REVIEW 4 cited by
What does it take to solve the measurement problem?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We summarise different aspects of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. We argue that it is a real problem which requires a solution, and identify the properties a theory needs to solve the problem. We show that no current interpretation of quantum mechanics solves the problem, and that, being interpretations rather than extensions of quantum mechanics, they cannot solve it. Finally, we speculate what a solution of the measurement problem might be good for.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The burden of Fundamentality: Metaphysical ambiguities and the issue of Superdeterminism
Superdeterminism is split into naive, metaphysical, and toy forms; naive forms illegitimately assume fundamentality, and Invariant Set Theory is committed to a confused priority monism.
-
Quantum selective measurement as a quasilinear evolution
A quasilinear continuous evolution is introduced for selective quantum measurements that converges to von Neumann projection outcomes while preserving ensemble equivalence and no-signaling.
-
Quantum selective measurement as a quasilinear evolution
A quasilinear continuous evolution is introduced that reproduces the final states of von Neumann rank-one projective measurement while preserving no-signaling and ensemble equivalence.
-
The Geometry Underlying the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
Eigenfunctions of the 2D quantum harmonic oscillator map to Z_n-invariant classical particle motions along circles in lens spaces S^3/Z_n inside the reduced phase space C^2/Z_n.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.