  • If the exact ground state contains phonon correlations beyond the single coherent displacement assumed in Eq. (6), the effective noise should acquire spatial correlations, turning the statistical mechanics mapping into a random-bond model with correlated disorder and shifting both critical couplings.
  • The gap between $p_{vN} \approx 0.11$ and $p_c \approx 0.178$ may be the same physics as strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking, a connection the paper leaves open; if that connection holds, the two Markov-length divergences should coincide with the SW-SSB boundary.
  • One could test the channel formula directly in a simulator by preparing a small cluster state, coupling it to engineered bosonic modes, and measuring the reduced spin density matrix to check whether it equals Eq. (8).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-dimensional cluster-state (symmetry-protected topological) Hamiltonian on a Lieb lattice locally coupled to bosonic modes. It first applies a polaron transformation and projects onto the phonon vacuum, obtaining an effective spin Hamiltonian whose ground state remains the cluster state at all couplings; the authors conclude that this pure-state approach does not detect the expected SPT-to-trivial transition. The paper then assumes that the ground state in the polaron-rotated frame factorizes as |Ψ̃_GS>⊗|0> (Eq. 6), traces out the phonons, and derives a local bit-flip channel with error rate p = (1/2)[1−e^{−2(g/ω)^2}] (Eqs. 7–9). Using the von Neumann conditional mutual information (CMI) and the Rényi-2 CMI, it predicts mixed-state transitions at g/ω ≈ 0.352 and g/ω ≈ 0.4694, respectively, and presents tensor-network data for the Rényi-2 CMI scaling.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the paper offers a useful bridge between microscopic spin-phonon models and the recently developed mixed-state phase-transition framework: the phonon bath is shown to act as a local X-noise channel, and the two CMI diagnostics give different transition points, illustrating that von Neumann and Rényi-2 notions of mixed-state phases can differ. The algebraic derivation of the channel from the product ansatz is clean, and the tensor-network method avoids Monte Carlo sampling of noise configurations. However, the key factorization assumption Eq. (6) is not established, and the Rényi-2 scaling analysis fixes the critical point from prior work, so the quantitative predictions are less secure than the presentation suggests.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV (Eqs. 6–9)] The bit-flip channel and both predicted critical couplings rely on the factorization |Ψ̃_tot> = |Ψ̃_GS>⊗|0> stated in Eq. (6) and treated as exact at the start of Sec. IV. The polaron-rotated Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) still contains the bosonic operators Ĉ_i and Ŝ_i inside the spin terms, so the exact ground state of that Hamiltonian will generally contain excited phonon components; the projection in Eq. (2) is a low-energy approximation. The variational calculation in Appendix C only minimizes within the product family |Ψ̃_GS>⊗|α>, so the result α=0 does not exclude squeezed or entangled phonon correlations. Because Eq. (9) maps p to g/ω monotonically, any correction to the channel shifts both transition points (g/ω≈0.352 and ≈0.4694). I ask the authors to either prove the factorization for this specific model or benchmark the exact reduced spin state against Eq. (8) using, for example, exact diagonalization or DMRG on small systems.
  2. [Sec. IV A (after Eq. 23)] The von Neumann CMI transition is identified with p_vN≈0.11 by importing the critical point of the 2D ±J random-bond Ising model from Ref. [96]. The mapping from the decohered cluster state to the RBIM is plausible, but the paper does not derive the relation between the disorder probability in that RBIM and the bit-flip parameter p of Eq. (8), nor does it compute p_vN directly for the model at hand. Since this is one of the two central quantitative predictions, the authors should provide the derivation or determine p_vN numerically with the same tensor-network approach used for the Rényi-2 CMI and show consistency.
  3. [Sec. IV B (Eq. 24 and Fig. 4)] The finite-size scaling analysis fixes p_c=0.178, taken from Ref. [35], and then reports that the data validate this value; this is partly circular. The scaling collapse should treat p_c as a free parameter and report its fitted value with an uncertainty, so that the only independent evidence for the critical point is the 'position of the peak approaches this value' statement in Fig. 4(a). In addition, the fitted exponent α changes from 2 (8×8 region, r′=2r) to 3.2 (4×4 region, r′=2r), so the scaling form of Eq. (24) is not universal; the authors should explain this geometry dependence or weaken the universality claim.
  4. [Appendix D (boundary contraction)] The numerical method is described as computing the Rényi-2 CMI exactly, but the boundary contraction keeps only 'significant' Schmidt values after an SVD truncation. No bond dimension, truncation error, or convergence data are reported. For the quantitative claims p_c=0.178 and the scaling exponents, the authors should report the numerical precision and demonstrate convergence with bond dimension.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The notation is not fully consistent: 'Renyi-2' and 'Rényi-2' appear interchangeably, and 'von Newmann' appears in Sec. IV B where 'von Neumann' is meant.
  2. [Appendix A (Eq. A7)] In the expression for κ_v, the fourth factor is written as ⟨0_e3|cos(B_e3)|0_e4⟩; the bra and ket labels should both be e3 (or e4, consistently).
  3. [Sec. II and Fig. 2] Figure 2 is referenced parenthetically as 'see Fig. 2b' and 'see Fig. 2(a)' with inconsistent punctuation; please standardize the caption references and make the vertex/edge sublattice labels in the figure match the text.
  4. [Sec. IV A (Eq. 18)] The probability P(l)=p^{|l|}(1−p)^{V_M−|l|} is stated without specifying that the string configuration l must be compatible with the region M; adding this clarification would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the Rényi-2 critical coupling is anchored by a fixed p_c imported from the same authors' prior work, while the bit-flip channel derivation itself is independent.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV B, Eq. (24) and Fig. 4 caption]
    "Translated to the phonon parameters, the critical point is predicted to appear at g/ω ∼ 0.4694. ... we fit the R´enyi-2 CMI to a power-law decaying function I2(A : C|B) = r−αg(r 1 ν (p − pc)), where pc is set to 0.178."

    The quantitative Rényi-2 prediction is not obtained from an independent fit in this paper: Eq. (24) fixes pc at 0.178, a value taken from Ref. [35] by Guo and Ashida, two of the present authors. The reported physical prediction g/ω ≈ 0.4694 is then the monotone translation of that fixed input through Eq. (9), and the scaling collapse with pc fixed cannot independently determine the transition location. This makes the Rényi-2 numerical 'validation' a consistency check against the imported value rather than a derivation of the critical point from the spin-phonon model. The circularity is partial: the microscopic channel derivation and the von Neumann estimate (pvN ≈ 0.11 from Refs. [70, 96]) remain independent.

full rationale

The main derivation of the mixed state is self-contained: starting from the polaron-rotated product ansatz |Ψ̃_tot⟩ = |Ψ̃_GS⟩ ⊗ |0⟩, Appendix B explicitly evaluates the partial trace over phonons and obtains the local bit-flip channel of Eq. (8) with p = (1/2)[1 − e^{−2(g/ω)^2}] in Eq. (9). That step is a genuine derivation from the stated ansatz, not a renaming of a fitted quantity. The von Neumann CMI transition at pvN ≈ 0.11 is anchored in external literature (Refs. [70, 96]), and the paper does not fit that value. The identified circular element is limited to the Rényi-2 sector: the critical p_c = 0.178 is imported from Ref. [35], which shares two authors with the present paper, and is then set as a fixed input in the scaling collapse of Eq. (24) before being translated into the predicted g/ω ≈ 0.4694. The numerical tensor-network data does provide an independent check that peaks approach the vicinity of that value, so the claim is not entirely forced, but the quantitative prediction is conditional on a self-cited input. The unverified product ansatz of Eq. (6) is a genuine correctness risk for the exactness of the channel, but it is an explicit assumption rather than a circular reduction, so it does not by itself raise the circularity score. Overall, the central channel result has independent content, while one load-bearing quantitative input is self-cited; score 4 matches this partial circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the polaron product ansatz and on two critical values imported from prior work (p_c = 0.178 from Ref. [35], p_vN ≈ 0.11 from Refs. [70, 96]). The auxiliary scaling exponents α and ν are fitted to the numerics. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Power-law exponent α in Rényi-2 CMI scaling, Eq. (24) = 2.0; 3.2; 2.0 (geometry dependent)
    Fitted to numerical Rényi-2 CMI data; variation with region A size is unexplained.
  • Correlation-length exponent ν in Eq. (24) = 1.1 or 1.15
    Fitted in the same scaling collapse; close to but not equal to the Ising value ν = 1.
  • Critical point of the gauge-sector CMI = 0.5
    Fitted to the gauge contribution; interpreted as the infinite-temperature limit and hence not a physical transition.
  • Ising-sector critical point p_c = 0.178 (from Ref. [35])
    Set as a fixed input in the scaling collapse (Eq. 24), not fitted here; its value originates from a prior paper by two of the authors.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Ground-state factorization in the polaron frame: |Ψ̃_tot⟩ = |Ψ̃_GS⟩ ⊗ |0⟩ (Eq. 6)
    The entire analysis (pure-state failure and the derived bit-flip channel) rests on this ansatz; no check against the exact ground state of Eq. (1) is provided.
  • domain assumption von Neumann CMI of the decohered cluster state is captured by an RBIM free-energy difference with a transition at p_vN ≈ 0.11
    The RBIM mapping is argued in Sec. IV A and the critical value is imported from Refs. [70, 96]; the paper does not directly compute IvN numerically.
  • domain assumption Statistical-mechanics mapping of the bit-flip decohered cluster state to (n-1)-flavor Ising and gauge models with Ising critical point p_c = 0.178
    Taken from Ref. [35] by two of the authors; used as the anchor of the Rényi-2 CMI finite-size scaling.
  • domain assumption Boundary-contraction tensor network contraction converges to the exact Rényi-2 CMI for systems up to 92x92
    The method is adapted from Refs. [70, 98]; no bond-dimension or truncation-error values are reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mixed-state phase transitions in spin-Holstein models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6ES2XLQH

