Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 139 references

Engineering and harnessing long-range interactions for atomic quantum simulators

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that polynomially decaying interactions among cold atoms, $U_s \propto s^{-\alpha}$, enable analog simulation of condensed-matter, lattice-gauge-theory, and chemistry problems, including beyond-Born-Oppenheimer regimes.

desk verdict A competent, well-organized review of long-range interaction engineering for atomic simulators, with no new results; the chemistry showcase needs a quantitative caveat about Coulomb vs. faster-decaying tails. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07250 v2 pith:6PYGTXTQ submitted 2025-06-08 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas

Javier Argüello-Luengo This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords analogquantumsimulationlong-rangeinteractionsopticallatticesRydbergatomsdipolarlatticegaugetheorieschemistryphoton-mediated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the toolbox for atomic quantum simulators has moved beyond contact interactions: dipole-dipole forces, trapped-ion Coulomb forces, photon-mediated couplings, and fermion-mediated couplings all give interactions that decay polynomially with distance, $U_s \propto s^{-\alpha}$, among atoms in optical potentials. The author's claim is that these engineered long-range interactions let itinerant atoms act as analog simulators for condensed-matter models, lattice gauge theories, and chemistry, including regimes where the Born-Oppenheimer approximation breaks down. The review's organizing assertion is that the experimental effort to engineer such interactions has opened up new regimes of many-body physics that were previously inaccessible to direct experimentation. A sympathetic reader should care because the paper maps a concrete set of experimental dials, chiefly the interaction exponent $\alpha$, onto a concrete set of hard many-body problems, and positions analog simulators as a complement to digital quantum computation and classical electronic-structure methods.

What carries the argument

The central object is the extended Hubbard model, a lattice model of particles hopping between sites and interacting at a distance, with Hamiltonian $\hat H = -J \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} \hat c_i^\dagger \hat c_j + \sum_s U_s \sum_i \hat n_i \hat n_{i+s}$. The crucial difference from the standard Hubbard model is that the interaction amplitude $U_s$ is engineered to decay polynomially, $U_s \propto s^{-\alpha}$ with $\alpha>0$, rather than exponentially. This tunable power-law decay is the mechanism that carries the argument: different platforms realize different exponents and strengths, and those exponents determine which quantum phases, gauge-theory constraints, or molecular potentials can be faithfully reproduced. The paper repeatedly returns to the same point: the long-range tail, not just the on-site or nearest-neighbour term, is what makes the simulated problems hard classically and what the atomic systems can now supply.

What would settle it

A quantitative test for the chemistry claim would be to simulate a small molecule such as molecular hydrogen with the proposed lattice mapping using $1/r^3$ dipolar repulsion, and to compare the extracted potential energy surface, bond length, and dissociation energy against high-accuracy quantum-chemistry benchmarks; a systematic deviation beyond the target accuracy would falsify the assertion that faster-than-Coulomb decays capture the essential physics. The review itself does not provide such a benchmark.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the interaction term $\sum_s U_s \sum_i \hat n_i \hat n_{i+s}$ in the extended Hubbard-type lattice Hamiltonian no longer needs to be exponentially decaying; four experimentally available mechanisms produce polynomial decays $U_s \propto s^{-\alpha}$, and this change is enough to move atomic simulators into new physics. The author organizes the toolbox into dipolar interactions (polar molecules, paramagnetic atoms, Rydberg atoms), ionic interactions with tunable exponents $0<\alpha<3$, photon-mediated interactions (cavities, nanophotonic fibres, photonic crystals), and atom-mediated interactions such as the fermionic RKKY potential. The paper then argues that these platforms are capable of simulating strongly correlated condensed-matter phases, lattice gauge theories such as the Schwinger model, and chemistry, with the most forward-looking strand being analog quantum chemistry where each electron is mapped to a fermionic atom, the nucleus is an optically shaped potential, and the long-range atomic repulsion stands in for Coulomb repulsion. This gives access, in principle, to electronic configurations, ultrafast ionization dynamics, and nuclear dynamics beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that interactions decaying faster than the $1/r$ Coulomb law, specifically dipolar $1/r^3$ or van der Waals $1/r^6$ interactions, already capture the essential physics of electron-electron repulsion in the molecules the simulators target.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, atomic simulators can access strongly correlated condensed-matter regimes such as supersolids, roton excitations, quantum droplets, and topological edge states that are hard for classical methods.
  • Long-range interactions can implement lattice gauge theories, with the Schwinger model as a benchmark, including confinement and string-breaking dynamics in trapped-ion and Rydberg platforms.
  • Mapping each electron to a fermionic atom avoids the exponential growth of Slater determinants, so analog simulators can tackle strongly correlated molecular configurations and electronic dynamics.
  • Molecular dynamics beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, including conical intersections and scattering cross-sections, can be probed at more favourable time and length scales than real attosecond experiments.
  • Analog simulators are positioned as a complementary route to digital quantum computers, with accuracy limited by system size and interaction control rather than by the number of qubits and entangling gates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review leaves implicit that the interaction exponent $\alpha$ is the key control parameter, so a platform with continuously tunable $\alpha$, as trapped ions already offer, could map the crossover between short-range and infinite-range physics on a single device.
  • A direct extension of the chemistry claim is a quantitative error benchmark: for a small molecule, compare the analog simulator's potential energy surface against high-accuracy quantum-chemistry results as a function of lattice spacing and interaction exponent $\alpha$.
  • A testable extension is to combine photon-mediated or fermion-mediated interactions with movable optical tweezers to simulate time-dependent electron-nuclear dynamics, going beyond the fixed-nucleus configurations emphasized in the review.
  • The review's focus on itinerant atoms in optical lattices suggests a natural comparison with Rydberg tweezer arrays, which realize similar long-range Hamiltonians with fixed atomic positions and could isolate the effect of mobility on the simulated phases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a single-author review of strategies and applications for engineering long-range interactions among ultracold atoms in optical potentials. It defines long-range interactions as polynomial decays U_s ∝ s^−α and surveys four mechanism families: dipole-dipole interactions (polar molecules, paramagnetic atoms, Rydberg atoms), ionic systems, photon-mediated interactions (cavities, nanophotonic fibres, photonic crystals), and atom-mediated interactions. It then showcases applications in condensed-matter physics, lattice gauge theories, and quantum chemistry, with particular emphasis on analog simulation of electronic structure, attosecond-scale dynamics, and dynamics beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. The paper argues that these analog platforms complement classical methods and digital quantum computers, especially for regimes where classical methods are challenged.

