Lagrangian averaged stochastic advection by Lie transport for fluids

Darryl D. Holm; James-Michael Leahy; Theodore D. Drivas

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 76 references

Lagrangian averaged stochastic advection by Lie transport for fluids

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that replacing the drift velocity of a stochastic fluid by its expectation yields a closed, Navier–Stokes-type equation for the mean field, with a Lie–Laplacian dissipation that regularizes the expected solution.

desk verdict LA SALT is a genuinely useful extension of the SALT mean-field construction, but the main well-posedness theorem has a regularity-index gap and the 2D vorticity identity in (3.9) is wrong as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11481 v2 pith:6OKLNVFX submitted 2019-08-29 math-ph math.MPmath.PRphysics.flu-dyn

Theodore D. Drivas , Darryl D. Holm , James-Michael Leahy This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.MPmath.PRphysics.flu-dyn MSC 35Q3535R6060H1576D0576B03

keywords stochasticfluiddynamicsLagrangianaveragingLietransportmean-fieldnonlinearityLie-Laplaciandissipationwell-posednessEulerequationsNavier-Stokes

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out a class of stochastic fluid equations, LA SALT, in which the velocity is transported both by white-noise vector fields and by its own ensemble-average velocity. Replacing the drift by the expectation makes the equations nonlinear in the sense of McKean (the drift depends on the law of the solution), and the central discovery is that the expectation field then satisfies a closed Navier–Stokes-type equation whose dissipation is a Lie–Laplacian built from the noise fields. The stochastic model therefore keeps the geometric conservation laws of ideal fluids, such as Kelvin's circulation theorem and helicity, while the mean motion is regularized. The paper proves local well-posedness of the LA SALT Euler equations in two and three dimensions, global well-posedness in two dimensions, and global well-posedness in three dimensions when the noise fields are large enough to make the Lie–Laplacian uniformly elliptic. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a mechanism, grounded in stochastic transport, by which unresolved fluctuations dissipate the mean while the ideal-fluid structure is preserved.

What carries the argument

The central object is the LA SALT transport vector field $dX_t = E[u_t]\,dt + \sum_k \xi^{(k)}(x)\circ dW_t^{(k)}$, whose drift is the expectation of the SALT velocity instead of the velocity itself; this expectation is what makes the system nonlinear in the sense of McKean. The key identity that carries the argument is that the Itô correction for the mean produces the Lie–Laplacian operator $\frac{1}{2}\sum_k \mathcal{L}_{\xi^{(k)}}(\mathcal{L}_{\xi^{(k)}}\cdot)$, which under Assumption 1, $\kappa|y|^2 \le \frac12\sum_k y_i\xi^{(k)}_i\xi^{(k)}_j y_j$ for all $x,y$, is a uniformly elliptic second-order operator in divergence form plus lower-order terms. This operator supplies the dissipation in the closed equation for $E[u]$, making Navier–Stokes-type energy estimates available; the bound $\frac12\sum_k ((\mathcal{L}^T_{\xi^{(k)}})^2 u, u)_{H^m} \le -\kappa'|\nabla u|^2_{H^m} + C|u|^2_{H^m}$ is the workhorse of the well-posedness theorems. The fluctuation dynamics are then linear stochastic transport equations slaved to the mean, which is what lets the paper close the variance equations.

What would settle it

For a fixed smooth divergence-free initial datum, solve the LLNS equation (3.15) for a sequence of noise fields whose ellipticity constants tend to infinity; if a finite-time singularity appears for arbitrarily large $\kappa$, the claimed global well-posedness of Theorem 2 for large noise is false. In 2D, measure the three terms in the vorticity variance identity (3.10): total enstrophy, mean enstrophy, and $\sum_k\int|\mathcal{L}_{\xi^{(k)}}E[\omega]|^2\,dA$. The paper predicts total enstrophy is conserved and the variance grows exactly at the rate given by that sum; any consistent departure from this identity would falsify the fluctuation-variance mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that averaging the SALT transport velocity over noise realizations — using $dX_t = E[u_t]\,dt + \sum_k \xi^{(k)}\circ dW_t^{(k)}$ in place of $dx_t = u_t\,dt + \sum_k \xi^{(k)}\circ dW_t^{(k)}$ — converts the stochastic Euler equations into a system whose expectation $v = E[u]$ obeys the Lie-Laplacian Navier-Stokes equation $\partial_t v + P\mathcal{L}^T_v v = P\frac12\sum_k \mathcal{L}^T_{\xi^{(k)}}(\mathcal{L}^T_{\xi^{(k)}}v) + Pf$. The double Lie derivative acts as a dissipation operator; under Assumption 1 it is uniformly elliptic, so the mean equation behaves analytically like Navier-Stokes with viscosity replaced by noise geometry. Theorem 1 states that LA SALT Euler is locally well-posed in Sobolev spaces for $d=2,3$, globally well-posed for $d=2$, and globally well-posed for $d=3$ whenever the ellipticity constant $\kappa$ exceeds a data-dependent threshold $\kappa_*$. The paper also shows that the total enstrophy of the two-dimensional vorticity is a conserved Casimir while the enstrophy of the mean decays and the fluctuation variance grows at an explicit rate, and it extends the construction to rigid-body dynamics, Burgers, Camassa-Holm, and stratified magnetohydrodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on Assumption 1 (equation (3.16)): the fixed noise fields $\xi^{(k)}$ must generate uniform ellipticity, meaning at every point and in every direction the quadratic form built from $\xi^{(k)}$ is bounded below by $\kappa|y|^2$; without it the Lie–Laplacian is not elliptic, the regularization mechanism fails, and the three-dimensional global-existence threshold $\kappa > \kappa_*$ is unavailable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The expected velocity of a LA SALT fluid satisfies a closed Navier–Stokes-type PDE, so non-locality in probability space acts as a regularization mechanism without molecular viscosity.
LA SALT Euler is locally well-posed in Sobolev spaces for $d=2,3$, globally well-posed for $d=2$, and globally well-posed for $d=3$ whenever the noise ellipticity constant $\kappa$ exceeds a data-dependent threshold.
The ideal-fluid conservation laws persist: Kelvin's circulation theorem holds along the stochastic flow, helicity is preserved in 3D, and total enstrophy in 2D is a conserved Casimir even while the mean enstrophy decays and the fluctuation variance grows.
The same construction applied to Burgers gives a viscous Burgers equation for the mean; applied to Camassa–Holm it yields a finite system of expectation-dependent SDEs for peakon parameters; applied to MHD it produces a stratified 3D system with Lie–Laplacian dissipation.
With constant noise fields equal to coordinate basis vectors, the Lie–Laplacian reduces to the ordinary Laplacian and the mean equation becomes the classical Navier–Stokes equation, recovering the stochastic Lagrangian representation of Navier–Stokes solutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial: the 2D variance identity (3.10) is a directly testable quantitative prediction, so the LA SALT framework could serve as a numerical laboratory for fluctuation-dissipation balance in turbulent transport without fitting parameters.
Editorial: the large-$\kappa$ global-existence threshold in 3D suggests a stochastic counterpart of the Navier–Stokes regularity problem in which the control parameter is the geometric strength of transport noise rather than molecular viscosity; the paper does not pursue this analogy.
Editorial: if the construction extends to the stratified MHD example as formulated, unresolved small-scale transport noise could act as an effective dissipation mechanism in geophysical or plasma models, replacing ad hoc viscosity terms; the paper leaves the physical testing of this open.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does a real service to the SALT program. It takes the mean-field (McKean) idea that first appeared in Drivas–Holm [3] and the Constantin–Iyer representation and packages it into a general Euler–Poincaré/Lie–Poisson framework with advected quantities. The expectation closure is transparent: the drift is E[u] by construction, so the mean satisfies a deterministic equation, now with Lie–Laplacian 'dissipation'. The fluctuation equations and the variance dynamics (2.16) are a genuine addition—I don't know a prior reference for those. The examples (rigid body, Burgers, CH, MHD) illustrate the breadth. Given the prior work, the main new content is the general formulation plus the variance equations and the well-posedness theorems; that's a reasonable, incremental contribution.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. First, the proof of Theorem 1 as written has a regularity index gap. The text requires m > d/2 + n + 1 to get E[u] ∈ C^{n+1}, with n = floor(m − d/2). That inequality is impossible. Sobolev embedding from H^m gives at best C^n. So the cited external theorem [41, Thm 3.3], which needs drift in C^{n+1}, is not applicable at the stated regularity. The standard fix is to lower the solution index by one (N = n − 1), which weakens the theorem's conclusion. As it stands, Theorem 1 is not established at the claimed regularity.

Second, Eq. (3.9) in the 2D vorticity section is wrong: the time integral is missing. The correct identity is an ODE, d/dt ||E[ω]||² = −Σ_k ||£_{ξ(k)}E[ω]||². And the 'decay to zero' claim ignores conservation of the spatial mean of E[ω]; the L² norm decays to the mean, not to zero. This is a concrete error, but it's in an illustrative section and is easily fixed.

Third, Assumption 1 (uniform ellipticity of the noise) is doing a lot of work. The paper's 'regularization mechanism' and the 3D global existence threshold both depend on it. Calling it 'minor' in the introduction undersells it; in data-driven SALT applications, such uniform ellipticity is a strong assumption. Worth flagging for the reader.

