Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Strongly Correlated Transport in Topological Y-Junction Devices

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Interactions stabilize a new fixed point in a Y-junction of helical edge states, with spin conductance exactly 2/3 e²/h at the self-dual interaction strength.

desk verdict Serious analytic paper with a plausible but unproven intermediate fixed point; the Potts embedding needs checking before the headline 2/3 e^2/h prediction can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05051 v3 pith:6JIUR6RE submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

E. Novais This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords topologicalinsulatorhelicaledgestatesY-junctionLuttingerliquidstronglycorrelatedtransportintermediatefixedpointquantumBrownianmotionthree-statePottsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that electron-electron interactions, usually dropped from topological-insulator edge theory, create a genuinely new transport regime in a three-terminal Y-junction: for strong repulsion and special tunneling phases the junction flows to a stable intermediate fixed point, neither the decoupled-edges limit nor the Andreev-like strong-tunneling limit. If the claim is right, the junction's spin conductance is set by the interaction strength alone, taking the exact value $2/3\,e^2/h$ at $g=1/3$ and sliding smoothly from $4/3\,e^2/h$ at $g=2/9$ to zero at $g=1/2$. Because the paper starts from a concrete patterned-topological-insulator geometry and ends with a conductance tensor, the prediction is a quantitative, in-principle measurable signature of strong correlations in multiterminal topological devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the intermediate fixed point $\Gamma_M$, reached through the correlated spin-flip tunneling operator $H_s$ that becomes relevant for $g<1/2$ once the tunneling phase is degenerate. Its renormalization-group flow is dual to quantum Brownian motion on a honeycomb lattice of pinned-field minima, with sublattice-connecting operators $s_\pm$; the duality is self-dual at $g=1/3$, where the mobility is exactly $1/2$. The conformal embedding of this dual theory into the B+C boundary phase of the three-state Potts model fixes $\Gamma_M$'s universality class, and the conductance tensor (symmetric part $G_S$, antisymmetric part zero by time-reversal symmetry) converts the mobility into the predicted spin conductance.

What would settle it

A measurement or numerical simulation of spin conductance through a helical-edge Y-junction with $g\simeq 1/3$ and degenerate tunneling phase should find exactly $2/3\,e^2/h$ at low temperature; observing a different plateau, a direct jump to $4/3\,e^2/h$ or zero, or no stable fixed point as $g$ is swept from $2/9$ to $1/2$ would refute the $\Gamma_M$ claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the strongly repulsive window $2/9 < g < 1/2$, with the tunneling phase locked to the degenerate values $2r\varphi \equiv \{0, 2\pi/3, 4\pi/3\} \pmod{2\pi}$, a Y-junction of three helical edge states is governed by a stable intermediate renormalization-group fixed point, called $\Gamma_M$, rather than by the weak- or strong-tunneling fixed points. At this fixed point the spin conductance evolves smoothly from $4/3\,e^2/h$ at $g=2/9$ to zero at $g=1/2$, passing through $2/3\,e^2/h$ at the self-dual point $g=1/3$. The argument uses Luttinger-liquid bosonization with Klein factors, a duality mapping to quantum Brownian motion on a honeycomb lattice of potential minima, and a conformal identification with the B+C boundary phase of the three-state Potts model; the fixed point's mobility is then converted into a two-terminal conductance through current-current correlation functions. If correct, this supplies a concrete, geometry-tunable prediction for interacting helical-edge devices and a stable intermediate fixed point that does not rely on the Klein-factor Hilbert-space twisting that made earlier three-wire fixed points poorly understood.

