Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 297 references

Hidden multipolar orders become computable from first principles

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A review of multipolar hidden-order phases in correlated insulators and the ab initio methods used to explain them.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful review of multipolar hidden order theory, strong on synthesis and honest about open problems, but marred by a duplicated section and some rhetorical overreach on 'parameter-free' claims. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2509.01788 v1 pith:6G6LDLJR submitted 2025-09-01 cond-mat.str-el

Hidden orders in spin-orbit entangled correlated insulators

Leonid V. Pourovskii , Dario Fiore Mosca , Lorenzo Celiberti , Sergii Khmelevskyi , Arun Paramekanti , Cesare Franchini This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords hidden ordermultipolar orderspin-orbit couplingstrongly correlated insulatorsdouble perovskitesactinide dioxidesforce theorem in Hubbard-Iintersite exchange interactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Review argues that parameter-free ab initio methods—the force theorem in the Hubbard-I approximation, DFT+DMFT susceptibility approaches, and cluster exact diagonalization—have turned hidden multipolar orders in spin-orbit entangled insulators from a puzzle into a computable phenomenon. The central object is a low-energy many-body effective Hamiltonian built from local high-rank multipole moments of the spin-orbit entangled ground-state multiplet. Applied to 5d double perovskites and actinide dioxides, these methods reproduce observed phases, predict new ones, and show that high-rank exchange rather than dipole exchange often drives the order. The sympathetic reading is that material-specific multipolar order parameters can now be derived without adjustable parameters.

Core claim

The review's thesis is that the ordering degrees of freedom in hidden-order correlated insulators are local high-rank multipole moments of magnetic and charge density, and that intersite couplings among these moments can be computed from electronic structure without free parameters. The pipeline is: define the spin-orbit entangled ground-state multiplet, expand its density matrix in spherical tensor operators, extract intersite exchange from the paramagnetic DFT+Hubbard-I state via the force theorem or from cluster strong-coupling calculations, add Jahn-Teller electron-lattice terms, and solve the resulting many-body effective Hamiltonian by mean-field plus RPA. This reproduces the ferro-oct

What carries the argument

The many-body effective Hamiltonian H = H_IEI + H_EM + H_EL + Σ H_1s, in which the intersite exchange term is a bilinear sum of multipolar operators O^Q_K(i) with coupling matrices V^{QQ'}_{KK'}(R_ij). The load-bearing identity is the multipole expansion of the ground-state multiplet density matrix, ρ = ⟨O^Q_K⟩ O^Q_K, which turns hidden order into defined rank-K order parameters. The FT-HI formula (Eq. 6) evaluates the exchange matrix elements from paramagnetic intersite propagators and derivatives of the Hubbard-I self-energy, making the whole construction parameter-free for Mott insulators.

Load-bearing premise

The correlated shell must have a fixed integer electron count because Coulomb repulsion suppresses charge fluctuations, and the low-energy physics must live in a well-separated ground-state multiplet with intersite couplings computed in the strong-coupling Hubbard-I limit; if that fails, the multipole expansion and the extracted exchange couplings break down.