The algebraic core—the closure of the mean and the variance dynamics—looks solid, and the authors are appropriately transparent about the prior appearance of the LLNS equation. The paper deserves a serious referee, but the referees should ask for a corrected Theorem 1 proof and a fix of Eq. (3.9). I'd encourage engagement, not desk rejection.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a class of stochastic fluid equations, termed Lagrangian averaged stochastic advection by Lie transport (LA SALT), in which the drift velocity of the stochastic transport vector field is the expectation E[u] of the velocity over noise realizations, while the noise terms are Stratonovich Lie transport along fixed divergence-free vector fields. The authors derive the Euler--Poincaré and Lie--Poisson formulations, show that the expectation field solves a closed deterministic equation with a Lie--Laplacian second-order operator (LLNS), compute local and integrated variance dynamics for fluctuations, and discuss examples including Euler, Burgers, Camassa--Holm, rigid body, and MHD. The paper also states well-posedness theorems: local existence for LA SALT Euler in Sobolev spaces in d=2,3, global existence in d=2, and global existence in d=3 for sufficiently large noise ellipticity constant. The main advertised regularity mechanism is that the mean-field nonlocality in probability space converts the otherwise conservative Euler dynamics into a regularized LLNS equation for the expectation.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides an appealing geometric framework that connects stochastic fluid dynamics, mean-field (McKean--Vlasov) nonlinearity, and deterministic Navier--Stokes-type regularization. The derivation of the closed LLNS equation from the LA SALT system, the explicit link to the Constantin--Iyer stochastic Weber velocity representation for constant noise correlations, and the geometric conservation structure (Kelvin's theorem, Casimirs, helicity, enstrophy) are valuable and clearly presented. The variance equations in Section 2.3 are explicit and go beyond the usual statement of the mean-field closure. The paper also credits the earlier work [3] for the LLNS equation and the statistical Kelvin theorem, which is appropriate. The main weakness is that the well-posedness theorem for LA SALT Euler is only sketched and, as stated, contains a regularity-gap in the proof that the hypotheses of the cited stochastic transport theorem are satisfied. This is load-bearing for the claimed well-posedness and regularization result, so the theorem needs repair or reformulation.

major comments (2)

[§3.3, Sketch of Proof of Theorem 1] The proof asserts that if u0∈H^m, f∈L2_T H^{m−1}, ξ∈C^{m+2}, and m>d/2+n+1, then Theorem 2 gives E[u]∈L∞_{T*} C^{n+1}_x with n=⌊m−d/2⌋. This inequality is impossible: by definition n≤m−d/2<n+1, so m<d/2+n+1. The same false inequality is used in the pressure estimate immediately below, where the paper requires m−1>n+d/2. Consequently the hypotheses of the cited linear stochastic transport theorem [41, Thm 3.3] are not verified, and Theorem 1 as stated is not established. The authors should either shift the Sobolev index n so that the required drift regularity follows, restate the theorem with the additional loss of regularity, or prove directly that the drift regularity demanded by [41, Thm 3.3] follows from Theorem 2.
[§3.1, Eq. (3.9)] The displayed identity is dimensionally inconsistent: it equates ∫(E[ω_t])^2 dA with ∫(E[ω_0])^2 dA minus a term evaluated at time t, with no time integral. Integrating the differential identity d/dt ∫(E[ω])^2 = −Σ_k ∫(£_{ξ(k)}E[ω])^2 dA gives an extra ds integral, and the integrand should be evaluated at time s, not t. Therefore the sentence immediately after (3.9) that the magnitude |E[ω]| 'will decay to zero' does not follow from the displayed equation as written. The corrected identity should be stated and the decay conclusion re-derived; equation (3.10) can be recovered after this correction.

minor comments (4)

[§3.3, Remark 7] The continuity assertion for LA SALT states the solution map as taking values in L2_ω C_{T*} H^{n−1} ∩ L2_ω L∞_{T*} H^n, but Theorem 1 only provides u∈L2_ω L∞_{T*} H^{n−1}, weak continuity in H^{n−1}, and strong continuity in H^{n−2}; the regularity and continuity statements in the remark and the theorem should be made consistent.
[§3.3, notation for L_p T E] The definition of L_p T E writes L^p([0,T], B([0,T]), Ω; E) and then says 'Ω is the Lebesgue measure on R'; this should presumably be the Lebesgue measure on [0,T].
[§1.1, Eq. (1.13)] The display of the LLNS equation has unbalanced parentheses in the Lie--Laplacian term; the closing parenthesis of the second Lie derivative is missing.
[§2.3, Eq. (2.14)] In the equation for the advected quantity a′, the expression '1/2 d|a′|_{L2}' is missing the square on the norm; it should be 1/2 d|a′|²_{L2}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the closed expectation equation is a transparent consequence of the model definition, and the analytic inputs are independent published results.

full rationale

The paper defines LA SALT by replacing the drift in the SALT stochastic vector field with E[u] (Eq. 1.4), and it explicitly says "we simply adopt the LA SALT formulation implied by the stochastic vector field (1.4) and explore its dynamical consequences" (Sec. 1.1). The closed LLNS equation (3.15) is therefore not a prediction smuggled in from elsewhere; it is an exact, transparent computation from the defining equations (3.12)-(3.13), including the Itô correction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no non-uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. The proof of Theorem 1 invokes [41] (Leahy and Mikulevicius) for a linear stochastic-transport well-posedness theorem; although this is a self-citation, the cited theorem is a published, independent SPDE result and the paper reduces the proof to it rather than assuming the conclusion. The apparent regularity-index inconsistency in the proof sketch (m > d/2 + n + 1 with n = floor(m - d/2) is impossible) is a correctness gap, not a circularity, and does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model takes the noise vector fields ξ(k) as given inputs, and all well-posedness and regularization claims depend on the uniform ellipticity Assumption 1. No free parameters are fitted in this paper, and no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

Noise vector fields ξ(k) = not fitted in this paper; assumed from prior data analysis (see SALT calibration papers [11,13,14])
The LA SALT model takes the stationary divergence-free vector fields ξ(k) as inputs. The regularization and 3D global existence results depend on their uniform ellipticity constant κ (Assumption 1), which is not computed here.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Assumption 1 (3.16): uniform ellipticity of the noise second-order tensor
Used in Theorem 2 and Theorem 1 to ensure the Lie-Laplacian term is uniformly elliptic, giving the LLNS regularization and global existence for large κ.
domain assumption The noise fields ξ(k) are time-independent, divergence-free and belong to C^{m+2}_σ ℓ^d_2
Maintains volume preservation of the LA SALT flow, the Lie-Poisson structure, and provides the regularity needed in Theorem 1.
standard math External estimates (3.18), (3.19) and linear stochastic transport well-posedness (Theorem 3.3 of [41], Lemma 5.1 of [42])
The proofs of Theorems 1 and 2 are built on these cited published results; the paper does not reproduce them.
domain assumption The Lagrangian is hyperregular with Gateaux derivatives (2.1)
Needed for the Legendre transform and the Euler-Poincaré reduced variational principle.
domain assumption M is a compact, oriented, boundaryless Riemannian manifold; on the torus T^d
Required for Hodge decomposition, Stokes theorem, and Sobolev embeddings used throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lagrangian averaged stochastic advection by Lie transport for fluids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OKLNVFX

@misc{pith2026190811481,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lagrangian averaged stochastic advection by Lie transport for fluids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OKLNVFX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11481}
}

abstract

We formulate a class of stochastic partial differential equations based on Kelvin's circulation theorem for ideal fluids. In these models, the velocity field is randomly transported by white-noise vector fields, as well as by its own average over realizations of this noise. We call these systems the Lagrangian averaged stochastic advection by Lie transport (LA SALT) equations. These equations are nonlinear and non-local, in both physical and probability space. Before taking this average, the equations recover the Stochastic Advection by Lie Transport (SALT) fluid equations introduced by Holm (2015). Remarkably, the introduction of the non-locality in probability space in the form of momentum transported by its own mean velocity gives rise to a closed equation for the expectation field which comprises Navier--Stokes equations with Lie--Laplacian "dissipation". As such, this form of non-locality provides a regularization mechanism. The formalism we develop is closely connected to the stochastic Weber velocity framework of Constantin and Iyer (2008) in the case when the noise correlates are taken to be the constant basis vectors in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and, thus, the Lie--Laplacian reduces to the usual Laplacian. We extend this class of equations to allow for advected quantities to be present and affect the flow through exchange of kinetic and potential energies. The statistics of the solutions for the LA SALT fluid equations are found to be changing dynamically due to an array of intricate correlations among the physical variables. The statistical properties of the LA SALT physical variables propagate as local evolutionary equations which when spatially integrated become dynamical equations for the variances of the fluctuations. Essentially, the LA SALT theory is a non-equilibrium stochastic linear response theory for fluctuations in SALT fluids with advected quantities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[3]

Circulation and ener gy theorem preserving stochastic ﬂuids

Theodore D Drivas and Darryl D Holm. Circulation and ener gy theorem preserving stochastic ﬂuids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mat hematics, pages 1–39, 2019

work page 2019
[1]

Darryl D. Holm. V ariational principles for stochastic ﬂ uid dynamics. Proc. A., 471(2176):20140963, 19, 2015

work page 2015
[2]

A stochastic Lagrangi an representation of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

Peter Constantin and Gautam Iyer. A stochastic Lagrangi an representation of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 61(3):330–345, 2008

work page 2008
[4]

Stochast ic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent ﬂows

Remigijus Mikulevicius and Boris L Rozovskii. Stochast ic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent ﬂows. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 35(5):1250–1310, 2004

work page 2004
[5]

The interaction between noise and tran sport mechanisms in PDEs

Franco Flandoli. The interaction between noise and tran sport mechanisms in PDEs. Milan Journal of Mathematics, 79(2):543–560, 2011

work page 2011
[6]

H. P . McKean, Jr. A class of Markov processes associated w ith nonlinear parabolic equations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 56:1907–1911, 1966

work page 1907
[7]

Holm, Jerrold E

Darryl D. Holm, Jerrold E. Marsden, and Tudor S. Ratiu. Th e Euler-Poincar´ e equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories. Adv. Math., 137(1):1–81, 1998

work page 1998
[8]

