Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 76 references

Time-resolved Coulomb explosion imaging of vibrational wave packets in alkali dimers on helium nanodroplets

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A delayed femtosecond probe that Coulomb-explodes alkali dimers on helium nanodroplets maps a vibrational wave packet's bond-length distribution over time, for K2 across more than 180 vibrational periods.

desk verdict First time-resolved CEI of vibrational wave packets on He droplets is a real advance, but the ~260 ps amplitude decay time is off by a factor of two because it is fit to spectral power, not amplitude. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12885 v2 pith:6FYAZRJQ submitted 2024-11-19 physics.atm-clus

Nicolaj K. Jyde , Henrik H. Kristensen , Lorenz Kranabetter , Jeppe K. Christensen , Emil Hansen , Mads B. Carlsen , Henrik Stapelfeldt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atm-clus
keywords time-resolvedCoulombexplosionimagingvibrationalwavepacketalkalidimersheliumnanodropletsdynamicStarkeffectstimulatedRamanscatteringvelocitymapdecoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Vibrational wave packets in the lowest triplet state of potassium and rubidium dimers, sitting on helium nanodroplets, are created by a non-resonant femtosecond pump pulse and then imaged by a delayed 50-fs probe that doubly ionizes the dimer and sends the two alkali ions flying apart. The paper's central claim is that the measured kinetic-energy distribution of the fragment ions can be converted, at each delay, into the time-dependent internuclear distance distribution P(R,t), which represents the squared wave packet within experimental accuracy. The resulting P(R,t) oscillates with the vibrational period for the full observation window, and for K2 the oscillation survives more than 180 periods while its amplitude decays from 0.035 Å to 0.020 Å on a ~260 ps timescale, attributed to weak coupling to the droplet. This matters because it turns Coulomb explosion imaging into a structural movie of vibrational motion on a helium droplet, going beyond earlier work that only recorded time-dependent ionization yields.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Coulomb explosion imaging relation Ekin = 7.2 eV / R (R in Å), which gives a one-to-one mapping between the kinetic energy of each Ak+ fragment and the internuclear distance at the instant of double ionization. Combined with the Jacobian transformation from P(Ekin) to P(R), it turns velocity-map images recorded at many pump–probe delays into the time-dependent distribution P(R,t). The wave-packet creation is described by the dynamic Stark effect, where the pump pulse transiently deepens and shifts the 13Sigma+u potential through the polarizability interaction, launching the coherent superposition of v=0 and v=1 states.

What would settle it

Compute the $K2^{2}$+ and $Rb2^{2}$+ potential curves with a correlated electronic-structure method over the R range 3.5–7 Å: if the potential deviates from the 1/R Coulomb form by more than the VMI energy resolution at any R, the one-to-one mapping in Eq. (1) fails for that portion of P(R,t). Or, in a separate experiment, image the same K2 wave packet with a probe that does not Stark-shift the neutral potential, such as femtosecond electron diffraction; agreement would confirm that P(R,t) is the field-free |Ψ(R,t)|^2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper demonstrates that timed Coulomb explosion imaging can recover the time-dependent internuclear separation distribution of a vibrational wave packet in K2 and Rb2 on helium nanodroplets. The pump pulse creates a coherent superposition dominated by the v=0 and v=1 vibrational states of the 13Sigma+u state; the probe pulse doubly ionizes the dimer, and Eq. (1), Ekin = 7.2 eV / R, converts each fragment kinetic energy into the bond length at the moment of explosion. Fourier analysis of the mean bond length <R>(t) yields the v=0–1 beat frequency, 611.7 GHz for K2 and 396.8 GHz for Rb2, consistent with calculated nu_1,0 for the free dimers. For K2 the oscillations persist for 300 ps with a gradually decreasing amplitude, and a sliding-window spectral analysis gives a decay time of 260 ± 30 ps, which the paper ascribes to vibrational relaxation caused by the nearby droplet.

