REVIEW 1 cited by
Deciphering the AMS cosmic-ray positron flux
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The flux of cosmic-ray high-energy positrons has recently been measured by AMS with unprecedented precision. This flux is well above the expectation from secondary positrons made by the observed fluxes of nuclear cosmic rays impinging on the interstellar medium. Various authors have pointed out that the positron excess may originate at the primary cosmic-ray source itself, rather than in the more local ISM, thus avoiding the temptation to invoke a dark-matter decay or annihilation origin, or nearby pulsars. We investigate the possibility that the source is the one of a comprehensive model of gamma-ray bursts and cosmic rays, proposed two decades ago. The result, based on the original unmodified priors of the model --and with no fitting of parameters-- very closely reproduces the shape and magnitude of the AMS observations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A revamped understanding of Cosmic Rays and Gamma-Ray Bursts
The paper claims new GRB and cosmic-ray data validate the Cannonball Model, with knees and positrons explained by relativistic supernova ejecta, though several 'predictions' rely on fitted parameters.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.