Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Closed-Loop Rhythmic Haptic Biofeedback via Smartwatch for Relaxation and Sleep Onset

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A smartwatch that vibrates slightly slower than your heartbeat can lower heart rate and feel relaxing, but one session does not speed up falling asleep.

desk verdict The sleep-onset null result is a useful negative, but the short-term relax claim rests on a baseline artifact until a contemporaneous control is added. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02432 v1 pith:6IQ6Y5ZB submitted 2025-07-03 cs.HC

Jueun Lee , Dennis Moschina , Supraja Ramesh , Tobias Röddiger , Kai Kunze , Michael Beigl This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords wearablehapticssmartwatchbiofeedbackrhythmicvibrationheartrateentrainmentlullabyrhythmrelaxationinterventionsleeponsetparasympatheticactivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a smartwatch can be a passive sleep aid by vibrating in lullaby-like rhythms whose tempo is continuously set just below the wearer's current heart rate. It claims that brief exposure to these closed-loop vibrations lowers heart rate and increases perceived relaxation, but that a single 20-minute session does not measurably shorten sleep onset or improve sleep-related physiological and behavioral measures. The result matters because it separates an acute calming effect from a genuine sleep-induction effect, suggesting that haptic biofeedback of this kind is not yet a reliable sleep-onset intervention. The paper's own conclusion is that rhythmic haptics may support momentary relaxation, while translation to sleep-specific outcomes needs further refinement.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a closed-loop biofeedback loop: an Apple Watch reads the wearer's heart rate through HealthKit once per second and sets the vibration tempo to 4% below that current value, an adaptation intended as 'weak non-invasive forcing' rather than the strong 20-30% adjustment used in anxiety-focused haptic studies. The haptic signal itself encodes lullaby time signatures, most importantly the alternating 3/4 waltz-like pattern made of taps and short vibrations. The system is built entirely on the watch, so the same device both senses heart rate and delivers stimulation, with no companion device required during the intervention.

What would settle it

Continuously record ECG beat-to-beat intervals while the smartwatch delivers vibrations set 4% below the current heart rate, and compare heart-rate deceleration and vagal HRV markers against a sham condition with identical vibration intensity but a fixed tempo unrelated to heart rate; if no reliable difference appears in a pre-registered sample, the claimed entrainment effect is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that closed-loop rhythmic haptic biofeedback delivered by a commercial smartwatch can produce short-term calming effects, but not enough to change sleep onset in a single session. In Study 1 (N=20), all five vibration patterns significantly reduced heart rate compared with baseline, and the alternating 3/4 pattern was rated most relaxing and ranked first by half of the participants. In Study 2 (N=28), the same 3/4 pattern during a 20-minute sleep attempt produced no significant differences in heart rate, heart-rate variability, subjective sleepiness, sleep-onset latency, or psychomotor vigilance, although RMSSD and high-frequency HRV trended toward increased parasympathetic activity. The paper therefore claims that tactile entrainment can lower arousal acutely, while its translation to sleep onset remains unestablished.