Holm, and Edriss S

Ciprian Foias, Darryl D. Holm, and Edriss S. Titi. The Nav ier-Stokes-alpha model of ﬂuid turbulence. Phys. D, 152/153:505–519, 2001. Advances in nonlinear mathematic s and science

work page 2001

Show all 76 references

[9]

Holm, and Edriss S

Ciprian Foias, Darryl D. Holm, and Edriss S. Titi. The thr ee dimensional viscous Camassa-Holm equa- tions, and their relation to the Navier-Stokes equations an d turbulence theory. J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 14(1):1–35, 2002

2002
[10]

C. J. Cotter, G. A. Gottwald, and D. D. Holm. Stochastic p artial differential ﬂuid equations as a diffusive limit of deterministic Lagrangian multi-time dynamics. Proc. A., 473(2205):20170388, 10, 2017

2017
[11]

Modelling uncertainty using circulation-preserving stochastic transport noise in a 2- layer quasi-geostrophic model

Colin Cotter, Dan Crisan, Darryl D Holm, Wei Pan, and Igo r Shevchenko. Modelling uncertainty using circulation-preserving stochastic transport noise in a 2- layer quasi-geostrophic model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05711, 2018

2018 arXiv
[12]

Implications of Kunita-Itˆ o- Wentzell formula for k-forms in stochastic ﬂuid dynamics

Aythami Bethencourt de Leon, Darryl Holm, Erwin Luesin k, and So Takao. Implications of Kunita-Itˆ o- Wentzell formula for k-forms in stochastic ﬂuid dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.07201, 2019

1903 arXiv
[13]

Numerically modeling stochastic Lie transport in ﬂuid dynamics

Colin Cotter, Dan Crisan, Darryl D Holm, Wei Pan, and Igo r Shevchenko. Numerically modeling stochastic Lie transport in ﬂuid dynamics. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 17(1):192–232, 2019

2019
[14]

A particle ﬁlter for stochastic advection by Lie transport (SALT): A case study for the dampe d and forced incompressible 2D Euler equation

Colin Cotter, Dan Crisan, Darryl D Holm, Wei Pan, and Igo r Shevchenko. A particle ﬁlter for stochastic advection by Lie transport (SALT): A case study for the dampe d and forced incompressible 2D Euler equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11884, 2019

1907 arXiv
[15]

Modelling the climate and weather of a 2D Lagrangian-averaged Euler-Boussinesq e quation with transport noise

Diego Alonso-Or´ an, Aythami Bethencourt de Le´ on, Darryl Holm, and So Takao. Modelling the climate and weather of a 2D Lagrangian-averaged Euler-Boussinesq e quation with transport noise. Submitted, 2019

2019
[16]

A Hamiltonian mean ﬁeld system for th e Navier–Stokes equation

Simon Hochgerner. A Hamiltonian mean ﬁeld system for th e Navier–Stokes equation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineerin g Sciences, 474(2218):20180178, 2018

2018
[17]

Poisson brackets and Clebsch representations for magneto- hydrodynamics, multiﬂuid plasmas, and elasticity

Darryl D Holm and Boris A Kupershmidt. Poisson brackets and Clebsch representations for magneto- hydrodynamics, multiﬂuid plasmas, and elasticity. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 6(3):347–363, 1983

1983
[18]

Franc ¸ois Gay-Balmaz and Darryl D. Holm. Stochastic ge ometric models with non-stationary spatial correlations in Lagrangian ﬂuid ﬂows. J. Nonlinear Sci., 28(3):873–904, 2018

2018
[19]

Dan Crisan, Franco Flandoli, and Darryl D. Holm. Soluti on properties of a 3D stochastic Euler ﬂuid equation. J. Nonlinear Sci., 29(3):813–870, 2019

2019
[20]

Mean ﬁeld limit for stochastic particle systems

Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu Wang. Mean ﬁeld limit for stochastic particle systems. In Active Particles, V olume 1, pages 379–402. Springer, 2017. 33

2017
[21]

Drivas and Gregory L

Theodore D. Drivas and Gregory L. Eyink. A Lagrangian ﬂu ctuation-dissipation relation for scalar turbulence. Part I. Flows with no bounding walls. J. Fluid Mech., 829:153–189, 2017

2017
[22]

A Lagrangian ﬂuct uation–dissipation relation for scalar tur- bulence

Theodore D Drivas and Gregory L Eyink. A Lagrangian ﬂuct uation–dissipation relation for scalar tur- bulence. Part II. wall-bounded ﬂows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 829:236–279, 2017

2017
[23]

Camassa- Holm equations as a closure model for turbulent channel and p ipe ﬂow

Shiyi Chen, Ciprian Foias, Darryl D Holm, Eric Olson, Ed riss S Titi, and Shannon Wynne. Camassa- Holm equations as a closure model for turbulent channel and p ipe ﬂow. Physical Review Letters , 81(24):5338, 1998

1998
[24]

A connection between the Camassa–Holm equations and turbulent ﬂows in ch annels and pipes