@misc{pith2026241202733,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mixed-state phase transitions in spin-Holstein models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6ES2XLQH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02733}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding coupled electron-phonon systems is one of the fundamental issues in strongly correlated systems. In this work, we aim to extend the notion of mixed-state phases to the realm of coupled electron/spinphonon systems. Specifically, we consider a two-dimensional cluster Hamiltonian locally coupled to a set of single bosonic modes with arbitrary coupling strength. First, we adopt a pure-state framework and examine whether a ground state phase transition out of the symmetry-protected topological phase can be captured using the standard polaron unitary transformation. This approach involves restricting the analysis to the low-energy manifold of the phonon degrees of freedom. We find that the pure-state approach fails to detect the anticipated transition to a topologically trivial phase at strong spin-phonon coupling. Next, we turn to a mixed-state picture. Here, we analyze mixed states of the model obtained by tracing out the phonons degrees of freedom. We employ two distinct diagnostics for mixed-state phase transitions: (i) the von Neumann conditional mutual information (CMI) and (ii) the R\'enyi-2 CMI. We argue that both measures detect signatures of mixed-state phase transitions, albeit at different critical spin-phonon coupling strengths, corresponding to subtly distinct notions of the mixed-state phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02733 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Pure- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. a) 2D cluster model on the Lieb lattice. The vertex term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Tripartition of regions where the CMI is defined. The radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: To reduce the impact of finite size effects, it is advan￾tageous to ensure that the size of region A is not too small and that r ′ ≫ r. Accordingly, we choose A as an 8×8 square and set r ′ = 2r for r ∈ {6, 8, 10, 12, 14}. As previously argued in Ref. [35], the CMI of …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strong and weak symmetries and their spontaneous symmetry breaking in mixed states emerging from the quantum Ising model under multiple decoherence

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under combined ZZ and X decoherence, the ground state of the transverse-field Ising chain becomes a mixed state whose phase diagram, revealed by Rényi-2 correlators and entanglement entropy, matches the quantum Ashkin...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [35]

    Tensor network formulation of symmetry protected topological phases in mixed states,

    Hanyu Xue, Jong Yeon Lee, and Yimu Bao, “Tensor network formulation of symmetry protected topological phases in mixed states,” (2024), arXiv:2403.17069 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [96]

    Deterministic quantum teleportation of atomic qubits,

    M. D. Barrett, J. Chiaverini, T. Schaetz, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, D. Leibfried, R. Ozeri, and D. J. Wineland, “Deterministic quantum teleportation of atomic qubits,” Nature 429, 737 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [1]

    Take the first row of a 2D tensor network as a matrix product state (MPS)

  4. [2]

    This will double the bond dimension of the original MPS

    Apply the second row of tensors as a matrix product operator (MPO) to the MPS. This will double the bond dimension of the original MPS

  5. [3]

    (C33) Where we defined θ = 4λp/ω. We then introduce three Kraus operators ˆK1,i =a1 ˆIi − ib1 ˆXi ˆK2,i =a2 ˆIi ˆK3,i =b3 ˆXi (C34) We confirm that these choice of Kraus operators indeed satisfy the required constraint 3X m=1 ˆK † m,i ˆKm,i = a2 1 + b2 1 + a2 2 + b2 3 ˆIi = ˆIi. (C35) We therefore have 3X m=1 ˆKm,i ˆρ1 ˆK † m,i = a1 ˆIi − ib1 ˆXi ˆρ1 a1 ˆ...

  6. [4]

    Perform a singular value decomposition (SVD) through the MPS and keep only the significant Schmidt values

  7. [5]

    We numerically find that the contraction time scales roughly linearly with system size

    Repeat step 2 until all rows are contracted. We numerically find that the contraction time scales roughly linearly with system size. This means that the structure of the problem guarantees that bond dimension does not increase as we perform row contractions

  8. [6]

    Polaron transformations in the realistic model of the strongly correlated electron system,

    E. I. Shneyder, S. V . Nikolaev, M. V . Zotova, R. A. Kaldin, and S. G. Ovchinnikov, “Polaron transformations in the realistic model of the strongly correlated electron system,” Phys. Rev. B 16 101, 235114 (2020)