Load-bearing premise

The entire kinetic-energy-to-bond-length mapping assumes the exploding dication feels a pure Coulomb repulsion and that the 50-fs probe does not distort the neutral molecule's potential, yet the paper itself invokes probe-induced distortion to explain the early oscillations in <R>(t).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method provides direct structural information—bond-length distributions—rather than only time-dependent ionization yields, so it can show how the shape of the wave packet evolves, not just when it returns to the Franck–Condon region.
  • For K2, the ~260 ps decay of the oscillation amplitude, attributed to weak coupling with the helium droplet, implies the droplet acts as a relaxation bath for the vibrating triplet-state dimers.
  • The same Coulomb explosion approach is expected to work for the other homonuclear alkali dimers (Li2, Na2, Cs2) and for heteronuclear alkali dimers, including in the singlet ground state with shorter pump pulses.
  • The dominant v=0–1 coherence produces cosine-like <R>(t) oscillations, with the weaker v=1–2 contribution visible as a small satellite peak in the power spectrum, matching dynamic Stark effect simulations.
  • The early transient modulation of <R>(t) is explained as a probe-induced distortion of the neutral potential that scales with the degree of alignment, meaning the probe is not completely passive while it images.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper does not make: if the probe-induced distortion is modeled quantitatively, the early transient in <R>(t) should be removable, yielding a cleaner field-free P(R,t).
  • Because P(R,t) contains full shape information, dephasing and revival of the wave packet should be visible as broadening and re-narrowing of the R-distribution, not just as amplitude decay of the mean.
  • The same Coulomb explosion protocol applied to a dimer cation such as K2+ would image vibrational relaxation directly, expected to be much faster because the charged dimer couples more strongly to the helium droplet.
  • The droplet-coupling interpretation predicts that the 260 ps decay time should vary with droplet size and temperature; scanning those parameters would test whether the mechanism is vibrational relaxation rather than pure dephasing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved Coulomb explosion imaging of vibrational wave packets in K2 and Rb2 in their lowest triplet state on helium nanodroplets. A nonresonant pump pulse creates a coherent superposition of v=0 and v=1 (with a small v=2 contribution) via the dynamic Stark effect, and a delayed intense probe pulse doubly ionizes the dimer; the kinetic energy of the fragment ions is converted to an internuclear distance distribution P(R,t) using a Coulomb repulsion law. The authors observe oscillatory P(R,t) and ⟨R⟩(t) for 300 ps (K2) and 100 ps (Rb2), identify the main oscillation frequencies as the v=0–1 vibrational coherences, compare them with independent calculations, and reproduce the early dynamics with a one-dimensional Schrödinger-equation simulation based on literature potentials and polarizabilities. They also report a gradual decrease of the K2 oscillation amplitude and extract a decay time τ=260±30 ps from a sliding-window Fourier transform, attributing the decay to coupling with the helium droplet.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a direct, time-resolved structural measurement of vibrational wave packets in molecules on helium nanodroplets, going beyond previous yield-based probes and extending Coulomb explosion imaging to a new class of weakly bound, droplet-embedded systems. The strength of the paper lies in the direct comparison of measured beat frequencies with independently calculated vibrational level spacings, and in the use of a dynamic Stark simulation with no fitted parameters aimed at reproducing the measured dynamics. The observed agreement with the simulated ⟨R⟩(t) and the matching of the main spectral peak at 611.7 GHz versus the calculated 611.8 GHz (K2) and 396.8 GHz versus 398.3/396.1 GHz (Rb2) are convincing evidence that the observed oscillations are the anticipated v=0–1 vibrational wave packets. The main quantitative weakness is the treatment of the decay time of the oscillation amplitude, which is computed from the decay of spectral power rather than amplitude.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. V.D, Fig. 8(b) and Abstract/Conclusion] The extracted decay constant is inconsistent with its interpretation. The sliding Fourier transform yields power spectra |SFT(t_i,ν)|², and the fit in Fig. 8(b) is to the spectral power; an exponential amplitude decay exp(−t/τ_amp) produces a power decay exp(−2t/τ_amp). Therefore the fit result τ=260±30 ps is the power decay time, implying an amplitude lifetime of about 520 ps. This is directly contradicted by the reported amplitude values: with τ_amp=260 ps, an initial amplitude of 0.035 Å would fall to 0.011 Å after 300 ps, whereas the measured value is 0.020 Å; with τ_amp≈520 ps the expected endpoint is 0.020 Å. The statements in the abstract ('decay time of the amplitude is ~260 ps'), in Sec. V.D, and in the conclusion ('on a time scale of ~0.3 ns') therefore misstate the central long-term quantitative result, and the comparison with the 0.3 ns lifetime of Grüner et al. (Ref. 35) as well as the attribution to droplet-induced vibrational relaxation rest on the wrong time constant. The authors should redo the analysis and correct all statements that quote the 260 ps value as an amplitude decay time.
