REVIEW
Venice: Improving Solid-State Drive Parallelism at Low Cost via Conflict-Free Accesses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Venice: Improving Solid-State Drive Parallelism at Low Cost via Conflict-Free Accesses
read the original abstract
The performance and capacity of solid-state drives (SSDs) are continuously improving to meet the increasing demands of modern data-intensive applications. Unfortunately, communication between the SSD controller and memory chips (e.g., 2D/3D NAND flash chips) is a critical performance bottleneck for many applications. SSDs use a multi-channel shared bus architecture where multiple memory chips connected to the same channel communicate to the SSD controller with only one path. As a result, path conflicts often occur during the servicing of multiple I/O requests, which significantly limits SSD parallelism. It is critical to handle path conflicts well to improve SSD parallelism and performance. Our goal is to fundamentally tackle the path conflict problem by increasing the number of paths between the SSD controller and memory chips at low cost. To this end, we build on the idea of using an interconnection network to increase the path diversity between the SSD controller and memory chips. We propose Venice, a new mechanism that introduces a low-cost interconnection network between the SSD controller and memory chips and utilizes the path diversity to intelligently resolve path conflicts. Venice employs three key techniques: 1) a simple router chip added next to each memory chip without modifying the memory chip design, 2) a path reservation technique that reserves a path from the SSD controller to the target memory chip before initiating a transfer, and 3) a fully-adaptive routing algorithm that effectively utilizes the path diversity to resolve path conflicts. Our experimental results show that Venice 1) improves performance by an average of 2.65x/1.67x over a baseline performance-optimized/cost-optimized SSD design across a wide range of workloads, 2) reduces energy consumption by an average of 61% compared to a baseline performance-optimized SSD design.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.