Load-bearing premise

The whole approach depends on the idea that a wrist vibration set a few percent slower than the wearer's current heart rate gently coaxes the heart to slow down, and that a smartwatch's heart-rate readings are accurate enough to run that feedback loop while someone is trying to sleep.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Short relaxation sessions of about five minutes with lullaby-rhythm haptics can reduce heart rate and improve perceived relaxation relative to no vibration.
  • Monotonous tap-only or vibration-only rhythms are judged less relaxing than alternating meters, so rhythmic variation is a relevant design feature for calming wearables.
  • A single 20-minute smartwatch vibration session should not be expected to shorten sleep onset; longer exposure, individual adaptation, or multimodal integration may be needed for sleep-specific benefits.
  • Closed-loop haptic biofeedback can run entirely on a commercial smartwatch with second-by-second heart-rate updates, enabling self-directed use without a researcher or companion device.
  • People who rarely wear smartwatches may show stronger parasympathetic responses than regular users, suggesting habituation or notification associations moderate the effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the acute heart-rate drop is a genuine entrainment effect, it should be tested against a sham vibration at a fixed tempo unrelated to heart rate while controlling expectation; the paper does not include that control condition.
  • The finger-tapping task used to estimate sleep onset may itself interfere with the intervention by demanding cognitive engagement, so an EEG-based sleep-onset measure could reveal effects that the current protocol masks.
  • A testable extension is to stop the vibration automatically once sleep onset is detected or after a short fixed window, because participants reported that continuous 20-minute stimulation kept them alert.
  • Because non-regular smartwatch users showed stronger high-frequency HRV responses, a study balanced on wearable experience and measuring notification-related associations could sharpen or overturn the reported trends.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper describes a smartwatch-based haptic biofeedback system that encodes lullaby-inspired rhythmic patterns (tap/vibration sequences in 2/4 and 3/4 meters) and adapts vibration tempo to 4% below the wearer's current heart rate, updated every second. Study 1 (N=20) compares five patterns in a within-subject resting protocol against an initial no-vibration baseline, measuring heart rate, sleepiness (SSS), questionnaire ratings, and preference rankings. Study 2 (N=28, three excluded) tests the most preferred 3/4 pattern against a no-vibration control on separate days during a 20-minute sleep-onset attempt, with ECG-derived HR/HRV, a finger-tapping-derived sleep-onset latency, SSS, and PVT. The authors report that all five patterns reduced heart rate relative to baseline and that 3/4 and Alternating were rated more relaxing, while Study 2 found no significant effects on HR, HRV, sleep onset, or psychomotor performance, with only non-significant HRV trends.