  2. [Sec. V.C and Sec. II (Eq. 1)] The paper's own explanation of the early transient modulation of ⟨R⟩(t) as a probe-induced distortion of the neutral 1³Σu⁺ potential, dependent on molecular alignment via Eq. (2), means that the measured P(R,t) is not strictly the field-free wave packet probability |Ψ(R,t)|². If this probe distortion is appreciable at other delays, the central imaging claim in the abstract ('P(R,t) ... represents the modulus square of the wave packet within the accuracy of the experiment') needs qualification. The authors should either estimate the size of the probe-induced potential distortion (and hence the systematic shift in R at the moment of ionization) or explicitly restrict the claim of mapping the field-free wave packet to the delays where the distortion is negligible, and state the resulting uncertainty in P(R,t).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V.D, Fig. 8 caption] The caption of Fig. 8(b) says 'Exponential fit used to determine the decay time τ of the oscillation amplitude', but the fit is performed on spectral power; the caption and text should state that the fit is to the power and clarify the relation between the power decay time and the amplitude decay time.
  2. [Sec. V.C, last paragraph] The phrase 'the v = 1–2 correspondence' in the comparison of the simulated and measured spectra should read 'the v = 1–2 coherence' or 'the v = 1–2 transition'.
  3. [Sec. V.A and Sec. II] The conversion from ion velocity to kinetic energy uses a calibration constant k chosen to match previous works; the resulting systematic uncertainty in the absolute R scale is not propagated into the reported ⟨R⟩ values and should be stated.
  4. [Sec. V.B, Fig. 5] The figure caption and text state that the vertical red line indicates ⟨R⟩(t), but the main text refers to the black dotted line as ⟨R⟩; the consistent notation used in the text should be reflected in the figure for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured wave-packet frequencies, amplitudes, and decay are validated against independent literature potentials and external prior data; the only calibration is a fixed Ekin–R conversion scale that does not drive the dynamical claims.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. P(Ekin) is measured directly; P(R,t) is obtained by a standard Jacobian transformation using Eq. (1), Ekin = 7.2 eV/R. The Coulomb form of the dication potential is justified by an independent CCSD(T) calculation (footnote 48), not by the target dynamics. The constant k in the velocity-to-energy conversion is calibrated to previous static measurements (Refs. 38,49), but this only anchors the absolute R scale; the time-dependent oscillation frequencies and their decay are extracted from the delay dependence and are not fitted outputs. The observed 611.7 GHz and 396.8 GHz peaks are compared with ν1,0 computed from literature potentials (Refs. 40,59), providing an independent benchmark. The DSE simulation uses literature polarizabilities and potentials with no parameters adjusted to reproduce the measured ⟨R⟩(t); its agreement is a genuine test. The lifetime comparison to Grüner et al. (Ref. 35) is external. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. Two caveats are noted but are not circularity: (i) Sec. V.C acknowledges probe-induced distortion of the neutral potential, which weakens the field-free interpretation of P(R,t) but is an experimental limitation, not a circular step; (ii) the abstract's 'decay time of the amplitude ~260 ps' appears to conflate the SFT spectral-power decay time with the amplitude decay time (Sec. V.D fits exp(−t/τ) to |SFT|², so the amplitude lifetime would be ~2τ ≈ 520 ps). This is a quantitative interpretation error, not a circular dependence, and does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement is direct and based on standard quantum mechanics and atomic physics. The main assumptions are the Coulombic dication potential, the cold initial vibrational state of the dimers, and the interpretative ascriptions of the probe-induced transient and the droplet-induced decay. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • k (velocity-to-energy calibration constant) = not stated numerically
    In E_kin(r) = k r^2, k is chosen so that the K2 ground-state distribution matches previous works (Refs. 38,49), anchoring the absolute R scale.
  • tau (coherence decay time) = 260 ± 30 ps
    Fitted exponential decay of the sliding Fourier transform spectral power at ~612 GHz for K2. This is the power decay time; the amplitude decay time would be roughly twice this value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The dication potential of K2 and Rb2 is well approximated by a pure Coulomb repulsion for R ≥ 4.5 Å.
    Used in Eq. 1 to convert E_kin to R. Justified by a CCSD(T) calculation cited in Ref. 48, which shows V_QC(R) essentially identical to V_Coul in the relevant range.
  • domain assumption Alkali dimers on helium droplets equilibrate to 0.37 K with only v=0 populated in the triplet state.
    Sec. II states this based on Ref. 39 and prior work. It ensures the initial state is a single vibrational level, a precondition for the wave packet analysis.
  • domain assumption The dynamic Stark effect model (Eqs. 2-3) with literature potentials and polarizabilities describes the wave packet creation.
    Sec. III uses V0(R) and alpha_parallel(R) from Refs. 40,59. The simulation is compared qualitatively with the experiment and no fitted parameters are introduced to force agreement.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed transient modulation of ⟨R⟩(t) is caused by a probe-induced distortion of the neutral potential that depends on molecular alignment.
    Sec. V.C proposes this explanation for the early-time modulation. It is plausible given the correlation with ⟨cos^2 theta_2D⟩(t), but it is not independently verified and is not corrected for in the main P(R,t) data.
  • ad hoc to paper The 260 ps decay is caused by vibrational relaxation due to coupling to the helium droplet.
    Sec. V.D attributes the decay to droplet coupling by analogy with Ref. 35, but the authors explicitly state that pure dephasing cannot be excluded and no dissipative simulation is performed in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-resolved Coulomb explosion imaging of vibrational wave packets in alkali dimers on helium nanodroplets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6FYAZRJQ