Significance. If taken as a review, the manuscript provides a useful and largely accurate synthesis of a fast-moving field. Its taxonomy of interaction-engineering mechanisms is clear, the underlying physics (Hubbard models, dipole-dipole potentials, RKKY interactions, Schwinger-model mappings) is standard and correctly described, and the reference list is broad. The explicit definition of long-range interactions as polynomial decays is helpful, as is the focus on itinerant atoms rather than only pinned arrays. The chemistry section is the most distinctive contribution: it identifies analog simulation of electronic configurations, molecular dynamics, and beyond-Born-Oppenheimer processes as an emerging frontier. A particular strength is that the author cites his own prior work mostly as concrete examples of previously published strategies, not as the basis of new derivations, so the review's narrative does not depend on those self-citations in a circular way.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3.1] The claim that 1/r^3 dipolar or 1/r^6 van der Waals interactions 'already capture the essential physics' of the Coulomb repulsion is load-bearing for the chemistry-simulation showcase, but it is asserted without a quantitative benchmark or a supporting citation. A potential with a 1/r^3 or 1/r^6 tail supports only finitely many bound states and lacks the 1/r Coulomb tail that produces the infinite Rydberg series, a well-defined ionization threshold, and long-range scattering phases; excitation spectra and response properties will therefore differ qualitatively from the target Coulomb system. Since the manuscript later proposes to 'benchmark and improve' classical methods precisely in strongly correlated, dynamical, and response regimes (Section 3.3.1), the fidelity of this mapping matters exactly where the review claims advantage. I request either an explicit quantitative study, for example using the models of Refs. [67], [68], or [134], showing that the relevant low-energy properties are reproduced to a stated accuracy, or a caveat that natural dipolar and van der Waals platforms address only ground-state and low-energy correlation features, while engineered 1/r couplings via cavity- or atom-mediated routes are needed for ionization and scattering regimes.
  2. [Section 3.3.2] The discussion of high-harmonic generation and non-sequential double ionization inherits the same fidelity issue. The manuscript suggests that Rydberg or paramagnetic atoms can mediate the long-range electron-electron interactions in these processes, but those platforms provide 1/r^3 or 1/r^6 couplings, not the 1/r Coulomb interactions whose tail governs recollision dynamics, the HHG cutoff, and correlated double-ionization pathways. The review should either cite a concrete mapping that preserves the relevant observables despite the modified tail, or explicitly state that the simulated dynamics is a proxy whose quantitative agreement with the electronic process has not been established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3] Reference [110] is Aspuru-Guzik and Walther, Nature Physics 8 (2012), which is not the paper that introduced quantum computation of molecular energies; the correct citation for that sentence is Ref. [111], Aspuru-Guzik et al., Science 309 (2005). Please swap the citations or revise the sentence.
  2. [General] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected in a revision: 'retoreflected' (Section 2), 'anoother' (Section 2.3), 'quadroupole' (Section 3.3.3), 'intramoleculecural' (Section 3.3.1), and 'T able' (Table 1 caption).
  3. [Section 2 and Table 1] The manuscript defines long-range interactions as polynomial decays U_s ∝ s^−α, but Table 1 lists photonic crystals with an exponential decay ∼ e^{−r/L}. Please clarify why this platform is included in a review of polynomial long-range interactions, or explicitly discuss the power-law regimes that can arise near band edges.
  4. [Section 2.2] The sentence 'Gauss's law prevents a stable ion trap from being based on static electromagnetic fields' is imprecise; Earnshaw's theorem, which concerns the impossibility of stable electrostatic equilibrium, is the operative result. This is a presentation issue rather than a technical one.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a review whose mapping claims are self-contained, and whose self-citations are descriptive rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is a review article, not a derivation paper. Its organizing Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) defines long-range interactions as polynomial decays U_s ∝ s^{-α}, and each surveyed platform (dipolar, ionic, photon-mediated, atom-mediated) is anchored to independent experimental and theoretical literature. The author's own prior work (e.g., Refs. [67, 68, 69, 93, 104, 134, 140]) is cited to show that particular proposals or applications exist, not to justify a derived result; none of these citations functions as a uniqueness proof, a fitted parameter, a hidden ansatz, or a renaming that makes a later claim true by construction. The weakest step, Sec. 3.3.1's assertion that 1/r^3 and 1/r^6 repulsions 'already capture the essential physics' of the Coulomb repulsion, is an unquantified modeling assumption about fidelity. That is a correctness and boundary-of-validity risk, not circularity, because the claim is not derived from, nor reducible to, the input Hamiltonian by construction. The paper also explicitly reframes the analog goal as benchmarking and complementing classical methods, showing that the claim is evaluative rather than an identity. No specific circular step can be quoted with an exhibit of Eq. X = Eq. Y, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's central narrative relies on standard physics assumptions rather than free parameters: the validity of the single-band Hubbard model for atoms in optical lattices, the Born-Oppenheimer separation in chemistry simulation, and the premise that faster-decaying dipolar/Rydberg interactions can approximate Coulomb physics. No free parameters are fitted. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Atoms in the lowest band of an optical lattice are described by the tight-binding Hubbard model with tunneling J and interactions U_s (Eq. 1).
    Invoked in Sec. 2 (Introduction) to frame all subsequent discussion of long-range interactions; assumes Wannier localization, negligible higher-band population, and that the interaction can be expressed as an on-site/long-range density-density term.
  • domain assumption The Born-Oppenheimer approximation separates electronic and nuclear motion, allowing one to solve the electronic Hamiltonian for fixed nuclear positions (Eq. 3).
    Used throughout Sec. 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 to justify mapping electrons to atoms in fixed optical potentials; the review acknowledges in Sec. 3.3.3 that the approximation fails at conical intersections, where other strategies are needed.
  • domain assumption Dipolar (1/r^3) or van der Waals (1/r^6) interactions capture the essential physics of the 1/r Coulomb repulsion for purposes of analog chemistry simulation.
    Stated explicitly in Sec. 3.3.1: 'Such interactions still decay faster than the 1/r Coulomb potential, but already capture the essential physics...' This assumption is load-bearing for the review's claim that cold-atom analog simulators can address chemistry problems, yet it is not derived or quantitatively benchmarked in the review.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Engineering and harnessing long-range interactions for atomic quantum simulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6PYGTXTQ