    2020

Show all 102 references
  1. [7]

    Attractive su-schrieffer-heeger- hubbard model on a square lattice away from half-filling,

    Bo Xing, Chunhan Feng, Richard Scalettar, G. George Ba- trouni, and Dario Poletti, “Attractive su-schrieffer-heeger- hubbard model on a square lattice away from half-filling,” Phys. Rev. B 108, L161103 (2023)

    2023

  2. [8]

    Possibility of a metallic phase in the charge-density-wave–spin-density-wave crossover region in the one-dimensional hubbard-holstein model at half filling,

    Yasutami Takada and Ashok Chatterjee, “Possibility of a metallic phase in the charge-density-wave–spin-density-wave crossover region in the one-dimensional hubbard-holstein model at half filling,” Phys. Rev. B67, 081102 (2003)

    2003

  3. [9]

    Effective electron-phonon coupling and pola- ronic transition in the presence of strong correlation,

    Paolo Barone, Roberto Raimondi, Massimo Capone, and Clau- dio Castellani, “Effective electron-phonon coupling and pola- ronic transition in the presence of strong correlation,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 085120 (2006)

    2006

  4. [10]

    Phase diagram of the one-dimensional hubbard-holstein model at quarter filling,

    Sahinur Reja, Sudhakar Yarlagadda, and Peter B. Littlewood, “Phase diagram of the one-dimensional hubbard-holstein model at quarter filling,” Phys. Rev. B84, 085127 (2011)

    2011

  5. [11]

    Correlated singlet phase in the one-dimensional hubbard- holstein model,

    Sahinur Reja, Sudhakar Yarlagadda, and Peter B. Littlewood, “Correlated singlet phase in the one-dimensional hubbard- holstein model,” Phys. Rev. B86, 045110 (2012)

    2012

  6. [12]

    Phase diagram of the hubbard-holstein model on a four-leg tube system at quarter fill- ing,

    Sahinur Reja and Satoshi Nishimoto, “Phase diagram of the hubbard-holstein model on a four-leg tube system at quarter fill- ing,” Phys. Rev. B97, 245108 (2018)

    2018

  7. [13]

    Charge-density-wave melting in the one-dimensional holstein model,

    Jan Stolpp, Jacek Herbrych, Florian Dorfner, Elbio Dagotto, and Fabian Heidrich-Meisner, “Charge-density-wave melting in the one-dimensional holstein model,” Phys. Rev. B101, 035134 (2020)

    2020

  8. [14]

    Topological quantum transition driven by charge-phonon cou- pling in higher-order topological insulators,

    Congwei Lu, Mei Zhang, Haibo Wang, Qing Ai, and Tao Liu, “Topological quantum transition driven by charge-phonon cou- pling in higher-order topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B107, 125118 (2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Electron-phonon coupling induced topological phase transi- tion in an α−T3 haldane-holstein model,

    Mijanur Islam, Kuntal Bhattacharyya, and Saurabh Basu, “Electron-phonon coupling induced topological phase transi- tion in an α−T3 haldane-holstein model,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 045426 (2024)

    2024

  10. [16]

    Strong cou- pling limit of the holstein-hubbard model,

    Zhaoyu Han, Steven A. Kivelson, and Hong Yao, “Strong cou- pling limit of the holstein-hubbard model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 167001 (2020)

    2020

  11. [17]

    Phonon-mediated long- range attractive interaction in one-dimensional cuprates,

    Yao Wang, Zhuoyu Chen, Tao Shi, Brian Moritz, Zhi-Xun Shen, and Thomas P. Devereaux, “Phonon-mediated long- range attractive interaction in one-dimensional cuprates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197003 (2021)

    2021

  12. [18]

    Resonating valence bond states in an electron-phonon system,

    Zhaoyu Han and Steven A. Kivelson, “Resonating valence bond states in an electron-phonon system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 186404 (2023)

    2023

  13. [19]

    Zero-temperature phases of the two-dimensional hubbard-holstein model: A non-gaussian exact diagonalization study,

    Yao Wang, Ilya Esterlis, Tao Shi, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Eu- gene Demler, “Zero-temperature phases of the two-dimensional hubbard-holstein model: A non-gaussian exact diagonalization study,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043258 (2020)

    2020

  14. [20]

    Quan- tum bipolaron superconductivity from quadratic electron- phonon coupling,

    Zhaoyu Han, Steven A. Kivelson, and Pavel A. V olkov, “Quan- tum bipolaron superconductivity from quadratic electron- phonon coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 226001 (2024)

    2024

  15. [21]

    Study of long-range orders of hard-core bosons coupled to cooperative normal modes in two- dimensional lattices,

    A. Ghosh and S. Yarlagadda, “Study of long-range orders of hard-core bosons coupled to cooperative normal modes in two- dimensional lattices,” Phys. Rev. B96, 125108 (2017)

