Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 5 cited by

CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation: Reviewing the Role of Neutrino Interaction Model Uncertainties on Accelerator-Based Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Uncertainties in neutrino-nucleus interaction models are the dominant systematic challenge for next-generation accelerator neutrino oscillation experiments.

desk verdict A straightforward review of neutrino-nucleus uncertainties that restates the consensus without new analysis or data. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28671 v1 pith:6QNLIRNY submitted 2026-05-27 hep-ex hep-ph

Stephen Dolan , Luke Pickering , Patrick Stowell , Callum Wilkinson , Clarence Wret This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-ph
keywords neutrinooscillationsneutrino-nucleusinteractionssystematicuncertaintiesCPviolationacceleratorneutrinosneardetectorsnuclearphysicsmassordering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review examines how uncertainties in modeling neutrino interactions with nuclei limit the precision of oscillation parameter measurements at accelerator facilities. These effects arise from complex nuclear physics details that alter predicted event rates and thus the inferred oscillation probabilities. The authors argue that as data volumes grow, controlling these uncertainties becomes essential to reach the sensitivity needed for detecting leptonic CP violation and determining the neutrino mass ordering. They survey prospects for mitigation through theoretical advances and near-detector rate measurements taken before oscillations occur. A sympathetic reader would care because unresolved nuclear uncertainties could prevent experiments from achieving their core physics objectives or revealing new phenomena.

What carries the argument

Neutrino-nucleus interaction model uncertainties, which stem from subtle nuclear physics details and directly affect the event rates used to infer oscillation probabilities.

What would settle it

Demonstration that residual neutrino-nucleus interaction uncertainties still dominate the error budget in a next-generation oscillation analysis after applying current best models and near-detector constraints.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Accelerator-based neutrino oscillation experiments have the potential to characterize charge-parity violation in the lepton sector, determine the neutrino mass ordering, and explore physics beyond three-flavour mixing, but this requires increasingly precise control over systematic uncertainties from neutrino-nucleus interaction modeling, which the paper states can be addressed through state-of-the-art theoretical modelling combined with precise near-detector measurements of interaction event rates.

Load-bearing premise

That state-of-the-art theoretical modelling combined with precise near-detector measurements will reduce nuclear-physics uncertainties to an acceptable level for next-generation oscillation analyses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Next-generation experiments will require reduced nuclear uncertainties to measure CP violation and mass ordering.
  • Near-detector measurements of interaction rates before oscillations can constrain the models.
  • Theoretical improvements in neutrino-nucleus modeling must advance alongside experimental data collection.
  • Without sufficient reduction, these uncertainties will prevent the experiments from reaching their target precision.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If near-detector constraints prove insufficient, dedicated neutrino scattering experiments may become necessary to isolate nuclear effects.
  • Cross-checks between different accelerator experiments' near detectors could reveal inconsistencies in current interaction models.
  • Better handling of these uncertainties might also improve analyses in non-oscillation neutrino physics programs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review paper examining the role of neutrino-nucleus interaction model uncertainties in accelerator-based neutrino oscillation experiments. It covers how these uncertainties, arising from nuclear physics details, affect event rates and the extraction of oscillation probabilities; the challenges they pose for measurements of CP violation, mass ordering, and beyond-three-flavour mixing; and the mitigation strategy of combining state-of-the-art theoretical modeling with precise near-detector constraints before oscillations occur. The paper reviews the status for current and next-generation experiments and assesses prospects for reducing the uncertainties to acceptable levels.

Significance. If the review provides an accurate synthesis of the literature, it offers a timely consolidation of a well-recognized systematic that will dominate error budgets as statistics increase in experiments such as T2K, NOvA, DUNE, and Hyper-Kamiokande. The paper correctly restates the field consensus that nuclear modeling uncertainties are among the most difficult to control and that near-detector data plus theory are the primary tools for reduction. No novel derivations, machine-checked proofs, or falsifiable predictions are presented, as expected for a review.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Title] Title: The phrasing 'CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation' frames the topic as a binary choice, but the abstract and content review how nuclear effects contribute to systematic uncertainties in CP-violation searches rather than presenting them as mutually exclusive interpretations; a more precise title would improve clarity.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 3: The claim that near-detector measurements combined with theory 'will be sufficient to reduce the nuclear-physics uncertainties to an acceptable level' is presented without quantitative benchmarks (e.g., target uncertainty levels for DUNE CP sensitivity); adding explicit target precisions or references to specific sensitivity studies would strengthen the review.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a timely review synthesizing the literature on neutrino-nucleus interaction uncertainties in oscillation experiments. We note the recommendation for minor revision; however, no specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: review paper with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review paper with no internal equations, derivations, or quantitative predictions. The abstract and provided text restate established consensus on neutrino-nucleus interaction uncertainties and the standard near-detector strategy without offering any new model, fit, or claim that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, fitted inputs called predictions, or ansatzes are present. The weakest assumption is explicitly the subject of the review rather than an unexamined premise.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; it introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. All content is drawn from prior literature on neutrino-nucleus interactions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation: Reviewing the Role of Neutrino Interaction Model Uncertainties on Accelerator-Based Neutrino Oscillation Measurements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6QNLIRNY

@misc{pith2026260528671,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation: Reviewing the Role of Neutrino Interaction Model Uncertainties on Accelerator-Based Neutrino Oscillation Measurements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6QNLIRNY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28671}
}
read the original abstract