Significance. If the short-term relaxation effect were convincingly established, the work would be a useful contribution to wearable haptics and passive biofeedback for relaxation: it introduces a commercially available smartwatch implementation, uses a two-stage design to select a pattern on the basis of preference and physiology, and reports an honest null result for sleep onset. The manuscript also gives a balanced discussion of limitations such as the first-night effect and smartwatch habituation. However, the central short-term claim is not currently supported because the heart-rate comparison in Study 1 lacks a matched no-vibration control, and the abstract overstates the parasympathetic evidence.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sections 2.1.4 and 2.2.1] The central short-term finding—that all five vibration patterns significantly reduced heart rate compared with baseline—rests on a comparison to a single 10-minute baseline recorded before any condition was presented. Because this baseline is always first, the observed decline in heart rate is confounded with elapsed time, habituation to the setting, and the natural effects of continued quiet sitting. The procedure includes a one-minute walk followed by one-minute recovery before each condition, but it does not include an interleaved no-vibration or sham-vibration condition at matched times. The introduction to Study 1 states that the patterns were compared with a non-vibration control condition, but the procedure does not describe such a condition. Therefore the heart-rate reduction cannot be attributed specifically to haptic stimulation, and the positive half of the central claim is not yet established.
  2. [Abstract; Section 3.2.1] The abstract's statement that the results showed increased parasympathetic activity during short-term stimulation is not supported by the reported statistics. Study 1 measured only heart rate, not HRV, and Study 2's parasympathetic indicators were non-significant trends (RMSSD p=.07, HF p=.24, LF/HF p=.39). A trend is not evidence of increased parasympathetic activity; please rephrase the abstract and conclusion to state that no significant differences in autonomic measures were found, with only suggestive trends. The perceived-relaxation result is likewise limited to comparisons among vibration patterns, since no pre-vibration relaxation rating was collected for a no-vibration control.
  3. [Sections 2.2.1, 2.2.3, 2.2.4, and 3.2] Post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests are reported without correction for multiple comparisons. In Section 2.2.1 there are five vibration-versus-baseline comparisons at alpha=0.05; in Sections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 there are ten pairwise pattern comparisons; and Study 2 runs multiple tests on HR, RMSSD, HF, LF/HF, SSS, SOL, and four PVT metrics. With this many tests, the reported p-values should be adjusted (e.g., Bonferroni-Holm or FDR), or the results should be explicitly labeled exploratory.
  4. [Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3] The sleep-onset measurement is underspecified. The text defines SOL as the time until the first finger-tapping interval exceeds 8 seconds, and the Discussion describes participants experiencing rhythmic feedback during the Finger Tapping Task, but the procedure in Section 3.1.2 does not state when or how participants performed the FTT during the 20-minute sleep phase, or which device they tapped. Because SOL is a central outcome of Study 2, the FTT protocol must be described explicitly.
  5. [Section 2.1.3] The adaptive loop's premise—that wrist-worn optical heart rate updated every second and reduced by 4% produces the 'weak non-invasive forcing' entrainment described in prior work—is not validated. No data are reported on the accuracy of the HealthKit heart-rate samples used for adaptation, the actual delivered vibration intervals, or the congruence between the stimulation rhythm and the ECG reference used in Study 2. Please provide this validation or temper the 'closed-loop biofeedback' characterization to something like 'heart-rate-paced vibration.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2] After excluding three participants with heart-rate spikes, the analysis sample is 25, not 28; please state the final N explicitly in the results.
  2. [Section 2.2.1] Please clarify whether the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests use per-participant median heart rate over the analyzed window, and how many heart-rate samples support each participant's median.
  3. [Figure 6] The figure uses 'regulated' and 'none' as condition labels; please align them with 'vibration' and 'control' used in the text.
  4. [Section 4] The explanation that shorter stimulation durations may be more effective is speculative because the study did not manipulate duration; please mark it as a hypothesis rather than an inference from the data.
  5. [Section 2.1.3 and References] The 3–5% reduction value is attributed to both [2] and [17]; [2] appears to be a theoretical entrainment paper, so please clarify that the empirical nap-study evidence comes from [17].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper is an empirical intervention study whose claims are tested against collected data, not derived from fitted inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript reports two within-subject experiments and does not purport to derive its outcomes from its assumptions. The adaptive vibration frequency is fixed at 4% below the current heart rate based on external physiological entrainment work (Anishchenko et al. [2]; Choi et al. [17]) and is set before data collection rather than fitted to the outcome data, so the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern does not occur. The selection of the 3/4 pattern for Study 2 follows from Study 1 preference and relaxation rankings; this is a conventional two-stage design in which the second study tests distinct outcomes (sleep onset latency, HRV, PVT) on new participants, so the selection does not by construction determine the reported null results. No load-bearing argument is justified by a self-citation by the present authors, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work by the same team. The abstract's phrase 'increased parasympathetic activity' is acknowledged in the results as non-significant trends (RMSSD p=.07, HF p=.24), which is a reporting or statistical-inference concern rather than a circularity. The absence of an interleaved no-vibration control in Study 1's heart-rate baseline comparison is a methodological validity concern, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. Accordingly, there is no specific circular step to quote.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on several borrowed domain assumptions rather than fitted constants: the 4% biofeedback adaptation, the 8-second sleep-onset threshold, wrist-heart-rate adequacy for control, and transferability of musical meter to haptics. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Heart-rate reduction factor for biofeedback adaptation = 4%
    Chosen from prior nap-study literature as a 'weak non-invasive forcing' level; not fitted to outcomes, but it defines the intervention and was not validated for this setup.
  • Sleep onset latency threshold = 8 seconds
    First inter-tap interval exceeding 8 seconds defines SOL; borrowed from Casagrande et al. 1997, not fitted to these data.
  • Stimulus durations = 5 minutes (Study 1), 20 minutes (Study 2)
    Experimental design choices made to balance duration and response quality; not fitted, but directly affect whether acute effects appear.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A 4% reduction of vibration tempo relative to current heart rate constitutes 'weak non-invasive forcing' that entrains cardiac rhythm.
    Invoked in Section 2.1.3 to justify the closed-loop frequency adaptation; the cited nap study was not replicated in this setup, and no entrainment check is reported.
  • domain assumption The first finger-tapping interval exceeding 8 seconds indicates sleep onset.
    Used in Section 3.1.3 to derive SOL from FTT; follows Casagrande et al. but is applied during concurrent vibration that may interfere with tapping (participants reported interference).
  • domain assumption Wrist-worn Apple Watch heart rate is accurate enough for real-time biofeedback control during rest and sleep attempts.
    Section 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 rely on HealthKit sampling without validating against ECG for control-loop timing, though Study 2 uses a chest strap for outcome ECG.
  • domain assumption Musical meter and lullaby structures retain their calming properties when translated into haptic vibration patterns.
    Section 2.1.2; the paper does not independently validate tactile entrainment of meter, only subjective preference.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Closed-Loop Rhythmic Haptic Biofeedback via Smartwatch for Relaxation and Sleep Onset." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6IQ6Y5ZB

@misc{pith2026250702432,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Closed-Loop Rhythmic Haptic Biofeedback via Smartwatch for Relaxation and Sleep Onset},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6IQ6Y5ZB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02432}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the use of musically structured, closed-loop vibration patterns as a passive biofeedback intervention for relaxation and sleep initiation. By encoding rhythmic meter structures into smartwatch vibrations and adapting their frequency to be slightly slower than the user's real-time heart rate, our system aims to reduce arousal through tactile entrainment, offering a non-invasive alternative to auditory or open-loop approaches previously used in sleep and anxiety contexts. In the first study (N=20), we compared five adaptive vibration rhythms for their effects on heart rate and subjective perceptions of relaxation in a resting context. In the second study (N=28), we evaluated the most promising pattern from Study 1 in a prolonged sleep initiation setting. Results showed increased parasympathetic activity and perceived relaxation during short-term stimulation, but no significant effects on sleep-related measures during the sleep onset phase. This work contributes to the understanding of how wearable haptic feedback can support relaxation and sleep, offering design insights and identifying methodological considerations for effectively integrating haptic interaction into self-directed interventions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02432 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Five different rhythmic patterns used in Study 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Screenshots of the custom Apple Watch app used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the procedures for (A) Study 1 and (B) Study 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (A) Median heart rate across conditions. Overlaid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean ratings of vibration experiences across vibra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Physiological indicators of autonomic activity in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    HW Agnew Jr, Wilse B Webb, and Robert L Williams. 1966. The first night effect: An Eeg studyof sleep. Psychophysiology 2, 3 (1966), 263–266

    work page 1966

  2. [2]

    Vadim S Anishchenko, Alexander G Balanov, Natalia B Janson, Natalia B Igosheva, and Grigory V Bordyugov. 2000. Entrainment between heart rate and weak noninvasive forcing. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 10, 10 (2000), 2339–2348

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Apple Inc. 2015. WKHapticType – Apple Developer Dokumentation. https: //developer.apple.com/documentation/watchkit/wkhaptictype. Zugriff am: 30.4.2024

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Apple Inc. 2024. HKQuantityTypeIdentifier.heartRate. https://developer. apple.com/documentation/healthkit/hkquantitytypeidentifier/1615138- heartrate. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/healthkit/ hkquantitytypeidentifier/1615138-heartrate Accessed: 2024-04-30

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Apple Inc. 2024. WKInterfaceDevice play(_:)- Method. https://developer.apple. com/documentation/watchkit/wkinterfacedevice/play(_:) Accessed: 2024-04-30

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Lucia Arsintescu, Kenji H Kato, Patrick F Cravalho, Nathan H Feick, Leland S Stone, and Erin E Flynn-Evans. 2019. Validation of a touchscreen psychomotor vigilance task. Accident Analysis & Prevention 126 (2019), 173–176

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    American Medical Association. 2010. Resolution 503: Insufficient sleep in ado- lescents. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Luciano Bernardi, Cesare Porta, and Peter Sleight. 2006. Cardiovascular, cere- brovascular, and respiratory changes induced by different types of music in musicians and non-musicians: the importance of silence. Heart 92, 4 (2006), 445–452

    work page 2006

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Preston, Emily Shannon, Cristina Wilson, and Naomi T