    2017

  16. [22]

    Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory,

    Ruihua Fan, Yimu Bao, Ehud Altman, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory,” PRX Quantum 5, 020343 (2024)

    2024

  17. [23]

    In- trinsic mixed-state quantum topological order,

    Zijian Wang, Zhengzhi Wu, and Zhong Wang, “In- trinsic mixed-state quantum topological order,” (2024), arXiv:2307.13758 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield dou- ble formulation of decoherence-induced transitions,

    Yimu Bao, Ruihua Fan, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Ehud Alt- man, “Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield dou- ble formulation of decoherence-induced transitions,” (2023), arXiv:2301.05687 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Replica topological order in quantum mixed states and quantum error correction,

    Zhuan Li and Roger S. K. Mong, “Replica topological order in quantum mixed states and quantum error correction,” (2024), arXiv:2402.09516 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [26]

    A noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order,

    Ramanjit Sohal and Abhinav Prem, “A noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order,” (2024), arXiv:2403.13879 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Towards a classification of mixed-state topological orders in two dimensions,

    Tyler Ellison and Meng Cheng, “Towards a classification of mixed-state topological orders in two dimensions,” (2024), arXiv:2405.02390 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Mixed-state topologi- cal order under coherent noises,

    Seunghun Lee and Eun-Gook Moon, “Mixed-state topologi- cal order under coherent noises,” (2024), arXiv:2411.03441 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Exact quantum algorithms for quantum phase recogni- tion: Renormalization group and error correction,

    Ethan Lake, Shankar Balasubramanian, and Soonwon Choi, “Exact quantum algorithms for quantum phase recogni- tion: Renormalization group and error correction,” (2023), arXiv:2211.09803 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Sym- metry protected topological order in open quantum systems,

    Caroline de Groot, Alex Turzillo, and Norbert Schuch, “Sym- metry protected topological order in open quantum systems,” Quantum 6, 856 (2022)

    2022

  25. [31]

    Strange correlation function for average symmetry-protected topological phases,

    Jian-Hao Zhang, Yang Qi, and Zhen Bi, “Strange correlation function for average symmetry-protected topological phases,” (2024), arXiv:2210.17485 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  26. [32]

    Average symmetry-protected topological phases,

    Ruochen Ma and Chong Wang, “Average symmetry-protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. X13, 031016 (2023)

    2023

  27. [33]

    Symme- try protected topological phases under decoherence,

    Jong Yeon Lee, Yi-Zhuang You, and Cenke Xu, “Symme- try protected topological phases under decoherence,” (2024), arXiv:2210.16323 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Symmetry-protected topological order at nonzero temperature,

    Sam Roberts, Beni Yoshida, Aleksander Kubica, and Stephen D. Bartlett, “Symmetry-protected topological order at nonzero temperature,” Phys. Rev. A96, 022306 (2017)

    2017

  29. [36]

    Locally purified density operators for symmetry- protected topological phases in mixed states,

    Yuchen Guo, Jian-Hao Zhang, Hao-Ran Zhang, Shuo Yang, and Zhen Bi, “Locally purified density operators for symmetry- protected topological phases in mixed states,” (2024), arXiv:2403.16978 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Symmetry protected topo- logical phases of mixed states in the doubled space,

    Ruochen Ma and Alex Turzillo, “Symmetry protected topo- logical phases of mixed states in the doubled space,” (2024), arXiv:2403.13280 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Fragility of time-reversal sym- metry protected topological phases,

    M. McGinley and N.R. Cooper, “Fragility of time-reversal sym- metry protected topological phases,” Nat. Phys. 16, 1181–1183 (2020)

    2020

  32. [39]

    Stability of time-reversal symmetry protected topological phases,

    Tian-Shu Deng, Lei Pan, Yu Chen, and Hui Zhai, “Stability of time-reversal symmetry protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 086801 (2021)

    2021

  33. [40]

    Two-dimensional symmetry- protected topological phases and transitions in open quantum systems,

    Yuxuan Guo and Yuto Ashida, “Two-dimensional symmetry- protected topological phases and transitions in open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B109, 195420 (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    Mixed-state quantum phases: Renormalization and quantum error correc- tion,

    Shengqi Sang, Yijian Zou, and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Mixed-state quantum phases: Renormalization and quantum error correc- tion,” Phys. Rev. X14, 031044 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Channeling quantum criticality,

    Yijian Zou, Shengqi Sang, and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Channeling quantum criticality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 250403 (2023)

    2023

  36. [43]

    Quan- tum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement,

    Jong Yeon Lee, Chao-Ming Jian, and Cenke Xu, “Quan- tum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement,” PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023)

    2023

  37. [44]

