Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

h-Flow: Flexible Flow-based Image Editing via Doob's h-Transform

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Image editing with rectified flows can be cast as Doob-conditioned generation on two terminal events, yielding closed-form reconstruction guidance and an orthogonally decoupled editing velocity.

desk verdict Solid, usable extension of Doob h-transform to rectified flows with a clean orthogonal trade-off; the independence assumption is real but does not sink the practical result. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.10800 v1 pith:6EZUZRTR submitted 2026-07-12 cs.CV

Zehui Guo , Zhen Wang , Junwei Shu , Yang Li , Changbo Wang , Long Chen This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords text-basedimageeditingrectifiedflowDoob'sh-transformvelocityorthogonaldecompositiontraining-freesourceconsistencytargetalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that text-based image editing need not rely on heuristic inversions or fragile source-to-target trajectories. By treating the task as sampling a process conditioned on two terminal events—exact source consistency and target-prompt alignment—one can import Doob’s h-transform after constructing an equivalent SDE that shares the rectified-flow marginals. Dedicated harmonic functions then supply an exact reconstruction velocity and a pure semantic difference of velocities; an orthogonal projection keeps those directions from interfering, so two scalar coefficients independently trade fidelity against edit strength. A reader cares because the resulting method is training-free, agnostic to the forward process, and empirically improves the fidelity–alignment trade-off over both inversion-based and inversion-free baselines on standard editing benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The RF bridge ODE dxt/dt = v_θ − (t/(1−t)) ∇ log h, with product-of-experts h = h_rec · h_edit, followed by orthogonal projection of the editing direction onto the complement of the reconstruction velocity.

What would settle it

On a suite of edits where source structure and target semantics are known to be statistically dependent, measure whether structural metrics remain invariant while the editing coefficient is swept after orthogonal projection; if those metrics degrade in lockstep with the editing coefficient, the claimed decoupling fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

h-Flow shows that deterministic rectified-flow editing can be rewritten as a reverse-time Doob bridge whose harmonic function factorizes into source and target factors; after an equivalent SDE is introduced, the bridge ODE admits closed-form reconstruction guidance and a velocity-difference editing signal that an orthogonal decomposition fully separates, giving independent control of the two objectives without retraining.

Load-bearing premise

The source-image constraint and the target-prompt constraint are treated as independent given the current latent, so their guidance forces simply add; if the two goals are strongly coupled the additive split no longer separates them.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes h-Flow, a training-free framework for text-based image editing with pre-trained rectified-flow (RF) models. Editing is cast as conditional generation under two terminal events (source consistency and target alignment) via Doob’s h-transform. Because classical h-transforms require a non-degenerate diffusion coefficient, the authors construct an equivalent Itô SDE that shares the RF marginals (g_eq = sqrt(2t/(1-t))), obtain the bridge PF-ODE (Eq. 11), and design product-of-experts harmonic functions h = h_rec · h_edit. Closed-form reconstruction guidance (Eq. 13–15) and a velocity-difference editing direction Δ_edit (Eq. 16) follow from Tweedie identities; an orthogonal projection (Eq. 17) then decouples the two controls, yielding the final editing ODE (Eq. 19). The method is forward-agnostic and is evaluated on PIE-Bench and PIE-Bench++ against inversion-based and inversion-free baselines, with ablations on λ_rec, λ_edit, projection, and multi-target decomposition.

Significance. If the claims hold, h-Flow supplies a clean theoretical bridge from classical Doob conditioning to deterministic RF editing, together with a practical, plug-and-play algorithm that improves the fidelity–editability trade-off without architecture-specific heuristics or retraining. Strengths include the Fokker–Planck argument for marginal equivalence (Supp. B), explicit Tweedie derivations of both guidance terms (Supp. C), a geometric decoupling proof (Supp. E), and consistent rank-1/2 results on public benchmarks with official baseline code. The free parameters are transparent user knobs rather than fitted quantities, and the forward-agnostic design is a genuine practical contribution for the growing RF editing literature.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 4.1, Eq. (12): the product-of-experts factorization h = h_rec · h_edit treats the terminal events {x0 = x_src} and {prompt = c_edit} as conditionally independent given xt. In ordinary editing these events are strongly dependent (c_edit shares most content with the source), so ∇log h is not the exact Doob correction for the joint terminal law; the missing cross-terms are never recovered by the subsequent orthogonal projection (Eq. 17). The paper should either (i) quantify the approximation error under realistic prompt overlap or (ii) rephrase the theoretical claim from “exact joint conditioning” to “principled additive approximation,” and discuss when the independence assumption is most/least harmful.
  2. Sec. 4.2 / Supp. C.2: the editing direction Δ_edit is obtained by replacing the unconditional score with the source-conditioned score, yielding a relative CFG-style difference. While the cancellation of time factors is neat, the manuscript never measures how well this relative score approximates the true ∇log p(c_edit | xt) under the RF kernel, nor how the approximation degrades for multi-attribute or long prompts (the very setting that later motivates the decompose-then-project extension in Supp. F). A short diagnostic (e.g., correlation of Δ_edit with finite-difference score estimates, or ablation of the source-baseline choice) would make the central editing signal more credible.
minor comments (5)
  1. Algorithm 1 and Sec. 5.1: the default forward process is RF-Inversion with n=24 while the backward uses N=28 Euler steps; the partial-inversion schedule and the handling of the t→0 singularity for v_rec are only fully clarified in Supp. E.3. A short paragraph in the main text would improve reproducibility.
  2. Table 1: UniEdit-Flow obtains the best source-consistency numbers yet ranks lower overall; a brief discussion of why high PSNR/SSIM does not translate into better HPS/AS (or into the average rank) would help readers interpret the trade-off.
  3. Fig. 1 and Fig. 3 captions contain several OCR/typo artifacts (“S our c e Imag”, “y elllo w”, “mil bee”); these should be cleaned for the camera-ready version.
  4. Related work (Sec. 2) correctly positions h-Edit, but a one-sentence contrast with concurrent RF editing methods that also claim theoretical grounding (e.g., DNAEdit, SplitFlow) would sharpen the novelty claim.
  5. Supp. I failure cases are valuable; moving a short summary of the six modes into the main conclusion would give a more balanced picture of the method’s limits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivations follow classical Doob h-transform plus RF identities; free parameters are user knobs, not fitted predictions; evaluations use external public benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central construction (equivalent SDE sharing RF marginals, product-of-experts h = h_rec · h_edit, closed-form reconstruction velocity v_rec from the Gaussian kernel and Tweedie, editing direction Δ_edit ≈ v_edit_θ − v_src_θ, and orthogonal projection of Δ_edit) is obtained by direct application of classical Doob theory and standard score–velocity identities already present in the RF literature. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then re-presented as a prediction; λ_rec and λ_edit are explicit user-chosen trade-off coefficients whose effects are ablated. Empirical superiority is measured on the public PIE-Bench / PIE-Bench++ suites against official baseline code, so the claimed ranking does not reduce by construction to the method's own inputs. Self-citations are absent from the load-bearing steps; the sole related prior (h-Edit) is an external diffusion work that the authors explicitly extend rather than invoke as a uniqueness theorem. The conditional-independence assumption underlying the product factorization is a modeling approximation that may affect correctness, but it is not a circular reduction of a claimed derivation to its own premises.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on classical Doob theory, the existence of an equivalent SDE sharing RF marginals, conditional independence of the two terminal events, and two user-chosen scalar strengths. No new physical entities are postulated; the free parameters are ordinary guidance scales.

free parameters (3)
  • λ_rec = 1.2
    Scalar multiplier on the closed-form reconstruction velocity; default 1.2 chosen by ablation on PIE-Bench for fidelity-edit trade-off.
  • λ_edit = 1.5
    Scalar multiplier on the orthogonal editing direction; default 1.5 chosen by ablation for the same trade-off.
  • N (Euler steps) = 28
    Number of discrete reverse steps; fixed at 28 for FLUX experiments.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption There exists an Itô SDE with diffusion coefficient √(2t/(1-t)) whose probability-flow ODE recovers the pre-trained RF velocity field and therefore shares identical marginals {p_t}.
    Invoked in Sec. 4.1 and proved via Fokker-Planck cancellation in Supplementary B; standard in the Score-SDE literature but essential for applying h-transforms to deterministic RF.
  • ad hoc to paper The two terminal events {x_0 = x_src} and {prompt = c_edit} are conditionally independent given the intermediate state x_t, so the joint harmonic function factorizes.
    Stated explicitly in Sec. 4.1 (Eq. 12); enables additive superposition of the two guidance terms.
  • domain assumption Tweedie posterior means approximated by the learned velocity network are sufficiently accurate for both source- and target-conditioned scores.
    Used throughout Sec. 4.2 and Supplementary C to obtain closed-form guidance; standard in flow-matching practice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of h-Flow: Flexible Flow-based Image Editing via Doob's h-Transform." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6EZUZRTR

@misc{pith2026260710800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: h-Flow: Flexible Flow-based Image Editing via Doob's h-Transform},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6EZUZRTR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.10800}
}
abstract

Editing images with pre-trained text-to-image flow models typically requires carefully balancing target alignment with the desired prompt and source consistency with the original image. Existing approaches either rely on inversion-based pipelines or heuristic source-to-target trajectory constructions, which often depend on architecture-specific designs or are sensitive to hyperparameters. In this paper, we propose h-Flow, a training-free and theoretically grounded flow-based editing framework. Inspired by Doob's $h$-Transform, we reformulate image editing as conditional generation under multiple terminal events corresponding to source consistency and target alignment. We first extend the classical $h$-Transform from SDE-based models to the deterministic RF framework by constructing an equivalent SDE with identical marginals. Within this formulation, we design dedicated $h$-functions for source consistency and target alignment, yielding closed-form reconstruction guidance and velocity-based semantic editing signals. We further introduce a velocity orthogonal decomposition to decouple reconstruction and editing directions, enabling a controllable trade-off between the two objectives. Extensive experiments demonstrate that h-Flow achieves effective, robust, and flexible editing across diverse scenarios. The code will be released soon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10800 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. h-Flow enables faithful text-based editing across diverse scenarios. Abstract. Editing images with pre-trained text-to-image flow models typically requires carefully balancing target alignment with the desired prompt and source consistency with the original image. Existing ap￾proaches either rely on inversion-based pipelines or heuristic source￾to-target trajectory constructions, which often depend on architecture￾s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of h-Flow. (a) Dual-Guidance via h-Transforms. We formu￾late image editing as a conditional generation process governed by two terminal con￾straints. The generative trajectory is jointly guided by a reconstruction function hrec (ensuring source structural fidelity) and an editing function hedit (enforcing target se￾mantic alignment). (b) Orthogonal Velocity Projection. To resolve the inherent tension betwee… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative comparisons. The source prompt and the target prompt is shown on the bottom for each example. The first column displays the real input image. The subsequent columns present the editing results of our proposed h-Flow, followed by various state-of-the-art baselines. background, action, texture, and position), while PIE-Bench++ extends the same images with multi-aspect prompts requiring simultaneous modific… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of projection variants. Top row: multi-target editing; Bottom row: single-target editing. “Complex-Proj" denotes our extended strategy. F.3 Visualization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Extended Qualitative Comparisons. We present additional editing results across diverse transformation types. The source and target prompts are displayed below each example. Compared to state-of-the-art baselines, our h-Flow consistently achieves the most precise semant…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Versatility of h-Flow. We demonstrate the capability of our method across various editing operations—including replacement, addition, deletion, and material modification—under both simple and complex prompt conditions. In all scenarios, h-Flow flawlessly executes the p…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Typical Failure Cases of h-Flow. We identify six failure modes constrained by inversion dependency and rigid orthogonal projection across 8 challenging scenarios: (a) Morphological distortion due to topological conflicts; (b, f) Layout hallucination driven by overwhelm…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    In: CVPR

    Beaudouin, G., Li, M., Kim, J., Yoon, S.H., Wang, M.: Delta rectified flow sampling for text-to-image editing. In: CVPR. pp. 18662–18672 (2026)

    2026

  2. [2]

    NeurIPS36, 68552–68575 (2023)

    Chen, S., Chewi, S., Lee, H., Li, Y., Lu, J., Salim, A.: The probability flow ode is provably fast. NeurIPS36, 68552–68575 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01715 (2026)

    Dao, T., Wang, Z., Pham, K.T., Chen, L.: Steerflow: Steering rectified flows for faithful inversion-based image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01715 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    In: ICML (2025)

    Deng, Y., He, X., Mei, C., Wang, P., Tang, F.: Fireflow: Fast inversion of rectified flow for image semantic editing. In: ICML (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    NeurIPS 34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A.: Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. NeurIPS 34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    https://github.com/discus0434/aesthetic-predictor-v2-5(2024)

    discus0434: Aesthetic predictor v2.5: A siglip-based aesthetic score predictor. https://github.com/discus0434/aesthetic-predictor-v2-5(2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Doob, J.L., et al.: Classical potential theory and its probabilistic counterpart, vol. 19. Springer (1984)

