Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Searching for a light $Z'$ through Higgs production at the LHC

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Four-lepton Higgs decays at the LHC can reveal a B-L Z' boson as light as 0.25 GeV.

desk verdict Solid recasting paper with a plausible low-mass B-L exclusion, but the 0.25 GeV headline limit leans on an efficiency transfer validated only at 1 GeV; deserves review with a request for public validation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11741 v2 pith:6JZXHVNY submitted 2019-08-30 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords B-LgaugebosonZ'Higgsportalfour-leptonfinalstateLHCrecastinglong-livedparticledisplacedvertexseesawmechanism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the minimal $U(1)_{B-L}$ extension of the Standard Model — a simple gauge route to neutrino masses — can be probed with existing LHC searches much more directly than has been assumed: the CMS search for Higgs decays to four muons is sensitive to a $Z'$ as light as 0.25 GeV. With the currently allowed Higgs mixing $\sin\alpha = 0.3$, that search excludes $g_{B-L}$ down to about $5\times 10^{-6}$, closing much of the previously unconstrained window below 1 GeV and improving existing limits there by roughly an order of magnitude. The paper also shows that in this region the $Z'$ is often long-lived in the lab frame, with mean decay lengths up to about 10 cm, so the same four-lepton searches double as displaced-vertex searches. Combined with ATLAS four-lepton, CMS final-state-radiation, and CMS data-scouting dilepton analyses, the result maps the $m_{Z'}$--$g_{B-L}$ plane from 0.25 GeV to tens of TeV.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the minimal $U(1)_{B-L}$ model: a Standard Model extension with one extra $U(1)$ gauge group under which quarks and leptons carry baryon-minus-lepton number, a singlet scalar $\chi$ whose vacuum expectation value gives the $Z'$ its mass $m_{Z'} = 2g_{B-L}\langle\chi\rangle$, and three right-handed neutrinos for anomaly cancellation and seesaw neutrino masses. The production mechanism that carries the result is the Higgs portal: mixing between the SM Higgs and $\chi$, parametrized by $\sin\alpha$, allows $pp\to h\to Z'Z'$ with a partial width proportional to $(g_{B-L}\sin\alpha/m_{Z'})^2$. The recasting is carried by the CMS $h\to 4\mu$ analysis's reported signal-model-independent detector efficiency of about 60%, which the authors use to extend the quoted 0.25--3.55 GeV limits up to 8.5 GeV, together with generator-level acceptance cuts on muon transverse momentum, pseudorapidity, and displacement $L_{xy}<9.8$ cm, $L_z<46.5$ cm.

What would settle it

Recalculate the CMS $h\to 4\mu$ selection with a full detector simulation for $pp\to h\to Z'Z'\to 4\mu$ with $m_{Z'}=0.25$ GeV, $g_{B-L}=10^{-5}$, and $\sin\alpha=0.3$, and compare the accepted signal yield with the efficiency-transfer prediction; if the yield is smaller than predicted by more than the quoted uncertainty, the $5\times 10^{-6}$ bound shifts. A simpler check would be a public table of generator-level acceptance times detector efficiency for the mass grid, since the paper gives none for the extension above 3.55 GeV.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that Higgs-mediated production $pp\to h\to Z'Z'\to 4\mu$, not direct Drell-Yan production, is the channel that opens up light $Z'$ bosons at the LHC. Recasting the CMS $h\to 4\mu$ search with its model-independent limits, the authors find that the four-lepton final state is sensitive to $m_{Z'}$ as low as 0.25 GeV and, at $\sin\alpha = 0.3$, constrains $g_{B-L}$ to about $5\times 10^{-6}$; the limit weakens to $1.8\times 10^{-4}$ at $m_{Z'} = 8.5$ GeV. Because the $Z'$ is boosted in Higgs decays, it can be displaced in the lab even when its proper lifetime is short, and the CMS search's 9.8 cm transverse displacement cut lets the bound cover mean lab-frame decay lengths up to about 10 cm. The ATLAS four-lepton search gives stronger limits where it applies, but only for prompt decays and with gaps from QCD resonances; the CMS dimuon scouting search takes over above about 50 GeV, while the final-state-radiation channel is the weakest.