    Exploring critical systems under measure- ments and decoherence via keldysh field theory,

    Ruochen Ma, “Exploring critical systems under measure- ments and decoherence via keldysh field theory,” (2023), arXiv:2304.08277 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Strong resilience of topological codes to depolarization,

    H. Bombin, Ruben S. Andrist, Masayuki Ohzeki, Helmut G. Katzgraber, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, “Strong resilience of topological codes to depolarization,” Phys. Rev. X 2, 021004 (2012). 17

    2012

  39. [46]

    An analog of topological entanglement entropy for mixed states,

    Ting-Tung Wang, Menghan Song, Zi Yang Meng, and Tarun Grover, “An analog of topological entanglement entropy for mixed states,” (2024), arXiv:2407.20500 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Symmetry-preserving quadratic lindbladian and dissipation driven topological transi- tions in gaussian states,

    Liang Mao, Fan Yang, and Hui Zhai, “Symmetry-preserving quadratic lindbladian and dissipation driven topological transi- tions in gaussian states,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 070501 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Dissipative phase transitions and passive error correction,

    Yu-Jie Liu and Simon Lieu, “Dissipative phase transitions and passive error correction,” Phys. Rev. A109, 022422 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    Role of bath- induced many-body interactions in the dissipative phases of the su-schrieffer-heeger model,

    Brett Min, Kartiek Agarwal, and Dvira Segal, “Role of bath- induced many-body interactions in the dissipative phases of the su-schrieffer-heeger model,” Phys. Rev. B110, 125415 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    Higher-form symmetries under weak measurement,

    Kaixiang Su, Nayan Myerson-Jain, Chong Wang, Chao-Ming Jian, and Cenke Xu, “Higher-form symmetries under weak measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 200402 (2024)

    2024

  44. [51]

    Information dynamics in decohered quantum memory with repeated syndrome measure- ments: a dual approach,

    Jacob Hauser, Yimu Bao, Shengqi Sang, Ali Lavasani, Utkarsh Agrawal, and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Information dynamics in decohered quantum memory with repeated syndrome measure- ments: a dual approach,” (2024), arXiv:2407.07882 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Valence bonds in random quantum magnets: Theory and application to ybmggao4,

    Itamar Kimchi, Adam Nahum, and T. Senthil, “Valence bonds in random quantum magnets: Theory and application to ybmggao4,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031028 (2018)

    2018

  46. [53]

    Topological order of mixed states in correlated quantum many-body systems,

    F. Grusdt, “Topological order of mixed states in correlated quantum many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. B95, 075106 (2017)

    2017

  47. [54]

    Topological indices for open and thermal systems via uhlmann’s phase,

    Zhoushen Huang and Daniel P. Arovas, “Topological indices for open and thermal systems via uhlmann’s phase,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076407 (2014)

    2014

  48. [55]

    Two- dimensional density-matrix topological fermionic phases: Topological uhlmann numbers,

    O. Viyuela, A. Rivas, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, “Two- dimensional density-matrix topological fermionic phases: Topological uhlmann numbers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076408 (2014)

    2014

  49. [56]

    Density- matrix chern insulators: Finite-temperature generalization of topological insulators,

    A. Rivas, O. Viyuela, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, “Density- matrix chern insulators: Finite-temperature generalization of topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B88, 155141 (2013)

    2013

  50. [57]

    Probing the topol- ogy of density matrices,

    Charles-Edouard Bardyn, Lukas Wawer, Alexander Altland, Michael Fleischhauer, and Sebastian Diehl, “Probing the topol- ogy of density matrices,” Phys. Rev. X8, 011035 (2018)

    2018

  51. [58]

    Symmetry-enforced many- body separability transitions,

    Yu-Hsueh Chen and Tarun Grover, “Symmetry-enforced many- body separability transitions,” PRX Quantum5, 030310 (2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    A new framework for quantum phases in open systems: Steady state of imaginary- time lindbladian evolution,

    Yuchen Guo, Ke Ding, and Shuo Yang, “A new framework for quantum phases in open systems: Steady state of imaginary- time lindbladian evolution,” (2024), arXiv:2408.03239 [quant- ph]

    2024

  53. [60]

    Strong-to-weak sponta- neous symmetry breaking in mixed quantum states,

    Leonardo A. Lessa, Ruochen Ma, Jian-Hao Zhang, Zhen Bi, Meng Cheng, and Chong Wang, “Strong-to-weak sponta- neous symmetry breaking in mixed quantum states,” (2024), arXiv:2405.03639 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [61]

    De- tecting topological order at finite temperature using entangle- ment negativity,

    Tsung-Cheng Lu, Timothy H. Hsieh, and Tarun Grover, “De- tecting topological order at finite temperature using entangle- ment negativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116801 (2020)

