Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Intermittency and Dissipation Regularity in Turbulence

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A weak Euler solution's Besov regularity σ forces its Duchon-Robert dissipation onto a Hausdorff measure of explicit dimension, implying quantitative intermittency whenever dissipation is lower-dimensional.

desk verdict Solid, honest paper: the new negative Besov regularity for the Duchon-Robert distribution is unconditional and correct, while the geometric intermittency conclusions are explicitly conditional on a Radon measure hypothesis that is not known to hold in the main inviscid-limit setting. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10032 v2 pith:6FXGYFOU submitted 2025-02-14 math.AP math-phmath.MPphysics.flu-dyn

Luigi De Rosa , Theodore D. Drivas , Marco Inversi , Philip Isett This is my paper
classification math.APmath-phmath.MPphysics.flu-dyn MSC 35Q3135D3076F0228A80
keywords incompressibleEulerequationsDuchon-RobertdistributionanomalousdissipationBesovregularityHausdorffdimensionintermittencystructurefunctionsOnsagersingularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a quantitative rigidity theorem for turbulent energy dissipation in weak solutions of the incompressible Euler equations. It shows that if the velocity field has spatial Besov regularity $\sigma$ in $L^p$, then the Duchon-Robert distribution $D$, the distributional source of anomalous energy dissipation, belongs locally to the negative Besov space $B^{2\sigma/(1-\sigma)-1}_{p/3,\infty}$, and the paper argues this exponent is optimal. When $D$ is a real-valued Radon measure, the measure must be absolutely continuous with respect to a Hausdorff measure of a dimension fixed by $\sigma$ and $p$, and a nonnegative $D$ obeys an explicit bound on balls. A corollary is an intermittency inequality: if a nontrivial dissipation measure is concentrated on a set of Hausdorff dimension $\gamma3$ the structure-function exponents must lie strictly below the Kolmogorov value $p/3$. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a rigorous bridge between the Onsager singularity theory of ideal fluids and the empirical intermittency of turbulent flows.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified energy identity of Proposition 1.3: for the space mollification $u_\ell$ of a weak solution, $$-D = (\partial_t + u_\ell\cdot\nabla) E_\ell + \mathrm{div}\, Q_\ell + C_\ell,$$ with $E_\ell = |u-u_\ell|^2/2$, $Q_\ell = (|u-u_\ell|^2/2 + (q-q_\ell))(u-u_\ell)$, and $C_\ell = (u-u_\ell)\cdot \mathrm{div}\,R_\ell + (u-u_\ell)\otimes(u-u_\ell):\nabla u_\ell$, where $R_\ell = u_\ell\otimes u_\ell - (u\otimes u)_\ell$. The identity splits the dissipation into terms that are small in negative norms ($E_\ell$, $Q_\ell$) and a term $C_\ell$ that is large in a positive norm; choosing the mollification scale $\ell$ optimally produces the mollification rates $|\langle D-D*\rho_\delta,\varphi\rangle| \lesssim \delta^{2\sigma/(1-\sigma)}$ and $|\langle D*\rho_\delta,\varphi\rangle| \lesssim \delta^{2\sigma/(1-\sigma)-1}$. These rates, read by duality, yield the negative Besov regularity; the Radon-measure conclusions then follow by testing $D$ against fractional-Sobolev cutoffs built on small balls and using Hausdorff measure. The same machinery, with a Stokes/dissipation term added, gives the Navier-Stokes identities and corollaries.