Load-bearing premise

The whole intermediate-fixed-point prediction rests on a borrowed identification—that this junction's low-energy dynamics, once the Klein factors are restored, is exactly the B+C boundary phase of the three-state Potts model—which the paper cites rather than proves; if that identification fails, the stable plateau and its $2/3\,e^2/h$ value collapse, leaving only the two endpoint conductance limits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the self-dual interaction strength $g=1/3$, the spin conductance is exactly $2/3\,e^2/h$, independent of the bare tunneling amplitude.
  • Sweeping $g$ between $2/9$ and $1/2$ tunes the spin conductance continuously from $4/3\,e^2/h$ down to zero, making the interaction strength a control knob for spin transport.
  • In the strong-repulsion regime single-electron tunneling is always irrelevant, so charge and spin conductance decouple: the spin sector follows $\Gamma_M$ while the charge sector stays at its decoupled-edges value.
  • With non-degenerate tunneling phases the stable intermediate point is absent, so changing the junction geometry to push $2r\varphi$ into $\{0, 2\pi/3, 4\pi/3\} \pmod{2\pi}$ switches the device between the $\Gamma_M$ plateau and the strong-tunneling behavior with conductance $4/3\,e^2/h$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit is that $\Gamma_M$ should carry universal finite-temperature scaling exponents inherited from the Potts B+C boundary phase; measuring the temperature power law of the spin conductance near $g=1/3$ would test the fixed point more sharply than the plateau value alone.
  • Because the phase $2r\varphi$ is set by the edge separation $d_0$ in the paper's geometry, a gate- or strain-tunable edge position could switch the device between the degenerate and generic phase windows, offering an electrical switch between $\Gamma_M$ and $\Gamma_A$ without changing $g$.
  • The same fixed point should appear in any three-wire junction whose Klein factors fail to produce Hilbert-space twisting, so cold-atom or circuit-QED emulators of coupled Luttinger liquids could observe the mobility $\mu=1/2$ at self-duality directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a model for a Y-junction of three helical edge states of a two-dimensional topological insulator, including single-electron tunneling, correlated spin-flip tunneling, and pair tunneling, with Luttinger-liquid interactions. The author derives the noninteracting scattering matrix, reproduces known weak-tunneling RG dimensions, and analyzes strong-tunneling fixed points via a duality to quantum Brownian motion. The central claim is that for degenerate tunneling phases 2r*phi = 0, 2*pi/3, 4*pi/3 (mod 2*pi) and strong repulsive interactions 2/9 < g < 1/2, a stable intermediate fixed point Gamma_M governs transport, with a spin conductance that evolves smoothly from 4/3 e^2/h at g = 2/9 to zero at g = 1/2 and equals 2/3 e^2/h at the self-dual point g = 1/3. The paper also summarizes fixed-point structure and conductance predictions for other parameter regimes.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a concrete, experimentally falsifiable prediction for strongly interacting helical-edge Y-junctions: an intermediate fixed point with a fractional spin conductance that interpolates between Andreev-like and zero-conductance limits. The manuscript is commendably explicit about which results are taken from earlier work: the boundary RG exponents in Eqs. (49)-(51) and the noninteracting scattering matrix in Eqs. (42)-(48) reproduce known point-contact and Oshikawa-Chamon-Affleck results. The proposed 2/3 e^2/h value at g = 1/3 is a sharp, measurable signature that would be new. However, the existence and universality of Gamma_M rest on a conformal embedding to the three-state Potts model that is cited but not derived for this model, and the quantitative conductance curve is supported only by endpoint expansions plus an unproved relation between mobility and the current correlator. The significance is therefore conditional on those missing steps being supplied.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VII.B.2, Eq. (88)] The existence and stability of the intermediate fixed point Gamma_M for 2/9 < g < 1/2 rest entirely on identifying the dual quantum Brownian motion on the honeycomb lattice, Eq. (88), with the B+C boundary phase of the three-state Potts model, citing Ref. 43. This embedding is asserted, not derived or checked for the present model. The manuscript itself emphasizes in Sec. VII.B.2 that the absence of Klein-factor Hilbert-space twisting makes its Gamma_M unlikely to be the OCA Gamma_M, and Sec. IV notes that Klein factors made the OCA Gamma_M poorly understood. Without the embedding, the endpoint RG equations only show that both Gamma_0 and Gamma_A are unstable in the interval 2/9 < g < 1/2; they do not establish that a single stable intermediate fixed point exists, nor do they determine its universal properties. The quantitative claims in Eqs. (102)-(103) and Fig. 9 therefore depend entirely on this identification. A direct check of the boundary operator content, or a controlled derivation that the honeycomb-lattice QBM lies in the Potts B+C universality class, is the decisive missing step.