@misc{pith2026241112885,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-resolved Coulomb explosion imaging of vibrational wave packets in alkali dimers on helium nanodroplets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6FYAZRJQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12885}
}
abstract

Vibrational wave packets are created in the lowest triplet state \triplet of $\mathrm{K_2}$ and $\mathrm{Rb_2}$ residing on the surface of helium nanodroplets, through non-resonant stimulated impulsive Raman scattering induced by a moderately intense near-infrared laser pulse. A delayed, intense 50-fs laser pulse doubly ionizes the alkali dimers via multiphoton absorption and thereby causes them to Coulomb explode into a pair of alkali ions $\mathrm{Ak^+}$. From the kinetic energy distribution $P(E_\mathrm{kin})$ of the $\mathrm{Ak^+}$ fragment ions, measured at a large number of delays, we determine the time-dependent internuclear distribution $P(R,t)$, which represents the modulus square of the wave packet within the accuracy of the experiment. For both $\mathrm{K_2}$ and $\mathrm{Rb_2}$, $P(R,t)$ exhibits a periodic oscillatory structure throughout the respective 300 ps and 100 ps observation times. The oscillatory structure is reflected in the time-dependent mean value of $R$, $\langle R \rangle(t)$. Fourier transformation of $\langle R \rangle(t)$ shows that the wave packets are composed mainly of the vibrational ground state and the first excited vibrational state, in agreement with numerical simulations. In the case of $\mathrm{K_2}$, the oscillations are observed for 300 ps corresponding to more than 180 vibrational periods with an amplitude that decreases gradually from 0.035 {\AA} to 0.020 {\AA}. Using time-resolved spectral analysis, we find that the decay time of the amplitude is $\sim$ 260 ps. The decrease is ascribed to the weak coupling between the vibrating dimers and the droplet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12885 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Energy diagram showing the potential curve for K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a1)-(a6) Calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Two-dimensional velocity image of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a)–(f) Experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The experimental time-dependent distribution of in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a1) and (c1) redisplay ⟨R⟩(t) for K2 and Rb2 with a significantly expanded y-scale to make the oscilla￾tions more visible. The two ⟨R⟩(t) traces are Fourier transformed to analyze their spectral content. Each power spectrum, displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Spectrogram obtained from sliding Fourier trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author R. M. \ Bowman , author M. Dantus , \ and\ author A. H. \ Zewail ,\ 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85088-2 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 161 ,\ pages 297 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(89)85088-2 1989

  2. [2]

    Baumert , author M

    author author T. Baumert , author M. Grosser , author R. Thalweiser , \ and\ author G. Gerber ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3753 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 67 ,\ pages 3753 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.3753 1991

  3. [3]

    Fischer , author D

    author author I. Fischer , author D. M. \ Villeneuve , author M. J. J. \ Vrakking , \ and\ author A. Stolow ,\ 10.1063/1.469285 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 5566 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.469285 1995

  4. [4]

    COSMA: Communication-aware Optimization of Fermionic Simulation Kernels for Modular Quantum Architectures

    author author K. Ohmori ,\ 10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093818 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 487 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Brif , author R

    author author C. Brif , author R. Chakrabarti , \ and\ author H. Rabitz ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075008 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 075008 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075008 2010