What would settle it

For a material the method labels multipolar, such as Ba2MgReO6 or NpO2, compute the same multipolar intersite couplings with a charge-fluctuation-retaining method like full DFT+DMFT at the same U; if the leading couplings shift by more than the mean-field ordering energy (around a meV), the strong-coupling extraction is unreliable. Alternatively, find a predicted purely quadrupolar phase that shows a measurable local magnetic dipole at the ordering temperature.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For a given double perovskite or actinide dioxide, the multipolar order——its rank, wavevector, and primary versus slave character——can be predicted before experiment; for example, A2WCl6 is predicted to host ferro-octupolar order.
  • Dipole-only theories miss the physics: even magnetic orders that look conventional, such as in PrO2 and NdN, carry large high-rank multipolar components and can be driven entirely by non-dipolar exchange.
  • Electron-lattice coupling must be included in the minimal model: quadrupolar orders are entangled with phonons through Jahn-Teller coupling, so structural and magnetic transitions can have the same origin.
  • The parameter-free pipeline is restricted to insulating phases where strong-coupling perturbation theory applies; metallic heavy-fermion multipolar systems remain beyond its reach.
  • Solving these Hamiltonians can generate measurable spectroscopic signatures, such as excitation gaps, neutron scattering intensities, and NMR lineshapes, which are the practical route to identifying hidden order in experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the strong-coupling premise holds, a systematic strain scan of d2 double perovskites should switch between quadrupolar and octupolar ground states; the derived Hamiltonian could be solved under strain to map this phase boundary.
  • The multipolar defect centres described qualitatively—ions whose ground multiplets carry only quadrupolar and octupolar moments—could be developed as strain or electric-field-gradient sensors, since these moments couple to field gradients rather than magnetic fields.
  • A direct benchmark with full DFT+DMFT (retaining charge fluctuations) on one or two canonical materials would quantify the error of Hubbard-I-derived exchange couplings and mark where the parameter-free pipeline fails.
  • The surface and nanoscale regime is a natural test: if quadrupolar order is pinned at broken-symmetry surfaces, surface-sensitive probes should see local multipolar patterns distinct from the bulk phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review surveys hidden multipolar order in spin-orbit entangled correlated insulators, with emphasis on ab initio and many-body methods for material-specific modeling. It introduces the ground-state multiplet formalism, multipole expansions, intersite exchange mechanisms, and electron-lattice (Jahn-Teller) couplings; then reviews DFT+U, DFT+DMFT, force-theorem in Hubbard-I, susceptibility-based, and cluster methods; and finally applies these to 5d double perovskites (d1, d2, d3), actinide dioxides, rare-earth mononitrides, heavy-fermion systems, and magnetoelectric materials. The central claim is that recent progress in modeling insulating multipolar phases stems from efficient ab initio methods enabling parameter-free, material-specific descriptions of hidden multipolar orders. The review is broad, generally balanced, and candid about open problems such as the UO2 3q stabilization and the missing entropy in Ba2MgReO6.

Significance. If the reviewed methods are reliable, this review documents a substantial advance in a difficult area: predicting multipolar order parameters and their microscopic mechanisms without resorting to purely model Hamiltonians. The paper is valuable as an up-to-date synthesis, with useful tables (Tables 1-2), figures, and explicit comparisons with experiments. It also honestly flags unsolved issues, which strengthens its credibility. However, the central 'parameter-free' claim is overstated: the methods use Hubbard U and Hund coupling as inputs, and electron-lattice methods require Jahn-Teller couplings and elastic constants. The strong-coupling integer-occupancy assumption underlying the force-theorem and cluster approaches is load-bearing but is not quantitatively assessed for the flagship 5d double perovskites. These issues affect the conclusions, but they are fixable within the scope of a review.

major comments (2)
  1. [Conclusions and Future Perspectives] The statement that progress stems from 'parameter-free, material-specific descriptions' overstates the methods. The Hubbard U (and Hund coupling) for the correlated shell is an input; the text itself quotes U in the 2-4 eV range for double perovskites. Electron-lattice methods require Jahn-Teller couplings g_Gamma and elastic constants. The conclusion should be qualified as, e.g., 'few-parameter' or 'with interaction parameters determined from constrained DFT or empirical fits', and the abstract/introduction should be aligned accordingly.
  2. [The ground-state multiplet and its moments / Force theorem in Hubbard-I] Equation (6) and the cluster perturbation expressions rely on the GSM assumption that charge fluctuations are suppressed and the correlated shell has integer occupancy. For 5d double perovskites, U/W is not very large (U ~ 2-4 eV and t2g bandwidth is comparable), yet no diagnostic such as the local occupancy variance or the weight of N +/- 1 charge multiplets is reported for the materials whose phase diagrams are claimed to be reproduced. The conclusions acknowledge that strong-coupling methods become generally invalid in the metallic state, but the review should also discuss where within the insulating regime the strong-coupling assumption may break down, especially for the d1 and d2 double perovskites used as flagship examples.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Approaches to electron-lattice interactions] The section 'Approaches to electron-lattice interactions' is repeated verbatim twice, with identical equations numbered (8) and (9). The duplicate should be removed and equations renumbered; the later reference to 'equation (9)' in the MBEH-solving section should be updated.
  2. [Figure 5] Figure 5 cross-references are inconsistent: NpO2 is cited in the text as Fig. 5c but the caption labels NpO2 as panel (b); PrO2 is cited as Fig. 5b but the caption labels PrO2 as panel (c); URu2Si2 is cited as Fig. 5e but the caption labels it as panel (d); NdN is cited as Fig. 5d but the caption labels it as panel (e).
  3. [Figure 4] The text refers to 'Figure 4e' for the mean-field ordering energy of d2 double perovskites, but the caption places that panel at (g); the computed NMR spectra are at panel (e), not (g). Please correct these cross-references.
  4. [General] There are several typos, e.g., 'quarupolar' (Box 1), 'quantum chemisty' (electron-lattice section), and 'mutipolar' (f-electron section). A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the review's predictions are checked against independent experiments and the method chain is not functionally identical to its inputs.

