Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine learning and information theory concepts towards an AI Mathematician

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04571 v1 pith:6OZFLE3K submitted 2024-03-07 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords termsabilitiescurrentinterestinglearningmathematicalmathematicianprovable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The current state-of-the-art in artificial intelligence is impressive, especially in terms of mastery of language, but not so much in terms of mathematical reasoning. What could be missing? Can we learn something useful about that gap from how the brains of mathematicians go about their craft? This essay builds on the idea that current deep learning mostly succeeds at system 1 abilities -- which correspond to our intuition and habitual behaviors -- but still lacks something important regarding system 2 abilities -- which include reasoning and robust uncertainty estimation. It takes an information-theoretical posture to ask questions about what constitutes an interesting mathematical statement, which could guide future work in crafting an AI mathematician. The focus is not on proving a given theorem but on discovering new and interesting conjectures. The central hypothesis is that a desirable body of theorems better summarizes the set of all provable statements, for example by having a small description length while at the same time being close (in terms of number of derivation steps) to many provable statements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Speech-to-Text x LLM x Text-to-Speech Combinations for AI Interview Systems

    eess.AS 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a large production dataset, the Google STT plus GPT-4.1 plus Cartesia TTS interview stack outperformed four alternatives, while LLM-judged quality correlated weakly with user satisfaction.

Pith tools