Shiyi Chen, Ciprian Foias, Darryl D Holm, Eric Olson, Ed riss S Titi, and Shannon Wynne. A connection between the Camassa–Holm equations and turbulent ﬂows in ch annels and pipes. Physics of Fluids , 11(8):2343–2353, 1999

1999
[25]

The Camassa–Holm equations and turbulence

Shiyi Chen, Ciprian Foias, Darryl D Holm, Eric Olson, Ed riss S Titi, and Shannon Wynne. The Camassa–Holm equations and turbulence. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 133(1-4):49–65, 1999

1999
[26]

Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , volume 293

Daniel Revuz and Marc Y or. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , volume 293. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

2013
[27]

A concise course on stochastic partial differential equati ons, volume 1905

Claudia Pr´ evˆ ot and Michael R¨ ockner. A concise course on stochastic partial differential equati ons, volume 1905. Springer, 2007

1905
[28]

Stochastic partial d ifferential equations on evolving surfaces and evolving riemannian manifolds

CM Elliott, M Hairer, and MR Scott. Stochastic partial d ifferential equations on evolving surfaces and evolving riemannian manifolds. arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.5958, 2012

2012 arXiv
[29]

Stochastic partial differential equations on manifolds, i

Istv´ an Gy¨ ongy. Stochastic partial differential equations on manifolds, i. Potential Analysis, 2(2):101– 113, 1993

1993
[30]

Stochastic partial differential equations on manifolds˜ ii

Istv´ an Gy¨ ongy. Stochastic partial differential equations on manifolds˜ ii. nonlinear ﬁltering. Potential Analysis, 6(1):39–56, 1997

1997
[31]

N. V . Krylov. Itˆ o’s formula for theLp-norm of stochasticW 1 p -valued processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 147(3-4):583–605, 2010

2010
[32]

Sur des ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles stochastiques monotones

´Etienne Pardoux. Sur des ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles stochastiques monotones. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´er . A-B, 275:A101–A103, 1972

1972
[33]

E. Pardoux. ´Equations aux d ´eriv´ees partielles stochastiques de type monotone . PhD thesis, Coll` ege de France, 1975

1975
[34]

N. V . Krylov and B. L. Rozovski˘ ı. Stochastic evolution equations. In Current problems in mathematics, Vol. 14 (Russian), pages 71–147, 256. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn . i Tekhn. Informatsii, Moscow, 1979

1979
[35]

N. V . Krylov. A relatively short proof of Itˆ o’s formula for SPDEs and its applications. Stoch. Partial Differ . Equ. Anal. Comput., 1(1):152–174, 2013

2013
[36]

Geometric formulation of the Cauchy invariants for incompressible Euler ﬂow in ﬂat and curved spaces

Nicolas Besse and Uriel Frisch. Geometric formulation of the Cauchy invariants for incompressible Euler ﬂow in ﬂat and curved spaces. J. Fluid Mech., 825:412–478, 2017

2017
[37]

The asymptotic Hopf invariant and it s applications

Vladimir I Arnold. The asymptotic Hopf invariant and it s applications. In Vladimir I. Arnold-Collected Works, pages 357–375. Springer, 1974

1974
[38]

Topological methods in hydrodynamics, volume 125

Vladimir I Arnold and Boris A Khesin. Topological methods in hydrodynamics, volume 125. Springer Science & Business Media, 1999

1999
[39]

The three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equa- tions: Classical theory , volume 157

James C Robinson, Jos´ e L Rodrigo, and Witold Sadowski. The three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equa- tions: Classical theory , volume 157. Cambridge University Press, 2016

2016
[40]

Mathematical Tools for the Study of the Incompressible Navi er-Stokes Equations and Related Models

Franck Boyer and Pierre Fabrie. Mathematical Tools for the Study of the Incompressible Navi er-Stokes Equations and Related Models . Springer New Y ork, 2013

2013
[41]

On d egenerate linear stochastic evolution equations driven by jump processes

James-Michael Leahy and Remigijus Mikuleviˇ cius. On d egenerate linear stochastic evolution equations driven by jump processes. Stochastic Process. Appl., 125(10):3748–3784, 2015

2015
[42]

On the solvability of degenerate stochastic partial differential equations in Sobolev spaces

M´ at´ e Gerencs´ er, Istv´ an Gy¨ ongy, and Nicolai Krylov. On the solvability of degenerate stochastic partial differential equations in Sobolev spaces. Stoch. Partial Differ . Equ. Anal. Comput., 3(1):52–83, 2015. 34

2015
[43]

Majda and Andrea L

Andrew J. Majda and Andrea L. Bertozzi. V orticity and incompressible ﬂow , volume 27 of Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

2002
[44]

Characteristics of degener ating second-order parabolic Itˆ o equations

NV Krylov and BL Rozovskii. Characteristics of degener ating second-order parabolic Itˆ o equations. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 32(4):336–348, 1986

1986
[45]