full rationale

This is a review article rather than a new derivation, and its central claim—that recently formulated ab initio methods enable material-specific descriptions of multipolar order—is supported by comparisons with external experiments (e.g., the two transitions in Ba2MgReO6, the hidden-order structure of NpO2 constrained by NMR and diffraction, and the non-collinear order of PrO2). The force-theorem Hubbard-I formula (Eq. 6) is quoted as derived in prior work and is used to compute intersite exchange matrices from DFT+HI electronic structure; these are then solved and compared to measured properties. I can find no place where a predicted quantity is identical, by construction, to a fitted parameter or to an input of the calculation. The strong-coupling integer-occupancy assumption is stated explicitly as a precondition and limitation of the methods, not as the predicted outcome; an assumption that restricts validity is not circular. Self-citations are frequent because the authors developed several of the reviewed methods, but the load-bearing validation is experimental and includes independent theoretical approaches; no specific reduction to a self-citation chain is exhibited. Any concern about the magnitude of charge fluctuations or the meaning of 'parameter-free' is a correctness or overclaim issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no new free parameters or entities. However, its central thesis relies on strong-coupling assumptions (large U, GSM projection) and on fitted model parameters in the underlying ab initio methods, which are inputs from prior literature rather than outputs of this paper.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U (and Hund coupling J_H) for correlated shell = material-dependent, typically 2-4 eV in double perovskites; from cRPA or fitted to spectra
    The reviewed methods (DFT+U, DFT+DMFT, DFT+HI, FT-HI) require these as inputs; the review's claim of 'parameter-free' methods is weakened because U and J_H are not derived within the paper and vary by material.
  • Jahn-Teller coupling constants g_Gamma and elastic constants = numbers obtained by fitting DFT/quantum-chemistry potential-energy surfaces to the Jahn-Teller Hamiltonian
    In the section 'Approaches to electron-lattice interactions', the couplings are extracted from fits of total energy vs distortion amplitude, i.e., fitted parameters.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The correlated shell has a well-defined integer occupancy and a well-separated ground-state multiplet; charge fluctuations are suppressed by large U.
    Section 'The ground-state multiplet and its moments', Eq. (1) and surrounding text; this is the basis for the multipole expansion and MBEH.
  • domain assumption The force theorem in the Hubbard-I approximation reproduces the lowest-order in hopping/U superexchange and is valid in Mott insulating phases.
    Section 'Force theorem in Hubbard-I', text after Eq. (6): 'Its applicability is limited to Mott insulating phases, where the FT-HI formula ... reproduces the lowest-order in hopping/U contribution to superexchange.' This limits the scope to insulators.
  • domain assumption Mean-field decoupling of the MBEH is adequate to identify ordered phases; transition temperatures are overestimated by roughly factor two.
    Section 'Solving the many-body effective Hamiltonian and calculating properties': 'the mean-field approximation leads to a systematic overestimation of transition temperatures... overestimation by about a factor of two was observed.' This is an accepted approximation with known error.
  • domain assumption The multipole expansion is complete within the GSM and coupling to states outside the GSM is perturbative.
    Implicit in the projection onto the GSM throughout the methods section; states outside GSM are treated in second-order perturbation for kinetic exchange.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hidden orders in spin-orbit entangled correlated insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6G6LDLJR