    Anisha Bontula, Rhian C. Preston, Emily Shannon, Cristina Wilson, and Naomi T. Fitter. 2023. Deep Pressure Therapy: A Promising Anxiety Treatment for In- dividuals with High Touch Comfort? IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2023). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10115...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Hannah Brown, Emily Shannon, and Naomi T Fitter. 2021. Design and prelim- inary evaluation of the aid vest: An automatic inflatable wearable device for anxiety reduction. In 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 745–750

    2021

  3. [11]

    Mary A Carskadon. 1986. Guidelines for the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT): a standard measure of sleepiness. Sleep 9, 4 (1986), 519–524

    1986

  4. [12]

    Mary A Carskadon, Christine Acebo, and Oskar G Jenni. 2004. Regulation of adolescent sleep: implications for behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1021, 1 (2004), 276–291

    2004

  5. [13]

    Maria Casagrande, Luigi De Gennaro, Cristiano Violani, Paride Braibanti, and Mario Bertini. 1997. A finger-tapping task and a reaction time task as behavioral measures of the transition from wakefulness to sleep: Which task interferes less with the sleep onset process? Sleep 2...

    1997

  6. [14]

    Vijay Kumar Chattu, Md Dilshad Manzar, Soosanna Kumary, Deepa Burman, David Warren Spence, and Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal. 2018. The global prob- lem of insufficient sleep and its serious public health implications. In Healthcare, Vol. 7. MDPI, 1

    2018

  7. [15]

    Kyung Yun Choi and Hiroshi Ishii. 2020. ambienBeat: Wrist-worn Mobile Tactile Biofeedback for Heart Rate Rhythmic Regulation. TEI 2020 (2020), 17–30

    2020

  8. [16]

    Kyung Yun Choi, Jinmo Lee, Neska ElHaouij, Rosalind Picard, and Hiroshi Ishii

  9. [17]

    Sang Ho Choi, Heenam Yoon, Hyung Won Jin, Hyun Bin Kwon, Seong Min Oh, Yu Jin Lee, and Kwang Suk Park. 2019. Effect of closed-loop vibration stimulation on heart rhythm during naps. Sensors 19, 19 (2019), 4136

    2019

  10. [18]

    Phoebe Chua, Kat Agres, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2024. Know Thyself: Im- proving Interoceptive Ability through Ambient Biofeedback in the Workplace. In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction (SIGHCI 2023). Association for Information Systems (AIS...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury

    Jean Costa, François Guimbretière, Malte F. Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2019. BoostMeUp: Improving Cognitive Performance in the Moment by Unobtrusively Regulating Emotions with a Smartwatch. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Giuseppe Curcio, Maria Casagrande, and Mario Bertini. 2001. Sleepiness: evalu- ating and quantifying methods. International Journal of Psychophysiology 41, 3 (2001), 251–263

    2001

  13. [21]

    Mariève Cyr, Despina Z Artenie, Alain Al Bikaii, David Borsook, and Jay A Olson

  14. [22]

    David F Dinges and John W Powell. 1985. Microcomputer analyses of perfor- mance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations.Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers 17, 6 (1985), 652–655

    1985

  15. [23]

    Olga Dobrushina, Yossi Tamim, Iddo Yehoshua Wald, Amber Maimon, and Amir Amedi. 2024. Training interoceptive awareness with real-time haptic vs. visual Closed-Loop Rhythmic Haptic Biofeedback via Smartwatch for Relaxation and Sleep Onset heartbeat feedback. bioRxiv (2024), 2024–01

    2024

  16. [24]

    Jillian Dorrian, Naomi L Rogers, and David F Dinges. 2004. Psychomotor vigilance performance: Neurocognitive assay sensitive to sleep loss. Sleep deprivation (2004), 39–70

    2004

  17. [25]

    Polar Electro. 2024. Polar H9 Heart Rate Sensor. https://www.polar.com/en/ sensors/h9-heart-rate-sensor Accessed: 2024-04-07

    2024

  18. [26]

    Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology. 1996. Heart rate variability: standards of measure- ment, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93, 5 (1996), 1043–1065

    1996

  19. [27]

