Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Balancing mass and momentum in the Local Group

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1405.3662 v2 pith:6LYKWBNQ submitted 2014-05-14 astro-ph.GA

Balancing mass and momentum in the Local Group

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords massodotcirctotaltimesconsistentestimatefind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

In the rest frame of the Local Group (LG), the total momentum of the Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31) should balance to zero. We use this fact to constrain new solutions for the solar motion with respect to the LG centre-of-mass, the total mass of the LG, and the individual masses of M31 and the MW. Using the set of remote LG galaxies at $>350$ kpc from the MW and M31, we find that the solar motion has amplitude $V_{\odot}=299\pm 15 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$ in a direction pointing toward galactic longitude $l_{\odot}=98.4^{\circ}\pm 3.6^{\circ}$ and galactic latitude $b_{\odot}=-5.9^{\circ}\pm 3.0^{\circ}$. The velocities of M31 and the MW in this rest frame give a direct measurement of their mass ratio, for which we find $\log_{10} (M_{\rm M31}/M_{\rm MW})=0.36 \pm 0.29$. We combine these measurements with the virial theorem to estimate the total mass within the LG as $M_{\rm LG}=(2.5\pm 0.4)\times 10^{12}~{\rm M}_{\odot}$. Our value for $M_{\rm LG}$ is consistent with the sum of literature values for $M_{\rm MW}$ and $M_{\rm M31}$. This suggests that the mass of the LG is almost entirely located within the two largest galaxies rather than being dispersed on larger scales or in a background medium. The outskirts of the LG are seemingly rather empty. Combining our measurement for $M_{\rm LG}$ and the mass ratio, we estimate the individual masses of the MW and M31 to be $M_{\rm MW}=(0.8\pm 0.5)\times 10^{12}~{\rm M}_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm M31}=(1.7\pm 0.3)\times 10^{12}~{\rm M}_{\odot}$, respectively. Our analysis favours M31 being more massive than the MW by a factor of $\sim$2.3, and the uncertainties allow only a small probability (9.8%) that the MW is more massive. This is consistent with other properties such as the maximum rotational velocities, total stellar content, and numbers of globular clusters and dwarf satellites, which all suggest that $M_{\rm M31}/M_{\rm MW}>1$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.