@misc{pith2026250901788,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hidden orders in spin-orbit entangled correlated insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6G6LDLJR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01788}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In many materials, ordered phases and their order parameters are easily characterized by standard experimental methods. "Hidden order" refers to a phase transition in which an ordered state emerges without such an easily detectable order parameter, despite clear thermodynamic evidence of the transition. The underlying mechanisms for these unconventional states of matter stem from spin-orbit coupling, which intertwines inter-site exchange, classical electron-magnetic interactions, and electron-lattice effects. This physics is elusive to experimental probes and beyond traditional theories of insulating magnetism, requiring sophisticated methodologies for its exploration. In this Review, we survey exotic hidden-order phases in correlated insulators, particularly focusing on the latest progress in material-specific theories and numerical approaches. The relevant degrees of freedom in these phases are local high-rank multipole moments of magnetic and charge density that emerge from spin-orbit entangled correlated shells of heavy d and f electron ions and interact on the lattice via various mechanisms. We discuss approaches to modelling hidden orders in realistic systems via direct ab initio calculations or by constructing low-energy many-body effective Hamiltonian. We also describe how these new theoretical tools have helped to uncover driving mechanisms for recently discovered multipolar phases in double perovskites of heavy transition metals, and how they have proved instrumental in disentangling the role of various interactions in "traditional" f-electron multipolar materials like actinide dioxides. In both cases, material-specific theories have played a key role in interpreting and predicting experimental signatures of hidden orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01788 by Arun Paramekanti, Cesare Franchini, Dario Fiore Mosca, Leonid V. Pourovskii, Lorenzo Celiberti, Sergii Khmelevskyi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spin-orbit entangled phenomena. Interplay of spin-orbit coupling with band and correlation effects induces unusual interactions (left side), which, in turn, generate unconventional phenomena (right side), including hidden multipolar orders. Characteristic energy scales and key families of materials hosting hidden orders are listed for d- and f-electron systems. Representative multipolar order parameters ar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Levels structure, ground state multiplets and hopping paths in d 1 and d 2 spin-orbit double perovskites. (a) The conventional unit cell of A2BB′O6 cubic double perovskites. (b) The level splitting on the d 1 and d 2 shells of magnetic B ′ sites due to the octahedral crystal field and spin-orbit coupling. Electron density distribution for the ground-state multiplet orbitals is shown after Ref.190, the spin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Intersite exchange interaction (IEI) matrices for three Jeff=3/2 SO insulators calculated by the force theorem in Hubbard-I (FT-HI) method. Left. The d3 double perovskite (DP) Ba2YOsO6. In this case there is no spin-orbit entanglement within the Jeff=3/2 ground state (GS), and the dominating IEI are antiferroic dipole-dipole Heisenberg terms as expected for a pure spin-3/2 system. Perturbative admixture of… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multipolar properties of d-electron systems computed with different methods a | Energy as a function of the canting angle for the 5d1 double perovskite (DP) Ba2NaOsO6 in the Jahn-Teller (JT) distorted phase with constrained DFT + U65 (left panel); graphical representation of the canted anti-ferromagnetic (cAFM) phase (right panel)65 . b | Mean field ordering energy vs temperature for the 5d1 DP Ba2MgReO6 w… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multipolar orders of f-electron systems computed with different methods a | Total energy of UO2 vs magnetic canting angle along the 1k antiferromagnetic (AFM) ⟨001⟩ → 3k AFM → 1k AFM ⟨110⟩ transformation pathway calculated by constained DFT+U204. Inset shows 3k quadrupolar and magnetic orders predicted from intersite exchange (IEI) Hamiltonian derived with the force theorem in Hubbard-I (FT-HI) method250 .… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

297 extracted references · 169 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965)

    1965

  2. [2]

    Khomskii, D. I. Transition Metal Compounds (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Properties of semiconductors with an extremum loop

    Rashba, E. Properties of semiconductors with an extremum loop. i. cyclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop. Sov. Phys.-Solid State 2, 1109 (1960)

    1960

  4. [4]

    V ., Chulkov, E

    Bihlmayer, G., Noël, P., Vyalikh, D. V ., Chulkov, E. V . & Manchon, A. Rashba-like physics in condensed matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 642–659, DOI: 10.1038/s42254-022-00490-y (2022)

    doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00490-y 2022

  5. [5]

    Hirsch, J. E. Spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999). 26/45

    1999

  6. [6]

    Maciejko, J., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. The quantum spin hall effect. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 31–53, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140538 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140538 2011