    1984

  8. [8]

    In: ICML

    Du, Y., Durkan, C., Strudel, R., Tenenbaum, J.B., Dieleman, S., Fergus, R., Sohl- Dickstein, J., Doucet, A., Grathwohl, W.S.: Reduce, reuse, recycle: Compositional generation with energy-based diffusion models and mcmc. In: ICML. pp. 8489–

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    In: ICML (2024)

    Esser, P., Kulal, S., Blattmann, A., Entezari, R., Müller, J., Saini, H., Levi, Y., Lorenz, D., Sauer, A., Boesel, F., et al.: Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In: ICML (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    In: ICLR (2023)

    Hertz, A., Mokady, R., Tenenbaum, J., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y., Cohen-Or, D.: Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross-attention control. In: ICLR (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    In: NeurIPS Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications (2021)

    Ho, J., Salimans, T.: Classifier-free diffusion guidance. In: NeurIPS Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    NeurIPS37, 22569– 22595 (2024)

    Huang, M., Cai, J., Jia, S., Lokhande, V.S., Lyu, S.: Paralleledits: Efficient multi- aspect text-driven image editing with attention grouping. NeurIPS37, 22569– 22595 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    In: CVPR

    Jiang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Zhuang, Y., Xiao, J., Chen, L.: Flowdc: Flow-based decoupling-decay for complex image editing. In: CVPR. pp. 25757– 25766 (2026)

    2026

  6. [14]

    Guo et al

    Jiao, G., Huang, B., Wang, K.C., Liao, R.: Uniedit-flow: Unleashing inversion and editing in the era of flow models (2025),https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13109 16 Z. Guo et al

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    In: ICLR (2024)

    Ju, X., Zeng, A., Bian, Y., Liu, S., Xu, Q.: Pnp inversion: Boosting diffusion-based editing with 3 lines of code. In: ICLR (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Kieu, D., Do, K., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, D., Nguyen, T.: Bidirectional diffusion bridge models. In: KDD. pp. 1139–1148 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23145 (2025)

    Kim, J., Hong, Y., Park, J., Ye, J.C.: Flowalign: Trajectory-regularized, inversion- free flow-based image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23145 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    In: ICCV

    Kim, J., Park, J., Song, Y., Kwak, N., Rhee, W.: Reflex: Text-guided editing of real images in rectified flow via mid-step feature extraction and attention adaptation. In: ICCV. pp. 15939–15948 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    In: ICCV

    Kulikov, V., Kleiner, M., Huberman-Spiegelglas, I., Michaeli, T.: Flowedit: Inversion-free text-based editing using pre-trained flow models. In: ICCV. pp. 19721–19730 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Labs, B.F.: Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux(2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747 (2022)

    Lipman, Y., Chen, R.T., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M., Le, M.: Flow matching for generative modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    In: ICLR (2023)

    Liu, X., Gong, C., Liu, Q.: Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. In: ICLR (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    In: ICLR (2023)

    Liu, X., Wu, L., Ye, M., Liu, Q.: Learning diffusion bridges on constrained domains. In: ICLR (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    In: ICLR (2022)

    Meng, C., He, Y., Song, Y., Song, J., Wu, J., Zhu, J.Y., Ermon, S.: Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. In: ICLR (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    In: CVPR

    Mokady, R., Hertz, A., Aberman, K., Pritch, Y., Cohen-Or, D.: Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models. In: CVPR. pp. 6038–6047 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    In: CVPR

    Nguyen, T., Do, K., Kieu, D., Nguyen, T.: h-edit: Effective and flexible diffusion- based editing via doob’s h-transform. In: CVPR. pp. 28490–28501 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    In: ICML

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: ICML. pp. 8748–8763. PMLR (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Cambridge university press (2000)

    Rogers,L.C.G.,Williams,D.:Diffusions,Markovprocesses,andmartingales,vol.2. Cambridge university press (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    In: ICLR (2025)

    Rout, L., Chen, Y., Ruiz, N., Caramanis, C., Shakkottai, S., Chu, W.S.: Semantic image inversion and editing using rectified stochastic differential equations. In: ICLR (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Särkkä, S., Solin, A.: Applied stochastic differential equations, vol. 10. Cambridge University Press (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    In: ICLR (2021)

    Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D.P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., Poole, B.: Score- based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In: ICLR (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    In: CVPR

    Tumanyan, N., Bar-Tal, O., Bagon, S., Dekel, T.: Splicing vit features for semantic appearance transfer. In: CVPR. pp. 10748–10757 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    In: CVPR

    Tumanyan, N., Geyer, M., Bagon, S., Dekel, T.: Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation. In: CVPR. pp. 1921–1930 (2023)

    1921

  26. [34]

    In: ICML

    Wang, J., Pu, J., Qi, Z., Guo, J., Ma, Y., Huang, N., Chen, Y., Li, X., Shan, Y.: Taming rectified flow for inversion and editing. In: ICML. pp. 64044–64058. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12057 (2026)

    Wang, Y., Jiang, Z., Wang, Z., Chen, L.: Coarse-guided visual generation via weighted h-transform sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12057 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004) h-Flow: Flexible Flow-based Image Editing via Doob’sh-Transform 17

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004) h-Flow: Flexible Flow-based Image Editing via Doob’sh-Transform 17

    2004

  29. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09341 (2023)

    Wu, X., Hao, Y., Sun, K., Chen, Y., Zhu, F., Zhao, R., Li, H.: Human preference score v2: A solid benchmark for evaluating human preferences of text-to-image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09341 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    In: NeurIPS (2025)

    Xie, C., Li, M., Li, S., Wu, Y., Yi, Q., Zhang, L.: Dnaedit: Direct noise alignment for text-guided rectified flow editing. In: NeurIPS (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    In: CVPR

    Xu, P., Jiang, B., Hu, X., Luo, D., He, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, C., Wu, Y., Ling, C., Wang, B.: Unveil inversion and invariance in flow transformer for versatile image editing. In: CVPR. pp. 28479–28489 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Com- munications and Applications (2024)

    Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Li, K., Xiao, J., Chen, L.: Freetuner: Any subject in any style with training-free diffusion. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Com- munications and Applications (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    In: AAAI

    Yang, K., Shen, B., Li, X., Dai, Y., Luo, Y., Ma, Y., Fang, W., Li, Q., Wang, Z.: Fia-edit: Frequency-interactive attention for efficient and high-fidelity inversion- free text-guided image editing. In: AAAI. vol. 40, pp. 11613–11621 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    In: NeurIPS (2025)

    Yoon, S.H., Li, M., Beaudouin, G., Wen, C., Azhar, M.R., Wang, M.: Splitflow: Flow decomposition for inversion-free text-to-image editing. In: NeurIPS (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    In: CVPR

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In: CVPR. pp. 586–595 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    In: ICLR (2024) 18 Z

    Zhou, L., Lou, A., Khanna, S., Ermon, S.: Denoising diffusion bridge models. In: ICLR (2024) 18 Z. Guo et al. Supplementary Material Text-based image editing requires a generated samplex0 to satisfy two terminal constraints att=0: source consistency tox src 0 and target alignm...

    2024

  37. [45]

    The structural fidelity, governed by the velocity component along˜vrec, is absolutely invariant to any changes in the editing strengthλedit

  38. [46]

    Complex-Proj

    Any modification to the reconstruction strengthλrec updates the baseline˜vrec, and the projection dynamically adapts to ensure the editing energy remains entirely orthogonal to the new structural constraint. Proof.For claim (1): The structural fidelity is determined by the sca...

  39. [47]

    flowers in mouth

    Disrupted Source Consistency and Ineffective Editing:When intro- ducing new concepts (e.g., adding "flowers in mouth" to the "dog wearing space suit"), baseline methods frequently struggle to control the editing strength. For instance, FlowEdit applies an excessively aggressiv...

  40. [48]

    meerkat" into a

    Background Distortion during Subject Replacement:In the task of morphing the "meerkat" into a "lion", methods like ODEInv and SDEdit com- pletely fail to retain the source image structure, regenerating an entirely differ- ent scene. Other flow-based methods (e.g., UniEdit and ...

  41. [49]

    german shepherd dog

    Attribute Omission under Complex Multi-Prompt Edits:The bot- tom three rows feature a more challenging dataset requiring simultaneous multi- attribute and compositional modifications. Under these complex prompts, base- line methods frequently struggle to satisfy all textual co...

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.