@misc{pith2026250607250,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Engineering and harnessing long-range interactions for atomic quantum simulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6PYGTXTQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07250}
}
read the original abstract

Interactions between quantum particles, such as electrons, are the source of important effects, ranging from superconductivity, to the formation of molecular bonds, or the stability of elementary compounds at high-energies. In this article, we illustrate how advances in the cold-atom community to further engineer such long-range interactions have stimulated the simulation of new regimes of these fundamental many-body problems. The goal is two-fold: first, to provide a comprehensive review of the different strategies proposed and/or experimentally realized to induce long-range interactions among atoms moving in optical potentials. Second, to showcase various fields where such platforms can offer new insights, ranging from the simulation of condensed matter phenomena to the study of lattice gauge theories, and the simulation of electronic configurations in chemistry. We then discuss the challenges and opportunities of these platforms compared to other complementary approaches based on digital simulation and quantum computation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [110]

    Aspuru-Guzik, P

    A. Aspuru-Guzik, P. Walther, Photonic quantum simulators. Nature Physics 8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/NPHYS2253

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2253 2012

  2. [111]

    Aspuru-Guzik, A.D

    A. Aspuru-Guzik, A.D. Dutoi, P.J. Love, M. Head-Gordon, Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies. Science 309(5741) (2005). https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1113479

    doi:10.1126/science.1113479 2005

  3. [67]

    Arg¨ uello-Luengo, T

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, T. Shi, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, Engineering analog quantum chemistry Hamiltonians using cold atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 103(4), 043318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.043318

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.043318 2021

  4. [68]

    Arg¨ uello-Luengo, A

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, T. Shi, P. Zoller, J.I. Cirac, Analogue quantum chemistry simulation. Nature 574(7777), 215–218 (2019). https://doi. org/10.1038/s41586-019-1614-4

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1614-4 2019

  5. [134]

    Arg¨ uello-Luengo, J

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, A.S. Maxwell, D.M. Weld, M.F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, Analog Simulation of High-Harmonic Genera- tion in Atoms. PRX Quantum 5(1), 010328 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.5.010328

    2024

  6. [1]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, S. Nascimb` ene, Quantum simulations with ultracold quan- tum gases. Nature Physics 8(4), 267–276 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys2259

    2012

  7. [2]

    Gross, I

    C. Gross, I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science (New York, N.Y.)357(6355), 995–1001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aal3837. 28883070

    2017

  8. [3]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T.W. H¨ ansch, I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415(6867), 39–44 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415039a

    doi:10.1038/415039a 2002

Show all 139 references
  1. [4]

    Hilker, G

    T.A. Hilker, G. Salomon, F. Grusdt, A. Omran, M. Boll, E. Demler, I. Bloch, C. Gross, Revealing hidden antiferromagnetic correlations in doped Hubbard chains via string correlators. Science 357(6350), 484–487 (2017). https://doi. org/10.1126/science.aam8990

    2017 doi

  2. [5]

    Gross, W.S

    C. Gross, W.S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection. Nat. Phys. 17(12), 1316–1323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-021-01370-5

    2021

  3. [6]

    Bakr, J.I

    W.S. Bakr, J.I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. F¨ olling, M. Greiner, A quantum gas micro- scope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice. Nature 462(7269), 74–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08482

    2009 doi

  4. [7]

    Sherson, C

    J.F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 467(7311), 68–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09378

    2010 doi

  5. [8]

    Boll, T.A

    M. Boll, T.A. Hilker, G. Salomon, A. Omran, J. Nespolo, L. Pollet, I. Bloch, C. Gross, Spin- and density-resolved microscopy of antiferromagnetic correla- tions in Fermi-Hubbard chains. Science 353(6305), 1257–1260 (2016). https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aag1635 14

    2016 doi

  6. [9]

    Mazurenko, C.S

    A. Mazurenko, C.S. Chiu, G. Ji, M.F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard anti- ferromagnet. Nature 545(7655), 462–466 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature22362

    2017

  7. [10]

    Zwerger, Mott–Hubbard transition of cold atoms in optical lattices

    W. Zwerger, Mott–Hubbard transition of cold atoms in optical lattices. J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5(2), S9 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1464-4266/5/2/352

    2003

  8. [11]

    Rey, Ultracold bosonic atoms in optical lattices

    A.M. Rey, Ultracold bosonic atoms in optical lattices. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland (2004)

    2004

  9. [12]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macr ` ı, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, A. Trombettoni, Long- range interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95(3), 035002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.035002

    2023 doi

  10. [13]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, G. Grynberg, Atom—Photon Interactions (WILEY-VCH Verlag, 1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527617197

    1998 doi

  11. [14]

    Menotti, M

    C. Menotti, M. Lewenstein, T. Lahaye, T. Pfau, Dipolar interaction in ultra-cold atomic gases. AIP Conf. Proc. 970(1), 332 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 2839130

    2008 doi

  12. [15]

    Bohn, A.M

    J.L. Bohn, A.M. Rey, J. Ye, Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quantum matter. Science (80-. ). 357(6355), 1002–1010 (2017)

    2017

  13. [16]

    K.K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M.H.G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J.J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P.S. Julienne, D.S. Jin, J. Ye, A High Phase-Space-Density Gas of Polar Molecules. Science 322(5899), 231–235 (2008). https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.1163861

    2008

  14. [18]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, S. Will, Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules. Nature pp. 1–5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07492-z

    2024 doi

  15. [19]