Accelerator-based neutrino oscillation experiments have the potential to revolutionise our understanding of fundamental physics, offering an opportunity to characterise charge-parity violation in the lepton sector; to determine the neutrino mass ordering; and to explore the possibility of physics beyond three-flavour neutrino mixing. However, as more data is collected, the current and next-generation of experiments will require increasingly precise control over the systematic uncertainties within their analyses. It is well known that some of the most challenging uncertainties to overcome stem from our uncertain modelling of neutrino--nucleus interactions, which also affect the event rates used to infer the oscillation probability. The sources of these uncertainties are often related to subtle details of the pertinent nuclear physics which are extremely difficult to control with sufficient precision. Confronting such uncertainties requires both state-of-the-art theoretical modelling and precise measurements of neutrino interaction event rates at experiment's near detectors, before oscillations occur. In this work, we review the role of neutrino interaction systematic uncertainties in current and future measurements of neutrino oscillation as well as the experimental and theoretical prospects for reducing them to an acceptable level for the next generation of experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28671 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic of an LBL neutrino oscillation experiment. The probability for a muon neutrino to oscillate to a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The shape of the predicted muon neutrino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The DUNE and T2K/Hyper-K unoscillated, νµ → νµ survival, and νµ → νe appearance fluxes, shown as a function of neutrino energy [15, 26]. Each flux is normalised so that the maximum corresponds to 1. inferred from the rate of neutrino interactions observed in the detector. Eq. 1 provides a simplified general expression for the rate of neutrino interactions in neutrino oscillation experiments, neglecting backgrounds: … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (36 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of the muon neutrino and antineutrino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Nuclear spectral functions predicted by three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The νµ – 40Ar interaction cross section as a function of neutrino energy, divided by the neutrino energy, for various channels as predicted by the GENIE event generator in the 10a configuration. The shape of the neutrino fluxes for currently running and planned LBL neu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The evolution of the cross section for various CC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The differential νµ – 40Ar CCINC cross section as a function of the hadronic invariant mass integrated over the DUNE neutrino-enhanced ND flux, broken down by interaction channel for the GENIE 10a and NuWro 25 event generator configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The differential cross section as a function of the energy transfer, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The differential muon-neutrino cross section as a function of the ratio between the visible hadronic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The cross section for neutrino–water interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of the differential cross section as a function of reconstructed neutrino energy at the ND and FD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the shapes of the relative and absolute bias in the reconstructed neutrino energy proxy with respect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the shape of the relative and absolute bias in the reconstructed neutrino energy proxy with respect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of the shape of the absolute bias in the reconstructed neutrino energy proxy with respect to the true [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Neutrino energy reconstruction bias for νµ – H2O CC0π plus a representative CCNπ ± background in which the final-state charged pions are below a given kinetic energy (K.E.) threshold, for a variety of thresholds. Interactions are simulated with the oscillated Hyper-K/…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The T2K measurement of the νµCC0π double￾differential cross section on C8H8 as a function of outgoing muon kinematics [303] is shown overlaid with predictions from the GENIE CRPA model, broken down by interaction channel. π-abs refers to contributions involving pion￾a…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Comparisons of event generator configurations to measurements of the transverse momentum imbalance in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The hadronic mass spectrum for νµ – 40Ar CCINC events in the DUNE ND and SBND, assuming the struck nucleon is at rest. As the SBND flux is not currently public, the SciBooNE flux was used [432] as a very close approximation. Each figure is broken down by the pion cont…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: CC1π ± [281] (left) and CCNπ ± [447] (right) measurements made by MINERvA on a C8H8 target compared to current generator models. Dashed lines show the contributions that come primarily from the Delta resonance (W < 1.3 GeV). The χ 2 values are shown in the legend. The…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: MINERvA’s measurements of the differential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: A measurement of the CCNπ 0Mp (N > 0,M > 0) (left) cross section from MINERvA on C8H8 [293] and the CC1π +Np (N > 0) cross section from T2K on C8H8 [290] (right) as a function of reconstructed initial state nucleon momentum, dσ/d pN, compared to current generator mode…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Predictions of a single |q3| slice (0.4 < q3 GeV/c < 0.5) of MINERvA’s νµ –C8H8 CCINC low￾recoil measurement shown for different generators (top) and the same slice broken down into interaction channels for NuWro 25, showing the different regions that CC-QE, CC￾2p2h, …
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: A comparison of the CCINC (CC0π) cross section as a function of E true ν for νµ – 40Ar and ν¯µ – 40Ar (νµ – 16O and ν¯µ – 16O) interactions, for a variety of neutrino generators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: The FD/ND flux-averaged cross section ratio as a function of the outgoing muon angle for DUNE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: A comparison of the reconstructed neutrino energy spectra and absolute neutrino energy bias for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: A comparison of the reconstructed neutrino energy spectra and absolute neutrino energy bias for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: The fraction of events in reconstructed transverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_28.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: A comparison of the shape of the cross section as a function of the outgoing lepton angle with respect to the () [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: A comparison of the single ν (–) e/ν (–) µ and double (ν¯e/ν¯µ )/(νe/νµ ) flavour ratios as a function of E true ν for CC0π interactions on H2O and CCINC interactions on 40Ar, for a variety of neutrino generators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_30.png]
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: A comparison of the ν¯e/νe and ν¯µ /νµ cross-section ratio as a function of E true ν for CC0π interactions on H2O and CCINC interactions on 40Ar, for a variety of neutrino generators. pions for Hyper-K/T2K and one considering wrong-sign neutrinos [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig…
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: A comparison of the flux-averaged cross sections as a function of the invariant hadronic mass, assuming the struck nucleon is at rest, for CCINC νµ – 40Ar interactions with the DUNE neutrino-enhanced and antineutrino-enhanced flux at the FD, shown for a variety of neu…
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: A comparison of the muon neutrino and antineutrino cross section (per nucleon) ratios as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_33.png]
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: The ratio in the neutrino energy reconstruction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_34.png]
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: The estimated relative wrong-sign neutrino con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_35.png]
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: The sensitivity to exclude CP conservation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_36.png]
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: The impact of systematic uncertainties reported by the NOvA experiment on extracted neutrino oscillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_37.png]
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: The absolute bias DUNE finds on the fitted value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_38.png]
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: Comparison of a simulated muon neutrino reconstructed energy spectra at the DUNE FD using different FSI models, to variations of ∆m 2 32. The reconstructed energy spectra under different FSI models are shown as histograms and variations of ∆m 2 32 ±0.4% are shown with…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interaction-model dependence in calorimetric energy reconstruction methods due to non-linear material effects in modern neutrino detectors

    hep-ex 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Calorimetric neutrino energy reconstruction carries an interaction-model-dependent bias of ~7-18 MeV from Birks quenching and charge recombination, reducible to ~3.5 MeV with idealised hybrid tracking.

  2. Radiative corrections in neutral-current (anti)neutrino elastic scattering at $\text{GeV}$ energies I: Nucleon targets

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Radiative corrections to neutral-current (anti)neutrino-nucleon elastic scattering are computed within low-energy EFT and reach a few percent, comparable to the strange-quark effects they must be disentangled from.

  3. Flow-Based Surrogates for High-Dimensional Likelihoods in Experimental Neutrino Physics

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid coupling-plus-autoregressive normalizing flow trained on a 110-parameter T2K-like near-detector likelihood reaches 98% relative ESS versus 5% for the post-fit Gaussian and matches MCMC flux predictions.

  4. Phenomenology of different cross-section models at DUNE

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At DUNE, the HF-CRPA+BS cross-section model combination yields the largest simulated event rates and improves projected neutrino oscillation sensitivities by 15-30% relative to the DUNE Technical Design Report tune.

  5. Weak charged current induced electron and positron scattering off proton at JLab and MAMI energies

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Calculated cross sections and spin observables for weak charged-current e±+p scattering at JLab-MAMI energies, presented as benchmarks to extract the axial dipole mass and test G- and T-invariance.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

286 extracted references · 264 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Coplowe et al

    D. Coplowe et al. Probing nuclear effects with neutrino- induced charged-current neutral pion production.Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):072007, 2020.arXiv:2002.05812,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.072007

    work page arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of nuclear effects in neutrino- argon interactions using generalized kinematic imbalance variables with the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):092007, 2024.arXiv:2310.06082,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.092007

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Multidifferential cross section measurements ofν µ-argon quasielasticlike reactions with the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Rev. D, 108(5):053002, 2023.arXiv:2301. 03700,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.053002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.053002 2023

  4. [5]

    Measurement of muon (anti-)neutrino charged-current quasielastic-like cross section using off-axis NuMI beam at ICARUS

    F. Abd Alrahman et al. Measurement of muon (anti-)neutrino charged-current quasielastic-like cross section using off-axis NuMI beam at ICARUS. 4 2026.arXiv:2604.24925

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  5. [6]

    X. G. Lu, D. Coplowe, R. Shah, G. Barr, D. Wark, and A. Weber. Reconstruction of Energy Spectra of Neutrino Beams Independent of Nuclear Effects.Phys. Rev. D, 92(5):051302, 2015.arXiv:1507.00967,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 051302

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92 2015

  6. [7]

    S. Dolan. Exploring Nuclear Effects in Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions Using Measurements of Transverse Kinematic Imbalance from T2K and MINERvA. 10 2018.arXiv:1810. 06043

    2018

  7. [8]

    Benchmarking neutrino interaction models via a comparative analysis of kine- matic imbalance measurements from the T2K, MicroBooNE and MINERvA experiments

    Wissal Filali, Laura Munteanu, and Stephen Dolan. Benchmarking neutrino interaction models via a comparative analysis of kine- matic imbalance measurements from the T2K, MicroBooNE and MINERvA experiments. 7 2024.arXiv:2407.10962