  2. [Sec. VIII, Eqs. (98)-(103)] The conductance value G_S(Gamma_M, g=1/3) = 2/3 e^2/h is obtained by equating the current-current correlator in Eq. (98) to 2/3 on the grounds that the mobility mu = 1/2 at the self-dual point. The paper does not derive the relation between mu and the correlator, and the 'smooth evolution' from 4/3 to zero is an interpolation between the two endpoint limits and the single self-dual point, not a computed curve. Equation (102) is therefore an assumption rather than a result, yet it supports the paper's central falsifiable prediction. The author should either derive the mobility-conductance relation in this Y-junction geometry or compute the current correlator directly at Gamma_M; without this, the claimed value 2/3 e^2/h is unsupported.
  3. [Sec. III, Eqs. (22)-(27)] The treatment of Klein factors is load-bearing for the mapping to the Potts model. The paper argues that Klein factors can be 'safely omitted' because their effect reduces to sign changes in expectation values, as illustrated in Eqs. (25)-(27). However, Klein factors also encode the Hilbert-space structure and boundary conditions of the fermion theory, not merely the signs of certain correlators. The paper itself acknowledges in Sec. IV that the OCA Gamma_M is poorly understood precisely because of Klein factors, and in Sec. VII.B.2 that its Gamma_M is unlikely to be the OCA one. The omission may alter the very boundary conformal field theory to which Eq. (88) is mapped. The author should justify that the sign-only treatment is sufficient for the conformal embedding, or at least discuss how the Klein-factor-induced twisting would modify the B+C phase identification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Introduction] There are numerous typographical issues: the title contains 'Y-Juction' instead of 'Y-Junction', and the Introduction has missing spaces such as 'Tomotivateprogressinthisarea, itisessential' and 'thepotentialtechnologicalbenefits'. These should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. VIII, Eq. (98)] The length L and the integration domain in Eq. (98) are not defined explicitly; the reader must infer that L is the system size and that the integral runs over the edge. Defining these symbols would improve clarity.
  3. [Sec. II, Eq. (5)] Eq. (5) states the dispersion for phi = pi/2, but the symbol phi is not explicitly defined in that paragraph; it should be tied to the Kane-Mele phase introduced earlier to avoid confusion.
  4. [Sec. VII.B.2 and Fig. 9] The text says the mobility 'increases steadily from 1 to 0 as g changes from 2/9 to 1/2', but the direction is ambiguous and Fig. 9 does not show the mobility axis. Labeling the figure with the mobility or conductance values and the direction of increasing g would remove ambiguity.
  5. [References] Reference 33 has a typo: 'David SénéchalAn Introduction to Bosonization' is missing a space after the author's name.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central ΓM identification relies on an external conformal embedding, not on the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The weak-tunneling RG dimensions (Eqs. 49-51), the refermionized scattering matrices (Eqs. 62-68), and the dual quantum Brownian motion RG equations (Eqs. 80, 86-87) are computed from the model Hamiltonian in Eqs. 22-24 and 30-31; none of the subsequent conductance values at Γ0, ΓA, or ΓM are obtained by fitting parameters to the quantity they predict. The load-bearing identification of the intermediate fixed point ΓM with the B+C boundary phase of the three-state Potts model is imported from Affleck, Oshikawa, and Saleur (Ref. 43), an external result not authored by the present paper, and it is explicitly flagged by the author as not identical to the OCA ΓM because of Klein-factor Hilbert-space twisting. A reader may worry that Eq. (87) plus the conformal embedding is an assumption rather than a derivation, but that is a correctness or verifiability concern about an external theorem, not circularity: the Potts B+C classification is independent content, and the paper's new conductance values (Eqs. 100-103) do not reduce by construction to the inputs. No self-citations are load-bearing, no fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is merely relabeled.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation contains no data fitting: every numerical input is either a material parameter or a geometric model parameter. The core claim does, however, rest on three unproven choices: the tunneling phase combination must lie in the degenerate class, the correlated-hopping signs must be positive, and the lattice classification of ΓM must match the Potts B+C boundary phase. Each of these enters as an assumption, not as a derived statement.