    Alicia Fernández-Sotos, Antonio Fernández-Caballero, and José M Latorre. 2016. Influence of tempo and rhythmic unit in musical emotion regulation. Frontiers in computational neuroscience 10 (2016), 80

    2016

  20. [28]

    Namni Goel, Takashi Abe, Marcia E Braun, and David F Dinges. 2014. Cognitive workload and sleep restriction interact to influence sleep homeostatic responses. Sleep 37, 11 (2014), 1745–1756

    2014

  21. [29]

    Monika Gurak. 2017. The Book of Lullabies. (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Matthew J Hertenstein, Rachel Holmes, Margaret McCullough, and Dacher Keltner. 2009. The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion 9, 4 (2009), 566

    2009

  23. [31]

    Horst-Peter Hesse. 2013. Musik und Emotion: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen des Musik-Erlebens. Springer-Verlag

    2013

  24. [32]

    András Horváth, Xavier Montana, Jean-Pol Lanquart, Philippe Hubain, Anna Szűcs, Paul Linkowski, and Gwenolé Loas. 2016. Effects of state and trait anxiety on sleep structure: A polysomnographic study in 1083 subjects. Psychiatry research 244 (2016), 279–283

    2016

  25. [33]

    Apple Inc. [n. d.]. WatchConnectivity Framework: Transferring Data Be- tween iOS and watchOS Apps. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/ watchconnectivity. Accessed: 2024-04-30

    2024

  26. [34]

    Abhinandan Jain, Adam Haar Horowitz, Felix Schoeller, Sang-won Leigh, Pattie Maes, and Misha Sra. 2020. Designing interactions beyond conscious control: a new model for wearable interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 4, ...

    2020

  27. [35]

    Kira Vibe Jespersen. 2022. A lullaby to the brain: The use of music as a sleep aid. In The musical neurons. Springer, 53–63

    2022

  28. [36]

    Stephanie Khalfa, Simone Dalla Bella, Mathieu Roy, Isabelle Peretz, and Sonia J Lupien. 2003. Effects of relaxing music on salivary cortisol level after psycholog- ical stress. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999, 1 (2003), 374–376

    2003

  29. [37]

    Mark L Knapp, Judith A Hall, and Terrence G Horgan. 1978. Nonverbal commu- nication in human interaction . Vol. 1. Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York

    1978

  30. [38]

    Sylvain Laborde, Emma Mosley, and Julian F Thayer. 2017. Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research–recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 213

    2017

  31. [39]

    Hui-Ling Lai and Marion Good. 2006. Music improves sleep quality in older adults. Journal of advanced nursing 53, 1 (2006), 134–144

    2006

  32. [40]

    Viviana Lo Martire, Danila Caruso, Laura Palagini, Giovanna Zoccoli, and Stefano Bastianini. 2020. Stress & sleep: A relationship lasting a lifetime. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 117 (2020), 65–77

    2020

  33. [41]

    Wendy Berry Mendes. 2009. Assessing autonomic nervous system activity. Methods in social neuroscience 118, 147 (2009), 21

    2009

  34. [42]

    Mark Meterko, Joseph D Restuccia, Kelly Stolzmann, David Mohr, Caitlin Bren- nan, Justin Glasgow, and Peter Kaboli. 2015. Response rates, nonresponse bias, and data quality: results from a national survey of senior healthcare leaders. Public Opinion Quarterly 79, 1 (2015), 130–144

    2015

  35. [43]

    Charles M Morin and Colin A Espie. 2011. The Oxford handbook of sleep and sleep disorders. Oxford University Press

    2011

  36. [44]

    Beatrice Murawski, Levi Wade, Ronald C Plotnikoff, David R Lubans, and Mitch J Duncan. 2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive and behavioral interventions to improve sleep health in adults without sleep disorders. Sleep medicine reviews 40 (2018), 160–169

    2018

  37. [45]

    NASA Ames Research Center. 2023. NASA PVT [Mobile application software]. https://apps.apple.com/app/id1146834402. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2023

  38. [46]

    Robert D Ogilvie and Robert T Wilkinson. 1984. The detection of sleep onset: behavioral and physiological convergence. Psychophysiology 21, 5 (1984), 510– 520

    1984

  39. [47]

    Yuuki Ooishi, Hideo Mukai, Ken Watanabe, Suguru Kawato, and Makio Kashino

  40. [48]

    JF Pagel and Bennett L Parnes. 2001. Medications for the treatment of sleep dis- orders: an overview. Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry 3, 3 (2001), 118

    2001

  41. [49]

    Richard V Palumbo, Marisa E Marraccini, Lisa L Weyandt, Oliver Wilder-Smith, Heather A McGee, Siwei Liu, and Matthew S Goodwin. 2017. Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature. Personality and social psychology review 21, 2 (2017), 99–141

    2017

  42. [50]

    Athina Papadopoulou, Jaclyn Berry, Terry Knight, and Rosalind Picard. 2019. Affective Sleeve: Wearable Materials with Haptic Action for Promoting Calmness. In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions , Norbert Streitz and Shin’ichi Konomi (Eds.). Springer International ...

    2019

  43. [51]

    Michael J Sateia, Karl Doghramji, Peter J Hauri, and Charles M Morin. 2000. Evaluation of chronic insomnia. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine review. Sleep 23, 2 (2000), 243–308

    2000

  44. [52]

    Rebecca Jane Scarratt, Ole Adrian Heggli, Peter Vuust, and Kira Vibe Jespersen

  45. [53]

    Fred Shaffer and Jay P Ginsberg. 2017. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in public health 5 (2017), 258

    2017

  46. [54]

    Azmeh Shahid, Kate Wilkinson, Shai Marcu, and Colin M Shapiro. 2012. Stanford sleepiness scale (SSS). STOP, THAT and one hundred other sleep scales (2012), 369–370

    2012

  47. [55]

    Anna Shcherbina, C Mikael Mattsson, Daryl Waggott, Heidi Salisbury, Jeffrey W Christle, Trevor Hastie, Matthew T Wheeler, and Euan A Ashley. 2017. Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. Journal of personalize...

    2017

  48. [56]

    Zvi Shinar, Solange Akselrod, Yaron Dagan, and Armanda Baharav. 2006. Au- tonomic changes during wake–sleep transition: A heart rate variability based approach. Autonomic Neuroscience 130, 1-2 (2006), 17–27

    2006

  49. [57]

    Petr Slovak, Alissa Antle, Nikki Theofanopoulou, Claudia Daudén Roquet, James Gross, and Katherine Isbister. 2023. Designing for emotion regulation interven- tions: an agenda for HCI theory and research. ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction 30, 1 (2023), 1–51

    2023

  50. [58]

    Hyo Won Son, Sang Hyuk Kim, Tae Mu Lee, Hyoyoung Heo, Hyun Bin Kwon, Byunghun Choi, Heenam Yoon, and Hyun Jae Baek. 2025. Closed-loop vibration stimulation based on heart rhythm for reducing sleep inertia. Journal of Sleep Research (2025), e14458

    2025

  51. [59]

    Cathy Speed, Thomas Arneil, Robert Harle, Alex Wilson, Alan Karthikesalingam, Michael McConnell, and Justin Phillips. 2023. Measure by measure: Resting heart rate across the 24-hour cycle. PLOS Digital Health 2, 4 (2023), e0000236

    2023

  52. [60]

    Juan Sztajzel. 2004. Heart rate variability: a noninvasive electrocardiographic method to measure the autonomic nervous system. Swiss medical weekly 134, 3536 (2004), 514–522

    2004

  53. [61]

    Azevedo, Nell Bennett, Andreas Bilicki, Jack Hooper, Fotini Markopoulou, and Manos Tsakiris

    Ruben T. Azevedo, Nell Bennett, Andreas Bilicki, Jack Hooper, Fotini Markopoulou, and Manos Tsakiris. 2017. The calming effect of a new wear- able device during the anticipation of public speech. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017),

    2017

  54. [62]

    Masako Tamaki, Hiroshi Nittono, Mitsuo Hayashi, and Tadao Hori. 2005. Exami- nation of the first-night effect during the sleep-onset period. Sleep 28, 2 (2005), 195–202