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [9]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurements of ν µ and ν µ +ν µ charged-current cross-sections without detected pions or protons on water and hydrocarbon at a mean anti-neutrino energy of 0.86 GeV.PTEP, 2021(4):043C01, 2021.arXiv:2004.13989,doi:10.1093/ ptep/ptab014

    work page arXiv 2021

Show all 286 references
  1. [12]

    Mousseau et al

    J. Mousseau et al. Measurement of Partonic Nuclear Effects in Deep-Inelastic Neutrino Scattering using MINERvA.Phys. Rev. D, 93(7):071101, 2016.arXiv:1601.06313,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.93.071101

    2016 arXiv

  2. [14]

    M. A. Ramírez et al. Neutrino-Induced Coherentπ+ Production in C, CH, Fe, and Pb at⟨Eν⟩∼6 GeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(5):051801, 2023.arXiv:2210.01285,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.131.051801

    2023

  3. [15]

    Kleykamp et al

    J. Kleykamp et al. Simultaneous Measurement ofν µQuasielas- ticlike Cross Sections on CH, C, H2O, Fe, and Pb as a Func- tion of Muon Kinematics at MINERvA.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(16):161801, 2023.arXiv:2301.02272,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.161801

    2023

  4. [16]

    Kleykamp et al

    J. Kleykamp et al. Measurement of the A dependence of theν µ charged-current quasielasticlike cross section as a function of muon and proton kinematics at⟨Eν⟩∼6 GeV.Phys. Rev. D, 112(5):052005, 2025.arXiv:2503.15047,doi:10.1103/ h9vz-x4xf

    2025

  5. [17]

    C. E. Patrick et al. Measurement of the Muon Antineutrino Double- Differential Cross Section for Quasielastic-like Scattering on Hydrocarbon atE ν ∼3.5GeV.Phys. Rev. D, 97(5):052002, 2018.arXiv:1801.01197,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97. 052002

    2018 doi arXiv

  6. [18]

    Filkins et al

    A. Filkins et al. Double-differential inclusive charged-currentν µ cross sections on hydrocarbon in MINERvA at⟨Eν ⟩ ∼3.5 GeV. Phys. Rev. D, 101(11):112007, 2020.arXiv:2002.12496, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.112007

    2020 doi

  7. [19]

    Ruterbories et al

    D. Ruterbories et al. Measurement of Quasielastic-Like Neutrino Scattering at⟨E ν ⟩ ∼3.5 GeV on a Hydrocarbon Target.Phys. Rev. D, 99(1):012004, 2019.arXiv:1811.02774,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.99.012004

    2019 arXiv

  8. [20]

    Bashyal et al

    A. Bashyal et al. High-Statistics Measurement of Antineutrino Quasielastic-like scattering atE ν ∼6~GeV on a Hydrocarbon Target.Phys. Rev. D, 108(3):032018, 2023.arXiv:2211. 10402,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032018

    2023 doi

  9. [21]

    M. V . Ascencio et al. Measurement of inclusive charged- currentν µscattering on hydrocarbon at⟨Eν⟩∼6 GeV with low three-momentum transfer.Phys. Rev. D, 106(3):032001, 2022.arXiv:2110.13372,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106. 032001

    2022 doi

  10. [22]

    Abe et al

    S. Abe et al. Improving neutrino-nuclei interaction models: Recommendations and case studies on Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle. Phys. Rev. D, 113(1):012011, 2026.arXiv:2509.17945,doi: 10.1103/615w-kjk2

    2026 doi

  11. [23]

    Komiske, Eric M

    Anders Andreassen, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, Benjamin Nachman, and Jesse Thaler. OmniFold: A Method to Simultaneously Unfold All Observables.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(18):182001, 2020.arXiv:1911.09107,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.182001

    2020

  12. [24]

    L. Koch. A response-matrix-centred approach to presenting cross- section measurements.JINST, 14(09):P09013–P09013, 2019. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/09/p09013

    2019 doi

  13. [25]

    Treatment of flux shape uncertainties in unfolded, flux-averaged neutrino cross-section measurements.Phys

    Lukas Koch and Stephen Dolan. Treatment of flux shape uncertainties in unfolded, flux-averaged neutrino cross-section measurements.Phys. Rev. D, 102:113012, 2020.arXiv:2009. 00552,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.113012

    2020 doi

  14. [27]

    Post-hoc regularisation of unfolded cross-section measurements.JINST, 17(10):P10021, 2022.arXiv:2207

    Lukas Koch. Post-hoc regularisation of unfolded cross-section measurements.JINST, 17(10):P10021, 2022.arXiv:2207. 02125,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/10/P10021

    2022 doi

  15. [28]

    Hypothesis tests and model parameter estimation on datasets with missing correlation information.Phys

    Lukas Koch. Hypothesis tests and model parameter estimation on datasets with missing correlation information.Phys. Rev. D, 111(3):033002, 2025.arXiv:2410.22333,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.033002

    2025

  16. [29]

    Mathematical methods for neutrino cross-section extraction

    Steven Gardiner. Mathematical methods for neutrino cross-section extraction. 1 2024.arXiv:2401.04065

    2024

  17. [30]

    W. Tang, X. Li, X. Qian, H. Wei, and C. Zhang. Data Unfolding with Wiener-SVD Method.JINST, 12(10):P10002, 2017.arXiv:1705.03568,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/ 10/P10002

    2017 doi arXiv

  18. [31]

    Huang, Andrew Cudd, Masaki Kawaue, Tatsuya Kikawa, Benjamin Nachman, Vinicius Mikuni, and Callum Wilkinson

    Roger G. Huang, Andrew Cudd, Masaki Kawaue, Tatsuya Kikawa, Benjamin Nachman, Vinicius Mikuni, and Callum Wilkinson. Machine learning assisted unfolding for neutrino cross-section measurements with the OmniFold technique.Phys. Rev. D, 112(1):012008, 2025.arXiv:2504.06857,doi:1...

    2025

  19. [32]

    Licciardi and B

    M. Licciardi and B. Quilain. A data-driven convergence criterion for iterative unfolding of smeared spectra. 1 2021.arXiv: 2101.01096

    2021

  20. [33]

    Mosel and K

    U. Mosel and K. Gallmeister. Muon-neutrino-induced charged current pion production on nuclei.Phys. Rev. C, 96(1):015503,

  21. [34]

    [Addendum: Phys.Rev.C 99, 035502 (2019)].arXiv: 1708.04528,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.015503

    2019 doi arXiv

  22. [35]

    Sobczyk and Jakub ˙Zmuda

    Jan T. Sobczyk and Jakub ˙Zmuda. Investigation of recent weak single-pion production data.Phys. Rev. C, 91(4):045501, 2015. arXiv:1410.7788,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.045501

    2015 doi arXiv

  23. [36]

    Marshall

    Jean Wolfs and Chris M. Marshall. Event generator tuning as a robustness test.Phys. Rev. D, 112(9):092018, 2025.arXiv: 2509.22526,doi:10.1103/9dxd-871x

    2025 doi

  24. [37]

    D’Agostini

    G. D’Agostini. On the use of the covariance matrix to fit correlated data.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrome- ters, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 346(1):306– 311, 1994. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article...

    1994 doi

  25. [38]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First Measurement of Energy-Dependent Inclusive Muon Neutrino Charged-Current Cross Sections on Argon with the MicroBooNE Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 75 128(15):151801, 2022.arXiv:2110.14023,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.151801

    2022

  26. [39]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of double-differential cross sec- tions for mesonless charged-current muon neutrino interactions on argon with final-state protons using the MicroBooNE detec- tor. 3 2024.arXiv:2403.19574

    2024

  27. [40]

    Fine et al

    R. Fine et al. Data Preservation at MINERvA. 9 2020.arXiv: 2009.04548

    2020

  28. [41]

    Minerva experiment open data release, 10 2025

    MINERvA Collaboration. Minerva experiment open data release, 10 2025. URL:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/3022562, doi:10.15484/3022562

    2025 doi

  29. [42]

    J. E. Amaro, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, R. González-Jiménez, G. D. Megias, and I. Ruiz Simo. Electron- versus neutrino- nucleus scattering.J. Phys. G, 47(12):124001, 2020.arXiv: 1912.10612,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abb128

    2020 doi

  30. [43]

    A. M. Ankowski et al. Electron scattering and neutrino physics. J. Phys. G, 50(12):120501, 2023.arXiv:2203.06853,doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/acef42

    2023 doi

  31. [44]

    Mo and Yung-Su Tsai

    Luke W. Mo and Yung-Su Tsai. Radiative Corrections to Elastic and Inelastic e p and mu p Scattering.Rev. Mod. Phys., 41:205– 235, 1969.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.41.205

    1969 doi

  32. [45]

    Radiative corrections: from medium to high energy experiments.Eur

    Andrei Afanasev et al. Radiative corrections: from medium to high energy experiments.Eur. Phys. J. A, 60(4):91, 2024.arXiv: 2306.14578,doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01281-y

    2024 doi

  33. [46]

    K. S. Egiyan et al. Measurement of 2- and 3-nucleon short range correlation probabilities in nuclei.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:082501, 2006.arXiv:nucl-ex/0508026,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.96.082501

    2006 arXiv

  34. [47]

    Hen et al

    O. Hen et al. Momentum sharing in imbalanced Fermi systems. Science, 346:614–617, 2014.arXiv:1412.0138,doi:10. 1126/science.1256785

    2014 arXiv

  35. [48]

    Dytman et al

    S. Dytman et al. Proton Transparency and Neutrino Physics: New Methods and Modeling. 8 2025.arXiv:2508.01905

    2025

  36. [49]

    Neutrino event generators: foundation, status and future.J

    Ulrich Mosel. Neutrino event generators: foundation, status and future.J. Phys. G, 46(11):113001, 2019.arXiv:1904.11506, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab3830

    2019 doi

  37. [50]

    Papadopoulou et al

    A. Papadopoulou et al. Inclusive Electron Scattering And The GENIE Neutrino Event Generator.Phys. Rev. D, 103:113003, 2021.arXiv:2009.07228,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103. 113003

    2021 doi

  38. [51]

    Implementation and investigation of electron-nucleus scattering in the neut neutrino event generator.Phys

    Seisho Abe. Implementation and investigation of electron-nucleus scattering in the neut neutrino event generator.Phys. Rev. D, 111(3):033006, 2025.arXiv:2412.07466,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.033006

    2025

  39. [52]

    Ankowski and Alexander Friedland

    Artur M. Ankowski and Alexander Friedland. Assessing the accuracy of the GENIE event generator with electron-scattering data.Phys. Rev. D, 102(5):053001, 2020.arXiv:2006.11944, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.053001

    2020 doi

  40. [53]

    Leitner, O

    T. Leitner, O. Buss, U. Mosel, and L. Alvarez-Ruso. Neutrino Interactions with Nuclei.AIP Conf. Proc., 967(1):192–196, 2007.arXiv:0709.0244,doi:10.1063/1.2834476

    2007 doi arXiv

  41. [54]

    Neutrino scattering with nuclei: Theory of low energy nuclear effects and its applications.PoS, NUFACT08:009, 2008

    Tina Leitner, Oliver Buss, Ulrich Mosel, and Luis Alvarez- Ruso. Neutrino scattering with nuclei: Theory of low energy nuclear effects and its applications.PoS, NUFACT08:009, 2008. arXiv:0809.3986,doi:10.22323/1.074.0009

    2008 doi arXiv

  42. [55]

    Leitner, O

    T. Leitner, O. Buss, and U. Mosel. Hadronic transport approach to neutrino nucleus scattering: The Giessen BUU model and its validation.Acta Phys. Polon. B, 40:2585–2592, 2009.arXiv: 0905.1644

    2009 arXiv

  43. [56]

    Lalakulich and U

    O. Lalakulich and U. Mosel. GiBUU and Shallow Inelastic Scattering.AIP Conf. Proc., 1663(1):040004, 2015.arXiv: 1303.6677,doi:10.1063/1.4919474

    2015 doi arXiv

  44. [57]

    Neutrino Interactions and Long-Baseline Exper- iments.PoS, ICHEP2016:504, 2016.arXiv:1611.00373, doi:10.22323/1.282.0504

    Ulrich Mosel. Neutrino Interactions and Long-Baseline Exper- iments.PoS, ICHEP2016:504, 2016.arXiv:1611.00373, doi:10.22323/1.282.0504

    2016 doi arXiv

  45. [58]

    Mosel and K

    U. Mosel and K. Gallmeister. Muon-neutrino-induced charged current cross section without pions: Theoretical analysis.Phys. Rev. C, 97(4):045501, 2018.arXiv:1712.07134,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevC.97.045501

    2018 arXiv

  46. [59]

    Kabirnezhad

    M. Kabirnezhad. Single pion production in electron-nucleon interactions.Phys. Rev. D, 102(5):053009, 2020.arXiv: 2006.13765,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.053009

    2020 doi

  47. [60]

    Arrington, P

    J. Arrington, P. G. Blunden, and W. Melnitchouk. Review of two-photon exchange in electron scattering.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 66:782–833, 2011.arXiv:1105.0951,doi:10.1016/ j.ppnp.2011.07.003

    2011 arXiv

  48. [61]

    Hill, and Gabriel Lee

    Zhihong Ye, John Arrington, Richard J. Hill, and Gabriel Lee. Proton and Neutron Electromagnetic Form Factors and Uncertainties.Phys. Lett. B, 777:8–15, 2018.arXiv:1707. 09063,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.023

    2018 doi

  49. [62]

    V . D. Burkert et al. The CLAS12 Spectrometer at Jefferson Laboratory.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 959:163419, 2020.doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.163419

    2020 doi

  50. [63]

    Arrington et al

    J. Arrington et al. Physics with CEBAF at 12 GeV and future opportunities.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 127:103985, 2022. arXiv:2112.00060,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103985

    2022 doi

  51. [64]

    B. A. Mecking et al. The CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS).Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 503:513–553, 2003.doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01001-5

    2003 doi

  52. [65]

    Korover et al

    I. Korover et al. Observation of large missing-momentum (e,e’p) cross-section scaling and the onset of correlated-pair dominance in nuclei.Phys. Rev. C, 107(6):L061301, 2023.arXiv:2209. 01492,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L061301

    2023 doi

  53. [66]

    Khachatryan et al

    M. Khachatryan et al. Electron-beam energy reconstruction for neutrino oscillation measurements.Nature, 599(7886):565– 570, 2021.doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04046-5

    2021 doi

  54. [67]

    Duer et al

    M. Duer et al. Measurement of Nuclear Transparency Ratios for Protons and Neutrons.Phys. Lett. B, 797:134792, 2019. arXiv:1811.01823,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07. 039

    2019 doi

  55. [68]