free parameters (2)
  • tunneling phase combination 2rφ = 2π for the degenerate class (with r = 2 and φ = π/2)
    The geometric ratio r = d0/(√3 a) enters in Eq. 7 and takes the value 2 for the geometry of Fig. 4. The intermediate fixed point exists only when 2rφ falls in the degenerate class {0, 2π/3, 4π/3} mod 2π; for other phases the junction flows to ΓA or Γ0 instead. This is a parameter choice dictated by the device geometry, not a fit to data.
  • sign of the correlated-hopping amplitudes λ_s and λ_c = positive, assumed
    Sec. VII states 'I assume λ_s,c > 0', justified as the expected sign from second-order perturbation theory in H_e. The sign acts as a π phase shift in the classical potential and affects which sublattice of minima is selected, so the existence and location of ΓM depend on this sign choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Each helical edge is a single-channel Luttinger liquid whose only consequential interaction is the g2 forward-scattering density-density term (Eq. 8).
    Sec. III, Eqs. 8-17. This is the standard low-energy description of helical edges and is taken over from the point-contact literature. It fixes the bosonized form Eq. 15 and therefore all subsequent scaling dimensions.
  • domain assumption Tunneling conserves the spin projection of the electrons and the tunneling amplitudes are identical for every pair of edges.
    Introduction and Sec. II ('I assume that tunneling preserves the spin projection, as expected in HgTe samples' and 'all tunneling amplitudes λ_e are identical'). This symmetry choice forbids the chiral χ± fixed points and selects the time-reversal-symmetric sector.
  • ad hoc to paper Klein factors can be replaced by Pauli matrices and safely omitted, with their effect reduced to sign changes in coupling constants (Eqs. 25-27).
    Sec. V states that 'the effect of Klein factors can be effectively incorporated as a sign change in the coupling constants in Eqs. (23 and 24), allowing them to be safely omitted'. The three-point expectation values in Eqs. 25-26 are the only place Klein factors are retained, and this omission is later acknowledged to distinguish this model from the OCA Y-junction.
  • ad hoc to paper The conformal embedding of Affleck-Oshikawa-Saleur applies to the present helical-edge model, mapping its intermediate fixed point to the B+C boundary phase of the three-state Potts model.
    Sec. VII.B.2: 'This fixed point can also be understood via a conformal embedding to the boundary physics of the three state Potts model, where this intermediate fixed point is associated to the B+C boundary phase', citing Ref. 43. The embedding is not derived for the helical-edge Hamiltonian.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantum Brownian motion mobility μ is directly tied to the current-current correlator in Eq. 98, with μ = 1/2 at the self-dual point g = 1/3 implying the value 2/3 for the correlator in Eq. 102.
    In Sec. VIII, the self-duality argument fixes μ = 1/2 and this is inserted into Eq. 98 to obtain G_S = 2/3 e^2/h at g = 1/3. The mapping from the mobility of the dual Brownian particle to the current correlator of the original theory is assumed rather than derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strongly Correlated Transport in Topological Y-Junction Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6JIUR6RE

@misc{pith2026250605051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strongly Correlated Transport in Topological Y-Junction Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6JIUR6RE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05051}
}
abstract