What would settle it

Compute, in a direct numerical simulation of forced turbulence, both the structure-function exponents $\zeta_p$ and the Hausdorff dimension $\gamma$ of the dissipation support at the smallest resolved scales; if for some $p>3$ the measured $\zeta_p/p$ exceeds the right-hand side of (5.1) with the measured $\gamma$, then the inequality of Corollary 1.2 (equivalently, Theorem 1.1) is violated. Alternatively, a convex-integration construction of an Euler weak solution with nonnegative nontrivial $D$ supported on a set of Hausdorff dimension $\gamma$ and regularity $\sigma_p$ violating (1.3) would falsify the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 1.1: for a weak solution $u \in L^p_t B^{\sigma}_{p,\infty}$ of the incompressible Euler equations with $p \in [3,\infty]$ and $\sigma\in(0,1)$, the Duchon-Robert distribution $D$ belongs locally to $B^{2\sigma/(1-\sigma)-1}_{p/3,\infty}$. If $D$ is additionally a real-valued Radon measure, then $|D|$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $H^\gamma$ for every $\gamma$ satisfying $2\sigma/(1-\sigma) > 1 - \frac{p-3}{p}(d+1-\gamma)$, and if $D\ge 0$ then $D(B_r(x,t)) \lesssim r^{2\sigma/(1-\sigma)-1 + \frac{p-3}{p}(d+1)}$ on compact sets. From this the paper derives Corollary 1.2: a nontrivial dissipation measure concentrated on a set of Hausdorff dimension $\gamma$ forces $2\sigma_p/(1-\sigma_p) \le 1 - \frac{p-3}{p}(d+1-\gamma)$ for every $p$ for which the solution has Besov regularity $\sigma_p$, so for $p>3$ and $\gamma<d+1$ the regularity index must drop strictly below $1/3$ and the structure function exponents below $p/3$. The authors present the same mechanism in the passive scalar transport equation, yielding an intermittent refinement of the Obukhov-Corrsin bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric conclusions—absolute continuity with respect to Hausdorff measure and the ball growth bound—hold only when the Duchon-Robert distribution is a real-valued Radon measure, and the paper notes that this measure property is guaranteed for strong limits of suitable Navier-Stokes solutions but is not rigorously justified for general vanishing-viscosity limits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the dissipation measure is concentrated on a set of Hausdorff dimension $\gamma$, the inequality in Corollary 1.2 becomes a hard upper bound on the Besov regularity of the velocity at every integrability exponent $p\ge 3$.
  • For $p>3$ and any lower-dimensional dissipative set ($\gamma<d+1$), the regularity index $\sigma_p$ must be strictly below $1/3$, so the absolute structure function exponents $\zeta_p = p\sigma_p$ deviate downward from Kolmogorov's $p/3$, with the deviation growing in $p$.
  • The negative-Besov regularity $D \in B^{2\sigma/(1-\sigma)-1}_{p/3,\infty}$ cannot be improved: known convex-integration solutions with prescribed kinetic-energy regularity saturate the exponent, at least for $p=\infty$ and along time marginals.
  • Because the proof is local, the results transfer from the torus to the interior of any open set $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^d$, and the same splitting applies to Navier-Stokes solutions, recovering Onsager quasi-singularity, the Four-Fifths law corollary, and resolved dissipation scales.
  • For the passive scalar equation, the analogous theorem yields the intermittent Obukhov-Corrsin inequality $2\beta_s/(1-\sigma_p) \le 1 - \frac{p(s-2)-s}{ps}(d+1-\gamma)$, recovering the classical bound when no dimension information is used.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the mollification-rate estimates (1.5) could be measured directly in numerical data at finite viscosity, giving a test of the predicted exponent $2\sigma/(1-\sigma)-1$ without passing to the inviscid limit.
  • Editorial inference: the relation $d\zeta_p^*/dp|_{p=3}=(2\gamma-5)/9$ implied by the bound permits a quantitative cross-check between independently measured structure-function slopes and dissipation-set dimension in the same dataset.
  • Editorial inference: because the split uses only the quadratic nonlinear structure plus a Duchon-Robert-type definition, analogous dimension bounds should hold for magnetohydrodynamic and compressible turbulent systems, a direction the authors mention but do not carry out.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a geometric-analytic framework for the Duchon–Robert dissipation distribution D of weak Euler solutions. The main result (Theorem 1.1) states that if u lies in L^p_t B^σ_{p,∞} with p ∈ [3,∞] and σ ∈ (0,1), then D belongs to B^{2σ/(1−σ)−1}_{p/3,∞} locally; if D is a real-valued Radon measure, then |D| is absolutely continuous with respect to H^γ for every γ satisfying (1.2), and if D ≥ 0 then D(B_r(x,t)) is bounded by a constant times r^{2σ/(1−σ)−1 + (p−3)/p (d+1)} on compacts. The proof is built on a modified energy identity (Proposition 1.3), mollification-rate estimates (Proposition 1.4), a Littlewood–Paley/duality argument, and a covering argument. Corollary 1.2 converts this into a quantitative intermittency constraint relating structure-function exponents to the Hausdorff dimension of the dissipative set. Section 4 recovers several known Onsager-type results and gives Navier–Stokes applications; Section 5 discusses physical implications, the measure hypothesis, sharpness, and a passive-scalar analogue.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a strong contribution. The Besov regularity of D is parameter-free and unconditional from the stated assumptions; the measure-theoretic conclusions are internally correct once the Radon measure hypothesis is granted, and the paper is explicit that this hypothesis is not implied by Besov regularity and is not rigorously justified in the general vanishing-viscosity limit. The intermittency bound (1.3) is a substantive constraint that connects the Onsager theory with the fractal geometry of the dissipative set, and Corollary 5.1 gives a concrete quantitative deviation from the Kolmogorov ζ_p = p/3 prediction. The paper also provides a clean modified energy identity with corollaries for both Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. The main limitation, namely that the geometric and intermittency conclusions require D to be a Radon measure, is openly acknowledged in the text rather than hidden, which is a definite strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Theorem 1.1, Proposition 1.4, Section 3] The statements cover p = ∞, but the proofs are written for finite p and repeatedly use exponents p/(p−2), p/(p−3), and the duality identity B^{-α}_{b,∞} = (B^α_{b',1})^* with b > 1. At p = ∞ these become 1, 1, and b = 1, respectively. The endpoint case appears to follow from the same estimates together with the standard embedding F^{s+ε}_{1,2} ⊂ B^s_{1,1}, but this is not written out. Since Theorem 1.1 is the paper's central claim and explicitly includes p = ∞, please add a short paragraph explaining the endpoint interpretation (or state that p = ∞ is obtained by a limiting argument with the relevant embeddings).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Proof of Theorem 1.1, Step 2] The sentence 'the identity (1.4) implies D ≡ 0 whenever σ > 1/3 (see for instance Corollary 4.1 below)' cites a corollary stated only for p = 3; for p > 3 the same conclusion follows from the estimates in Corollary 2.2, but the reference should be expanded or a parenthetical explanation added.
  2. [Section 5.5, Theorem 5.3] Theorem 5.3 is a numbered theorem whose proof is omitted with the note that the arguments are the same as for Euler. Since this is a nontrivial extension to passive scalars, please either provide a proof or explicitly label the statement as a sketch to be developed elsewhere.
  3. [Proposition 1.4, first estimate] The bound on ∥∂t(φ − φ ∗ ρδ)∥_{L^{p/(p−2)}} by a constant times δ∥φ∥_{W^{1,p/(p−3)}} uses an unstated Sobolev embedding when p = 3 (where L^{p/(p−2)} = L^3 and L^{p/(p−3)} = L^∞); this step should be spelled out for completeness.
  4. [Figure 1 and Section 5.2] The value γ = 3.85 is inferred by combining the DNS value dζ_p/dp|_{p=3} ≈ 0.3 with the assumption that the bound is saturated at p = 3; the text calls this 'reasonable', but the figure caption and surrounding discussion should make the heuristic status of this inference explicit so that it is not read as a rigorous measurement.
  5. [Throughout] There are a few typographical issues: 'weak solutions' in Corollary 1.2 should be singular, 'F ractal' in Section 2.4 has a stray space, and 'the preformed' in Section 5.5 should be 'we performed'. These are cosmetic and do not affect the mathematics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is a parameter-free derivation from the stated Besov and Radon-measure hypotheses, with the measure assumption's limited justification explicitly disclosed.

full rationale

The paper's central argument is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. Proposition 1.3 is an algebraic identity derived from the weak formulation and the Duchon–Robert energy balance; Proposition 1.4 estimates the mollified distribution purely from the resulting identity plus standard mollification and pressure estimates; and Step 1 of Theorem 1.1 converts those estimates into the negative Besov bound by a Littlewood–Paley splitting in which the scale δ is chosen as 2^{-k}. Steps 2 and 3 then use only the Besov regularity of D plus the explicitly assumed Radon-measure property to obtain the Hausdorff absolute-continuity and ball-growth conclusions. Corollary 1.2 is a direct contrapositive of Theorem 1.1(i). The known results recovered in Section 4 are derived again from the same identity rather than being used as inputs. The cited prior works, including self-citations [33,35], are either being generalized or are auxiliary estimates not equivalent to the main theorem. The only nontrivial hypothesis is that D is a real-valued Radon measure; the paper explicitly flags in Section 5.1 that the L^3 compactness needed to guarantee this in the vanishing-viscosity setting 'is in general not rigorously justified.' That is a stated limitation on applicability, not a circular step: the theorem remains a valid conditional result, and the unconditional Besov regularity part does not use the measure hypothesis at all. No fitted constants, no prediction forced by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain are present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof introduces no fitted constants and no new physical entities. It imports standard Besov calculus, a known pressure estimate, and the explicit measure assumption. The empirical gamma = 3.85 in Figure 1 is an external input for illustration, not a parameter of the theorem.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Weak solutions and the Duchon-Robert energy balance: (∂t|u|^2/2 + div((|u|^2/2+q)u) = −D).
    This is the definition of D in Eq (1.1); the entire paper studies this object.
  • domain assumption u in L^p_t B^sigma_{p,infty} for p in [3,∞] and sigma in (0,1).
    This is the regularity hypothesis of Theorem 1.1, used in Corollary 2.2 and Proposition 1.4.
  • standard math Pressure double regularity: ||q||_{L^{p/2}_t B^{2sigma}_{p/2,∞}} ≲ ||u||^2_{L^p_t B^sigma_{p,∞}}.
    Invoked as Eq (2.6) from [22,23,59]; needed to control Q_l and C_l. Not re-proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption D is a real-valued Radon measure for the geometric conclusions.
    Assumed in Theorem 1.1(i)-(ii) and Corollary 1.2; needed for the Hausdorff measure covering argument and to apply D to Lipschitz cutoffs.
  • standard math Subadditivity of fractional Sobolev norm under pointwise maxima [85, Lemma 2.8].
    Used in Step 2 of Theorem 1.1 to bound the norm of chi = max_i chi_i by the sum of individual norms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intermittency and Dissipation Regularity in Turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6FXGYFOU

@misc{pith2026250210032,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intermittency and Dissipation Regularity in Turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6FXGYFOU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10032}
}
read the original abstract

We lay down a geometric-analytic framework to capture properties of energy dissipation within weak solutions to the incompressible Euler equations. For solutions with spatial Besov regularity, it is proved that the Duchon-Robert distribution has optimal improved regularity in a negative Besov space and, in the case it is a Radon measure, it is absolutely continuous with respect to a suitable Hausdorff measure. This imposes quantitative constraints on the dimension of the, possibly fractal, dissipative set and the admissible structure functions exponents, relating to the phenomenon of ''intermittency'' in turbulence. As a by-product of the approach, we also recover many known ''Onsager singularity'' type results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10032 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structure function exponents for p ∈ [3, 6]. Blue dots are absolute structure function exponents measured from the JHU turbulence database. Red triangles are trans￾verse exponents reported in [63]. Dashed grey line corresponds to the Kolmogorov prediction of p 3 . Solid grey line corresponds to our bound ζ ∗ p with γ = 3.85 inferred from [63]. 5.3. Sharpness of the results & convex integration. Recent years have see… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Turbulent and intermittent phenomena in a universal total anomalous dissipator

    math.AP 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    An explicit incompressible flow on the 2-torus is constructed that simultaneously causes anomalous dissipation, Richardson dispersion, anomalous regularization, and spatial intermittency for every Hölder exponent below 1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [35]

    De Rosa and P

    L. De Rosa and P. Isett, Intermittency and lower dimensional dissipation in incompressible fluids , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 11, 37

    2024

  2. [33]

    De Rosa, T

    L. De Rosa, T. D. Drivas, and M. Inversi, On the support of anomalous dissipation measures , J. Math. Fluid Mech. 26 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 56, 24. 20

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Aluie and G

    H. Aluie and G. L. Eyink, Scale locality of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence , Physical review letters 104 (2010), no. 8, 081101

    2010

  4. [2]

    Anselmet, Y

    F. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E. J. Hopfinger, and R. A. Antonia, High-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 140 (1984), 63–89

    1984

  5. [3]