Load-bearing premise

The whole low-mass bound rests on the assumption that the detector efficiency reported by the CMS $h\to 4\mu$ analysis, found to be roughly signal-model independent, transfers unchanged to $B-L$ $Z'$ events at every mass used in the paper, including $m_{Z'}=0.25$ GeV and decays with muons displaced up to 9.8 cm.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing LHC Run 2 data, not future searches, already exclude a $B-L$ $Z'$ with $m_{Z'}$ around 0.25 GeV and coupling near $5\times 10^{-6}$, a region previously considered hard to reach.
  • At the High-Luminosity LHC, the same four-lepton searches will push the coupling limits lower across 0.25--8.5 GeV, with the gain muted in the displaced region below roughly 0.5 GeV.
  • The improved bounds nearly close the window for observable heavy-neutrino production through the $Z'$ or Higgs in this model: $pp\to Z'\to NN$ cross sections fall to at most a few femtobarns, and Higgs-mediated heavy-neutrino rates are suppressed by about three orders of magnitude relative to previously considered values.
  • Because the Higgs-portal limits scale with $g_{B-L}\sin\alpha$, the result can be rescaled to any assumed mixing: for example, at $m_{Z'}=1$ GeV the coupling limit moves from $3\times 10^{-5}$ at $\sin\alpha=0.3$ to $5\times 10^{-5}$ at $\sin\alpha=0.2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the efficiency transfer holds, the same CMS $h\to 4\mu$ recasting should apply to any Higgs-coupled light gauge boson with a muonic decay, making the 0.25 GeV frontier a generic test of Higgs portals rather than a $B-L$-specific result.
  • The analysis assumes zero kinetic mixing between $U(1)_{B-L}$ and hypercharge; opening that mixing would change both production and decay of the $Z'$ and would likely alter the low-mass limits, so the $5\times 10^{-6}$ bound should be read as specific to the minimal model.
  • A dedicated search with a transverse displacement cut larger than the 9.8 cm used by CMS could push sensitivity below $g_{B-L}\sim 10^{-6}$ for $m_{Z'}<0.5$ GeV, where the paper shows the $Z'$ lifetime grows while the Higgs-mediated production cross section remains non-negligible.
  • A future precise measurement of the Higgs mixing angle, for example at a lepton collider, would break the $\sin\alpha$--$g_{B-L}$ degeneracy and turn this combined search into a direct measurement of the gauge coupling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the reach of existing ATLAS and CMS searches for a light Z' in the minimal U(1)_{B-L} model, concentrating on Z' pair-production via the SM Higgs (pp→h→Z'Z'→4l), Drell-Yan Z' production, and final-state radiation from Z→4μ. The authors recast the CMS h→4μ search [46], the ATLAS h→4l search [47], the CMS L_μ−L_τ FSR search [48], and the CMS dimuon scouting search [45] into the (m_Z', g_B-L) parameter space for a fixed Higgs mixing sinα = 0.3. The central claim is that the four-lepton final state is sensitive to m_Z' as low as 0.25 GeV, with the CMS h→4μ analysis excluding g_B-L down to about 5×10^-6 at that mass, an order-of-magnitude improvement in the 0.25–1 GeV region, and that the same search can probe displaced Z' decays with lab-frame lengths up to about 10 cm.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a valuable recast that helps fill a gap in the low-mass Z' parameter space and demonstrates the utility of Higgs-mediated production for probing light gauge bosons. The analytical formulas in Eqs. (2.10), (3.1), (3.2), (4.3), and (4.4) are clearly stated, and the use of public experimental limits with explicit scenario choices (m_N = m_Z'/3, sinα = 0.3) is a strength. However, the headline sensitivity at m_Z' = 0.25 GeV relies on an unvalidated transfer of the CMS detector efficiency to a kinematically extreme region, which is the main risk to the result. The extension of the CMS mass reach beyond 3.55 GeV also lacks public validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, CMS h→4μ paragraph] The reported validation of the generator-level acceptance α_gen is limited to a single sample at m_Z' = 1 GeV. The headline constraint g_B-L ≈ 5×10^-6 at m_Z' = 0.25 GeV (Sec. 5 and Fig. 8) is obtained by applying the CMS detector efficiency ε_detector ≈ 60% to a signal at that mass, where the Z' is ultra-boosted (βγ ~ 100) and the muons are highly collimated, and for small couplings the decays can be displaced with lab-frame length up to about 1 m. Because the limit scales as sqrt(1/ε), an efficiency of 30% instead of 60% would shift the 0.25 GeV bound from 5×10^-6 to about 7×10^-6, eroding the claimed order-of-magnitude improvement. This efficiency transfer is load-bearing and should be validated at the low-mass endpoint or treated with a conservative efficiency uncertainty.
  2. [Sec. 4, CMS h→4μ paragraph] The extension of the CMS h→4μ limits from the published mass range (0.25–3.55 GeV) to 8.5 GeV is a reimplementation using the cuts in Eqs. (4.1)–(4.2) and a single-bin background estimate of 9.90 ± 1.24_stat ± 1.84_syst events, rather than the model-independent upper limits reported by CMS. No public validation table is provided for this extension, so the limits displayed in Figs. 8 and 9 for m_Z' > 3.55 GeV rest on this unvalidated reimplementation. This is load-bearing for the claimed mass reach of the CMS h→4μ channel.
  3. [Sec. 5, discussion of Fig. 8] The statement that 'it is perfectly safe to use the analysis in this region' for the CMS h→4μ search in the displaced regime (m_Z' ≲ 0.5 GeV, g_B-L ≲ few×10^-6) is not supported by any validation of the efficiency transfer for decays with lab-frame displacement approaching the Lxy < 9.8 cm and Lz < 46.5 cm cuts. The CMS ε_detector ≈ 60% factor was demonstrated by the collaboration for its own benchmark samples and is not automatically universal for a B-L Z' with a different boost and decay-vertex distribution. This is particularly relevant for the HL-LHC projection, where the displaced region contributes to the sensitivity, and should be quantified before the long-lived sensitivity claim is made.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 6] The sentence 'The constraints from the ATLAS search [40] are somewhat stronger than the CMS search [58]' appears to refer to the wrong references; the h→4l searches are [47] and [46], while [40] and [58] are high-mass dilepton analyses. Please correct the citations.
  2. [Sec. 5] The phrase 'this analysis in not included' should read 'this analysis is not included'.
  3. [Sec. 2.1] The word 'Intheseesawlimit' is missing spaces and should be 'In the seesaw limit'.
  4. [Sec. 4, CMS h→4μ paragraph] The sentence 'We have however used the model-independent limits given in Ref. [46]' is slightly confusing because the preceding sentence describes a χ^2 background estimate; consider clarifying that the χ^2 estimate is only used for the HL-LHC projection and not for the current limits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's limits are obtained by comparing external CMS/ATLAS upper limits with independently computed B-L cross sections; self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external data. The central exclusion curves in Figs. 7-9 follow from published CMS h->4mu [46], ATLAS h->4l [47], CMS FSR [48] and CMS dilepton [45] upper limits, compared with B-L signal cross sections computed from Eqs. (3.1)-(3.2) using standard NLO MadGraph/UFO inputs. No parameter of the result is fitted to the data being constrained: sin alpha=0.3 and mN=mZ'/3 are explicitly stated scenario choices, not derived from the excluded regions. The only efficiency input, epsilon_detector ~ 60%, is taken from the CMS collaboration's reported model-independence and checked by the authors at 1 GeV; whether this transfer holds at 0.25 GeV or for displaced decays is a validity/robustness concern about an external input, not circular reasoning. Author self-citations ([14], [51], [71]) provide tooling, model files, and context for heavy-neutrino comments; the constraints themselves are not justified by those citations. Thus no predicted quantity collapses by construction into an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the transferability of experimental efficiencies and on the assumed decoupling of the exotic Higgs and vanishing kinetic or mass mixing. The only hand-picked numerical inputs are sin alpha = 0.3 and m_N = m_Z'/3, both stated as choices rather than fit parameters. No new particles are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • sin alpha (Higgs mixing angle) = 0.3
    Chosen as a representative near-maximal mixing allowed by Higgs constraints in Sec. 2.2; all Higgs-mediated bounds scale with sin alpha and would weaken for smaller values.
  • m_N / m_Z' = 1/3
    Three degenerate heavy neutrinos with mass m_Z'/3 are used in the branching-ratio calculation to maximize BR(Z' to NN) and minimize the muon branching ratio; the paper states this is conservative in Sec. 2.3.
  • m_h_chi (exotic Higgs mass) = set heavy/decoupled
    The second scalar is assumed heavy enough not to affect the rates and is not assigned a numerical value; this decoupling assumption appears in Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 3.2.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Zero kinetic mixing between U(1)_{B-L} and U(1)_Y at the electroweak scale.
    Sec. 2.1 makes this assumption to isolate the Higgs-mixing portal; loop-induced kinetic mixing could modify the couplings and the resulting limits.
  • domain assumption No Z-Z' mass mixing; SM fermions interact with the Z' only through g_B-L.
    Assumed throughout; Sec. 5 acknowledges that opening this mixing adds hypercharge-portal contributions and changes the interpretation of the limits.
  • domain assumption DarkCast scaling correctly accounts for nonperturbative QCD effects in Z' branching ratios below 1 GeV.
    Used in Sec. 2.3 to set low-mass branching ratios; if the scaling is inaccurate, the low-mass bounds would shift.
  • domain assumption The exotic Higgs h_chi is heavy enough that only the SM-like Higgs contributes to Z' pair production.
    Stated in Secs. 2.2 and 3.2; if h_chi is lighter, additional production and width effects appear.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Searching for a light $Z'$ through Higgs production at the LHC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6JZXHVNY

@misc{pith2026190811741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Searching for a light $Z'$ through Higgs production at the LHC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6JZXHVNY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11741}
}
abstract

We investigate the potential of LHC resonance searches in leptonic final states to probe the $Z'$ in the minimal $U(1)_{B-L}$ model. Considering the current constraints on the $Z'$ in terms of its mass $m_{Z'}$ and the associated gauge coupling $g_{B-L}$ as well as constraints in the Higgs sector, we analyse the potential of dilepton and four lepton final states for $Z'$ production. This includes Drell-Yan production, Higgs mediated decays and final state radiation processes concentrating only on the ATLAS and CMS detectors at the LHC. We show that the four-lepton final state is sensitive to $m_{Z'}$ as low as 0.25 GeV. Furthermore, setting the Higgs mixing to $\sin\alpha = 0.3$, this final state has a strong sensitivity and it probes regions of parameter space where the $Z'$ is long-lived. We demonstrate the sensitivity at the High Luminosity LHC and comment on the potential of probing displaced vertices due to long-lived $Z'$. Finally, we also comment on the strength of $Z'$ and Higgs mediated heavy neutrino processes by taking into account the constraints derived.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Submitted to: Phys. Lett.(2018) , [1812.00380]. – 24 –

  2. [47]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-Standard-Model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2018) 166, [1802.03388]

    ATLAScollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-Standard-Model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2018) 166, [1802.03388]

  3. [48]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for anLµ−Lτ gauge boson using Z→ 4µ events in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B792 (2019) 345–368, [1808.03684]

  4. [45]

    collaboration,Search for a narrow resonance decaying to a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Tech

    CMS Collaboration collaboration, C. collaboration,Search for a narrow resonance decaying to a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-EXO-19-018, CERN, Geneva, 2019

  5. [1]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle,Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 1642

  6. [2]

    Davidson,B−l as the Fourth Color, Quark - Lepton Correspondence, and Natural Masslessness of Neutrinos Within a Generalized Ws Model, Phys

    A. Davidson,B−l as the Fourth Color, Quark - Lepton Correspondence, and Natural Masslessness of Neutrinos Within a Generalized Ws Model, Phys. Rev. D20 (1979) 776

  7. [3]

    R. N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak,Local B-L Symmetry of Electroweak Interactions, Majorana Neutrinos and Neutron Oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 1316–1319

  8. [4]

    ATLAScollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for new high-mass phenomena in the dilepton final state using 36 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2017) 182, [1707.02424]

Show all 73 references
  1. [5]

    SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Hea vy Fla vor Group, DELPHI, LEP, ALEPH, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, L3 collaboration, t. S. Electroweak,A Combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model, hep-ex/0312023

  2. [6]

    SLAC E158 collaboration, P. L. Anthony et al.,Observation of parity nonconservation in Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 181602, [hep-ex/0312035]

  3. [7]

    Carena, A

    M. Carena, A. Daleo, B. A. Dobrescu and T. M. P. Tait,Z′ gauge bosons at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 093009, [hep-ph/0408098]

  4. [8]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csaki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia,The Minimal Set of Electroweak Precision Parameters, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 033011, [hep-ph/0604111]

  5. [9]

    Harnik, J

    R. Harnik, J. Kopp and P. A. N. Machado,Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors, JCAP 1207 (2012) 026, [1202.6073]

  6. [10]

    Bellini et al.,Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino, Phys

    G. Bellini et al.,Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 141302, [1104.1816]

  7. [11]

    Bauer, P

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel,Hunting All the Hidden Photons, JHEP 07 (2018) 094, [1803.05466]

  8. [12]

    Vilain et al.,Measurement of differential cross-sections for muon-neutrino electron scattering, Phys

    CHARM-II collaboration, P. Vilain et al.,Measurement of differential cross-sections for muon-neutrino electron scattering, Phys. Lett. B302 (1993) 351–355. – 22 –

  9. [13]

    Deniz et al.,Measurement of Nu(e)-bar -Electron Scattering Cross-Section with a CsI(Tl) Scintillating Crystal Array at the Kuo-Sheng Nuclear Power Reactor, Phys

    TEXONO collaboration, M. Deniz et al.,Measurement of Nu(e)-bar -Electron Scattering Cross-Section with a CsI(Tl) Scintillating Crystal Array at the Kuo-Sheng Nuclear Power Reactor, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 072001, [0911.1597]

  10. [14]

    Amrith, J

    S. Amrith, J. M. Butterworth, F. F. Deppisch, W. Liu, A. Varma and D. Yallup,LHC Constraints on aB−L Gauge Model using Contur, 1811.11452

  11. [15]

    J. M. Butterworth, D. Grellscheid, M. Kr¨amer, B. Sarrazin and D. Yallup,Constraining new physics with collider measurements of Standard Model signatures, JHEP 03 (2017) 078, [1606.05296]

  12. [16]

    Ilten, Y

    P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, M. Williams and W. Xue,Serendipity in dark photon searches, JHEP 06 (2018) 004, [1801.04847]

  13. [17]

    Aaij et al.,Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeVpp Collisions, Phys

    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al.,Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeVpp Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 061801, [1710.02867]

  14. [18]

    Bechtle, S

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,HiggsSignals : Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 2711, [1305.1933]

  15. [19]

    Ilnicka, T

    A. Ilnicka, T. Robens and T. Stefaniak,Constraining Extended Scalar Sectors at the LHC and beyond, Mod. Phys. Lett.A33 (2018) 1830007, [1803.03594]

  16. [20]

    Bechtle, S

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,Probing the Standard Model with Higgs signal rates from the Tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC, JHEP 11 (2014) 039, [1403.1582]

  17. [21]

    ATLAScollaboration, Measurements of the Higgs boson production cross section via Vector Boson Fusion and associatedWH production in theWW∗→𝓁ν𝓁ν decay mode with the ATLAS detector at√s = 13 TeV,

  18. [22]

