Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Data-Efficient Finetuning Using Cross-Task Nearest Neighbors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.00196 v2 pith:6J3FMEQS submitted 2022-12-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsdatafinetuningmultitaskpoolcross-tasklabelednearest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Obtaining labeled data to train a model for a task of interest is often expensive. Prior work shows training models on multitask data augmented with task descriptions (prompts) effectively transfers knowledge to new tasks. Towards efficiently building task-specific models, we assume access to a small number (32-1000) of unlabeled target-task examples and use those to retrieve the most similar labeled examples from a large pool of multitask data augmented with prompts. Compared to the current practice of finetuning models on uniformly sampled prompted multitask data (e.g.: FLAN, T0), our approach of finetuning on cross-task nearest neighbors is significantly more data-efficient. Using only 2% of the data from the P3 pool without any labeled target-task data, our models outperform strong baselines trained on all available data by 3-30% on 12 out of 14 datasets representing held-out tasks including legal and scientific document QA. Similarly, models trained on cross-task nearest neighbors from SuperNaturalInstructions, representing about 5% of the pool, obtain comparable performance to state-of-the-art models on 12 held-out tasks from that pool. Moreover, the models produced by our approach also provide a better initialization than single multitask finetuned models for few-shot finetuning on target-task data, as shown by a 2-23% relative improvement over few-shot finetuned T0-3B models on 8 datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Merge to Mix: Mixing Datasets via Model Merging

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Merge to Mix shows that the performance of a parameter-averaged model predicts the performance of a model fine-tuned on any dataset mixture, enabling fast and accurate dataset mixture selection.

  2. Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Weighted Task Diversity allocates the annotation budget across tasks in inverse proportion to the base model's average confidence, improving MMLU and AlpacaEval scores with up to 80% fewer labels.

Pith tools