    Armstrong and V

    S. Armstrong and V. Vicol, Anomalous diffusion by fractal homogenization , Annals of PDE 11 (2025), no. 1, 2

    2025

  6. [4]

    Bardos, P

    C. Bardos, P. Gwiazda, A. ´Swierczewska-Gwiazda, E. S. Titi, and E. Wiedemann,Onsager’s conjecture in bounded domains for the conservation of entropy and other companion laws , Proceedings of the Royal Society A 475 (2019), no. 2230, 20190289

    2019

  7. [5]

    Barral and S

    J. Barral and S. Seuret, The Frisch-Parisi conjecture I: Prescribed multifractal behavior, and a partial solution , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 175 (2023), 76–108

    2023

  8. [6]

    , The Frisch-Parisi conjecture II: Besov spaces in multifractal environment, and a full solution , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 175 (2023), 281–329

    work page 2023

Show all 85 references
  1. [7]

    Bergh and J

    J. Bergh and J. L¨ ofstr¨ om,Interpolation spaces. An introduction, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. No. 223, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976

    1976

  2. [8]

    Bernard, K

    D. Bernard, K. Gawedzki, and A. Kupiainen, Anomalous scaling in the n-point functions of a passive scalar , Physical Review E 54 (1996), no. 3, 2564

    1996

  3. [9]

    Boffetta, A

    G. Boffetta, A. Mazzino, and A. Vulpiani, Twenty-five years of multifractals in fully developed turbulence: a tribute to Giovanni Paladin , J. Phys. A 41 (2008), no. 36, 363001, 25

    2008

  4. [10]

    Bru´ e, M

    E. Bru´ e, M. Colombo, G. Crippa, C. De Lellis, and M. Sorella, Onsager critical solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 23 (2024), no. 10, 1350–1366

    2024

  5. [11]

    Bru` e and C

    E. Bru` e and C. De Lellis, Anomalous dissipation for the forced 3D Navier-Stokes equations , Comm. Math. Phys. 400 (2023), no. 3, 1507–1533

    2023

  6. [12]

    Buckmaster, Onsager’s conjecture almost everywhere in time , Comm

    T. Buckmaster, Onsager’s conjecture almost everywhere in time , Comm. Math. Phys. 333 (2015), no. 3, 1175–1198

    2015

  7. [13]

    Buckmaster, C

    T. Buckmaster, C. De Lellis, P. Isett, and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi Jr., Anomalous dissipation for 1/5-H¨ older Euler flows, Ann. of Math. (2) 182 (2015), no. 1, 127–172

    2015

  8. [14]

    Buckmaster, C

    T. Buckmaster, C. De Lellis, L. Sz´ ekelyhidi Jr., and V. Vicol, Onsager’s conjecture for admissible weak solutions , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019), no. 2, 229–274

    2019

  9. [15]

    Buckmaster, N

    T. Buckmaster, N. Masmoudi, M. Novack, and V. Vicol, Intermittent convex integration for the 3D Euler equations, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 217, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, [2023] ©2023

    2023

  10. [16]

    Burczak, L

    J. Burczak, L. Sz´ ekelyhidi Jr., and B. Wu, Anomalous dissipation and Euler flows (2023). Prepring available at arXiv:2310.02934

    2023 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Caffarelli, R

    L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, and L. Nirenberg, Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (1982), no. 6, 771–831

    1982

  12. [18]

    Chen and J

    G.-Q. Chen and J. Glimm, Kolmogorov’s theory of turbulence and inviscid limit of the Navier-Stokes equations in R3, Comm. Math. Phys. 310 (2012), no. 1, 267–283

    2012

  13. [19]

    Cheskidov and R

    A. Cheskidov and R. Shvydkoy, Euler equations and turbulence: analytical approach to intermittency , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46 (2014), no. 1, 353–374

    2014

  14. [20]

    , Volumetric theory of intermittency in fully developed turbulence , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 247 (2023), no. 3, Paper No. 45, 35

    2023

  15. [21]

    Colombo, G

    M. Colombo, G. Crippa, and M. Sorella, Anomalous dissipation and lack of selection in the Obukhov–Corrsin theory of scalar turbulence, Annals of PDE 9 (2023), no. 2, 21

    2023

  16. [22]

    Colombo and L

    M. Colombo and L. De Rosa, Regularity in time of H¨ older solutions of Euler and hypodissipative Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020), no. 1, 221–238

    2020

  17. [23]

    Colombo, L

    M. Colombo, L. De Rosa, and L. Forcella, Regularity results for rough solutions of the incompressible Euler equations via interpolation methods, Nonlinearity 33 (2020), no. 9, 4818–4836

    2020

  18. [24]

    E, and E

    P Constantin, W. E, and E. S. Titi, Onsager’s conjecture on the energy conservation for solutions of Euler’s equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 165 (1994), no. 1, 207–209

    1994

  19. [25]

    Constantin and I

    P. Constantin and I. Procaccia, Scaling in fluid turbulence: a geometric theory , Physical Review E 47 (1993), no. 5, 3307

    1993

  20. [26]

    , The geometry of turbulent advection: sharp estimates for the dimensions of level sets , Nonlinearity 7 (1994), no. 3, 1045

    1994

  21. [27]

    Corrsin, On the spectrum of isotropic temperature fluctuations in an isotropic turbulence , Journal of Applied Physics 22 (1951), no

    S. Corrsin, On the spectrum of isotropic temperature fluctuations in an isotropic turbulence , Journal of Applied Physics 22 (1951), no. 4, 469–473

    1951

  22. [28]

    Crisanti, M

    A. Crisanti, M. H. Jensen, G. Paladin, and A. Vulpiani, Intermittency and predictability in a shell model for three- dimensional turbulence, 1994, pp. 239–251. Chaotic advection, tracer dynamics and turbulent dispersion (Gavi, 1993)

    1994

  23. [29]

    Daneri, E

    S. Daneri, E. Runa, and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi, Non-uniqueness for the Euler equations up to Onsager’s critical exponent , Ann. PDE 7 (2021), no. 1, Paper No. 8, 44

    2021

  24. [30]

    Daneri and L

    S. Daneri and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi Jr., Non-uniqueness and h-principle for H¨ older-continuous weak solutions of the Euler equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 224 (2017), no. 2, 471–514

    2017

  25. [31]

    De Lellis and H

    C. De Lellis and H. Kwon, On nonuniqueness of H¨ older continuous globally dissipative Euler flows, Anal. PDE 15 (2022), no. 8, 2003–2059

    2022

  26. [32]

    De Lellis and L

    C. De Lellis and L. Sz´ ekelyhidi Jr.,Dissipative continuous Euler flows , Invent. Math. 193 (2013), no. 2, 377–407

    2013

  27. [34]

    De Rosa and S

    L. De Rosa and S. Haffter, Dimension of the singular set of wild H¨ older solutions of the incompressible Euler equations , Nonlinearity 35 (2022), no. 10, 5150–5192

    2022

  28. [36]

    De Rosa and R

    L. De Rosa and R. Tione, Sharp energy regularity and typicality results for H¨ older solutions of incompressible Euler equations, Anal. PDE 15 (2022), no. 2, 405–428

    2022

  29. [37]

    D. A. Donzis, K. R. Sreenivasan, and P. K. Yeung, Scalar dissipation rate and dissipative anomaly in isotropic turbulence , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 532 (2005), 199–216

    2005

  30. [38]

    T. D. Drivas, Self-regularization in turbulence from the kolmogorov 4/5-law and alignment , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 380 (2022), no. 2226, 20210033

    2022

  31. [39]

    T. D. Drivas, T. M. Elgindi, G. Iyer, and I-J. Jeong, Anomalous dissipation in passive scalar transport , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 243 (2022), no. 3, 1151–1180

    2022

  32. [40]

    T. D. Drivas and G. L. Eyink, An Onsager singularity theorem for turbulent solutions of compressible Euler equations , Comm. Math. Phys. 359 (2018), 733–763

    2018

  33. [41]

    11, 4465–4482

    , An Onsager singularity theorem for Leray solutions of incompressible Navier-Stokes , Nonlinearity 32 (2019), no. 11, 4465–4482

    2019

  34. [42]

    T. D. Drivas and H. Q. Nguyen, Remarks on the emergence of weak euler solutions in the vanishing viscosity limit , Journal of Nonlinear Science 29 (2019), 709–721