    ATLAScollaboration, Study of the Higgs boson properties and search for high-mass scalar resonances in theH→ZZ∗→ 4𝓁 decay channel at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

  19. [23]

    ATLAScollaboration, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson produced in association with a vector boson and decaying to ab¯b pair inpp collisions at 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector,

  20. [24]

    ATLAScollaboration, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying intobb in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

  21. [25]

    ATLAScollaboration, Measurement of fiducial, differential and production cross sections in the H→γγ decay channel with 13.3 fb−1 of 13 TeV proton-proton collision data with the ATLAS detector,

  22. [26]

    ATLAScollaboration, Search for the Associated Production of a Higgs Boson and a Top Quark Pair in Multilepton Final States with the ATLAS Detector,

  23. [27]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2017) 047, [1706.09936]

  24. [28]

    CMS collaboration, Updated measurements of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel at√s = 13 TeV in pp collisions at CMS., . – 23 –

  25. [29]

    CMS collaboration, Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV,

  26. [30]

    CMS collaboration, Update on the search for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at the LHC decaying to W + W in the fully leptonic final state,

  27. [31]

    Khachatryan et al.,Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, JHEP 10 (2015) 144, [1504.00936]

    CMS collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, JHEP 10 (2015) 144, [1504.00936]

  28. [32]

    Collaboration,Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV,

    CMS collaboration, C. Collaboration,Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV,

  29. [33]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for heavy ZZ resonances in the𝓁+𝓁−𝓁+𝓁− and 𝓁+𝓁−ν¯ν final states using proton–proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    ATLAScollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for heavy ZZ resonances in the𝓁+𝓁−𝓁+𝓁− and 𝓁+𝓁−ν¯ν final states using proton–proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J.C78 (2018) 293, [1712.06386]

  30. [34]

    Lopez-Val and T

    D. Lopez-Val and T. Robens,∆r and the W-boson mass in the singlet extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 114018, [1406.1043]

  31. [35]

    Robens and T

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak,Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C75 (2015) 104, [1501.02234]

  32. [36]

    D’Eramo, B

    F. D’Eramo, B. J. Kavanagh and P. Panci,Probing Leptophilic Dark Sectors with Hadronic Processes, Phys. Lett. B771 (2017) 339–348, [1702.00016]

  33. [37]

    Anastasi et al.,Limit on the production of a low-mass vector boson ine+e−→ Uγ, U→ e+e− with the KLOE experiment, Phys

    A. Anastasi et al.,Limit on the production of a low-mass vector boson ine+e−→ Uγ, U→ e+e− with the KLOE experiment, Phys. Lett. B750 (2015) 633–637, [1509.00740]

  34. [38]

    BaBar collaboration, J. P. Lees et al.,Search for a Dark Photon ine+e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 201801, [1406.2980]

  35. [39]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for high-mass resonances in dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2018) 120, [1803.06292]

  36. [40]

    Aad et al.,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at√s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at√s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B796 (2019) 68–87, [1903.06248]

  37. [41]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for low-mass quark-antiquark resonances produced in association with a photon at√s = 13 TeV, 1905.10331

  38. [42]

    J. Gu, H. Li, Z. Liu, S. Su and W. Su,Learning from Higgs Physics at Future Higgs Factories, JHEP 12 (2017) 153, [1709.06103]

  39. [43]

    Dong et al.,CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector, 1811.10545

    CEPC Study Group collaboration, M. Dong et al.,CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector, 1811.10545

  40. [44]

    Fujiwara, T

    T. Fujiwara, T. Kugo, H. Terao, S. Uehara and K. Yamawaki,Nonabelian Anomaly and Vector Mesons as Dynamical Gauge Bosons of Hidden Local Symmetries, Prog. Theor. Phys. 73 (1985) 926

  41. [49]

    de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, 1610.07922

  42. [50]

    Tanabashi et al.,Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group collaboration, M. Tanabashi et al.,Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 030001

  43. [51]

    F. F. Deppisch, W. Liu and M. Mitra,Long-lived Heavy Neutrinos from Higgs Decays, JHEP 08 (2018) 181, [1804.04075]

  44. [52]

    Degrande, C

    C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter,UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 1201–1214, [1108.2040]

  45. [53]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, [1405.0301]

  46. [54]

    Sj¨ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 159–177, [1410.3012]

  47. [55]

    Aad et al.,A search for prompt lepton-jets inpp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2016) 062, [1511.05542]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,A search for prompt lepton-jets inpp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2016) 062, [1511.05542]

  48. [56]

    Aad et al.,Search for long-lived neutral particles decaying into lepton jets in proton-proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 088, [1409.0746]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for long-lived neutral particles decaying into lepton jets in proton-proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 088, [1409.0746]

  49. [57]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for light long-lived neutral particles produced in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV and decaying into collimated leptons or light hadrons with the ATLAS detector, 1909.01246

  50. [58]

    CMS Collaboration collaboration, Search for a narrow resonance in high-mass dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions using 140fb−1 of data at√s = 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-EXO-19-019, CERN, Geneva, 2019

  51. [59]

    Khalil,Low scaleB - L extension of the Standard Model at the LHC, J

    S. Khalil,Low scaleB - L extension of the Standard Model at the LHC, J. Phys. G35 (2008) 055001, [hep-ph/0611205]

  52. [60]

    Khalil,TeV-scale gauged B-L symmetry with inverse seesaw mechanism, Phys

    S. Khalil,TeV-scale gauged B-L symmetry with inverse seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 077702, [1004.0013]

  53. [61]

    C. O. Dib, G. R. Moreno and N. A. Neill,Neutrinos with a linear seesaw mechanism in a scenario of gauged B-L symmetry, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 113003, [1409.1868]

  54. [62]

    A. Das, N. Okada and D. Raut,Enhanced pair production of heavy Majorana neutrinos at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 115023, [1710.03377]

  55. [63]

    A. Das, N. Okada and D. Raut,Heavy Majorana neutrino pair productions at the LHC in minimal U(1) extended Standard Model, Eur. Phys. J.C78 (2018) 696, [1711.09896]. – 25 –

  56. [64]

    E. J. Chun, A. Das, J. Kim and J. Kim,Searching for flavored gauge bosons, JHEP 02 (2019) 093, [1811.04320]

  57. [65]

    A. Das, N. Okada, S. Okada and D. Raut,Probing the seesaw mechanism at the 250 GeV ILC, 1812.11931

  58. [66]

    S. Jana, N. Okada and D. Raut,Displaced vertex signature of type-I seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 035023, [1804.06828]

  59. [67]

    Klasen, F

    M. Klasen, F. Lyonnet and F. S. Queiroz,NLO+NLL collider bounds, Dirac fermion and scalar dark matter in the B–L model, Eur. Phys. J.C77 (2017) 348, [1607.06468]

  60. [68]

    Fileviez Pérez, C

    P. Fileviez Pérez, C. Murgui and A. D. Plascencia,Neutrino-Dark Matter Connections in Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 035041, [1905.06344]

  61. [69]

    Heeba and F

    S. Heeba and F. Kahlhoefer,Probing the freeze-in mechanism in dark matter models with U(1)′ gauge extensions, 1908.09834

  62. [70]

    R. N. Mohapatra and N. Okada,Dark Matter Constraints on Low Mass and Weakly Coupled B-L Gauge Boson, 1908.11325

  63. [71]

    Deppisch, S

    F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni and W. Liu,Heavy neutrino production viaZ′ at the lifetime frontier, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 035005, [1905.11889]

  64. [72]

    A. Das, P. S. B. Dev and N. Okada,Long-Lived TeV-Scale Right-Handed Neutrino Production at the LHC in GaugedU(1)X Model, 1906.04132

  65. [73]

    Chiang, G

    C.-W. Chiang, G. Cottin, A. Das and S. Mandal,Displaced heavy neutrinos fromZ′ decays at the LHC, 1908.09838. – 26 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.