Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Initial Investigation of Non-Native Spoken Question-Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.04691 v1 pith:6K6DVEA2 submitted 2021-07-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords spokensystemstaskgrammarnon-nativetext-basedapproachesassessment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Text-based machine comprehension (MC) systems have a wide-range of applications, and standard corpora exist for developing and evaluating approaches. There has been far less research on spoken question answering (SQA) systems. The SQA task considered in this paper is to extract the answer from a candidate$\text{'}$s spoken response to a question in a prompt-response style language assessment test. Applying these MC approaches to this SQA task rather than, for example, off-topic response detection provides far more detailed information that can be used for further downstream processing. One significant challenge is the lack of appropriately annotated speech corpora to train systems for this task. Hence, a transfer-learning style approach is adopted where a system trained on text-based MC is evaluated on an SQA task with non-native speakers. Mismatches must be considered between text documents and spoken responses; non-native spoken grammar and written grammar. In practical SQA, ASR systems are used, necessitating an investigation of the impact of ASR errors. We show that a simple text-based ELECTRA MC model trained on SQuAD2.0 transfers well for SQA. It is found that there is an approximately linear relationship between ASR errors and the SQA assessment scores but grammar mismatches have minimal impact.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools