pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09877 · v1 · pith:6LRFRV2Knew · submitted 2019-06-24 · ✦ hep-ex · nucl-ex

J/psi production as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in pp collisions at sqrt{s} = 5.02 TeV with ALICE

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 16:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex nucl-ex
keywords J/ψ productioncharged particle multiplicitypp collisionsALICE experimentforward rapidityquarkoniummultiplicity dependence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relative J/ψ yield increases linearly with charged-particle multiplicity in 5.02 TeV pp collisions at forward rapidity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first measurement of relative J/ψ yields versus relative charged-particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV, taken at forward rapidity. The data show a linear rise in J/ψ production as multiplicity grows. When placed alongside earlier ALICE results at 13 TeV, the trend stays the same across energies but varies strongly with the size of the rapidity interval separating the J/ψ measurement from the multiplicity count. These findings are set against theoretical calculations to probe the mechanisms behind charmonium production in small collision systems.

Core claim

The relative J/ψ yields as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity exhibit a linear increase in pp collisions at √s = 5.02 TeV measured at forward rapidity. Comparison with measurements at √s = 13 TeV shows that this increase is independent of collision energy but depends strongly on the rapidity gap between the J/ψ and multiplicity measurements.

What carries the argument

The ratio of J/ψ yield in a given multiplicity class to the average yield, plotted against the relative multiplicity, measured in the forward region.

Load-bearing premise

That the J/ψ and multiplicity measurements at different rapidities and energies are comparable without large uncorrected systematic effects from detector acceptance or analysis choices.

What would settle it

A measurement at a third energy, such as 7 TeV, showing a different slope for the multiplicity dependence would falsify the energy-independence claim.

read the original abstract

The relative J/$\psi$ yields as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV, measured at forward rapidity, are investigated for the first time. A linear increase of the relative J/$\psi$ yield with respect to multiplicity is observed. A comparison of the findings of the present work with the available ALICE measurements obtained in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV at forward and mid-rapidity indicates that the increase of J/$\psi$ with multiplicity is independent of energy but exhibits a strong dependence on the rapidity gap between the J/$\psi$ and multiplicity measurements. The results are compared with theoretical model calculations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first measurement of relative J/ψ yields as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity in pp collisions at √s = 5.02 TeV at forward rapidity with ALICE. It observes a linear increase and compares the results to prior ALICE measurements at √s = 13 TeV (forward and mid-rapidity) to conclude that the multiplicity dependence is independent of collision energy but exhibits a strong dependence on the rapidity gap between the J/ψ and multiplicity measurements. The data are also compared to theoretical models.

Significance. If the cross-energy and cross-rapidity comparisons are shown to be robust, the result constrains models of charmonium production in high-multiplicity pp events by isolating the role of rapidity correlations versus energy. The experimental measurement itself is a straightforward extension of established ALICE techniques and supplies new data points for model testing.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results/comparison section] Results/comparison section: The central claim that the J/ψ multiplicity dependence is energy-independent but rapidity-gap-dependent rests on quantitative comparison of the 5.02 TeV forward-rapidity slope with the 13 TeV forward- and mid-rapidity slopes. The manuscript does not provide an explicit demonstration (e.g., a table or dedicated paragraph) that the relative multiplicity estimator is defined over identical pseudorapidity intervals, that pile-up and vertexing corrections are applied consistently, or that residual detector-response differences have been quantified and shown not to mimic a rapidity-gap effect. Without this, the slope comparison that underpins the energy-independence statement cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main observations but omits any mention of statistical significance, systematic uncertainties, or the size of the multiplicity bins; adding a single sentence summarizing these would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review. The major comment identifies a need for explicit documentation supporting the cross-energy and cross-rapidity slope comparisons. We address this below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the J/ψ multiplicity dependence is energy-independent but rapidity-gap-dependent rests on quantitative comparison of the 5.02 TeV forward-rapidity slope with the 13 TeV forward- and mid-rapidity slopes. The manuscript does not provide an explicit demonstration (e.g., a table or dedicated paragraph) that the relative multiplicity estimator is defined over identical pseudorapidity intervals, that pile-up and vertexing corrections are applied consistently, or that residual detector-response differences have been quantified and shown not to mimic a rapidity-gap effect. Without this, the slope comparison that underpins the energy-independence statement cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration would strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (and accompanying table) in the Results/comparison section that: (i) states the pseudorapidity acceptance used for the multiplicity estimator in each dataset (|η|<1 for the mid-rapidity measurement and the corresponding forward intervals for the others), confirming they match the definitions in the cited 13 TeV publications; (ii) notes that pile-up rejection, vertex reconstruction, and event-selection criteria follow the identical ALICE procedures documented in those references; and (iii) summarizes the evaluation of residual detector-response differences (via Monte Carlo closure tests and data-driven checks) showing that any such effects are smaller than the quoted uncertainties and do not alter the observed slope ordering with rapidity gap. These additions will allow the reader to evaluate the robustness of the energy-independence statement directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Pure experimental measurement; no derivation or self-referential fitting

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of relative J/ψ yields as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity at forward rapidity in 5.02 TeV pp collisions. The central claims consist of an observed linear trend and a comparison to prior ALICE datasets at 13 TeV. No equations derive a quantity from fitted parameters that are then re-used as a prediction, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem or self-citation chain is invoked to force the result. The analysis is a self-contained empirical observation against external data, qualifying for score 0 under the rules.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental measurement paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced as the claim is observational.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5665 in / 1064 out tokens · 44143 ms · 2026-05-25T16:55:04.007125+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

9 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sjstrand and M

    T. Sjstrand and M. van Zijl, Phys. Rev. D36, 2019 (1987)

  2. [2]

    Abelev et al

    B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B712, 165 (2012)

  3. [3]

    S. G. Weber (ALICE Collaboration), (2017) [arXiv:1704.04735 [hep-ex]]

  4. [4]

    and others (ALICE Collaboration), Phys

    Adamov, D. and others (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B776, 91-104 (2018)

  5. [5]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), JHEP 1509, 148 (2015)

  6. [6]

    Aamodt et al

    K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), JINST 3, S08002 (2008)

  7. [7]

    S. G. Weber, A. Dubla, A. Andronic and A. Morsch, (2018) arXiv:1811.07744 [nucl-th]

  8. [8]

    B. Z. Kopeliovich et al., Phys. Rev. D88, 116002 (2013) [arXiv:1308.3638 [hep-ph]]

  9. [9]

    E. G. Ferreiro and C. Pajares, Phys. Rev. C86, 034903 (2012) [arXiv:1203.5936 [hep-ph]]