    2005

  55. [63]

    Michel Toussaint, Remy Luthringer, Nicolas Schaltenbrand, Gabriella Carelli, Eric Lainey, Anne Jacqmin, Alain Muzet, and Jean-Paul Macher. 1995. First-night effect in normal subjects and psychiatric inpatients. Sleep 18, 6 (1995), 463–469

    1995

  56. [64]

    Sandra E Trehub, Anna M Unyk, and Laurel J Trainor. 1993. Maternal singing in cross-cultural perspective. Infant behavior and development 16, 3 (1993), 285–295

    1993

  57. [65]

    John Trinder, Jan Kleiman, Melinda Carrington, Simon Smith, Sibilah Breen, Nellie Tan, and Young Kim. 2001. Autonomic activity during human sleep as a function of time and sleep stage. Journal of sleep research 10, 4 (2001), 253–264

    2001

  58. [66]

    Anna M Unyk, Sandra E Trehub, Laurel J Trainor, and E Glenn Schellenberg

  59. [67]

    Jan BF Van Erp and Alexander Toet. 2015. Social touch in human–computer interaction. Frontiers in digital humanities 2 (2015), 2

    2015

  60. [68]

    Preeti Vyas, Unma Mayur Desai, Karin Yamakawa, and Karon Maclean. 2023. A Descriptive Analysis of a Formative Decade of Research in Affective Haptic System Design. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–23

    2023

  61. [69]

    Kieran Woodward, Eiman Kanjo, David J Brown, T Martin McGinnity, Becky Inkster, Donald J Macintyre, and Athanasios Tsanas. 2020. Beyond mobile apps: a survey of technologies for mental well-being. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 13, 3 (2020), 1216–1235

    2020

  62. [70]

    Mingdi Xu, Takeshi Tachibana, Nana Suzuki, Eiichi Hoshino, Yuri Terasawa, Norihisa Miki, and Yasuyo Minagawa. 2021. The effect of haptic stimulation simulating heartbeats on the regulation of physiological responses and proso- cial behavior under stress: The influence of inter...

    2021

  63. [71]

    Ami Yamasato, Mayu Kondo, Shunya Hoshino, Jun Kikuchi, Shigeki Okino, and Kenji Yamamoto. 2019. Characteristics of music to improve the quality of sleep. Music and Medicine 11, 3 (2019), 195–202

    2019

  64. [72]

    Bin Yu, Mathias Funk, Jun Hu, and Loe Feijs. 2018. Unwind: a musical biofeedback for relaxation assistance. Behaviour & Information Technology 37, 8 (2018), 800– 814. Lee et al

    2018

  65. [73]

    Yiran Zhao, Yujie Tao, Grace Le, Rui Maki, Alexander Adams, Pedro Lopes, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2023. Affective Touch as Immediate and Passive Wearable Intervention. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (2023), 1–23

    2023

  66. [1992]

    Psychology of music 20, 1 (1992), 15–28

    Lullabies and simplicity: A cross-cultural perspective. Psychology of music 20, 1 (1992), 15–28

    1992

  67. [2017]

    PloS one 12, 12 (2017), e0189075

    Increase in salivary oxytocin and decrease in salivary cortisol after listening to relaxing slow-tempo and exciting fast-tempo music. PloS one 12, 12 (2017), e0189075

    2017

  68. [2021]

    In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’21)

    aSpire: Clippable, Mobile Pneumatic-Haptic Device for Breathing Rate Regulation via Personalizable Tactile Feedback. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8...

    2021

  69. [2022]

    Sleep medicine reviews 64 (2022), 101660

    The effect of evening light on circadian-related outcomes: A systematic review. Sleep medicine reviews 64 (2022), 101660

    2022

  70. [2023]

    PloS One 18, 1 (2023), e0278813

    The audio features of sleep music: Universal and subgroup characteristics. PloS One 18, 1 (2023), e0278813

    2023

  71. [2285]

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-02274-2 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK London

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.