Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Whose ChatGPT? Unveiling Real-World Educational Inequalities Introduced by Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.22282 v2 pith:6KH3DR5A submitted 2024-10-29 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords llmsstudentsavailabilityeducationalequitywritingchatgptdisadvantaged
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The universal availability of ChatGPT and other similar tools since late 2022 has prompted tremendous public excitement and experimental effort about the potential of large language models (LLMs) to improve learning experience and outcomes, especially for learners from disadvantaged backgrounds. However, little research has systematically examined the real-world impacts of LLM availability on educational equity beyond theoretical projections and controlled studies of innovative LLM applications. To depict trends of post-LLM inequalities, we analyze 1,140,328 academic writing submissions from 16,791 college students across 2,391 courses between 2021 and 2024 at a public, minority-serving institution in the US. We find that students' overall writing quality gradually increased following the availability of LLMs and that the writing quality gaps between linguistically advantaged and disadvantaged students became increasingly narrower. However, this equitizing effect was more concentrated on students with higher socioeconomic status. These findings shed light on the digital divides in the era of LLMs and raise questions about the equity benefits of LLMs in early stages and highlight the need for researchers and practitioners on developing responsible practices to improve educational equity through LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Addressing the sustainable AI trilemma: a case study on LLM agents and RAG

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM-dependent memory operations in agents and RAG consume orders of magnitude more energy than vector methods, and resource-constrained hardware pays higher energy for lower quality.

Pith tools