  7. [7]

    & Cros, V

    Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V . Magnetic skyrmions: Advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater .2, 17031 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Mott, N. F. & Peierls, R. Discussion of the paper by de boer and verwey. Proc. Phys. Soc. 49, 72, DOI: 10.1088/0959-5309/49/4S/308 (1937)

    work page doi:10.1088/0959-5309/49/4s/308 1937

  9. [9]

    Mott, N. F. The basis of the electron theory of metals, with special reference to the transition metals. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 62, 416, DOI: 10.1088/0370-1298/62/7/303 (1949)

    doi:10.1088/0370-1298/62/7/303 1949

  10. [10]

    & Tokura, Y

    Imada, M., Fujimori, A. & Tokura, Y . Metal-insulator transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039–1263, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1039 (1998)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.1039 1998

  11. [11]

    Morosan, E., Natelson, D., Nevidomskyy, A. H. & Si, Q. Strongly correlated materials. Adv. Mater. 24, 4896–4923, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202018 (2012). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10. 1002/adma.201202018

    doi:10.1002/adma.201202018 2012

  12. [12]

    Witczak-Krempa, W., Chen, G., Kim, Y . B. & Balents, L. Correlated quantum phenomena in the strong spin-orbit regime. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 57–82, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-020911-125138 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Orbital Order and Fluctuations in Mott Insulators

    Khaliullin, G. Orbital Order and Fluctuations in Mott Insulators. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 160, 155–202, DOI: 10.1143/PTPS.160.155 (2005). https://academic.oup.com/ptps/article-pdf/doi/10.1143/PTPS.160.155/ 5162453/160-155.pdf

    doi:10.1143/ptps.160.155 2005

  14. [14]

    G., Lee, E

    Rau, J. G., Lee, E. K.-H. & Kee, H.-Y . Spin-orbit physics giving rise to novel phases in correlated systems: Iridates and related materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 195–221, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031115-011319 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    K.-H., Yang, B.-J

    Schaffer, R., Lee, E. K.-H., Yang, B.-J. & Kim, Y . B. Recent progress on correlated electron systems with strong spin–orbit coupling. Reports on Prog. Phys. 79, 094504, DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/094504 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/094504 2016

  16. [16]

    & Takagi, H

    Takayama, T., Chaloupka, J., Smerald, A., Khaliullin, G. & Takagi, H. Spin–orbit-entangled electronic phases in 4d and 5d transition-metal compounds. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 062001, DOI: 10.7566/JPSJ.90.062001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.90.062001

    doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.062001 2021

  17. [17]

    Khomskii, D. I. & Streltsov, S. V . Orbital effects in solids: Basics, recent progress, and opportunities.Chem. Rev. 121, 2992–3030, DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00579 (2021). PMID: 33314912, https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.chemrev.0c00579

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00579 2021

  18. [18]

    J., Krajewska, A

    Browne, A. J., Krajewska, A. & Gibbs, A. S. Quantum materials with strong spin–orbit coupling: challenges and opportunities for materials chemists. J. Mater . Chem. C9, 11640–11654, DOI: 10.1039/D1TC02070F (2021)

    work page doi:10.1039/d1tc02070f 2021

  19. [19]

    & Khaliullin, G

    Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: From heisenberg to a quantum compass and kitaev models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017205 (2009)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.017205 2009

  20. [20]

    Calder, S. et al. Magnetically driven metal-insulator transition in naoso3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 257209, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.257209 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.257209 2012

  21. [21]

    Kim, B. et al. Lifshitz transition driven by spin fluctuations and spin-orbit renormalization in naoso3. Phys. Rev. B 94, 241113, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.241113 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.241113 2016

  22. [22]

    Spin liquids in frustrated magnets

    Balents, L. Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature 464, 199–208, DOI: 10.1038/nature08917 (2010)

    doi:10.1038/nature08917 2010

  23. [23]

    A., Mclaughlin, A

    de Vries, M. A., Mclaughlin, A. C. & Bos, J.-W. G. Valence bond glass on an fcc lattice in the double perovskite ba2ymoo6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 177202, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.177202 (2010). 27/45

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.177202 2010

  24. [24]

    & Obata, Y

    Sasaki, K. & Obata, Y . Studies of the dynamical jahn-teller effect on static magnetic susceptibility.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 28, 1157–1167, DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.28.1157 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.28.1157

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.28.1157 1970

  25. [25]

    Heinze, S. et al. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 7, 713–718, DOI: 10.1038/nphys2045 (2011)

    doi:10.1038/nphys2045 2011

  26. [26]

    Everschor-Sitte, K., Masell, J., Reeve, R. M. & Kläui, M. Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions—overview of recent progress in an active research field. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901, DOI: 10.1063/1.5048972 (2018). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5048972/19981128/240901_1_1.5048972.pdf

    doi:10.1063/1.5048972 2018

  27. [27]

    Dzialoshinskii, I. E. Sov. phys. jetp. Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1259 (1957)

    1957

  28. [28]

    New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction

    Moriya, T. New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 228–230, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.228 (1960)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.4.228 1960

  29. [29]

    Morrish, A. H. Canted Antiferromagnetism: Hematite (World Scientific, 1994)

    1994

  30. [30]

    & Balents, L

    Pesin, D. & Balents, L. Mott physics and band topology in materials with strong spin–orbit interaction. Nat. Phys. 6, 376–381, DOI: 10.1038/nphys1606 (2010)

    doi:10.1038/nphys1606 2010

  31. [31]

    Celiberti, L. et al. Spin-orbital jahn-teller bipolarons. Nat. Commun. 15, 2429, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-024-46621-0 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    & Franchini, C

    Fiore Mosca, D., Schnait, H., Celiberti, L., Aichhorn, M. & Franchini, C. The mott transition in the 5d1 compound ba2naoso6: A dft+dmft study with paw spinor projectors. Comput. Mater. Sci. 233, 112764, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112764 (2024)

    arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    & Paramekanti, A

    Hart, K., Sutcliffe, R., Refael, G. & Paramekanti, A. Phonon-driven multipolar dynamics in spin-orbit coupled mott insulators (2024). 2404.17633

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    & Pourovskii, L

    Khmelevskyi, S. & Pourovskii, L. V . Non-collinear magnetism driven by a hidden multipolar order in pro2. Commun. Phys. 7, 12, DOI: 10.1038/s42005-023-01503-7 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01503-7 2024

  35. [35]

    Soh, J.-R. et al. Spectroscopic signatures and origin of hidden order in Ba2MgReO6. Nat. Commun. 15, 10383, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53893-z (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53893-z 2024

  36. [36]

    Yahne, D. R. et al. Dipolar spin ice regime proximate to an all-in-all-out néel ground state in the dipolar- octupolar pyrochlore ce2sn2o7. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011005, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011005 (2024)

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.011005 2024

  37. [37]

    & Mydosh, J

    Shah, N., Chandra, P., Coleman, P. & Mydosh, J. A. Hidden order in uru2si2. Phys. Rev. B 61, 564–569, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.564 (2000)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.564 2000

  38. [38]

    Amitsuka, H. et al. Hidden order and weak antiferromagnetism in uru2si2. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 312-313, 390–396, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(01)01343-6 (2002). The International Conference on Strongly Correlated Electron Systems

    work page doi:10.1016/s0921-4526(01)01343-6 2002

  39. [39]

    Chandra, P., lian, P., Mydosh, J. A. & Tripathi, V . Hidden orbital order in the heavy fermion metal uru2si2. Nature 417, 831–834, DOI: 10.1038/nature00795 (2002)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature00795 2002

  40. [40]

    & Nordström, L

    Cricchio, F., Bultmark, F., Grånäs, O. & Nordström, L. Itinerant magnetic multipole moments of rank five as the hidden order in uru2si2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 107202, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.107202 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.107202 2009

  41. [41]

    & Khaliullin, G

    Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Magnetically hidden order of kramers doublets in d1 systems: sr2vo4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 067205, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.067205 (2009)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.067205 2009

  42. [42]

    & Balents, L

    Chen, G., Pereira, R. & Balents, L. Exotic phases induced by strong spin-orbit coupling in ordered double perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 82, 174440, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174440 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.174440 2010

  43. [43]

    S., Gingras, M

    Gardner, J. S., Gingras, M. J. P. & Greedan, J. E. Magnetic pyrochlore oxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53–107, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.53 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.53 2010