  6. [6]

    Brinks , author F

    author author D. Brinks , author F. D. \ Stefani , author F. Kulzer , author R. Hildner , author T. H. \ Taminiau , author Y. Avlasevich , author K. Müllen , \ and\ author N. F. \ van Hulst ,\ 10.1038/nature09110 journal journal Nature \ volume 465 ,\ pages 905 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09110

  7. [7]

    Christensen , author J

    author author L. Christensen , author J. H. \ Nielsen , author C. B. \ Brandt , author C. B. \ Madsen , author L. B. \ Madsen , author C. S. \ Slater , author A. Lauer , author M. Brouard , author M. P. \ Johansson , author B. Shepperson , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.073005 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.073005

  8. [8]

    author author M. P. \ Minitti , author J. M. \ Budarz , author A. Kirrander , author J. S. \ Robinson , author D. Ratner , author T. J. \ Lane , author D. Zhu , author J. M. \ Glownia , author M. Kozina , author H. T. \ Lemke , author M. Sikorski , author Y. Feng , author S. Nelson , author K. Saita , author B. Stankus , author T. Northey , author J. B. \...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.255501

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Glownia , author A

    author author J. Glownia , author A. Natan , author J. Cryan , author R. Hartsock , author M. Kozina , author M. Minitti , author S. Nelson , author J. Robinson , author T. Sato , author T. van Driel , author G. Welch , author C. Weninger , author D. Zhu , \ and\ author P. Buc...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Chergui \ and\ author E

    author author M. Chergui \ and\ author E. Collet ,\ 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00831 journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 11025 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Haldrup , author G

    author author K. Haldrup , author G. Levi , author E. Biasin , author P. Vester , author M. G. \ Laursen , author F. Beyer , author K. S. \ Kjær , author T. Brandt van Driel , author T. Harlang , author A. O. \ Dohn , author R. J. \ Hartsock , author S. Nelson , author J. M. \...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Ihee , author V

    author author H. Ihee , author V. A. \ Lobastov , author U. M. \ Gomez , author B. M. \ Goodson , author R. Srinivasan , author C.-Y. \ Ruan , \ and\ author A. H. \ Zewail ,\ 10.1126/science.291.5503.458 journal journal Science \ volume 291 ,\ pages 458 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    Yang , author M

    author author J. Yang , author M. Guehr , author X. Shen , author R. Li , author T. Vecchione , author R. Coffee , author J. Corbett , author A. Fry , author N. Hartmann , author C. Hast , author K. Hegazy , author K. Jobe , author I. Makasyuk , author J. Robinson , author M. ...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Yang , author X

    author author J. Yang , author X. Zhu , author T. J. A. \ Wolf , author Z. Li , author J. P. F. \ Nunes , author R. Coffee , author J. P. \ Cryan , author M. G \"u hr , author K. Hegazy , author T. F. \ Heinz , author K. Jobe , author R. Li , author X. Shen , author T. Veccion...

    doi

  7. [15]

    o ter , author J. Ullrich , author T. Pfeifer , author R. Moshammer , author S. Gr \

    author author B. Wolter , author M. G. \ Pullen , author A.-T. \ Le , author M. Baudisch , author K. Doblhoff-Dier , author A. Senftleben , author M. Hemmer , author C. D. \ Schr \"o ter , author J. Ullrich , author T. Pfeifer , author R. Moshammer , author S. Gr \"a fe , auth...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author U. D. \ Giovannini , author J. Küpper , \ and\ author A. Trabattoni ,\ 10.1088/1361-6455/acb872 journal journal J. Phys. B \ volume 56 ,\ pages 054002 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Stapelfeldt , author E

    author author H. Stapelfeldt , author E. Constant , author H. Sakai , \ and\ author P. B. \ Corkum ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.426 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 58 ,\ pages 426 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  10. [18]

    author author D. E. \ Folmer , author L. Poth , author E. S. \ Wisniewski , \ and\ author A. W. \ Castleman ,\ 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00138-9 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 287 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  11. [19]

    Chelkowski \ and\ author A

    author author S. Chelkowski \ and\ author A. D. \ Bandrauk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.023403 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 65 ,\ pages 023403 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  12. [20]