I analyze electron transport through a Y-junction formed by helical edge states of a two-dimensional topological insulator (2DTI), focusing on the strongly interacting regime. An experimentally motivated device geometry and a spin-conserving tunneling Hamiltonian are proposed. I compute the conductance tensor and show that, for specific tunneling phases and strong repulsive interactions ($g<1/2$), transport is governed by an intermediate renormalization group fixed point that interpolates between the weak- and strong-tunneling limits. These results extend previous studies of point-contact tunneling and demonstrate how interactions qualitatively modify the transport properties of multiterminal topological devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05051 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Y-junction of three topological edge states. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. , with real nearest-neighbor hopping, t1,and complex, chiral second-nearest-neighbor hopping, t2 = |t2| e iφ. This setup realizes integer quantum Hall physics without the need for an external magnetic field. Kane and Mele’s key insight was that such complex hoppings, t2, naturally emerges from the spin-orbit cou￾pling in some materials. As a result, their model effec￾tively consists of two time-reversed copies of th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Tight-biding electronic density for an edge state by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Microscopic description of the Y -junction on a topological insulator using the Kane-Mele model. The blue line represent edge states with define helicity, for instance: up spins propagating clockwise and down spins propagating counterclockwise. is bounded by a pair of …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The zero conductance scattering matrix, Γ0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: For a given ±φ˜, the up spin channel will have a χ± scattering matrix, while the down spin channel will have a χ∓ scattering matrix. The line type indicates the edge that the fermion originates, solid for edge 1, dashed for edge 2 and dotted for edge 3. As expected the…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A plot of the function F for φ¯ = 0 and π. A. The Θ field At weak tunneling and for g > 2, Hc has a relevant renormalization group flow. The minima of F lie on the FA triangular lattice, (x, y) = n⃗c1 + m⃗c2, (78) where ⃗ci = √ 4π 3 pg 2 ⃗ai . The dual theory is descri…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Renormalization group diagram for λs,c > 0 and rφ ̸= 2πn . Solid lines are stable and dotted lines are un￾stable fixed points for the renormalization group flow. The arrows indicate the renormalization flow. At g = 1 2 , 1, 2 the model is marginal and there are lines o…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Renormalization group diagram for λs,c > 0 and 2rφ ≡  0, 2π 3 , 4π 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pauly , author B

    author C. Pauly , author B. Rasche , author K. Koepernik , author M. Liebmann , author M. Pratzer , author M. Richter , author J. Kellner , author M. Eschbach , author B. Kaufmann , author L. Plucinski , et al. , journal Nature Physics volume 11 , pages 338 ( year 2015 ), ISSN issn 1745-2473

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Yang , author L

    author F. Yang , author L. Miao , author Z. F. Wang , author M.-Y. Yao , author F. Zhu , author Y. R. Song , author M.-X. Wang , author J.-P. Xu , author A. V. Fedorov , author Z. Sun , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 109 , pages 016801 ( year 2012 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    author I. K. Drozdov , author A. Alexandradinata , author S. Jeon , author S. Nadj-Perge , author H. Ji , author R. J. Cava , author B. Andrei Bernevig , and author A. Yazdani , journal Nature Phys volume 10 , pages 664 ( year 2014 ), ISSN issn 1745-2473, 1745-2481

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Roth , author C

    author A. Roth , author C. Br " une , author H. Buhmann , author L. W. Molenkamp , author J. Maciejko , author X.-L. Qi , and author S.-C. Zhang , journal Science volume 325 , pages 294 ( year 2009 ), ISSN issn 0036-8075

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    author C. L. Kane and author E. J. Mele , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 , pages 226801 ( year 2005 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007, 1079-7114 , cond-mat/0411737

    arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    author F. D. M. Haldane , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 61 , pages 2015 ( year 1988 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    author S. V. Mambakkam and author S. Law , journal Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena volume 38 , pages 055001 ( year 2020 ), ISSN issn 2166-2746, 2166-2754

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Breunig and author Y

    author O. Breunig and author Y. Ando , journal Nat Rev Phys volume 4 , pages 184 ( year 2021 ), ISSN issn 2522-5820

    work page 2021

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Xu and author J

    author C. Xu and author J. E. Moore , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 73 , pages 045322 ( year 2006 ), ISSN issn 1098-0121, 1550-235X , cond-mat/0508291

    2006 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hou , author E.-A

    author C.-Y. Hou , author E.-A. Kim , and author C. Chamon , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 102 , pages 076602 ( year 2009 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    2009

  3. [11]

    author J. C. Y. Teo and author C. L. Kane , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 79 , pages 235321 ( year 2009 ), ISSN issn 1098-0121, 1550-235X

    2009

  4. [12]

    Dolcetto , author M

    author G. Dolcetto , author M. Sassetti , and author T. L. Schmidt , journal La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento volume 39 , pages 113 ( year 2016 ), ISSN issn 0393697X, 0393697X

    2016

  5. [13]

    Zhang , author Q

    author H. Zhang , author Q. Zou , and author L. Li , journal Nano Lett. volume 21 , pages 6253 ( year 2021 ), ISSN issn 1530-6984, 1530-6992

    2021

  6. [14]

    Song , author D

    author K. Song , author D. Soriano , author A. W. Cummings , author R. Robles , author P. Ordej \'o n , and author S. Roche , journal Nano Lett. volume 18 , pages 2033 ( year 2018 ), ISSN issn 1530-6984, 1530-6992

    2018

  7. [15]

    Park , author G

    author K. Park , author G. Csire , and author B. Ujfalussy , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 102 , pages 134504 ( year 2020 ), ISSN issn 2469-9950, 2469-9969 , 2005.02570

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Dong , author X

    author P. Dong , author X. Hou , author J. He , author Y. Zhang , author Y. Ding , author X. Zeng , author J. Wang , author Y. Wu , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 109 , pages L140503 ( year 2024 ), ISSN issn 2469-9950, 2469-9969

    2024

  9. [17]

    Yi and author C

    author H. Yi and author C. L. Kane , title Quantum Brownian Motion in a Periodic Potential and the Multi Channel Kondo Problem ( year 1996 ), cond-mat/9602099

    1996 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Nayak , author M

    author C. Nayak , author M. P. A. Fisher , author A. W. W. Ludwig , and author H. H. Lin , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 59 , pages 15694 ( year 1999 ), ISSN issn 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    1999

  11. [19]

    Lal , author S

    author S. Lal , author S. Rao , and author D. Sen , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 66 , pages 165327 ( year 2002 ), ISSN issn 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    2002

  12. [20]

    Chamon , author M

    author C. Chamon , author M. Oshikawa , and author I. Affleck , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 91 , pages 206403 ( year 2003 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007, 1079-7114 , cond-mat/0305121

    2003 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Egger , author B

    author R. Egger , author B. Trauzettel , author S. Chen , and author F. Siano , journal New J. Phys. volume 5 , pages 117 ( year 2003 ), ISSN issn 1367-2630

    2003

  14. [22]

    Oshikawa , author C

    author M. Oshikawa , author C. Chamon , and author I. Affleck , journal J. Stat. Mech. volume 2006 , pages P02008 ( year 2006 ), ISSN issn 1742-5468

    2006

  15. [23]

    Agarwal , author S

    author A. Agarwal , author S. Das , author S. Rao , and author D. Sen , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 103 , pages 026401 ( year 2009 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    2009

  16. [24]

    Das , author S

    author S. Das , author S. Rao , and author D. Sen , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 74 , pages 045322 ( year 2006 ), ISSN issn 1098-0121, 1550-235X

    2006

  17. [25]

    Giuliano , author A

    author D. Giuliano , author A. Nava , author R. Egger , author P. Sodano , and author F. Buccheri , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 105 , pages 035419 ( year 2022 ), ISSN issn 2469-9950, 2469-9969

    2022

  18. [26]

    Michetti , author J

    author P. Michetti , author J. C. Budich , author E. G. Novik , and author P. Recher , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 85 , pages 125309 ( year 2012 ), ISSN issn 1098-0121, 1550-235X

    2012

  19. [27]