    Single pion production and pion propagation in achilles.Phys

    Joshua Isaacson, William Jay, Alessandro Lovato, Pedro Machado, Alexis Nikolakopoulos, Noemi Rocco, and Noah Steinberg. Single pion production and pion propagation in achilles.Phys. Rev. D, 113(3):036005, 2026.arXiv:2508.19213,doi:10. 1103/13bh-22lm

    2026

  56. [69]

    Ieki et al

    K. Ieki et al. Measurement of absorption and charge exchange ofπ + on carbon.Phys. Rev. C, 92:035205, 2015.arXiv: 1506.07783,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.035205

    2015 doi arXiv

  57. [70]

    E. S. Pinzon Guerra et al. Measurement ofσ ABS andσ CX ofπ + on carbon by the Dual Use Experiment at TRIUMF (DUET). Phys. Rev. C, 95(4):045203, 2017.arXiv:1611.05612,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.045203

    2017 doi arXiv

  58. [71]

    B. W. Allardyce et al. Pion reaction cross-sections and nuclear sizes.Nucl. Phys. A, 209:1–51, 1973.doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(73)90049-3

    1973

  59. [72]

    F. G. Binon, P. Duteil, J. P. Garron, J. Gorres, L. Hugon, J. P. Peigneux, C. Schmit, M. Spighel, and J. P. Stroot. Scattering of negative pions on carbon.Nucl. Phys. B, 17:168–188, 1970. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90408-6

    1970 doi

  60. [73]

    C. H. Quentin Ingram, P. A. M. Gram, J. Jansen, R. E. Mischke, J. Zichy, J. Bolger, E. T. Boschitz, G. Probstle, and J. Arvieux. MEASUREMENT OF QUASIELASTIC SCATTERING OF PIONS FROM O-16 AT ENERGIES AROUND THE DELTA (1232) RESONANCE.Phys. Rev. C, 27:1578–1601, 1983. doi:10.110...

    1983 doi

  61. [74]

    M. K. Jones et al. Pion absorption above the Delta (1232) resonance.Phys. Rev. C, 48:2800–2817, 1993.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.48.2800

    1993

  62. [75]

    Ashery, I

    D. Ashery, I. Navon, G. Azuelos, H. K. Walter, H. J. Pfeiffer, and F. W. Schleputz. True Absorption and Scattering of Pions on Nuclei.Phys. Rev. C, 23:2173–2185, 1981.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.23.2173

    1981

  63. [76]

    Nakai, T

    K. Nakai, T. Kobayashi, T. Numao, T. A. Shibata, J. Chiba, and K. Masutani. MEASUREMENTS OF CROSS-SECTIONS FOR PION ABSORPTION BY NUCLEI.Phys. Rev. Lett., 44:1446–1449, 1980.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.44. 1446

    1980 doi

  64. [77]

    Bellotti, D

    E. Bellotti, D. Cavalli, and C. Matteuzzi. Positive-pion absorption by c nuclei at 130 mev.Nuovo Cim. A, 18:75–93, 1973.doi: 10.1007/BF02820838. CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 76

    1973 doi

  65. [78]

    Navon, D

    I. Navon, D. Ashery, J. Alster, G. Azuelos, B. M. Barnett, W. Gyles, R. R. Johnson, D. R. Gill, and T. G. Masterson. True Absorption and Scattering of 50-MeV Pions.Phys. Rev. C, 28:2548, 1983. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.28.2548

    1983 doi

  66. [79]

    J. W. Cronin, R. Cool, and A. Abashian. Cross Sections of Nuclei for High-Energy Pions.Phys. Rev., 107:1121–1130, 1957. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.107.1121

    1957 doi

  67. [80]

    Colin Wilkin, C. R. Cox, J. J. Domingo, K. Gabathuler, E. Pedroni, J. Rohlin, P. Schwaller, and N. W. Tanner. A comparison of pi+ and pi- total cross-sections of light nuclei near the 3-3 resonance.Nucl. Phys. B, 62:61–85, 1973.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(73)90242-3

    1973

  68. [81]

    A. S. Clough et al. Pion-Nucleus Total Cross-Sections from 88- MeV to 860-MeV.Nucl. Phys. B, 76:15–28, 1974.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(74)90134-5

    1974 doi

  69. [82]

    A. S. Carroll, I. H. Chiang, C. B. Dover, T. F. Kycia, K. K. Li, P. O. Mazur, D. N. Michael, P. M. Mockett, D. C. Rahm, and R. Rubinstein. Pion-Nucleus Total Cross-Sections in the (3,3) Resonance Region.Phys. Rev. C, 14:635–638, 1976.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.14.635

    1976 doi

  70. [83]

    Androic et al

    D. Androic et al. Multinucleon emission following the pion absorption in N, Ar and Xe.Fizika B, 10:279–284, 2001

    2001

  71. [84]

    Kotli ´nski et al

    B. Kotli ´nski et al. Pion absorption reactions on N, Ar and Xe.Eur. Phys. J. A, 9:537–552, 2000.doi:10.1007/s100500070010

    2000 doi

  72. [85]

    Rowntree et al

    D. Rowntree et al. pi+ absorption on N and Ar.Phys. Rev. C, 60:054610, 1999.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.60.054610

    1999 doi

  73. [86]

    Kotlinski et al

    B. Kotlinski et al. Initial state interaction in the (pi+,3p) reaction on N, Ar and Xe.Eur. Phys. J. A, 1:435–445, 1998.doi: 10.1007/s100500050078

    1998 doi

  74. [87]

    Kotlinski

    B. Kotlinski. Multinucleon pion absorption cross-sections on N, Ar and Xe in the Delta resonance region.Acta Phys. Polon. B, 29:3065–3071, 1998

    1998

  75. [88]

    Wilkins and George Igo

    Bruce D. Wilkins and George Igo. 10-MeV Proton Reaction Cross Sections for Several Elements.Phys. Rev., 129:2198–2206, 1963.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.129.2198

    1963 doi

  76. [89]

    J. F. Dicello and G. Igo. Proton Total Reaction Cross Sections in the 10-20-MeV Range: Calcium-40 and Carbon-12.Phys. Rev. C, 2:488–499, 1970.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.2.488

    1970 doi

  77. [90]

    Makino, Charles N

    Motoji Q. Makino, Charles N. Waddell, and Robert M. Eisberg. Proton total reaction cross sections of car- bon from 16 to 28 mev.Nuclear Physics, 68(2):378– 386, 1965. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0029558265906541, doi:10.1016/0029-5582(65)90654-1

    1965 doi

  78. [91]

    Slaus, D

    I. Slaus, D. J. Margaziotis, R. F. Carlson, Willem T. H. Van Oers, and J. Reginald Richardson. Structure in the energy dependence of the proton total reaction cross section for C and Si in the energy region 20-40 MeV.Phys. Rev. C, 12:1093–1095, 1975. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.12.1093

    1975 doi

  79. [92]

    W. F. McGill, R. F. Carlson, T. H. Short, J. M. Cameron, J. Reginald Richardson, I. Slaus, Willem T. H. Van Oers, J. W. Verba, D. J. Margaziotis, and P. Doherty. Measurements of the proton total reaction cross section for light nuclei between 20 and 48 MeV. Phys. Rev. C, 10:22...