Rozovsky and Sergey V

Boris L. Rozovsky and Sergey V . Lototsky. Stochastic Evolution Systems . Springer International Pub- lishing, 2018

2018
[46]

On s ome properties of space inverses of stochastic ﬂows

James-Michael Leahy and Remigijus Mikuleviˇ cius. On s ome properties of space inverses of stochastic ﬂows. Stoch. Partial Differ . Equ. Anal. Comput., 3(4):445–478, 2015

2015
[47]

On c lassical solutions of linear stochastic integro- differential equations

James-Michael Leahy and Remigijus Mikuleviˇ cius. On c lassical solutions of linear stochastic integro- differential equations. Stoch. Partial Differ . Equ. Anal. Comput., 4(3):535–591, 2016

2016
[48]

Mome ntum maps and stochastic Clebsch action principles

Ana Bela Cruzeiro, Darryl D Holm, and Tudor S Ratiu. Mome ntum maps and stochastic Clebsch action principles. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 357(2):873–912, 2018

2018
[49]

De Castro, and Darryl D

Alexis Arnaudon, Alex L. De Castro, and Darryl D. Holm. N oise and dissipation on coadjoint orbits. J. Nonlinear Sci., 28(1):91–145, 2018

2018
[50]

The Burgers’ equation with stochastic transport: shock formation, local and global ex istence of smooth solutions

Diego Alonso-Or´ an, Aythami Bethencourt de Le´ on, and So Takao. The Burgers’ equation with stochastic transport: shock formation, local and global ex istence of smooth solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07821, 2018

2018 arXiv
[51]

Spontaneous stoc hasticity and anomalous dissipation for burgers equation

Gregory L Eyink and Theodore D Drivas. Spontaneous stoc hasticity and anomalous dissipation for burgers equation. Journal of Statistical Physics , 158(2):386–432, 2015

2015
[52]

Slow modes in passive advection

Denis Bernard, Krzysztof Gawedzki, and Antti Kupiaine n. Slow modes in passive advection. Journal of Statistical Physics, 90(3-4):519–569, 1998

1998
[53]

Flux-freez ing breakdown in high-conductivity mag- netohydrodynamic turbulence

Gregory Eyink, Ethan Vishniac, Cristian Lalescu, Huss ein Aluie, Kalin Kanov, Kai B¨ urger, Randal Burns, Charles Meneveau, and Alexander Szalay. Flux-freez ing breakdown in high-conductivity mag- netohydrodynamic turbulence. Nature, 497(7450):466, 2013

2013
[54]

Turbulent reconnection and its implications

Alex Lazarian, G Eyink, E Vishniac, and Grzegorz Kowal. Turbulent reconnection and its implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathema tical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 373(2041):20140144, 2015

2015
[55]

Inertial-range reconnection in magnetohydr odynamic turbulence and in the solar wind

Cristian C Lalescu, Yi-Kang Shi, Gregory L Eyink, Theod ore D Drivas, Ethan T Vishniac, and Alexan- der Lazarian. Inertial-range reconnection in magnetohydr odynamic turbulence and in the solar wind. Physical review letters, 115(2):025001, 2015

2015
[56]

Phase transition in the passive scalar advection

Krzysztof Gawe ¸dzki and Massimo V ergassola. Phase transition in the passive scalar advection. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 138(1-2):63–90, 2000

2000
[57]

Particles and ﬁelds in ﬂuid turbulence

G Falkovich, K Gawe ¸dzki, and Massimo V ergassola. Particles and ﬁelds in ﬂuid turbulence. Reviews of modern Physics, 73(4):913, 2001

2001
[58]

Turbulent cascade of circulations

Gregory L Eyink. Turbulent cascade of circulations. Comptes Rendus Physique, 7(3-4):449–455, 2006

2006
[59]

Time-reversal-symmetry breaking in turbulence

Jennifer Jucha, Haitao Xu, Alain Pumir, and Eberhard Bo denschatz. Time-reversal-symmetry breaking in turbulence. Physical review letters, 113(5):054501, 2014

2014
[60]

Turbulent cascade direction and Lag rangian time-asymmetry

Theodore D Drivas. Turbulent cascade direction and Lag rangian time-asymmetry. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29(1):65–88, 2019

2019
[61]

Momentum maps and me asure-valued solutions (peakons, ﬁlaments, and sheets) for the epdiff equation

Darryl D Holm and Jerrold E Marsden. Momentum maps and me asure-valued solutions (peakons, ﬁlaments, and sheets) for the epdiff equation. In The breadth of symplectic and Poisson geometry, pages 203–235. Springer, 2005

2005
[62]

Wave breaking for the stoch astic Camassa–Holm equation

Dan Crisan and Darryl D Holm. Wave breaking for the stoch astic Camassa–Holm equation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 376:138–143, 2018

2018
[63]

An integrable shallo w water equation with peaked solitons

Roberto Camassa and Darryl D Holm. An integrable shallo w water equation with peaked solitons. Physical review letters, 71(11):1661, 1993