    Michetti and author B

    author P. Michetti and author B. Trauzettel , journal Applied Physics Letters volume 102 , pages 063503 ( year 2013 ), ISSN issn 0003-6951, 1077-3118

    2013

  20. [28]

    Suzuki , author Y

    author K. Suzuki , author Y. Harada , author K. Onomitsu , and author K. Muraki , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 91 , pages 245309 ( year 2015 ), ISSN issn 1098-0121, 1550-235X

    2015

  21. [29]

    Fendley , author M

    author P. Fendley , author M. P. A. Fisher , and author C. Nayak , journal Annals of Physics volume 324 , pages 1547 ( year 2009 ), ISSN issn 00034916 , 0902.0998

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    von Delft and author H

    author J. von Delft and author H. Schoeller , journal Annalen der Physik volume 510 , pages 225 ( year 1998 ), ISSN issn 0003-3804, 1521-3889 , cond-mat/9805275

    1998 arXiv

  23. [31]

    author A. O. Gogolin , author A. A. Nersesyan , and author A. M. Tsvelik , title Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems ( publisher Cambridge University Press , address Cambridge , year 2004 ), edition 1st ed., ISBN isbn 978-0-521-61719-2 978-0-521-59031-0

    2004

  24. [32]

    author H. J. Schulz , author G. Cuniberti , and author P. Pieri ( year 1998 )

    1998

  25. [33]

    S \'e n \'e chal , title An introduction to bosonization ( year 1999 )

    author D. S \'e n \'e chal , title An introduction to bosonization ( year 1999 )

    1999

  26. [34]

    Di Francesco , author P

    author P. Di Francesco , author P. Mathieu , and author D. S \'e n \'e chal , title Conformal Field Theory , Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics ( publisher Springer , address New York Berlin Paris [etc.] , year 1997 ), ISBN isbn 978-0-387-94785-3

    1997

  27. [35]

    author X. G. Wen , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 41 , pages 12838 ( year 1990 ), ISSN issn 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    1990

  28. [36]

    Wen , journal Advances in Physics volume 44 , pages 405 ( year 1995 ), ISSN issn 0001-8732, 1460-6976 , cond-mat/9506066

    author X.-G. Wen , journal Advances in Physics volume 44 , pages 405 ( year 1995 ), ISSN issn 0001-8732, 1460-6976 , cond-mat/9506066

    1995 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Chen , author B

    author S. Chen , author B. Trauzettel , and author R. Egger , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 89 , pages 226404 ( year 2002 ), ISSN issn 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    2002

  30. [38]

    Eggert and author I

    author S. Eggert and author I. Affleck , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 46 , pages 10866 ( year 1992 ), ISSN issn 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    1992

  31. [39]

    author C. L. Kane and author M. P. A. Fisher , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 46 , pages 15233 ( year 1992 a ), ISSN issn 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    1992

  32. [40]

    author C. L. Kane and author M. P. A. Fisher , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 68 , pages 1220 ( year 1992 b ), ISSN issn 0031-9007

    1992

  33. [41]

    Caldeira and author A

    author A. Caldeira and author A. Leggett , journal Annals of Physics volume 149 , pages 374 ( year 1983 ), ISSN issn 00034916

    1983

  34. [42]

    Guinea , journal Phys

    author F. Guinea , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 32 , pages 4486 ( year 1985 ), ISSN issn 0163-1829

    1985

  35. [43]

    Affleck , author M

    author I. Affleck , author M. Oshikawa , and author H. Saleur , journal Nuclear Physics B volume 594 , pages 535 ( year 2001 ), ISSN issn 05503213

    2001

  36. [44]

    Yi , journal Phys

    author H. Yi , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 65 , pages 195101 ( year 2002 ), ISSN issn 0163-1829, 1095-3795 , cond-mat/9912452

    2002 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kitaev , in booktitle AIP Conference Proceedings ( year 2009 ), pp

    author A. Kitaev , in booktitle AIP Conference Proceedings ( year 2009 ), pp. pages 22--30 , 0901.2686

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.