    L.D. Carr, D. DeMille, R.V. Krems, J. Ye, Cold and ultracold molecules: Science, technology and applications. New J. Phys. 11(5), 055049 (2009). https://doi. org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055049

    2009 doi

  16. [20]

    Griesmaier, J

    A. Griesmaier, J. Stuhler, T. Koch, M. Fattori, T. Pfau, S. Giovanazzi, Com- paring contact and dipolar interactions in a bose-einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(25), 250402 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT. 15 97.250402/FIGURES/1/MEDIUM

    2006 doi

  17. [21]

    de Paz, A

    A. de Paz, A. Sharma, A. Chotia, E. Mar´ echal, J.H. Huckans, P. Pedri, L. Santos, O. Gorceix, L. Vernac, B. Laburthe-Tolra, Nonequilibrium quantum magnetism in a dipolar lattice gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(18), 185305 (2013). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185305

    2013 doi

  18. [22]

    de Paz, P

    A. de Paz, P. Pedri, A. Sharma, M. Efremov, B. Naylor, O. Gorceix, E. Mar´ echal, L. Vernac, B. Laburthe-Tolra, Probing spin dynamics from the Mott insulating to the superfluid regime in a dipolar lattice gas. Phys. Rev. A 93(2), 021603 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA...

    2016 doi

  19. [23]

    Norcia, C

    M.A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M.J. Mark, R.N. Bisset, L. Santos, F. Ferlaino, Two-dimensional supersolidity in a dipolar quantum gas. Nature 596(7872), 357–361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-021-03725-7

    2021

  20. [24]

    Aikawa, A

    K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, A. Rietzler, R. Grimm, F. Fer- laino, Bose-Einstein Condensation of Erbium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(21), 210401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.210401

    2012 doi

  21. [25]

    L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S.F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A.H. H´ ebert, G.A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dickerson, F. Ferlaino, O. Markovi´ c, M. Greiner, Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a Hubbard quantum simulator. Nature 622(7984), 724–729 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/...

    2023 doi

  22. [26]

    Baier, M.J

    S. Baier, M.J. Mark, D. Petter, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, Z. Cai, M. Baranov, P. Zoller, F. Ferlaino, Extended Bose-Hubbard models with ultracold magnetic atoms. Science 352(6282), 201–205 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aac9812

    2016 doi

  23. [27]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe-Tolra, B.L. Lev, T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: A review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases. Rep. Prog. Phys. 86(2), 026401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aca814

    2022 doi

  24. [28]

    ˇSibali´ c, C.S

    N. ˇSibali´ c, C.S. Adams,Rydberg Physics (IOP Publishing, 2018)

    2018

  25. [29]

    Saffman, T.G

    M. Saffman, T.G. Walker, K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(3), 2313–2363 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.2313

    2010

  26. [30]

    Dudin, A

    Y.O. Dudin, A. Kuzmich, Strongly interacting Rydberg excitations of a cold atomic gas. Science (80-. ). 336(6083), 887–889 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/ SCIENCE.1217901

    2012

  27. [31]

    Distante, P

    E. Distante, P. Farrera, A. Padr´ on-Brito, D. Paredes-Barato, G. Heinze, H. de Riedmatten, Storing single photons emitted by a quantum memory on a highly 16 excited Rydberg state. Nat. Comm. 8(1), 1–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms14072

    2017

  28. [32]

    L. Li, A. Kuzmich, Quantum memory with strong and controllable Rydberg- level interactions. Nat. Commun. 7(1), 1–5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms13618

    2016

  29. [33]

    Ripka, H

    F. Ripka, H. K¨ ubler, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, A room-temperature single-photon source based on strongly interacting Rydberg atoms. Science (80-. ). 362(6413), 446– 449 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAU1949

    2018 doi

  30. [34]

    Anderson, K.C

    S.E. Anderson, K.C. Younge, G. Raithel, Trapping rydberg atoms in an opti- cal lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(26), 263001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.263001

    2011

  31. [35]

    Schauß, M

    P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, I. Bloch, Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two- dimensional Rydberg gas. Nature 491(7422), 87–91 (2012). https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature11596

    2012

  32. [36]

    Browaeys, T

    A. Browaeys, T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Ryd- berg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16(2), 132–142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-019-0733-z

    2020

  33. [37]

    Balewski, A.T

    J.B. Balewski, A.T. Krupp, A. Gaj, S. Hofferberth, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, Ryd- berg dressing: Understanding of collective many-body effects and implications for experiments. New J. Phys. 16(6), 063012 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1367-2630/16/6/063012

    2014

  34. [38]

    Guardado-Sanchez, B.M

    E. Guardado-Sanchez, B.M. Spar, P. Schauss, R. Belyansky, J.T. Young, P. Bienias, A.V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, W.S. Bakr, Quench Dynamics of a Fermi Gas with Strong Nonlocal Interactions. Phys. Rev. X 11(2), 021036 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021036

    2021 doi

  35. [39]

    Neuhauser, M

    W. Neuhauser, M. Hohenstatt, P.E. Toschek, H. Dehmelt, Localized visible Ba+ mono-ion oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 22(3), 1137 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.22.1137

    1980

  36. [40]

    Wineland, W.M

    D.J. Wineland, W.M. Itano, Spectroscopy of a single Mg+ ion. Phys. Lett. A 82(2), 75–78 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(81)90942-7

    1981 doi

  37. [41]

    Blatt, C.F

    R. Blatt, C.F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions. Nature Phys 8(4), 277–284 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2252

    2012 doi

  38. [42]

    Schneider, D

    C. Schneider, D. Porras, T. Schaetz, Experimental quantum simulations of many-body physics with trapped ions. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75(2), 024401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/2/024401 17

    2012 doi

  39. [43]

    Porras, J.I

    D. Porras, J.I. Cirac, Quantum manipulation of trapped ions in two dimensional coulomb crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(25), 250501 (2006). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.96.250501

    2006

  40. [44]

    Britton, B.C

    J.W. Britton, B.C. Sawyer, A.C. Keith, C.C.J. Wang, J.K. Freericks, H. Uys, M.J. Biercuk, J.J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins. Nature 484(7395), 489–492 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10981

    2012 doi

  41. [45]

    Kim, M.S

    K. Kim, M.S. Chang, R. Islam, S. Korenblit, L.M. Duan, C. Monroe, Entan- glement and tunable spin-spin couplings between trapped ions using multiple transverse modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(12), 120502 (2009). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.103.120502

    2009

  42. [46]

    Jurcevic, B.P

    P. Jurcevic, B.P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, C.F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many- body system. Nature 511(7508), 202–205 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature13461

    2014

  43. [47]

    Schneider, M

    C. Schneider, M. Enderlein, T. Huber, T. Schaetz, Optical trapping of an ion. Nat. Photonics 4(11), 772–775 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010

    2010 doi

  44. [48]

    Hoenig, F

    D. Hoenig, F. Thielemann, L. Karpa, T. Walker, A. Mohammadi, T. Schaetz, Trapping Ion Coulomb Crystals in an Optical Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(13), 133003 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.133003

    2024 doi

  45. [49]

    Karpa, Trapping Single Ions and Coulomb Crystals with Light Fields (Springer, 2019)

    L. Karpa, Trapping Single Ions and Coulomb Crystals with Light Fields (Springer, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27716-1

    2019 doi

  46. [50]

    Schmied, T

    R. Schmied, T. Roscilde, V. Murg, D. Porras, J.I. Cirac, Quantum phases of trapped ions in an optical lattice. New J. Phys. 10(4), 045017 (2008). https: //doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/045017

    2008 doi

  47. [51]

    Enderlein, T

    M. Enderlein, T. Huber, C. Schneider, T. Schaetz, Single ions trapped in a one- dimensional optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(23), 233004 (2012). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.233004. arXiv:1208.3329v1

    2012 arXiv

  48. [52]

    Cormick, T

    C. Cormick, T. Schaetz, G. Morigi, Trapping ions with lasers. New J. Phys. 13(4), 043019 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/4/043019

    2011 doi

  49. [53]

    Lambrecht, J

    A. Lambrecht, J. Schmidt, P. Weckesser, M. Debatin, L. Karpa, T. Schaetz, Long lifetimes and effective isolation of ions in optical and electrostatic traps. Nature Photon 11(11), 704–707 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0030-2

    2017 doi

  50. [54]

    Cirac, P

    J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, A scalable quantum computer with ions in an array of microtraps. Nature 404(6778), 579–581 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/ 18 35007021

    2000

  51. [55]

    Lanyon, C

    B.P. Lanyon, C. Hempel, D. Nigg, M. M¨ uller, R. Gerritsma, F. Z¨ ahringer, P. Schindler, J.T. Barreiro, M. Rambach, G. Kirchmair, M. Hennrich, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, C.F. Roos, Universal digital quantum simulation with trapped ions. Science (80-. ). 334(6052), 57–61 (2011). htt...

    2011 arXiv

  52. [56]

    Tomza, K

    M. Tomza, K. Jachymski, R. Gerritsma, A. Negretti, T. Calarco, Z. Idziaszek, P.S. Julienne, Cold hybrid ion-atom systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91(3), 035001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035001

    2019 doi

  53. [57]

    Chang, J.S

    D.E. Chang, J.S. Douglas, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.L. Hung, H.J. Kimble, Collo- quium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons. Reviews of Modern Physics 90(3), 031002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.90.031002

    2018

  54. [58]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity. Nature 464(7293), 1301– 1306 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09009

    2010 doi

  55. [59]

    Periwal, E.S

    A. Periwal, E.S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J.F. Wienand, E.J. Davis, M. Schleier- Smith, Programmable interactions and emergent geometry in an array of atom clouds. Nature 600(7890), 630–635 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-021-04156-0. arXiv:2106.04070

    2021 arXiv

  56. [60]

    Goban, K.S

    A. Goban, K.S. Choi, D.J. Alton, D. Ding, C. Lacroˆ ute, M. Pototschnig, T. Thiele, N.P. Stern, H.J. Kimble, Demonstration of a State-Insensitive, Com- pensated Nanofiber Trap. Physical Review Letters 109(3), 033603 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.033603

    2012 doi

  57. [61]

    Hinney, A.S

    J. Hinney, A.S. Prasad, S. Mahmoodian, K. Hammerer, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, M. Schemmer, Unraveling two-photon entangle- ment via the squeezing spectrum of light traveling through nanofiber-coupled atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(12), 123602 (2021). https://d...

    2021 arXiv

  58. [62]

    Chang, A.S

    D.E. Chang, A.S. Sørensen, E.A. Demler, M.D. Lukin, A single-photon transistor using nano-scale surface plasmons. Nat. Phys. 3(11), 807–812 (2007). https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys708. arXiv:0706.4335

    2007 arXiv

  59. [63]

    Goban, C.L

    A. Goban, C.L. Hung, S.P. Yu, J. Hood, J. Muniz, J. Lee, M. Martin, A. McClung, K. Choi, D. Chang, O. Painter, H. Kimble, Atom–light interac- tions in photonic crystals. Nat. Comm. 5(1), 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10. 1038/ncomms4808 19

    2014

  60. [64]

    Douglas, H

    J.S. Douglas, H. Habibian, C.L. Hung, A.V. Gorshkov, H.J. Kimble, D.E. Chang, Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals. Nature Photonics 9(5), 326–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015. 57

    2015 doi

  61. [65]

    Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.L

    A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.L. Hung, D.E. Chang, J.I. Cirac, H.J. Kimble, Subwave- length vacuum lattices and atom-atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals. Nature Photonics 9(5), 320–325 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphoton.2015.54. arXiv:1407.7336

    2015 arXiv

  62. [66]

    J.D. Hood, A. Goban, A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Lu, S.P. Yu, D.E. Chang, H.J. Kimble, Atom–atom interactions around the band edge of a photonic crystal waveguide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(38), 10507–10512 (2016). https://doi. org/10.1073/PNAS.1603788113

    2016 doi

  63. [69]

    Arg¨ uello-Luengo, A

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, Tuning Long- Range Fermion-Mediated Interactions in Cold-Atom Quantum Simulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(8), 083401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129. 083401

    2022 doi

  64. [70]

    S. De, I.B. Spielman, Fermion-mediated long-range interactions between bosons stored in an optical lattice. Appl. Phys. B 114(4), 527–536 (2014). https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00340-013-5556-5

    2014 doi

  65. [71]

    Paredes, G

    R. Paredes, G. Bruun, A. Camacho-Guardian. Perspective: Interactions medi- ated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons (2024). https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2406.13795

    2024 doi arXiv

  66. [72]

    Baier, M.J

    S. Baier, M.J. Mark, D. Petter, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, Z. Cai, M. Baranov, P. Zoller, F. Ferlaino, Extended Bose-Hubbard models with ultracold magnetic atoms. Science (80-. ). 352(6282), 201–205 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/ SCIENCE.AAC9812

    2016

  67. [73]

    Samutpraphoot, P.L

    P. Samutpraphoot, P.L. Ocola, H. Bernien, C. Senko, V. Vuleti´ c, M.D. Lukin, Strong coupling of two individually controlled atoms via a nanophotonic cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(6), 063602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PHYSREVLETT.124.063602/FIGURES/4/MEDIUM. arXiv:1909.09108 20

    2020 arXiv

  68. [74]

    G´ oral, L

    K. G´ oral, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, Quantum phases of dipolar bosons in opti- cal lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(17), 170406 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.88.170406

    2002

  69. [76]

    Sinha, K

    S. Sinha, K. Sengupta, Phases and collective modes of a hardcore Bose-Fermi mixture in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. B 79(11), 115124 (2009). https://doi. org/10.1103/PHYSREVB.79.115124/FIGURES/6/MEDIUM

    2009 doi

  70. [78]

    B¨ uchler, G

    H.P. B¨ uchler, G. Blatter, Supersolid versus phase separation in atomic bose- fermi mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(13), 130404 (2003). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PHYSREVLETT.91.130404/FIGURES/3/MEDIUM

    2003

  71. [79]

    Bland, E

    T. Bland, E. Poli, C. Politi, L. Klaus, M.A. Norcia, F. Ferlaino, L. Santos, R.N. Bisset, Two-Dimensional Supersolid Formation in Dipolar Condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(19), 195302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128. 195302

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    Casotti, E

    E. Casotti, E. Poli, L. Klaus, A. Litvinov, C. Ulm, C. Politi, M.J. Mark, T. Bland, F. Ferlaino, Observation of vortices in a dipolar supersolid. Nature pp. 1–5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08149-7

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    Mottl, F

    R. Mottl, F. Brennecke, K. Baumann, R. Landig, T. Donner, T. Esslinger, Roton-type mode softening in a quantum gas with cavity-mediated long-range interactions. Science 336(6088), 1570–1573 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1220314. arXiv:1203.1322

    2012 arXiv

  74. [82]

    C. Feng, Y. Chen, Tunable range interactions and multi-roton excitations for bosons in a bose-fermi mixture with optical lattices. Commun. Theor. Phys. 71(7), 869 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/7/869

    2019 doi

  75. [83]

    Ferrier-Barbut, H

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, T. Pfau, Observa- tion of quantum droplets in a strongly dipolar bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(21), 215301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.116.215301/ FIGURES/4/MEDIUM. arXiv:1601.03318 21

    2016 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M.J. Mark, F. W¨ achtler, L. Santos, F. Fer- laino, Quantum-Fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute bose-einstein con- densate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid. Phys. Rev. X 6(4), 41039 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVX.6.0...

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Cabrera, L

    C.R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, L. Tarrue, Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of bose-Einstein condensates. Science (80- . ). 359(6373), 301–304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAO5686/ SUPPL FILE/AAO5686-CABRERA-SM.PDF. arXiv:1708.07806

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Karpiuk, M

    T. Karpiuk, M. Brewczyk, S. Ospelkaus-Schwarzer, K. Bongs, M. Gajda, K. Rz¸ azewski, Soliton trains in Bose-Fermi mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(10), 100401 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.93.100401/ FIGURES/4/MEDIUM

    2004 doi

  79. [87]

    Santhanam, V.M

    J. Santhanam, V.M. Kenkre, V.V. Konotop, Solitons of Bose-Fermi mixtures in a strongly elongated trap. Phys. Rev. A 73(1), 13612 (2006). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PHYSREV A.73.013612/FIGURES/1/MEDIUM

    2006 doi

  80. [88]

    DeSalvo, K

    B.J. DeSalvo, K. Patel, G. Cai, C. Chin, Observation of fermion-mediated interactions between bosonic atoms. Nature 568(7750), 61–64 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1055-0

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    Cheiney, C.R

    P. Cheiney, C.R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, L. Tarruell, Bright soliton to quantum droplet transition in a mixture of bose-einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(13), 135301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT. 120.135301/FIGURES/4/MEDIUM. arXiv:1710.11079

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Nandkishore, S.L

    R.M. Nandkishore, S.L. Sondhi, Many-Body Localization with Long-Range Interactions. Phys. Rev. X 7(4), 041021 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.7.041021

    2017

  83. [91]

    Serbyn, D.A

    M. Serbyn, D.A. Abanin, Z. Papi´ c, Quantum many-body scars and weak break- ing of ergodicity. Nat. Phys. 17(6), 675–685 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-021-01230-2

    2021

  84. [92]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H.P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topo- logical phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms. Science 365(6455), 775–780 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/scien...