    Légaré , author K

    author author F. Légaré , author K. F. \ Lee , author A. D. \ Bandrauk , author D. M. \ Villeneuve , \ and\ author P. B. \ Corkum ,\ 10.1088/0953-4075/39/13/S23 journal journal J. Phys. B \ volume 39 ,\ pages S503 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author I. A. \ Bocharova , author A. S. \ Alnaser , author U. Thumm , author T. Niederhausen , author D. Ray , author C. L. \ Cocke , \ and\ author I. V. \ Litvinyuk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.013417 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 83 ,\ pages 013417 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Rupprecht , author L

    author author P. Rupprecht , author L. Aufleger , author S. Heinze , author A. Magunia , author T. Ding , author M. Rebholz , author S. Amberg , author N. Mollov , author F. Henrich , author M. W. \ Haverkort , author C. Ott , \ and\ author T. Pfeifer ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.0...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Rudenko , author T

    author author A. Rudenko , author T. Ergler , author B. Feuerstein , author K. Zrost , author C. Schröter , author R. Moshammer , \ and\ author J. Ullrich ,\ 10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.06.038 journal journal Chem. Phys. \ volume 329 ,\ pages 193 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  16. [24]

    Ergler , author A

    author author T. Ergler , author A. Rudenko , author B. Feuerstein , author K. Zrost , author C. D. \ Schr \"o ter , author R. Moshammer , \ and\ author J. Ullrich ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.193001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 193001 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    Stapelfeldt , author E

    author author H. Stapelfeldt , author E. Constant , \ and\ author P. B. \ Corkum ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3780 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 3780 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  18. [26]

    Malakar , author W

    author author Y. Malakar , author W. L. \ Pearson , author M. Zohrabi , author B. Kaderiya , author K. R. \ P , author F. Ziaee , author S. Xue , author A. T. \ Le , author I. Ben-Itzhak , author D. Rolles , \ and\ author A. Rudenko ,\ 10.1039/C8CP07032F journal journal Phys. ...

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author C. B. \ Madsen , author L. B. \ Madsen , author S. S. \ Viftrup , author M. P. \ Johansson , author T. B. \ Poulsen , author L. Holmegaard , author V. Kumarappan , author K. A. \ J rgensen , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073007 journal j...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author J. L. \ Hansen , author J. H. \ Nielsen , author C. B. \ Madsen , author A. T. \ Lindhardt , author M. P. \ Johansson , author T. Skrydstrup , author L. B. \ Madsen , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1063/1.4719816 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 136 ,\...

    doi

  21. [29]

    \ Zou , author M

    author author Y.-Q. \ Zou , author M. Berngruber , author V. S. \ Anasuri , author N. Zuber , author F. Meinert , author R. Löw , \ and\ author T. Pfau ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.023002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 023002 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    Baumert , author V

    author author T. Baumert , author V. Engel , author C. Röttgermann , author W. Strunz , \ and\ author G. Gerber ,\ 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85602-7 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 191 ,\ pages 639 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  23. [31]

    Claas , author G

    author author P. Claas , author G. Droppelmann , author C. P. \ Schulz , author M. Mudrich , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ 10.1088/0953-4075/39/19/S23 journal journal J. Phys. B \ volume 39 ,\ pages S1151 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    Claas , author G

    author author P. Claas , author G. Droppelmann , author C. P. \ Schulz , author M. Mudrich , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ 10.1021/jp070893i journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 111 ,\ pages 7537 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  25. [33]

    Mudrich , author P

    author author M. Mudrich , author P. Heister , author T. Hippler , author C. Giese , author O. Dulieu , \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.042512 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 80 ,\ pages 042512 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    Schlesinger , author M

    author author M. Schlesinger , author M. Mudrich , author F. Stienkemeier , \ and\ author W. T. \ Strunz ,\ 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.03.060 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 490 ,\ pages 245 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    Grüner , author M

    author author B. Grüner , author M. Schlesinger , author P. Heister , author W. T. \ Strunz , author F. Stienkemeier , \ and\ author M. Mudrich ,\ 10.1039/c0cp02355h journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 6816 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  28. [36]

    Higgins , author C

    author author J. Higgins , author C. Callegari , author J. Reho , author F. Stienkemeier , author W. E. \ Ernst , author M. Gutowski , \ and\ author G. Scoles ,\ 10.1021/jp981115g journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 102 ,\ pages 4952 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    B \"u nermann \ and\ author F

    author author O. B \"u nermann \ and\ author F. Stienkemeier ,\ 10.1140/epjd/e2011-10466-0 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. D \ volume 61 ,\ pages 645 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    author author H. H. \ Kristensen , author L. Kranabetter , author C. A. \ Schouder , author C. Stapper , author J. Arlt , author M. Mudrich , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.093201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 093201 ( year 202...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Aub \"o ck , author J

    author author G. Aub \"o ck , author J. Nagl , author C. Callegari , \ and\ author W. E. \ Ernst ,\ 10.1021/jp070891y journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 111 ,\ pages 7404 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    author author J. B. \ Bauer \ and\ author J. P. \ Toennies ,\ 10.1063/1.5083116 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 150 ,\ pages 144310 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  33. [41]

    author author H. H. \ Kristensen , author L. Kranabetter , author A. Ghazaryan , author C. A. \ Schouder , author F. Jensen , author R. E. \ Zillich , author M. Lemeshko , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ @noop journal journal To be submitted \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  34. [42]

    Magnier , author M

    author author S. Magnier , author M. Aubert-Fr \'e con , \ and\ author A. R. \ Allouche ,\ 10.1063/1.1764498 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 1771 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  35. [43]

    \ Allouche \ and\ author M

    author author A.-R. \ Allouche \ and\ author M. Aubert-Fr \'e con ,\ 10.1063/1.3694014 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 136 ,\ pages 114302 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    Ruhman , author A

    author author S. Ruhman , author A. Joly , \ and\ author K. Nelson ,\ 10.1109/3.146 journal journal IEEE J. Quantum Electron \ volume 24 ,\ pages 460 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988 doi

  37. [45]

    author author E. F. \ Thomas \ and\ author N. E. \ Henriksen ,\ 10.1063/1.4954663 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 144 ,\ pages 244307 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    \ Shu , author E

    author author C.-C. \ Shu , author E. F. \ Thomas , \ and\ author N. E. \ Henriksen ,\ 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.03.006 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 683 ,\ pages 234 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    ^ 39 K^ 41 K , the ^ 39 K+ and ^ 41 K+ ions acquire energy according to momentum conservation NoStop

    note If K2 is a heterodimer, e.g. ^ 39 K^ 41 K , the ^ 39 K+ and ^ 41 K+ ions acquire energy according to momentum conservation NoStop

  40. [48]

    The result, shown as V_ QC (R) in Fig

    note For instance, the K2^ 2+ potential curve was recently calculated at the CCSD(T) level of theory. The result, shown as V_ QC (R) in Fig. 1, is essentially identical to V_ Coul for R 4.5 A. Stop

  41. [49]

    author author H. H. \ Kristensen , author L. Kranabetter , author C. A. \ Schouder , author J. Arlt , author F. Jensen , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.023104 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 107 ,\ pages 023104 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  42. [50]

    author author S. H. \ Albrechtsen , author J. K. \ Christensen , author R. M. P. \ Tanyag , author H. H. \ Kristensen , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.109.043112 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 109 ,\ pages 043112 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    Kranabetter , author H

    author author L. Kranabetter , author H. H. \ Kristensen , author C. A. \ Schouder , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1063/5.0200389 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 160 ,\ pages 131101 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    Townsend , author B

    author author D. Townsend , author B. J. \ Sussman , \ and\ author A. Stolow ,\ 10.1021/jp109095d journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 115 ,\ pages 357 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  45. [53]

    author author B. J. \ Sussman , author J. G. \ Underwood , author R. Lausten , author M. Y. \ Ivanov , \ and\ author A. Stolow ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.053403 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 73 ,\ pages 053403 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  46. [54]

    Stapelfeldt \ and\ author T

    author author H. Stapelfeldt \ and\ author T. Seideman ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.543 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 75 ,\ pages 543 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  47. [55]

    Ohshima \ and\ author H

    author author Y. Ohshima \ and\ author H. Hasegawa ,\ 10.1080/0144235X.2010.511769 journal journal Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 29 ,\ pages 619 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  48. [56]

    Fleischer , author Y

    author author S. Fleischer , author Y. Khodorkovsky , author E. Gershnabel , author Y. Prior , \ and\ author I. S. \ Averbukh ,\ 10.1002/ijch.201100161 journal journal Isr. J. Chem. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 414 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  49. [57]

    author author C. P. \ Koch , author M. Lemeshko , \ and\ author D. Sugny ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035005 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 035005 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    author author J. A. \ Fleck , author J. R. \ Morris , \ and\ author M. D. \ Feit ,\ 10.1007/BF00896333 journal journal Appl. Phys \ volume 10 ,\ pages 129 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

  51. [59]

    Deiglmayr , author M

    author author J. Deiglmayr , author M. Aymar , author R. Wester , author M. Weidem \"u ller , \ and\ author O. Dulieu ,\ 10.1063/1.2960624 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 129 ,\ pages 064309 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  52. [60]

    author author J. P. \ Toennies \ and\ author A. F. \ Vilesov ,\ 10.1002/anie.200300611 journal journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 2622 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  53. [61]

    Stienkemeier , author J

    author author F. Stienkemeier , author J. Higgins , author W. E. \ Ernst , \ and\ author G. Scoles ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3592 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 3592 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  54. [62]

    author author F. R. \ Br \"u hl , author R. A. \ Miron , \ and\ author W. E. \ Ernst ,\ 10.1063/1.1418747 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 10275 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  55. [63]

    u nermann , author F. Stienkemeier , author O. Dulieu , \ and\ author M. Weidem \

    author author M. Mudrich , author O. B \"u nermann , author F. Stienkemeier , author O. Dulieu , \ and\ author M. Weidem \"u ller ,\ 10.1140/epjd/e2004-00139-6 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. D \ volume 31 ,\ pages 291 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    doi

  56. [64]

    Lackner , author J

    author author F. Lackner , author J. Poms , author G. Krois , author J. V. \ Pototschnig , \ and\ author W. E. \ Ernst ,\ 10.1021/jp4030238 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 117 ,\ pages 11866 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  57. [65]

    author author D. W. \ Chandler \ and\ author P. L. \ Houston ,\ 10.1063/1.453276 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 1445 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  58. [66]

    author author A. T. J. B. \ Eppink \ and\ author D. H. \ Parker ,\ 10.1063/1.1148310 journal journal Rev. Sci. Instrum. \ volume 68 ,\ pages 3477 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  59. [67]

    author author C. A. \ Schouder , author A. S. \ Chatterley , author L. B. \ Madsen , author F. Jensen , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.063125 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 102 ,\ pages 063125 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  60. [68]

    author author A. S. \ Chatterley , author M. O. \ Baatrup , author C. A. \ Schouder , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1039/C9CP06260B journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 3245 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    author author G. M. \ Roberts , author J. L. \ Nixon , author J. Lecointre , author E. Wrede , \ and\ author J. R. R. \ Verlet ,\ 10.1063/1.3126527 journal journal Rev. Sci. Instrum. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 053104 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  62. [70]

    note We found the vibrational energy levels by solving the stationary vibrational Schrodinger equation based on the internuclear potentials given in bauer_accurate_2019 . Stop

  63. [71]

    Kranabetter , author H

    author author L. Kranabetter , author H. H. \ Kristensen , author A. Ghazaryan , author C. A. \ Schouder , author A. S. \ Chatterley , author P. Janssen , author F. Jensen , author R. E. \ Zillich , author M. Lemeshko , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.0...

    doi

  64. [72]

    note We note that these lifetimes are comparable to lifetimes calculated for the v = 1 level in ground state diatomic molecules inside He nanodroplet, see Ref. blancafort-jorquera_vibrational_2021 , but more than an order of magnitude longer than the decoherence lifetime measu...

  65. [73]

    Lackner , author G

    author author F. Lackner , author G. Krois , author T. Buchsteiner , author J. V. \ Pototschnig , \ and\ author W. E. \ Ernst ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.153001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 153001 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  66. [74]

    author author S. H. \ Albrechtsen , author C. A. \ Schouder , author A. Viñas Muñoz , author J. K. \ Christensen , author C. Engelbrecht Petersen , author M. Pi , author M. Barranco , \ and\ author H. Stapelfeldt ,\ 10.1038/s41586-023-06593-5 journal journal Nature \ volume 62...

    doi

  67. [75]

    Blancafort-Jorquera \ and\ author M

    author author M. Blancafort-Jorquera \ and\ author M. González ,\ 10.1039/D1CP03629G journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 25961--25973 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  68. [76]

    Thaler , author M

    author author B. Thaler , author M. Meyer , author P. Heim , \ and\ author M. Koch ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.115301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 115301 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.