  44. [44]

    Mydosh, J. A. & Oppeneer, P. M. Colloquium: Hidden order, superconductivity, and magnetism: The unsolved case of uru2si2. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1301–1322, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1301 (2011). 28/45

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1301 2011

  45. [45]

    Tsirlin, A. A. et al. Hidden magnetic order in cuncn. Phys. Rev. B 85, 224431, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85. 224431 (2012)

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.85 2012

  46. [47]

    Sugiyama, J. et al. Hidden magnetic order in sr 2vo4 clarified with µ +sr. Phys. Rev. B 89, 020402, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.020402 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.020402 2014

  47. [48]

    & Hermele, M

    Huang, Y .-P., Chen, G. & Hermele, M. Quantum spin ices and topological phases from dipolar-octupolar doublets on the pyrochlore lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 167203, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.167203 (2014)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.167203 2014

  48. [49]

    Zhao, L. et al. Evidence of an odd-parity hidden order in a spin–orbit coupled correlated iridate. Nat. Phys. 12, 32–36, DOI: 10.1038/nphys3517 (2016)

    doi:10.1038/nphys3517 2016

  49. [50]

    S., Friemel, G

    Cameron, A. S., Friemel, G. & Inosov, D. S. Multipolar phases and magnetically hidden order: review of the heavy-fermion compound ce1−xlaxb6. Reports on Prog. Phys. 79, 066502, DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/6/ 066502 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/6/ 2016

  50. [51]

    & Chen, G

    Li, Y .-D., Wang, X. & Chen, G. Hidden multipolar orders of dipole-octupole doublets on a triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 94, 201114, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.201114 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.201114 2016

  51. [52]

    Lu, L. et al. Magnetism and local symmetry breaking in a mott insulator with strong spin orbit interactions. Nat. Commun. 8, 14407, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14407 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14407 2017

  52. [53]

    & Chen, G

    Li, Y .-D. & Chen, G. Symmetry enriched u(1) topological orders for dipole-octupole doublets on a pyrochlore lattice. Phys. Rev. B 95, 041106, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041106 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.041106 2017

  53. [54]

    & Franchini, C

    Kim, B., Khmelevskyi, S., Mohn, P. & Franchini, C. Competing magnetic interactions in a spin- 1 2 square lattice: Hidden order in sr2vo4. Phys. Rev. B 96, 180405, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.180405 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.180405 2017

  54. [55]

    & Chen, G

    Liu, C., Li, Y .-D. & Chen, G. Selective measurements of intertwined multipolar orders: Non-kramers doublets on a triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 98, 045119, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.045119 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.045119 2018

  55. [56]

    Ishikawa, H. et al. Ordering of hidden multipoles in spin-orbit entangled 5d1 ta chlorides. Phys. Rev. B 100, 045142, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.045142 (2019)

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.045142 2019

  56. [57]

    Gaudet, J. et al. Quantum spin ice dynamics in the dipole-octupole pyrochlore magnet ce2zr2o7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187201, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.187201 (2019)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.187201 2019

  57. [58]

    Intertwined dipolar and multipolar order in the triangular-lattice magnet tmmggao4

    Shen, Y .et al. Intertwined dipolar and multipolar order in the triangular-lattice magnet tmmggao4. Nat. Commun. 10, 4530, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12410-3 (2019)

    doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12410-3 2019

  58. [59]

    Rau, J. G. & Gingras, M. J. Frustrated quantum rare-earth pyrochlores. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 357–386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-022317-110520 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-022317-110520 2019

  59. [60]

    Hirai, D. et al. Detection of multipolar orders in the spin-orbit-coupled 5d mott insulator Ba2MgReo6. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022063, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022063 (2020)

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.022063 2020

  60. [61]

    V ., Rønnow, H

    Aeppli, G., Balatsky, A. V ., Rønnow, H. M. & Spaldin, N. A. Hidden, entangled and resonating order.Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 477–479, DOI: 10.1038/s41578-020-0207-z (2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-020-0207-z 2020

  61. [62]

    Zvereva, E. A. et al. Hidden magnetic order in the triangular-lattice magnet li2mnteo6. Phys. Rev. B 102, 094433, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.094433 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.094433 2020

  62. [63]