    2019 doi

  85. [93]

    Gallego-Lizarribar, S

    K. Gallego-Lizarribar, S. Juli` a-Farr´ e, M. Lewenstein, C. Weitenberg, L. Bar- biero, J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo. Probing spontaneously symmetry-broken phases with spin-charge separation through noise correlation measurements (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.08374 22

    2024 doi arXiv

  86. [94]

    Baldelli, C.R

    N. Baldelli, C.R. Cabrera, S. Juli` a-Farr´ e, M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, Frus- trated Extended Bose-Hubbard Model and Deconfined Quantum Critical Points with Optical Lattices at the Antimagic Wavelength. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(15), 153401 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

    2024 doi

  87. [95]

    Chanda, J

    T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, L. Tagliacozzo, Confinement and Lack of Thermalization after Quenches in the Bosonic Schwinger Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(18), 180602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.180602

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    Hauke, D

    P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller, Quantum simulation of a lattice schwinger model in a chain of trapped ions. Phys. Rev. X 3(4), 41018 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041018. arXiv:1306.2162

    2014 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Surace, P

    F.M. Surace, P. Fromholz, N.D. Oppong, M. Dalmonte, M. Aidelsburger, Ab Initio Derivation of Lattice-Gauge-Theory Dynamics for Cold Gases in Opti- cal Lattices. PRX Quantum 4(2), 020330 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.020330

    2023

  90. [98]

    Martinez, C.A

    E.A. Martinez, C.A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. Nature 534(7608), 516–519 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18318

    2016 doi

  91. [99]

    Nguyen, M.C

    N.H. Nguyen, M.C. Tran, Y. Zhu, A.M. Green, C.H. Alderete, Z. Davoudi, N.M. Linke, Digital Quantum Simulation of the Schwinger Model and Sym- metry Protection with Trapped Ions. PRX Quantum 3(2), 020324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020324

    2022 doi

  92. [100]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T.V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaˇ ca, A. Lukin, S.H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, S.T. Wang, A. Keesling, M.D. Lukin, P. Zoller, A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator. Nature pp. 1–6 (2025). https://doi.org...

    2025 doi

  93. [101]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F.M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E.R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K.S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A.V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, C. Monroe. Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator (2024). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.13815

    2024 doi arXiv

  94. [102]

    Homeier, A

    L. Homeier, A. Bohrdt, S. Linsel, E. Demler, J.C. Halimeh, F. Grusdt, Real- istic scheme for quantum simulation of $${{\mathbb{Z}}} {2}$$ lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2 + 1)D. Commun Phys 6(1), 1–10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01237-6

    2023 doi

  95. [103]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, M. Atala, J.T. Barreiro, S. Nascimb` ene, N.R. Cooper, I. Bloch, N. Goldman, Measuring the Chern num- ber of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms. Nat. Phys. 11(2), 162 (2015) 23

    2015

  96. [104]

    Arg¨ uello-Luengo, U

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, U. Bhattacharya, A. Celi, R.W. Chhajlany, T. Grass, M. P lodzie´ n, D. Rakshit, T. Salamon, P. Stornati, L. Tarruell, M. Lewenstein, Synthetic dimensions for topological and quantum phases. Commun Phys 7(1), 1–10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01636-3

    2024 doi

  97. [105]

    Halimeh, M

    J.C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, B. Yang. Cold-atom quan- tum simulators of gauge theories (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310. 12201

    2023 doi

  98. [106]

    Surace, P.P

    F.M. Surace, P.P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, M. Dalmonte, Lattice Gauge Theories and String Dynamics in Rydberg Atom Quantum Simu- lators. Phys. Rev. X 10(2), 021041 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX. 10.021041

    2020 doi

  99. [107]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, P.R. Grzybowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. J¨ unemann, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. Kasper, A. Piga, S.J. Ran, M. Rizzi, G. Sierra, L. Tagliacozzo, E. Tirrito, T.V. Zache, J. Zakrzewski, E. Zoh...

    2022

  100. [108]

    Bransden, C.J

    B.H. Bransden, C.J. Joachain, T.J. Plivier, Physics of Atoms and Molecules (Pearson education, 2003)

    2003

  101. [109]

    Szabo, N.S

    A. Szabo, N.S. Ostlund, Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory(Courier Corporation, 1996)

    1996

  102. [112]

    Berry, C

    D.W. Berry, C. Gidney, M. Motta, J.R. McClean, R. Babbush, Qubitization of arbitrary basis quantum chemistry leveraging sparsity and low rank factor- ization. Quantum 3, 208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-02-208. arXiv:1902.02134

    2019 arXiv

  103. [113]

    Babbush, N

    R. Babbush, N. Wiebe, J. McClean, J. McClain, H. Neven, G.K.L. Chan, Low- depth quantum simulation of materials. Phys. Rev. X 8(1), 11044 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011044

    2018 doi

  104. [114]

    Babbush, D.W

    R. Babbush, D.W. Berry, J.R. McClean, H. Neven, Quantum simulation of chemistry with sublinear scaling to the continuum. arXiv:1807.09802 (2018). arXiv:1807.09802 24

    2018 arXiv

  105. [115]

    Low, I.L

    G.H. Low, I.L. Chuang, Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum 3, 163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-07-12-163. arXiv:1610.06546

    2019 arXiv

  106. [116]

    Feynman, Forces in Molecules

    R.P. Feynman, Forces in Molecules. Phys. Rev. 56(4), 340–343 (1939). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.340

    1939 doi

  107. [117]

    Hellmann, Einf¨ uhrung in die Quantenchemie(J.W

    H. Hellmann, Einf¨ uhrung in die Quantenchemie(J.W. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Mich, 1944)

    1944

  108. [118]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, Syn- thetic three-dimensional atomic structures assembled atom by atom. Nature 561(7721), 79–82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0450-2

    2018 doi

  109. [119]

    Malz, J.I

    D. Malz, J.I. Cirac, Few-Body Analog Quantum Simulation with Rydberg- Dressed Atoms in Optical Lattices. PRX Quantum 4(2), 020301 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020301

    2023 doi

  110. [120]

    L¨ uhmann, C

    D.S. L¨ uhmann, C. Weitenberg, K. Sengstock, Emulating Molecular Orbitals and Electronic Dynamics with Ultracold Atoms. Phys. Rev. X 5(3), 031016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031016

    2015 doi

  111. [121]

    Krausz, M

    F. Krausz, M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(1), 163–234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.163

    2009 doi

  112. [122]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. L’Huillier, in Strong Field Laser Physics, ed. by T. Brabec, Springer Series in Optical Sciences (Springer, New York, NY, 2009), pp. 147–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34755-4 7

    2009 doi

  113. [123]

    Ciappina, J.A

    M.F. Ciappina, J.A. P´ erez-Hern´ andez, A.S. Landsman, W.A. Okell, S. Zherebtsov, B. F¨ org, J. Sch¨ otz, L. Seiffert, T. Fennel, T. Shaaran, T. Zim- mermann, A. Chac´ on, R. Guichard, A. Za ¨ ır, J.W.G. Tisch, J.P. Marangos, T. Witting, A. Braun, S.A. Maier, L. Roso, M. Kr¨ ...

