Quantum Effective Dynamics of Papapetrou Spacetime

Faqiang Yuan; Xiaokan Guo

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 32 references

Quantum Effective Dynamics of Papapetrou Spacetime

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives a quantum-corrected Papapetrou metric and claims that quantum geometry removes the classical wormhole throat for tiny masses while creating a new throat.

desk verdict First LQG effective metric for the anti-scalar Papapetrou wormhole, but the central ODE is not solved as written: Eq. (III.10) fails Eq. (III.9), so the wormhole conclusions are unsupported until that is fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08821 v2 pith:6IKE7WZ5 submitted 2025-06-10 gr-qc

Xiaokan Guo , Faqiang Yuan This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc

keywords loopquantumgravityPapapetrouspacetimeeffectivemetricpolymerquantizationwormholethroatanti-scalarfieldnullenergycondition

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper applies loop-quantum-inspired polymer quantization to the Papapetrou spacetime, an exponential wormhole solution of Einstein gravity coupled to an anti-scalar field. It claims that the resulting effective metric is still a wormhole, but with two throat candidates: the classical throat at $r=M$ and a new throat created by the $\tilde{\delta}_c$-correction. For masses below the threshold $M \le (\gamma \tilde{\delta}_c L_0/2)\exp[-2/(1-\gamma^2 \tilde{\delta}_b^2)]$, the classical throat stops flaring out and disappears, while the new throat remains. This matters because it connects Planck-scale quantum geometry to a concrete signature, namely whether a wormhole requires exotic matter, and it gives an explicit metric for future lensing and orbit calculations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the polymerized Hamiltonian constraint (III.6), built from SU(1,1) holonomy variables with replacements $\tilde b\to\sinh(\tilde{\delta}_b\tilde b)/\tilde{\delta}_b$ and $\tilde c\to\sin(\tilde{\delta}_c\tilde c)/\tilde{\delta}_c$. Its equations of motion, together with the constraint $\tilde H_{\rm eff}=0$, determine the triad variables $\tilde p_b$ and $\tilde p_c$ and hence every component of the effective metric. The quantum parameters are fixed by the area gap $\Delta=2\sqrt3\pi\gamma G\hbar$, giving $\tilde{\delta}_b=2\sqrt3$ and $\tilde{\delta}_c L_0=\sqrt{\Delta}$, so the construction converts the classical Papapetrou solution into a one-parameter family of quantum-corrected wormhole metrics whose throat structure is analyzed through the area function.

What would settle it

Substitute the proposed solution (III.10) together with (III.11) into the effective equation of motion (III.9) and check the equality. A mismatch, such as a common prefactor leaving a $\operatorname{sech}^2$ factor on one side while the other side retains a $\sqrt{1+\tanh^2}$ factor, would show that the proposed solution is not a solution and that the effective metric must be re-derived.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the classical Hamiltonian dynamics of Papapetrou spacetime as a limit of the Janis-Newman-Winicour scalar-field spacetime, the authors replace connection components by their holonomy-corrected versions, $c\to\sin(\tilde{\delta}_c c)/\tilde{\delta}_c$ and $b\to\sinh(\tilde{\delta}_b b)/\tilde{\delta}_b$, and solve the resulting effective equations of motion. Substituting the solutions into the reconstruction formula yields the effective metric (III.24)-(III.27), which reduces to the classical exponential metric when both $\tilde{\delta}$'s vanish. The paper shows the area $A(\tilde{\tau})=4\pi p_c(\tilde{\tau})$ has a stationary point at $\tilde{\tau}=M$, the classical throat, and another at the point fixed by $e^{2\tilde T}=\tilde{\delta}_c^2/4$; this second point satisfies the flare-out condition. At $\tilde{\tau}=M$, the second derivative of the area is positive only when $M>\gamma\tilde{\delta}_c L_0 e^{-2/(1-\gamma^2\tilde{\delta}_b^2)}/2$, so for smaller masses the classical throat disappears. At the same threshold the combination $\rho+p_r$ changes sign, so the null energy condition is restored at the classical throat exactly when that throat vanishes, while the new throat, with all metric components finite, carries the wormhole.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the explicit functions in Eq. (III.10) really solve the effective equation of motion in Eq. (III.9); the metric components, the throat positions, and the small-mass threshold are all derived from that solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For masses above the threshold, the effective spacetime still contains a traversable wormhole throat at $r=M$, supported by matter that violates the null energy condition.
For masses at or below the threshold, the classical throat is gone, the null energy condition is restored there, and the new $\tilde{\delta}_c$-dependent throat is the only wormhole throat.
The effective metric is explicit in elementary functions, so photon orbits, lensing, and tidal forces can be computed without numerical spacetime integration.
The mass threshold involves the Planck-scale combination $\tilde{\delta}_c L_0$, so the predicted disappearance affects only extremely small wormholes, not astrophysical-scale ones.
In the limit $\tilde{\delta}_b=\tilde{\delta}_c=0$ the metric returns to the classical Papapetrou exponential wormhole, providing a consistency check of the derivation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step is to locate the new throat explicitly in terms of the radial coordinate and compute null geodesics through it; the paper leaves this to numerics because the inverse of $\tilde T(t)$ is not analytic.
The same polymerized-Hamiltonian pipeline could be applied to other phantom-scalar limits of the Janis-Newman-Winicour family, yielding a class of quantum wormholes with tunable throat structure.
The simultaneous disappearance of the classical throat and restoration of the null energy condition suggests a general pattern: in these effective models, quantum geometry may remove the need for exotic matter at wormhole throats.
Because the threshold depends on the quantization ambiguities $\tilde{\delta}_b$ and $\tilde{\delta}_c$, an observed Planck-scale wormhole could in principle constrain those polymer parameters.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the first LQG effective metric for the anti-scalar Papapetrou wormhole, built by taking the JNW classical dynamics and polymerizing it in the AOS style. That construction is clean and the paper is honest about what it does and does not do. The classical limit to Papapetrou is nicely handled, and the discussion of prior wormhole polymerizations is fair.

The problem is that the central derivation does not hold up. Equation (III.9) is the effective equation of motion, and the proposed solution (III.10) does not satisfy it. Direct substitution gives a left-hand side proportional to sech^2(u) and a right-hand side proportional to sqrt(1 + tanh^2(u)), after the same prefactor. Those are not equal except at one point. The metric components, the new throat at T = T0, the small-mass disappearance threshold, and the energy-condition results all follow from that solution. So the paper's main claims are not derived as written.

The qualitative picture might survive a corrected solution. The ODE itself is plausible, and the error could be a typo in the solution or in the transcription of the equation. But the paper does not provide a workaround: the appendix Taylor expansions inherit the same problem, and the numerical plot in Fig. 1 is based on the same unverified solution.

Other soft spots are minor. The quantum parameters are fixed by the area gap and black hole entropy, which is standard practice; it does not make the argument circular. The paper also openly admits it cannot invert the relation for the new throat analytically, which limits the traversal analysis. Those are honest limitations, not fatal flaws.

This is a paper that deserves referee time. The topic is relevant and the authors have done real work. But as submitted, the central claim is not established. I would send it back for major revision: correct or re-solve the ODE, verify the solution numerically, and re-derive the consequences. If that works, the paper becomes a useful addition to the catalog. As it stands, I would not cite it yet.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies loop-quantum-gravity effective-dynamics methods to the Papapetrou spacetime, a phantom-scalar-field extension of Schwarzschild, treating the spacetime as the sigma-to-iM limit of the JNW spacetime. It derives equations of motion from a polymerized Hamiltonian constraint, proposes a solution for the variable x, constructs an effective quantum-corrected metric, and then analyzes wormhole conditions: a new quantum throat at T=T0, disappearance of the classical throat at tau=M for sufficiently small mass, and restoration of the null energy condition. The central physical claim is that extremely small masses remove the classical wormhole throat while quantum effects create a new one.

Significance. If the derivation were valid, the manuscript would provide a useful analytic example in the LQG effective-black-hole and wormhole program, with explicit metric components, a concrete mass threshold, and a falsifiable prediction. The authors are also transparent about limitations, such as the lack of a traversability analysis for the new throat and the dependence of the results on the choice of quantum parameters. However, the central derivation is invalid: the proposed solution of the key equation of motion does not satisfy that equation. Since the metric, the throat analysis, the threshold mass, and the energy-condition results all depend on that solution, the manuscript does not establish its main claim.

major comments (2)

[Section III, Eqs. (III.9)-(III.10)] The proposed solution (III.10) does not solve the effective equation of motion (III.9). Let a = sqrt(d~-1) = gamma*delta~_b and u = a*(kappa*gamma^2*L0*M*t - 1). The proposed solution can be written as x = gamma*L0*M*tanh(u)/(a + tanh(u)). Substituting into (III.9), the left-hand side becomes kappa*gamma*(gamma*L0*M)^2*a^2*sech^2(u)/(a+tanh(u))^2, while the right-hand side becomes kappa*gamma*(gamma*L0*M)^2*a^2*sqrt(1+tanh^2(u))/(a+tanh(u))^2. Equality would require sech^2(u) = sqrt(1+tanh^2(u)), which holds only at u=0, not for generic u. Therefore (III.10) is not a solution of (III.9), and the subsequent formulas (III.11), (III.18), (III.20)-(III.23) that are built from it are not derived.
[Section IV, Eqs. (IV.2)-(IV.6)] The wormhole-throat analysis and the claimed threshold M <= gamma*delta~_c*L0/2*exp(-2/(1-gamma^2*delta~_b^2)) all use the explicit functional forms of x(t), T(t), and tau(t) obtained in Section III, which in turn rely on the invalid solution (III.10). Consequently, the sign of d^2 A/dtau^2 at tau=M and at T=T0 is not established by the given calculation. The claims of a new quantum throat and of the disappearance of the classical throat for small mass therefore lack a valid derivation as the manuscript stands.

minor comments (4)

[Section III, Eq. (III.21)] The factor printed as "e2 M 2" is ambiguous; the exponent should be typeset clearly so that the expression can be checked against the classical limit.
[Section IV, Eq. (IV.6)] The final displayed equality appears to drop the positive prefactor 8*pi*L0/(kappa*M); the sign, and hence the threshold condition, is unaffected, but the formula should be corrected.
[Throughout] The quantum parameters are written with and without tildes (e.g., delta~_b and delta~_c versus delta_b and delta_c); the notation should be standardized.
[Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including "papapetrou", "astrophyiscal", and "travesability"; these should be corrected in a revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: quantum parameters are fixed by independent LQG area-gap and entropy inputs, and the wormhole conclusions are downstream consequences rather than assumed inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The quantum parameters γ, δ_b, and δ_c are fixed by independent inputs: γ=0.2375 from black hole entropy, δ_b=2√3 from the LQG area gap, and δ_c L_0=√Δ with Δ=2√3πγGℏ (Section IV and refs. [1,27,28]). These parameters are not fitted to reproduce the wormhole-throat disappearance or the new throat. The effective Hamiltonian (III.6) is obtained by standard polymer replacements, and the equations of motion, solutions, metric components, and wormhole conditions are then derived from those equations. The threshold M ≤ γδ_c L_0/2 exp(-2/(1-γ²δ_b²)) is an algebraic consequence of evaluating the second derivative of the area at τ=M, not an input imposed to obtain that result. No load-bearing self-citations appear: the cited method papers [9,12] are external, and the authors do not invoke any uniqueness theorem from their own prior work. The claimed new throat at T_0 is found by solving dA/dτ=0 and checking the second derivative, which is a legitimate mathematical derivation rather than a definitional rearrangement. Any possible algebraic inconsistency in the solution of Eq. (III.9) (as noted by a skeptical reader) would be a correctness or validity issue, not circularity, because the conclusion is not inserted as an assumption anywhere in the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the LQG polymerization scheme, the analytic-continuation definition of the anti-scalar field, and three chosen parameters: gamma, delta_b, and delta_c L0. No new particles, forces, or conserved charges are postulated beyond what the classical Papapetrou solution already contains.

free parameters (3)

Immirzi parameter gamma = 0.2375
Set from black hole entropy calculations. It appears in the effective Hamiltonian and in the small-mass threshold. It is a model input from prior literature, not fitted to the wormhole result.
delta_b = 2 sqrt(3)
Chosen so that the holonomy area equals the LQG area gap Delta. This quantization-scheme choice determines the size of quantum corrections and the disappearance threshold.
delta_c L0 = (2 sqrt(3) pi gamma G hbar)^(1/2)
Chosen as the square root of the area gap following ref [28]. It controls the location of the new throat and appears explicitly in the mass threshold.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The connection variables can be polymerized by replacing c with sin(delta_c c)/delta_c and b with sinh(delta_b b)/delta_b, with delta_b and delta_c constant on the phase space.
This is the LQC polymerization scheme imported from refs [9,12]. The paper states the parameters are constant but gives no derivation from full LQG, and different choices are acknowledged in Section V.
domain assumption The Papapetrou spacetime is obtained as the limit sigma -> iM of the JNW solution, making the scalar field imaginary and flipping the sign of its energy-momentum tensor.
Used in Section II to justify the classical Hamiltonian and again in Section III when taking the limit. The physical status of an anti-scalar field is assumed rather than derived.
domain assumption The exterior of Papapetrou spacetime admits a time-like homogeneous foliation with SU(1,1) internal gauge group and a fiducial cell.
Required for the radial evolution method of ref [9] and for the symmetry-reduced variables in equations (II.4)-(II.5).
standard math The polymerized quantities sin(delta_c c)/delta_c times pc and pi_phi are constants of motion in the effective theory.
The reduction to the solved system in Section III relies on this conservation, mirroring the classical constants of motion used in Section II.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Effective Dynamics of Papapetrou Spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6IKE7WZ5

@misc{pith2026250608821,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Effective Dynamics of Papapetrou Spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6IKE7WZ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08821}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the quantum effective dynamics of Papapetrou spacetime by using methods from loop quantum gravity. The Papapetrou spacetime is an extension of the Schwarzschild spacetime with an extra coupled anti-scalar field. By solving the equations of motion generated by the Hamiltonian constraint for Papapetrou spacetime, we can construct the quantum effective metric. The resulting effective metric for the quantum-corrected Papapetrou spacetime demonstrates the quantum effects will give rise to a new wormhole throat, while the classical wormhole throat disappear in the case of extremely small mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08821 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

flare-out

Substituting (II.19) to (II.13), we have d˜y dt = κγ(˜y + y+)(˜y + y−). (II.20) Thus, the equations of motion that we need to solve are (II.15), (II.17), (II.18), (II.19), and (II.20). To recover the Papapetrou spacetime, we need to take the following limit for the scalar charge σ := q G 4π ˜πφ L0 − →iM. (II.21) 6 In this limit, the equations of motion th...

work page
[2]

Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge University Press, 2007

T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge University Press, 2007

work page 2007
[3]

Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, 2004

C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, 2004

2004
[4]

Agullo, A.-Z

I. Agullo, A.-Z. Wang, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Loop quantum cosmology: Relation between theory and observations, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and L. Shapiro, Springer, 2023

work page 2023
[5]

Bodendorfer, F

N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. M ¨unch, Effective quantum extended spacetime of polymer Schwarzschild black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 195015 (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106024 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

Alonso-Bardaji, D

A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera, An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137075 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Lewandowski, Y .-G

J. Lewandowski, Y .-G. Ma, J.-S. Yang, and C. Zhang, Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss cheese models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101501 (2023)

work page 2023

Show all 32 references

[9]

Zhang, J

C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y .-G. Ma, and J.-S. Yang, Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, L081504 (2025); Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity: A solution without Cauchy horizons, arXiv:2412.02487v2

2025
[10]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, Quantum transfiguration of Kruskal black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241301 (2018); Quantum extension of the Kruskal spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 98, 126003 (2018)

2018
[11]

Gan, X.-M

W.-C. Gan, X.-M. Kuang, Z.-H. Yang, Y .-G. Gong, A.-Z. Wang, and B. Wang, Nonexistence of quan- tum black and white hole horizons in an improved dynamic approach, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 280411 (2024)

2024
[12]

A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Reality of the Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 878 (1968)

1968
[13]

Zhang and X.-D

C. Zhang and X.-D. Zhang, Quantum geometry and effective dynamics of Janis-Newman-Winicour singularities, Phys. Rev. D 101, 086002 (2020)

2020
[14]

Papapetrou, Eine Theorie des Gravitationsfeldes mit einer Feldfunktion, Z

A. Papapetrou, Eine Theorie des Gravitationsfeldes mit einer Feldfunktion, Z. Phys. A 139, 518 (1954). 17

1954
[15]

M. A. Makukov and E. G. Mychelkin, Simpler than vacuum: Antiscalar alternatives to black holes, Phys. Rev. D 98, 064050 (2018)

2018
[16]

Boonserm, T

P. Boonserm, T. Ngampitipan, A. Simpson, and M. Visser, Exponential metric represents a traversable wormhole, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084048 (2018)

2018
[17]

Gao and J.-H

C.-J. Gao and J.-H. Qiu, From the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked singularities to the Einstein- Maxwell phantom wormholes, Universe 10, 328 (2024)

2024
[18]

Kunstatter, J

G. Kunstatter, J. Louko, and A. Peltola, Polymer quantization of the Einstein-Rosen wormhole throat, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024034 (2010)

2010
[19]

Kunstatter, J

G. Kunstatter, J. Louko, and A. Peltola, Quantum dynamics of the Einstein-Rosen wormhole throat, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044022 (2011)

2011
[20]

DeBenedictis, Anisotropic structures and wormholes with loop quantum gravity holonomy correc- tions, Phys

A. DeBenedictis, Anisotropic structures and wormholes with loop quantum gravity holonomy correc- tions, Phys. Rev. D 84, 104030 (2011)

2011
[21]

I. P. R. Baranov, H. A. Borges, F. C. Sobrinho, and S. Carneiro, Wormhole solutions in quantum spacetime, Class. Quantum Grav. 42, 085012 (2025)

2025
[22]

Sengupta, S

R. Sengupta, S. Ghosh, and M. Kalam, Lorentzian wormhole in the framework of loop quantum cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 830 (2023)

2023
[23]

C. R. Muniz, T. Tangphati, R. M. P. Neves, and M. B. Cruz, Casimir wormholes with GUP correction in the loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101673 (2024)

2024
[24]

M. V . de S. Silva, G. Alencar, R. N. Costa Filho, R. M. P. Neves, and C. R. Muniz, Traversable wormholes sourced by dark matter in loop quantum cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 289 (2025)

2025
[25]

M. B. Cruz, R. M. P. Neves, and C. R. Muniz, Traversable wormholes from loop quantum gravity, JCAP05(2024)016

2024
[26]

M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988)

1988
[27]

P. P. Nath and D. Sarma, Study of exponential wormhole metric in f(R) gravity, Phys. Scr.99, 045004 (2024)

2024
[28]

Ashtekar and M

A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity, Class. Quantum Grav. 23, 391 (2005)

2005
[29]

Corichi and P

A. Corichi and P. Singh, Loop quantization of the Schwarzschild interior revisited, Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 055006 (2016)

2016
[30]

Turimov, Y

B. Turimov, Y . Turaev, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchl´ık, Circular motion of test particles around worm- hole represented by exponential metric, Phys. Dark Univ. 35, 100946 (2022)

2022
[31]

Manna, F

T. Manna, F. Rahaman, and T. Chowdhury, Strong lensing in the exponential wormhole spacetimes, New Astron. 102, 102040 (2023)

2023
[32]

Mychelkin, M

E. Mychelkin, M. Makukov, G. Suliyeva, and N. Jafari, On the weak and strong field effects in antis- calar background, Gen. Relativ. Grav.56, 44 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

flare-out

Substituting (II.19) to (II.13), we have d˜y dt = κγ(˜y + y+)(˜y + y−). (II.20) Thus, the equations of motion that we need to solve are (II.15), (II.17), (II.18), (II.19), and (II.20). To recover the Papapetrou spacetime, we need to take the following limit for the scalar charge σ := q G 4π ˜πφ L0 − →iM. (II.21) 6 In this limit, the equations of motion th...

work page

[2] [2]

Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge University Press, 2007

T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity , Cambridge University Press, 2007

work page 2007

[3] [3]

Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, 2004

C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, 2004

2004

[4] [4]

Agullo, A.-Z

I. Agullo, A.-Z. Wang, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Loop quantum cosmology: Relation between theory and observations, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and L. Shapiro, Springer, 2023

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Bodendorfer, F

N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. M ¨unch, Effective quantum extended spacetime of polymer Schwarzschild black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 195015 (2019)

work page 2019

[6] [6]

J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106024 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Alonso-Bardaji, D

A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera, An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137075 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Lewandowski, Y .-G

J. Lewandowski, Y .-G. Ma, J.-S. Yang, and C. Zhang, Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss cheese models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101501 (2023)

work page 2023