    2020

  55. [62]

    Efficient detection of strong-to-weak sponta- neous symmetry breaking via the r ´enyi-1 correlator,

    Zack Weinstein, “Efficient detection of strong-to-weak sponta- neous symmetry breaking via the r ´enyi-1 correlator,” (2024), arXiv:2410.23512 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Topological phase tran- sitions at finite temperature,

    Paolo Molignini and Nigel R. Cooper, “Topological phase tran- sitions at finite temperature,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023004 (2023)

    2023

  57. [64]

    Topological order at nonzero tempera- ture,

    Matthew B. Hastings, “Topological order at nonzero tempera- ture,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 210501 (2011)

    2011

  58. [65]

    Persistent topo- logical negativity in a high-temperature mixed-state,

    Yonna Kim, Ali Lavasani, and Sagar Vijay, “Persistent topo- logical negativity in a high-temperature mixed-state,” (2024), arXiv:2408.00066 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Gauge theory and mixed state criticality,

    Takamasa Ando, Shinsei Ryu, and Masataka Watan- abe, “Gauge theory and mixed state criticality,” (2024), arXiv:2411.04360 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  60. [67]

    Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective,

    Pablo Sala, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Masaki Oshikawa, and Yizhi You, “Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 155150 (2024)

    2024

  61. [68]

    Strong- to-weak symmetry breaking states in stochastic dephasing sta- bilizer circuits,

    Yoshihito Kuno, Takahiro Orito, and Ikuo Ichinose, “Strong- to-weak symmetry breaking states in stochastic dephasing sta- bilizer circuits,” Phys. Rev. B110, 094106 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    Strong-to-weak spontaneous breaking of 1-form symmetry and intrinsically mixed topological order,

    Carolyn Zhang, Yichen Xu, Jian-Hao Zhang, Cenke Xu, Zhen Bi, and Zhu-Xi Luo, “Strong-to-weak spontaneous breaking of 1-form symmetry and intrinsically mixed topological order,” (2024), arXiv:2409.17530 [quant-ph]

    2024

  63. [70]

    Emergent gauge fields and the

    Kaixiang Su, Yimu Bao, and Cenke Xu, “Emergent gauge fields and the ”choi-spin liquids” in steady states,” (2024), arXiv:2408.07125 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Local uni- tary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order,

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Local uni- tary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010)

    2010

  65. [73]

    Generating topological order: No speedup by dissipation,

    Robert K ¨onig and Fernando Pastawski, “Generating topological order: No speedup by dissipation,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 045101 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution,

    Andrea Coser and David P ´erez-Garc´ıa, “Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution,” Quan- tum 3, 174 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Stability of mixed- state quantum phases via finite markov length,

    Shengqi Sang and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Stability of mixed- state quantum phases via finite markov length,” (2024), arXiv:2404.07251 [quant-ph]

    2024

  68. [76]

    Spacetime markov length: a diagnostic for fault tolerance via mixed-state phases,

    Amir-Reza Negari, Tyler D. Ellison, and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Spacetime markov length: a diagnostic for fault tolerance via mixed-state phases,” (2024), arXiv:2412.00193 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Sufficient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von neumann algebra,

    D Petz, “Sufficient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von neumann algebra,” Commun. Math. Phys. 105, 123– 131 (1986)

    1986

  70. [78]

    Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,

    Man-Duen Choi, “Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,” Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285–290 (1975)

    1975

  71. [79]

    Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,

    A. Jamiolkowski, “Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,” Rep. Math. Phys.3, 275–278 (1972)

    1972

  72. [80]

    Mixed- state quantum anomaly and multipartite entanglement,

    Leonardo A. Lessa, Meng Cheng, and Chong Wang, “Mixed- state quantum anomaly and multipartite entanglement,” (2024), arXiv:2401.17357 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Anomaly in open quantum sys- tems and its implications on mixed-state quantum phases,

    Zijian Wang and Linhao Li, “Anomaly in open quantum sys- tems and its implications on mixed-state quantum phases,” (2024), arXiv:2403.14533 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Anomalies of average symmetries: Entanglement and open quantum sys- tems,

    Po-Shen Hsin, Zhu-Xi Luo, and Hao-Yu Sun, “Anomalies of average symmetries: Entanglement and open quantum sys- tems,” (2023), arXiv:2312.09074 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Topological phases with average symmetries: the decohered, the disordered, and the intrinsic,

    Ruochen Ma, Jian-Hao Zhang, Zhen Bi, Meng Cheng, and Chong Wang, “Topological phases with average symmetries: the decohered, the disordered, and the intrinsic,” (2024), arXiv:2305.16399 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Average-exact mixed anoma- lies and compatible phases,