    2017 doi

  114. [124]

    Sali` eres, A

    P. Sali` eres, A. L’Huillier, P. Antoine, M. Lewenstein, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , vol. 41, ed. by B. Bederson, H. Walther (Academic Press, 1999), pp. 83–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-250X(08) 60219-0

    1999 doi

  115. [125]

    Amini, J

    K. Amini, J. Biegert, F. Calegari, A. Chac´ on, M.F. Ciappina, A. Dauphin, D.K. Efimov, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, K. Giergiel, P. Gniewek, A.S. Landsman, M. Lesiuk, M. Mandrysz, A.S. Maxwell, R. Moszy´ nski, L. Ort- mann, J. Antonio P´ erez-Hern´ andez, A. Pic´ on, E. Pis...

    2019 doi

  116. [126]

    Eberly, Q

    J.H. Eberly, Q. Su, J. Javanainen, High-order harmonic production in mul- tiphoton ionization. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, JOSAB 6(7), 1289–1298 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.6.001289

    1989 doi

  117. [127]

    Smirnova, M

    O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov. Multielectron High Harmonic Generation: Simple man on a complex plane, chapter 7 in Attosecond and XUV physics, edited by T. Schultz and M. Vrakking (2013)

    2013

  118. [128]

    Popruzhenko, D

    S. Popruzhenko, D. Bauer, Strong field approximation for systems with Coulomb interaction. Journal of Modern Optics 55(16), 2573–2589 (2008). https://doi. org/10.1080/09500340802161881

    2008 doi

  119. [129]

    Popruzhenko, Keldysh theory of strong field ionization: History, applica- tions, difficulties and perspectives

    S.V. Popruzhenko, Keldysh theory of strong field ionization: History, applica- tions, difficulties and perspectives. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47(20), 204001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/20/204001

    2014 doi

  120. [131]

    R. Dum, A. Sanpera, K.A. Suominen, M. Brewczyk, M. Ku´ s, K. Rzazewski, M. Lewenstein, Wave Packet Dynamics with Bose-Einstein Condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(18), 3899–3902 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 3899

    1998 doi

  121. [132]

    S. Sala, J. F¨ orster, A. Saenz, Ultracold-atom quantum simulator for attosecond science. Phys. Rev. A 95(1), 011403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 95.011403

    2017 doi

  122. [133]

    Senaratne, S.V

    R. Senaratne, S.V. Rajagopal, T. Shimasaki, P.E. Dotti, K.M. Fujiwara, K. Singh, Z.A. Geiger, D.M. Weld, Quantum simulation of ultrafast dynam- ics using trapped ultracold atoms. Nat Commun 9(1), 2065 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04556-3

    2018 doi

  123. [135]

    Baer, Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: Electronic Nonadiabatic Coupling Terms and Conical Intersections(John Wiley & Sons, 2006)

    M. Baer, Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: Electronic Nonadiabatic Coupling Terms and Conical Intersections(John Wiley & Sons, 2006)

    2006

  124. [136]

    Meyer, U

    H.D. Meyer, U. Manthe, L.S. Cederbaum, The multi-configurational time- dependent Hartree approach. Chemical Physics Letters 165(1), 73–78 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(90)87014-I 26

    1990 doi

  125. [137]

    MacDonell, C.E

    R.J. MacDonell, C.E. Dickerson, C.J. Birch, A. Kumar, C.L. Edmunds, M.J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, I. Kassal, Analog quantum simulation of chemical dynamics. Chem. Sci. 12(28), 9794–9805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/ D1SC02142G. arXiv:2012.01852

    2021 arXiv

  126. [138]

    Olaya-Agudelo, B

    V.C. Olaya-Agudelo, B. Stewart, C.H. Valahu, R.J. MacDonell, M.J. Millican, V.G. Matsos, F. Scuccimarra, T.R. Tan, I. Kassal. Simulating open-system molecular dynamics on analog quantum computers (2024). https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2407.17819

    2024 doi arXiv

  127. [139]

    Navickas, R.J

    T. Navickas, R.J. MacDonell, C.H. Valahu, V.C. Olaya-Agudelo, F. Scuccimarra, M.J. Millican, V.G. Matsos, H.L. Nourse, A.D. Rao, M.J. Biercuk, C. Hempel, I. Kassal, T.R. Tan. Experimental Quantum Simulation of Chemical Dynamics (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.04044

    2024 doi arXiv

  128. [140]

    Arg¨ uello-Luengo, A

    J. Arg¨ uello-Luengo, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, J.I. Cirac. Optical lattice quantum simulator of dynamics beyond Born-Oppenheimer (2025). https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2503.23464

    2025 doi

  129. [141]

    Juanes-Marcos, S.C

    J.C. Juanes-Marcos, S.C. Althorpe, Geometric phase effects in the H+H2 reaction: Quantum wave-packet calculations of integral and differential cross sections. The Journal of Chemical Physics 122(20), 204324 (2005). https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1924411

    2005 doi

  130. [142]

    S. Li, J. Huang, Z. Lu, Y. Shu, W. Chen, D. Yuan, T. Wang, B. Fu, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, D.H. Zhang, X. Yang, Observation of geometric phase effect through backward angular oscillations in the H + HD → H2 + D reaction. Nat Commun 15(1), 1698 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-...

    2024 doi

  131. [143]

    Kuppermann, Y.S.M

    A. Kuppermann, Y.S.M. Wu, The geometric phase effect shows up in chemical reactions. Chemical Physics Letters 205(6), 577–586 (1993). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0009-2614(93)80015-H 27

    1993 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.