    Maharaj, D. D. et al. Octupolar versus néel order in cubic5d2 double perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 087206, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.087206 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.087206 2020

  63. [64]

    Sibille, R. et al. A quantum liquid of magnetic octupoles on the pyrochlore lattice. Nat. Phys. 16, 546–552, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0827-7 (2020). 29/45

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0827-7 2020

  64. [65]

    Fiore Mosca, D. et al. Interplay between multipolar spin interactions, jahn-teller effect, and electronic correlation in a Jeff = 3 2 insulator. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.104401 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.104401 2021

  65. [66]

    V ., Mosca, D

    Pourovskii, L. V ., Mosca, D. F. & Franchini, C. Ferro-octupolar order and low-energy excitations ind2 double perovskites of osmium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 237201, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.237201 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.237201 2021

  66. [67]

    Pourovskii, L. V . & Khmelevskyi, S. Hidden order and multipolar exchange striction in a correlated <i>f</i>- electron system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2025317118, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025317118 (2021). https: //www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2025317118

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2025317118 2021

  67. [68]

    Smith, E. M. et al. Case for a u(1)π quantum spin liquid ground state in the dipole-octupole pyrochlore ce2zr2o7. Phys. Rev. X 12, 021015, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021015 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.021015 2022

  68. [69]

    Distinguishing thermodynamics and spectroscopy for octupolar u(1) spin liquid of ce pyrochlores

    Chen, G. Distinguishing thermodynamics and spectroscopy for octupolar u(1) spin liquid of ce pyrochlores. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033169, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033169 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033169 2023

  69. [70]

    & Paramekanti, A

    V oleti, S., Pradhan, K., Bhattacharjee, S., Saha-Dasgupta, T. & Paramekanti, A. Probing octupolar hidden order via janus impurities. npj Quantum Mater. 8, 42, DOI: 10.1038/s41535-023-00575-6 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00575-6 2023

  70. [71]

    H., Urru, A

    Verbeek, X. H., Urru, A. & Spaldin, N. A. Hidden orders and (anti-)magnetoelectric effects in cr2o3 and α−fe2o3. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L042018, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L042018 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.l042018 2023

  71. [72]

    Szilva, A. et al. Quantitative theory of magnetic interactions in solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035004, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.035004 (2023)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.035004 2023

  72. [73]

    Santini, P. et al. Multipolar interactions in f -electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 807–863, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.807 (2009)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.807 2009

  73. [74]

    & Nordström, L

    Bultmark, F., Cricchio, F., Grånäs, O. & Nordström, L. Multipole decomposition of LDA+ u energy and its application to actinide compounds. Phys. Rev. B 80, 035121, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.035121 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.035121 2009

  74. [75]

    Pourovskii, L. V . Two-site fluctuations and multipolar intersite exchange interactions in strongly correlated systems. Phys. Rev. B 94, 115117, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.115117 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.115117 2016

  75. [76]

    & Savrasov, S

    Pi, S.-T., Nanguneri, R. & Savrasov, S. Calculation of multipolar exchange interactions in spin-orbital coupled systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077203, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077203 (2014)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.077203 2014

  76. [77]

    & Savrasov, S

    Pi, S.-T., Nanguneri, R. & Savrasov, S. Anisotropic multipolar exchange interactions in systems with strong spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 90, 045148, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.045148 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.045148 2014

  77. [78]

    Fiore Mosca, D., Pourovskii, L. V . & Franchini, C. Modeling magnetic multipolar phases in density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 106, 035127, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.035127 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.035127 2022

  78. [79]

    E., Tehrani, A

    Schaufelberger, L., Merkel, M. E., Tehrani, A. M., Spaldin, N. A. & Ederer, C. Exploring energy landscapes of charge multipoles using constrained density functional theory. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033172, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.5.033172 (2023)

    2023

  79. [80]

    Kimata, M. et al. X-ray study of ferroic octupole order producing anomalous hall effect. Nat. Commun. 12, 5582, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25834-7 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25834-7 2021

  80. [81]

    F., McEwen, K

    McMorrow, D. F., McEwen, K. A., Steigenberger, U., Rønnow, H. M. & Yakhou, F. X-ray resonant scattering study of the quadrupolar order in upd3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 057201, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.057201 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.057201 2001

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.