Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DNN Verification, Reachability, and the Exponential Function Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.06064 v2 pith:6MYYEHA2 submitted 2023-05-10 cs.LO cs.CC

DNN Verification, Reachability, and the Exponential Function Problem

classification cs.LO cs.CC
keywords verificationdnnsactivationfunctionsproblemdevelopingalgorithmschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly being deployed to perform safety-critical tasks. The opacity of DNNs, which prevents humans from reasoning about them, presents new safety and security challenges. To address these challenges, the verification community has begun developing techniques for rigorously analyzing DNNs, with numerous verification algorithms proposed in recent years. While a significant amount of work has gone into developing these verification algorithms, little work has been devoted to rigorously studying the computability and complexity of the underlying theoretical problems. Here, we seek to contribute to the bridging of this gap. We focus on two kinds of DNNs: those that employ piecewise-linear activation functions (e.g., ReLU), and those that employ piecewise-smooth activation functions (e.g., Sigmoids). We prove the two following theorems: 1) The decidability of verifying DNNs with a particular set of piecewise-smooth activation functions is equivalent to a well-known, open problem formulated by Tarski; and 2) The DNN verification problem for any quantifier-free linear arithmetic specification can be reduced to the DNN reachability problem, whose approximation is NP-complete. These results answer two fundamental questions about the computability and complexity of DNN verification, and the ways it is affected by the network's activation functions and error tolerance; and could help guide future efforts in developing DNN verification tools.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mining Verdict Boundaries for Neural Network Verification

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    BMiner speeds up Branch-and-Bound neural network verification by using exponential and gradient-guided search to skip subproblems on the way to each path's verdict boundary, cutting average verification time by 17–30%.