    Yichen Xu and Chao-Ming Jian, “Average-exact mixed anoma- lies and compatible phases,” (2024), arXiv:2406.07417 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Hydrodynamics as the effective field theory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    Xiaoyang Huang, Marvin Qi, Jian-Hao Zhang, and An- drew Lucas, “Hydrodynamics as the effective field theory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,” (2024), arXiv:2407.08760 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Spontaneous sym- metry breaking in open quantum systems: strong, weak, and strong-to-weak,

    Ding Gu, Zijian Wang, and Zhong Wang, “Spontaneous sym- metry breaking in open quantum systems: strong, weak, and strong-to-weak,” (2024), arXiv:2406.19381 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Symmetry enforced entan- 18 glement in maximally mixed states,

    Amin Moharramipour, Leonardo A. Lessa, Chong Wang, Timo- thy H. Hsieh, and Subhayan Sahu, “Symmetry enforced entan- 18 glement in maximally mixed states,” (2024), arXiv:2406.08542 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Instability of steady-state mixed- state symmetry-protected topological order to strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    Jeet Shah, Christopher Fechisin, Yu-Xin Wang, Joseph T. Iosue, James D. Watson, Yan-Qi Wang, Brayden Ware, Alexey V . Gor- shkov, and Cheng-Ju Lin, “Instability of steady-state mixed- state symmetry-protected topological order to strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,” ...

    2024

  81. [89]

    Bilayer construction for mixed state phenomena with strong, weak sym- metries and symmetry breakings,

    Shuangyuan Lu, Penghao Zhu, and Yuan-Ming Lu, “Bilayer construction for mixed state phenomena with strong, weak sym- metries and symmetry breakings,” (2024), arXiv:2411.07174 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one- way model,

    D. Gross, J. Eisert, N. Schuch, and D. Perez-Garcia, “Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one- way model,” Phys. Rev. A76, 052315 (2007)

    2007

  83. [91]

    Robust creation of entanglement between ions in spatially sep- arate cavities,

    Daniel E. Browne, Martin B. Plenio, and Susana F. Huelga, “Robust creation of entanglement between ions in spatially sep- arate cavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 067901 (2003)

    2003

  84. [92]

    Persistent entangle- ment in arrays of interacting particles,

    Hans J. Briegel and Robert Raussendorf, “Persistent entangle- ment in arrays of interacting particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910–913 (2001)

    2001

  85. [93]

    A one-way quantum computer,

    Robert Raussendorf and Hans J. Briegel, “A one-way quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188–5191 (2001)

    2001

  86. [94]

    Maximal entangle- ment versus entropy for mixed quantum states,

    Tzu-Chieh Wei, Kae Nemoto, Paul M. Goldbart, Paul G. Kwiat, William J. Munro, and Frank Verstraete, “Maximal entangle- ment versus entropy for mixed quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 022110 (2003)

    2003

  87. [95]

    Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states,

    Robert Raussendorf, Daniel E. Browne, and Hans J. Briegel, “Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 022312 (2003)

    2003

  88. [97]

    Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack,

    Lov K. Grover, “Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack,” Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 325–328 (1997)

    1997

  89. [98]

    Simplified quantum logic with trapped ions,

    C. Monroe, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, D. M. Meekhof, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, “Simplified quantum logic with trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. A55, R2489–R2491 (1997)

    1997

  90. [99]

    Lang-firsov approaches to polaron physics: From variational methods to unbiased quantum monte carlo simulations,

    Martin Hohenadler and Wolfgang von der Linden, “Lang-firsov approaches to polaron physics: From variational methods to unbiased quantum monte carlo simulations,” inPolarons in Ad- vanced Materials, edited by A. S. Alexandrov (Springer Nether- lands, Dordrecht, 2007) pp. 463–502

    2007

  91. [100]

    Petz map recovery for long- range entangled quantum many-body states,

    Yangrui Hu and Yijian Zou, “Petz map recovery for long- range entangled quantum many-body states,” Phys. Rev. B110, 195107 (2024)

    2024

  92. [101]

    Universality class of the nishimori point in the 2d ±J random-bond ising model,

    A. Honecker, M. Picco, and P. Pujol, “Universality class of the nishimori point in the 2d ±J random-bond ising model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047201 (2001)

    2001

  93. [102]

    Statistics of two-dimensional lattices with many components,

    Taro Kihara, Yukio Midzuno, and Toshio Shizume, “Statistics of two-dimensional lattices with many components,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 9, 681–687 (1954)

    1954

  94. [103]

    Vari- ational study of hard-core bosons in a two-dimensional opti- cal lattice using projected entangled pair states,

    Valentin Murg, Frank Verstraete, and J Ignacio Cirac, “Vari- ational study of hard-core bosons in a two-dimensional opti- cal lattice using projected entangled pair states,” Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 75, 033605 (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.