Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A theorem on extensive ground state entropy, spin liquidity and some related models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06236 v7 pith:6LO3WVTI submitted 2024-07-07 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords spinquantumanticommutingguillemotleftguillemotrightliquiditymodelsstructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

An exact mechanism is written down to guarantee extensive residual ground state entropy and spin liquidity in spin-1/2 lattice models with bond-dependent couplings. It is based on the presence of extensively large and mutually non-commuting (``\guillemotleft anticommuting\guillemotright'') sets of local conserved quantities with a gauge-like character. This mutual algebra is similar to those of spin-1/2 degrees of freedom however arising in the structure of local conserved charges whose support is not restricted to a single lattice site. The general theorem is first pedagogically illustrated through a variant of the familiar one-dimensional quantum Ising model featuring such an \guillemotleft anticommuting\guillemotright$~$structure. This leads to classical spin liquidity co-existing with quantum Ising order. The rest of the paper is then devoted to applications in higher dimensions with more general \guillemotleft anticommuting\guillemotright$~$structures which voids spin or magnetic ordering altogether. Proofs of the resultant quantum spin liquidity are given through an analysis of static and dynamic $n$-point spin correlators relying solely on the \guillemotleft anticommuting\guillemotright$~$algebraic structure of the constructed models. It is not evident if they admit exact solutions using known techniques. The precise nature of these quantum spin liquids is thus an open question including the existence of a quasiparticle description for these models. We compare and contrast them with other well-known quantum spin liquids.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools