pith. sign in

arxiv: 1601.01509 · v2 · pith:6H3YVT22new · submitted 2016-01-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

On the dispute between Boltzmann and Gibbs entropy

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords entropynegativeboltzmannstatisticaltemperaturesconsidercorrectgibbs
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Very recently, the validity of the concept of negative temperature has been challenged by several authors since they consider Boltzmann's entropy (that allows negative temperatures) inconsistent from a mathematical and statistical point of view, whereas they consider Gibbs' entropy (that does not admit negative temperatures) the correct definition for microcanonical entropy. In the present paper we prove that for systems with equivalence of the statistical ensembles Boltzmann entropy is the correct microcanonical entropy. Analytical results on two systems supporting negative temperatures, confirm the scenario we propose. In addition, we corroborate our proof by numeric simulations on an explicit lattice system showing that negative temperature equilibrium states are accessible and obey standard statistical mechanics prevision.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.