    2019

  35. [43]

    Duchon and R

    J. Duchon and R. Robert, Inertial energy dissipation for weak solutions of incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equa- tions, Nonlinearity 13 (2000), no. 1, 249–255

    2000

  36. [44]

    T. M. Elgindi and K. Liss, Norm growth, non-uniqueness, and anomalous dissipation in passive scalars , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248 (2024), no. 6, 120

    2024

  37. [45]

    G. L. Eyink, Intermittency and anomalous scaling of passive scalars in any space dimension , Physical Review E 54 (1996), no. 2, 1497

    1996

  38. [46]

    , Local 4/5-law and energy dissipation anomaly in turbulence , Nonlinearity 16 (2002), no. 1, 137

    2002

  39. [47]

    Fluid Mech

    , Onsager’s ‘ideal turbulence’ theory , J. Fluid Mech. 988 (2024), Paper No. P1, 74

    2024

  40. [48]

    G. L. Eyink and H. Aluie, The breakdown of Alfv´ en ’s theorem in ideal plasma flows: Necessary conditions and physical conjectures, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 223 (2006), no. 1, 82–92

    2006

  41. [49]

    Frisch, From global scaling, ` a la Kolmogorov, to local multifractal scaling in fully developed turbulence, 1991, pp

    U. Frisch, From global scaling, ` a la Kolmogorov, to local multifractal scaling in fully developed turbulence, 1991, pp. 89–99. Turbulence and stochastic processes: Kolmogorov’s ideas 50 years on

    1991

  42. [50]

    The legacy of A

    , Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. The legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov

    1995

  43. [51]

    Frisch and G

    U. Frisch and G. Parisi, On the singularity structure of fully developed turbulence , Turbulence and Predictability of Geo- physical Flows and Climate Dynamics, (North-Holland, Amsterdam) (1985), 84–87

    1985

  44. [52]

    K. Gawedzki, Intermittency of passive advection , Advances in turbulence vii: Proceedings of the seventh european turbu- lence conference, held in saint-jean cap ferrat, france, 30 june–3 july, 1998, pp. 493–502

    1998

  45. [53]

    V. Giri, H. Kwon, and M. Novack, The L3-based strong Onsager theorem, Preprint available at arXiv:2305.18509 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    PDE 10 (2024), no

    , A wavelet-inspired L3-based convex integration framework for the Euler equations , Ann. PDE 10 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 19, 271

    2024

  47. [55]

    Elias Hess-Childs and Keefer Rowan, A universal total anomalous dissipator , arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18526 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Hopf, ¨Uber die Anfangswertaufgabe f¨ ur die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen, Math

    E. Hopf, ¨Uber die Anfangswertaufgabe f¨ ur die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen, Math. Nachr. 4 (1951), 213–231

    1951

  49. [57]

    Isett, A proof of Onsager’s conjecture , Ann

    P. Isett, A proof of Onsager’s conjecture , Ann. of Math. (2) 188 (2018), no. 3, 871–963

    2018

  50. [58]

    , Nonuniqueness and existence of continuous, globally dissipative Euler flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.244 (2022), no. 3, 1223–1309

    2022

  51. [59]

    , Regularity in time along the coarse scale flow for the incompressible Euler equations , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), no. 10, 6927–6987

    2023

  52. [60]

    PDE 17 (2024), no

    , On the endpoint regularity in Onsager’s conjecture , Anal. PDE 17 (2024), no. 6, 2123–2159

    2024

  53. [61]

    Isett and S-J Oh, On the kinetic energy profile of H¨ older continuous Euler flows , Ann

    P. Isett and S-J Oh, On the kinetic energy profile of H¨ older continuous Euler flows , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire34 (2017), no. 3, 711–730

    2017

  54. [62]

    K. P. Iyer, J. Schumacher, K. R. Sreenivasan, and P. K. Yeung, Steep cliffs and saturated exponents in three-dimensional scalar turbulence, Physical review letters 121 (2018), no. 26, 264501

    2018

  55. [63]

    K. P. Iyer, K. R. Sreenivasan, and P. K. Yeung, Scaling exponents saturate in three-dimensional isotropic turbulence , Physical Review Fluids 5 (2020), no. 5, 054605

    2020

  56. [64]

    Jaffard, On the Frisch-Parisi conjecture , J

    S. Jaffard, On the Frisch-Parisi conjecture , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 79 (2000), no. 6, 525–552

    2000

  57. [65]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynold’s numbers , C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.) 30 (1941), 301–305

    1941

  58. [66]

    Fluid Mech

    , A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number , J. Fluid Mech. 13 (1962), 82–85

    1962

  59. [67]

    Lanthaler, S

    S. Lanthaler, S. Mishra, and C. Par´ es-Pulido, On the conservation of energy in two-dimensional incompressible flows , Nonlinearity 34 (2021), no. 2, 1084–1135

    2021

  60. [68]

    Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace , Acta Math

    J. Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace , Acta Math. 63 (1934), no. 1, 193–248

    1934

  61. [69]

    Lunardi, Interpolation theory, Second, Appunti

    A. Lunardi, Interpolation theory, Second, Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Nuova Serie). [Lecture Notes. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (New Series)], Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2009

    2009

  62. [70]

    Maggi, Sets of finite perimeter and geometric variational problems , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol

    F. Maggi, Sets of finite perimeter and geometric variational problems , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 135, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. An introduction to geometric measure theory. 21

    2012

  63. [71]

    B. B. Mandelbrot, Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier, Journal of fluid Mechanics 62 (1974), no. 2, 331–358

    1974

  64. [72]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan, The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 224 (1991), 429–484

    1991

  65. [73]

    , The multifractal spectrum of the dissipation field in turbulent flows , Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements 2 (1987), 49–76

    1987

  66. [74]

    Novack, Scaling laws and exact results in turbulence , Nonlinearity 37 (2024), no

    M. Novack, Scaling laws and exact results in turbulence , Nonlinearity 37 (2024), no. 9, Paper No. 095002, 16

    2024

  67. [75]

    Novack and V

    M. Novack and V. Vicol, An intermittent Onsager theorem , Invent. Math. 233 (2023), no. 1, 223–323

    2023

  68. [76]

    A. M. Obukhov, Structure of the temperature field in a turbulent flow , Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr. Geofiz 13 (1949), no. 1, 58–69

    1949

  69. [77]

    Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento (9) 6 (1949), no

    L. Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento (9) 6 (1949), no. Supplemento, 2 (Convegno Internazionale di Meccanica Statistica), 279–287

    1949

  70. [78]

    Paladin and A

    G. Paladin and A. Vulpiani, Anomalous scaling laws in multifractal objects , Phys. Rep. 156 (1987), no. 4, 147–225

    1987

  71. [79]

    Z.-S. She, E. Aurell, and U. Frisch, The inviscid Burgers equation with initial data of Brownian type , Comm. Math. Phys. 148 (1992), no. 3, 623–641

    1992

  72. [80]

    Shinbrot, The energy equation for the Navier-Stokes system , SIAM J

    M. Shinbrot, The energy equation for the Navier-Stokes system , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 5 (1974), 948–954

    1974

  73. [81]

    Siggia, Numerical study of small-scale intermittency in three-dimensional turbulence

    E. Siggia, Numerical study of small-scale intermittency in three-dimensional turbulence. , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 107 (1982), 375–406

    1982

  74. [82]

    Sorella and C

    M. Sorella and C. J. Johansson, Nontrivial absolutely continuous part of anomalous dissipation measures in time (2023). Preprint available at arXiv:2303.09486

    2023

  75. [83]

    K. R. Sreenivasan, Turbulent mixing: A perspective, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (2019), no. 37, 18175–18183

    2019

  76. [84]

    K. R. Sreenivasan and C. Meneveau, Singularities of the equations of fluid motion , Physical Review A 38 (1988), no. 12

    1988

  77. [85]

    Warma, The fractional relative capacity and the fractional Laplacian with Neumann and Robin boundary conditions on open sets , Potential Anal

    M. Warma, The fractional relative capacity and the fractional Laplacian with Neumann and Robin boundary conditions on open sets , Potential Anal. 42 (2015), no. 2, 499–547. (L. De Rosa) Gran Sasso Science Institute, viale Francesco Crispi, 7, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy Email addres...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.