1993
[64]

Pers pectives on the formation of peakons in the stochastic camassa-holm equation

Thomas M Bendall, Colin J Cotter, and Darryl D Holm. Pers pectives on the formation of peakons in the stochastic camassa-holm equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03018, 2019. 35

1910 arXiv
[65]

Sur un principe variationnel pour le s ´ ecoulements stationnaires des liquides parfaits et ses applications aux problemes de stabilit´ e non lin´ eaires

Vladimir I Arnold. Sur un principe variationnel pour le s ´ ecoulements stationnaires des liquides parfaits et ses applications aux problemes de stabilit´ e non lin´ eaires. Journal de m ´ecanique, 5(1):29, 1966

1966
[66]

On the differential geometry of inﬁn ite-dimensional Lie groups and its application to the hydrodynamics of perfect ﬂuids

Vladimir I Arnold. On the differential geometry of inﬁn ite-dimensional Lie groups and its application to the hydrodynamics of perfect ﬂuids. In Vladimir I. Arnold-Collected Works , pages 33–69. Springer, 1966

1966
[67]

Groups of diffeomorph isms and the motion of an incompressible ﬂuid

David G Ebin and Jerrold Marsden. Groups of diffeomorph isms and the motion of an incompressible ﬂuid. Ann. Math, 92(1):102–163, 1970

1970
[68]

Nonlinear stability of ﬂuid and plasma equilibria

Darryl D Holm, Jerrold E Marsden, Tudor Ratiu, and Alan W einstein. Nonlinear stability of ﬂuid and plasma equilibria. Physics reports, 123(1-2):1–116, 1985

1985
[69]

Comments on the hi story, theory, and applications of symplectic reduction

Jerrold E Marsden and Alan Weinstein. Comments on the hi story, theory, and applications of symplectic reduction. In Quantization of singular symplectic quotients , pages 1–19. Springer, 2001

2001
[70]

The geometry of momentum

Alan Weinstein. The geometry of momentum. G´eom´etrie au XXeme Siecle, Histoire et Horizons, Hermann, Paris, pages 236–245, 2005

2005
[71]

Sur une forme nouvelle des ´ equations de la m´ ecanique

Henri Poincar´ e. Sur une forme nouvelle des ´ equations de la m´ ecanique. CR Acad. Sci , 132:369–371, 1901

1901
[72]

Euler-poincar´ e dynamics of perfect com plex ﬂuids

Darryl D Holm. Euler-poincar´ e dynamics of perfect com plex ﬂuids. In Geometry, mechanics, and dynamics, pages 169–180. Springer, 2002

2002
[73]

The helicity and vorticity of liquid-crystal ﬂows

Franc ¸ois Gay-Balmaz and Cesare Tronci. The helicity and vorticity of liquid-crystal ﬂows. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineer ing Sciences, 467(2128):1197–1213, 2010

2010
[74]

Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis , volume 42005

J¨ urgen Jost. Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis , volume 42005. Springer, 2008

2008
[75]

Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations

Charles Bradﬁeld Morrey Jr. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations . Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

2009
[76]

Foundations of global non-linear ana lysis

Richard S Palais. Foundations of global non-linear ana lysis. 1968. 36

1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [3]

Circulation and ener gy theorem preserving stochastic ﬂuids

Theodore D Drivas and Darryl D Holm. Circulation and ener gy theorem preserving stochastic ﬂuids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mat hematics, pages 1–39, 2019

work page 2019

[2] [1]

Darryl D. Holm. V ariational principles for stochastic ﬂ uid dynamics. Proc. A., 471(2176):20140963, 19, 2015

work page 2015

[3] [2]

A stochastic Lagrangi an representation of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

Peter Constantin and Gautam Iyer. A stochastic Lagrangi an representation of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 61(3):330–345, 2008

work page 2008

[4] [4]

Stochast ic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent ﬂows

Remigijus Mikulevicius and Boris L Rozovskii. Stochast ic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent ﬂows. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 35(5):1250–1310, 2004

work page 2004

[5] [5]

The interaction between noise and tran sport mechanisms in PDEs

Franco Flandoli. The interaction between noise and tran sport mechanisms in PDEs. Milan Journal of Mathematics, 79(2):543–560, 2011

work page 2011

[6] [6]

H. P . McKean, Jr. A class of Markov processes associated w ith nonlinear parabolic equations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 56:1907–1911, 1966

work page 1907

[7] [7]

Holm, Jerrold E

Darryl D. Holm, Jerrold E. Marsden, and Tudor S. Ratiu. Th e Euler-Poincar´ e equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories. Adv. Math., 137(1):1–81, 1998

work page 1998

[8] [8]

Holm, and Edriss S

Ciprian Foias, Darryl D. Holm, and Edriss S. Titi. The Nav ier-Stokes-alpha model of ﬂuid turbulence. Phys. D, 152/153:505–519, 2001. Advances in nonlinear mathematic s and science

work page 2001