    1974 doi

  80. [93]

    P. U. Renberg, David F. Measday, M. Pepin, P. Schwaller, B. Favier, and C. Richard-Serre. Reaction cross-sections for protons in the energy range 220-570 mev.Nucl. Phys. A, 183:81–104, 1972. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90932-3

    1972 doi

  81. [94]

    G. P. Millburn, W. Birnbaum, W. E. Crandall, and L. Schecter. Nuclear radii from inelastic cross-section measurements.Phys. Rev., 95:1268–1278, Sep 1954. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.95.1268,doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.95.1268

    1954 doi

  82. [95]

    Goloskie and K

    R. Goloskie and K. Strauch. Measurement of proton inelastic cross sections between 77 mev and 133 mev.Nuclear Physics, 29:474–485, 1962. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0029558262901979,doi:10. 1016/0029-5582(62)90197-9

    1962

  83. [96]

    Chen, Christopher P

    Francis F. Chen, Christopher P. Leavitt, and Anatole M. Shapiro. Attenuation Cross Sections for 860-Mev Protons.Phys. Rev., 99(3):857, 1955.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.99.857

    1955 doi

  84. [97]

    The Liquid Argon In A Testbeam (LArIAT) Experiment.JINST, 15(04):P04026, 2020.arXiv:1911

    Roberto Acciarri et al. The Liquid Argon In A Testbeam (LArIAT) Experiment.JINST, 15(04):P04026, 2020.arXiv:1911. 10379,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/04/P04026

    2020 doi

  85. [98]

    Measurement of theπ–Ar total hadronic cross section at the LArIAT experiment.Phys

    Elena Gramellini et al. Measurement of theπ–Ar total hadronic cross section at the LArIAT experiment.Phys. Rev. D, 106(5):052009, 2022.arXiv:2108.00040,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.052009

    2022

  86. [99]

    First Measurement of pion-Ar and proton-Ar Total Inelastic Cross Sections in the Sub-GeV Energy Regime with ProtoDUNE-SP Data

    Saeed Abbaslu et al. First Measurement of pion-Ar and proton-Ar Total Inelastic Cross Sections in the Sub-GeV Energy Regime with ProtoDUNE-SP Data. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.11925

    2025

  87. [100]

    Measurement of Exclusive pion–argon Interactions Using ProtoDUNE-SP

    Saeed Abbaslu et al. Measurement of Exclusive pion–argon Interactions Using ProtoDUNE-SP. 11 2025.arXiv:2511. 13462

    2025

  88. [101]

    J. G. Messchendorp et al. Hadron Physics Opportunities at FAIR. 12 2025.arXiv:2512.15986

    2025

  89. [102]

    Investigation of hadronic exit channels of the π −+12 Creaction at an incident momentum of 0.7 GeV/c.PoS, FAIRness2022:023, 2023.doi:10.22323/1.419.0023

    Fatima Hojeij. Investigation of hadronic exit channels of the π −+12 Creaction at an incident momentum of 0.7 GeV/c.PoS, FAIRness2022:023, 2023.doi:10.22323/1.419.0023

    2023 doi

  90. [103]

    Studies ofπ −−12C reactions at 0.7GeV/c with the HADES spectrometer.EPJ Web Conf., 291:04004, 2024

    Beatrice Ramstein. Studies ofπ −−12C reactions at 0.7GeV/c with the HADES spectrometer.EPJ Web Conf., 291:04004, 2024. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429104004

    2024 doi

  91. [104]

    Nova central value tuning and uncertainties for the hn fsi model in genie 3 [poster]

    Michael Dolce, Jeremy Wolcott, and Hugh Gallagher. Nova central value tuning and uncertainties for the hn fsi model in genie 3 [poster]. 0(0), 6 2020. URL:https://www.osti.gov/ biblio/1637615,doi:10.2172/1637615

    2020 doi

  92. [105]

    PhD thesis, Imperial Coll., London, 2017

    Wing Yan Ma.Five sample joint neutrino/antineutrino oscillation analysis in T2K. PhD thesis, Imperial Coll., London, 2017. doi:10.25560/58946

    2017 doi

  93. [106]

    PhD thesis, Imperial Coll., London, 2020.doi:10

    Toby Nonnenmacher.Development of Detectors and Simulation Methods for Measurement of Hadrons from Neutrino Interac- tions. PhD thesis, Imperial Coll., London, 2020.doi:10. 25560/85985

    2020

  94. [107]

    Otuka et al

    N. Otuka et al. Towards a More Complete and Accurate Experi- mental Nuclear Reaction Data Library (EXFOR): International Collaboration Between Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC). Nucl. Data Sheets, 120:272–276, 2014.arXiv:2002.07114, doi:10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.065

    2014 doi

  95. [108]

    Kunieda et al

    S. Kunieda et al. Overview of JENDL-4.0/HE and benchmark calculation.JAEA-Conf, 004:41–46, 2016

    2016

  96. [109]

    Brown et al

    D.A. Brown et al. Endf/b-viii.0: The 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with cielo-project cross sections, new standards and thermal scattering data.Nuclear Data Sheets, 148:1–142, 2018. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data. URL:https://www.sciencedirect....

    2018 doi

  97. [110]

    Kohley et al

    Z. Kohley et al. Modeling interactions of intermediate-energy neutrons in a plastic scintillator array with Geant4.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 682:59–65, 2012.doi:10.1016/j.nima. 2012.04.060

    2012 doi

  98. [112]

    Olivier et al

    A. Olivier et al. Measurement of the multineutronν¯µcharged current differential cross section at low available energy on hydrocarbon.Phys. Rev. D, 108(11):112010, 2023.arXiv: 2310.17014,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.112010

    2023 doi

  99. [113]

    Elkins et al

    M. Elkins et al. Neutron measurements from antineutrino hydro- carbon reactions.Phys. Rev. D, 100(5):052002, 2019.arXiv: 1901.04892,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.052002

    2019 doi

  100. [114]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. Bringing the SciBar Detector to the Booster Neutrino Beam. 1 2006.arXiv:hep-ex/0601022

    2006 arXiv

  101. [116]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. Measurement of Muon Neu- CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 77 trino Quasi-Elastic Scattering on Carbon.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:032301, 2008.arXiv:0706.0926,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.032301

    2008 arXiv

  102. [117]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. First measurement of the Muon An- tineutrino Double-Differential Charged-Current Quasi-Elastic Cross Section.Phys. Rev. D, 88(3):032001, 2013.arXiv: 1301.7067,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.032001

    2013 doi arXiv

  103. [118]

    A Study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the NOMAD experiment.Eur

    V Lyubushkin et al. A Study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the NOMAD experiment.Eur. Phys. J. C, 63:355–381, 2009.arXiv:0812.4543,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-009-1113-0

    2009 arXiv

  104. [119]

    Martini, M

    M. Martini, M. Ericson, and G. Chanfray. Neutrino quasielastic interaction and nuclear dynamics.Phys. Rev. C, 84:055502, 2011.arXiv:1110.0221,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84. 055502

    2011 doi arXiv

  105. [120]

    Nieves, I

    J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas. Two Particle- Hole Excitations in Charged Current Quasielastic Antineutrino– Nucleus Scattering.Phys. Lett. B, 721:90–93, 2013.arXiv: 1302.0703,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.03.002

    2013 doi arXiv

  106. [121]

    Martini and M

    M. Martini and M. Ericson. Quasielastic and multinucleon excitations in antineutrino-nucleus interactions.Phys. Rev. C, 87(6):065501, 2013.arXiv:1303.7199,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.87.065501

    2013 arXiv

  107. [123]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. First measurement of theν µ charged-current cross section on a water target without pions in the final state.Phys. Rev. D, 97(1):012001, 2018.arXiv:1708.06771,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.97.012001

    2018 arXiv

  108. [125]

    Betancourt et al

    M. Betancourt et al. Direct Measurement of Nuclear Dependence of Charged Current Quasielasticlike Neutrino Interactions Using MINERνA.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(8):082001, 2017.arXiv: 1705.03791,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.082001

    2017 doi arXiv

  109. [126]

    Wolcott et al

    J. Wolcott et al. Measurement of electron neutrino quasielastic and quasielasticlike scattering on hydrocarbon at⟨E ν ⟩= 3.6 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(8):081802, 2016.arXiv:1509.05729, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.081802

    2016 doi arXiv

  110. [127]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First Simultaneous Measurement of Differential Muon-Neutrino Charged-Current Cross Sections on Argon for Final States with and Without Protons Using MicroBooNE Data. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(4):041801, 2024.arXiv:2402.19281, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.041801

    2024 doi

  111. [128]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Differential Cross Section Measurement of Charged Currentνe Interactions Without Pions in MicroBooNE. Phys. Rev. D, 106(5):L051102, 2022.arXiv:2208.02348, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051102

    2022 doi

  112. [129]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of charged-current muon neutrino-argon interactions without pions in the final state using the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Rev. D, 112(7):072007, 2025. arXiv:2507.00921,doi:10.1103/xfs2-94m3

    2025 doi arXiv

  113. [130]

    G. A. Fiorentini et al. Measurement of Muon Neutrino Quasielastic Scattering on a Hydrocarbon Target atEν ∼3.5 GeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:022502, 2013.arXiv:1305.2243,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.111.022502

    2013 arXiv

  114. [131]

    Fields et al

    L. Fields et al. Measurement of Muon Antineutrino Quasielastic Scattering on a Hydrocarbon Target at Eν∼3.5 GeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(2):022501, 2013.arXiv:1305.2234,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.022501

    2013 doi arXiv

  115. [132]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of single- and double- differential cross sections for mesonless charged-current muon neutrino interactions on argon with final-state protons using the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Rev. D, 112(11):112004, 2025. arXiv:2403.19574,doi:10.1103/8v2y-l89l

    2025 doi

  116. [133]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of differential cross sections for νµ -Ar charged-current interactions with protons and no pions in the final state with the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Rev. D, 102(11):112013, 2020.arXiv:2010.02390,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.112013

    2020

  117. [134]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurement of muon neutrino induced charged current interactions without charged pions in the final state using a new T2K off-axis near detector W AGASCI-BabyMIND.Phys. Rev. D, 112(11):112020, 2025.arXiv:2509.07814,doi: 10.1103/fpqb-j6nv

    2025 doi

  118. [135]

    Ericson and M

    M. Ericson and M. Martini. Neutrino versus antineutrino cross sections andCPviolation.Phys. Rev. C, 91(3):035501, 2015. arXiv:1501.02442,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.035501

    2015 doi arXiv

  119. [136]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First Measurement of Differential Cross Sections for Muon Neutrino Charged Current Interactions on Argon with a Two-proton Final State in the MicroBooNE Detector. 11 2022.arXiv:2211.03734

    2022

  120. [137]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Demonstration of neutron identification in neu- trino interactions in the MicroBooNE liquid argon time projec- tion chamber.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(10):1052, 2024.arXiv: 2406.10583,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13423-z

    2024 doi

  121. [138]

    Munteanu, S

    L. Munteanu, S. Suvorov, S. Dolan, D. Sgalaberna, S. Bolognesi, S. Manly, G. Yang, C. Giganti, K. Iwamoto, and C. Jesús-Valls. New method for an improved antineutrino energy reconstruction with charged-current interactions in next-generation detectors. Phys. Rev. D, 101(9):092...

    2020 doi

  122. [139]

    Dolan et al

    S. Dolan et al. Sensitivity of the upgraded T2K Near Detector to constrain neutrino and antineutrino interactions with no mesons in the final state by exploiting nucleon-lepton correlations.Phys. Rev. D, 105(3):032010, 2022.arXiv:2108.11779,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.105.032010

    2022

  123. [140]

    X. G. Lu, L. Pickering, S. Dolan, G. Barr, D. Coplowe, Y . Uchida, D. Wark, M. O. Wascko, A. Weber, and T. Yuan. Measurement of nuclear effects in neutrino interactions with minimal dependence on neutrino energy.Phys. Rev. C, 94(1):015503, 2016.arXiv:1512.05748,doi:10.1103/ Ph...

    2016 arXiv

  124. [141]

    Nakajima et al

    Y . Nakajima et al. Measurement of Inclusive Charged Current Interactions on Carbon in a Few-GeV Neutrino Beam.Phys. Rev. D, 83:012005, 2011.arXiv:1011.2131,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.83.012005

    2011 arXiv

  125. [143]

    Rodriguez et al

    A. Rodriguez et al. Measurement of single charged pion production in the charged-current interactions of neutrinos in a 1.3-GeV wide band beam.Phys. Rev. D, 78:032003, 2008.arXiv: 0805.0186,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.032003

    2008 doi arXiv

  126. [144]

    Kurimoto et al

    Y . Kurimoto et al. Measurement of Inclusive Neutral Current Neutralπ 0 Production on Carbon in a Few-GeV Neutrino Beam. Phys. Rev. D, 81:033004, 2010.arXiv:0910.5768,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.033004

    2010 doi arXiv

  127. [145]

    Kurimoto et al

    Y . Kurimoto et al. Improved Measurement of Neutral Current Coherentπ 0 Production on Carbon in a Few-GeV Neutrino Beam.Phys. Rev. D, 81:111102, 2010.arXiv:1005.0059, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.111102

    2010 doi arXiv

  128. [146]

    Aguilar-Arevalo et al

    Alexis A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. Measurement ofν µ and ¯νµ induced neutral current singleπ 0 production cross sections on mineral oil atE ν ∼O(1GeV).Phys. Rev. D, 81:013005, 2010. arXiv:0911.2063,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.013005

    2010 doi arXiv

  129. [147]

    Measurement ofν µ-induced charged- current neutral pion production cross sections on mineral oil at eν ∈0.5−2.0GeV.Phys

    A.A.Aguilar-Arevalo et al. Measurement ofν µ-induced charged- current neutral pion production cross sections on mineral oil at eν ∈0.5−2.0GeV.Phys. Rev., D83:052009, 2011.arXiv: 1010.3264

    2011 arXiv

  130. [148]

    Adamson et al

    P. Adamson et al. Measurement of singleπ 0 production by coherent neutral-currentνFe interactions in the MINOS Near CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 78 Detector.Phys. Rev. D, 94(7):072006, 2016.arXiv:1608. 05702,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.072006

    2016 doi

  131. [149]

    Acciarri et al

    R. Acciarri et al. First measurement of the cross section forν µ and ¯νµ induced single charged pion production on argon using ArgoNeuT.Phys. Rev. D, 98(5):052002, 2018.arXiv:1804. 10294,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.052002

    2018 doi

  132. [150]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurement of the singleπ 0 production rate in neutral current neutrino interactions on water.Phys.Rev., D97:032002, 2018.arXiv:1704.07467

    2018 arXiv

  133. [151]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurement of the muon neutrino charged-current singleπ + production on hydrocarbonPhys.Rev., D101:012007, 2020.arXiv:1909.03936

    2020

  134. [152]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Signal selection and model-independent extraction of the neutrino neutral-current singleπ + cross section with the t2k experiment. 3 2025.arXiv:2503.06843

    2025

  135. [153]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. First differential measurement of the singleπ + production cross section in neutrino neutral-current scattering. 3 2025.arXiv:2503.06849

    2025

  136. [154]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. First Measurement of the Electron-Neutrino Charged- Current Pion Production Cross Section on Carbon with the T2K Near Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135(15):151802, 2025.arXiv: 2505.00516,doi:10.1103/klhv-7t6h

    2025 doi

  137. [155]

    Aliaga et al

    L. Aliaga et al. Single neutral pion production by charged-current ¯νµ interactions on hydrocarbon at⟨e ν ⟩=3.6 gev.Phys. Lett., B749:130–136, 2015.arXiv:1503.02107

    2015

  138. [156]

    McGivern et al

    C.L. McGivern et al. Cross sections for neutrino and antineutrino induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-gev region using minerva.Phys. Rev., D94:052005, 2016.arXiv:1606. 07127

    2016

  139. [157]

    Le et al

    T. Le et al. Measurement of ¯νµ charged-current singleπ − production on hydrocarbon in the few-gev region using minerva. Phys.Rev., D100:052008, 2019.arXiv:1906.08300

    2019

  140. [158]

    M. A. Acero et al. Measurement ofν µcharged-current inclusive π0 production in the NOvA near detector.Phys. Rev. D, 107(11):112008, 2023.arXiv:2306.04028,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.112008

    2023

  141. [159]

    Abubakar et al

    S. Abubakar et al. Measurement ofπ 0 Production in ¯νµ Charged- Current Interactions in the NOvA Near Detector. 11 2025. arXiv:2511.05807

    2025 arXiv

  142. [160]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of neutral current singleπ 0 production on argon with the microboone detector.Phys.Rev.D, 107:012004, 5 2023.arXiv:2205.07943

    2023

  143. [161]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of the differential cross section for neutral pion production in charged-current muon neutrino interactions on argon with the microboone detector.Phys.Rev.D, 110:092014, 2024.arXiv:2404.09949

    2024

  144. [162]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First double-differential cross section measurement of neutral-currentπ 0 production in neutrino-argon scattering in the microboone detector. 4 2024.arXiv:2404. 10948

    2024

  145. [163]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First Measurement ofνe andν¯e Charged- Current Single Charged-Pion Production Differential Cross Sections on Argon Using the MicroBooNE Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135(6):061802, 2025.arXiv:2503.23384,doi: 10.1103/sfrz-c8m9

    2025 doi

  146. [164]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First Double-Differential Cross Section Measurement of Neutral-Currentπ0 Production in Neutrino- Argon Scattering in the MicroBooNE Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134(16):161802, 2025.arXiv:2404.10948,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.161802

    2025

  147. [165]

    Xianguo Lu and Jan T. Sobczyk. Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino and antineutrino interactions on nuclei using generalized final-state correlations.Phys. Rev. C, 99(5):055504, 2019.arXiv:1901.06411,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99. 055504

    2019 doi arXiv

  148. [166]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of single charged pion production in charged-currentν µ-Ar interactions with the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Rev. D, 113(3):032007, 2026.arXiv:2509. 03628,doi:10.1103/t2cw-cdx2

    2026 doi

  149. [167]

    Mislivec et al

    A. Mislivec et al. Measurement of total and differential cross sections of neutrino and antineutrino coherentπ ± production on carbon.Phys. Rev. D, 97(3):032014, 2018.arXiv:1711. 01178,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.032014

    2018 doi

  150. [168]

    Higuera et al

    A. Higuera et al. Measurement of Coherent Production ofπ ± in Neutrino and Antineutrino Beams on Carbon fromE ν of 1.5 to 20 GeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113(26):261802, 2014.arXiv: 1409.3835,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.261802

    2014 doi arXiv

  151. [169]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurements of theν µandν¯µ-induced coherent charged pion production cross sections on C12 by the T2K experiment.Phys. Rev. D, 108(9):092009, 2023.arXiv:2308. 16606,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.092009

    2023 doi

  152. [170]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurement of Coherentπ + Production in Low Energy Neutrino-Carbon Scattering.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(19):192501, 2016.arXiv:1604.04406,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.192501

    2016 arXiv

  153. [171]

    Acciarri et al

    R. Acciarri et al. First Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Coherent Charged Pion Production on Argon.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113(26):261801, 2014. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 114, 039901 (2015)].arXiv:1408.0598,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 113.261801

    2014 doi arXiv

  154. [172]

    Faissner et al

    H. Faissner et al. Observation of Neutrino and Anti-neutrino Induced Coherent Neutral Pion Production Off 27Al.Phys. Lett. B, 125:230–236, 1983.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83) 91274-1

    1983 doi

  155. [173]

    Isiksal, D

    E. Isiksal, D. Rein, and J. G. Morfin. EVIDENCE FOR NEU- TRINO AND ANTI-NEUTRINOS INDUCED COHERENT PI0 PRODUCTION.Phys. Rev. Lett., 52:1096–1099, 1984. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1096

    1984 doi

  156. [174]

    Bergsma et al

    F. Bergsma et al. Measurement of the Cross-section of Coherent π0 Production by Muon Neutrino and Anti-neutrino Neutral Current Interactions on Nuclei.Phys. Lett. B, 157:469–474, 1985.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90402-2

    1985 doi

  157. [175]

    H. J. Grabosch et al. COHERENT PION PRODUCTION IN NEUTRINO AND ANTI-NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS ON NUCLEI OF HEA VY FREON MOLECULES.Z. Phys. C, 31:203, 1986.doi:10.1007/BF01479528

    1986 doi

  158. [176]

    Baltay et al

    C. Baltay et al. Evidence for Coherent Neutral Pion Production by High-energy Neutrinos.Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:2629–2632, 1986. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2629

    1986 doi

  159. [177]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. First Observation of Coherentπ 0 Production in Neutrino Nucleus Interactions withE ν <2 GeV. Phys. Lett. B, 664:41–46, 2008.arXiv:0803.3423,doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.05.006

    2008 doi arXiv

  160. [178]

    C. T. Kullenberg et al. A Measurement of Coherent Neutral Pion Production in Neutrino Neutral Current Interactions in NOMAD.Phys. Lett. B, 682:177–184, 2009.arXiv:0910. 0062,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.10.083

    2009 doi

  161. [179]

    M. A. Acero et al. Measurement of neutrino-induced neutral- current coherentπ 0 production in the NOvA near detector. Phys. Rev. D, 102(1):012004, 2020.arXiv:1902.00558,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.012004

    2020 doi

  162. [180]

    Wu et al

    Q. Wu et al. A Precise measurement of the muon neutrino-nucleon inclusive charged current cross-section off an isoscalar target in the energy range 2.5<E(nu)<40-GeV by NOMAD.Phys. Lett. B, 660:19–25, 2008.arXiv:0711.1183,doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2007.12.027

    2008 arXiv

  163. [181]

    Adamson et al

    P. Adamson et al. Neutrino and Antineutrino Inclusive Charged- current Cross Section Measurements with the MINOS Near Detector.Phys. Rev. D, 81:072002, 2010.arXiv:0910.2201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.072002

    2010 doi arXiv

  164. [182]

    Acciarri et al

    R. Acciarri et al. Measurements of Inclusive Muon Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged Current Differential Cross Sections on Argon in the NuMI Antineutrino Beam.Phys. Rev. D, 89(11):112003, 2014.arXiv:1404.4809,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.89.112003

    2014 arXiv

  165. [183]

    Ren et al

    L. Ren et al. Measurement of the antineutrino to neutrino charged- current interaction cross section ratio in MINERvA.Phys. Rev. D, 95(7):072009, 2017. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 97, 019902 (2018)].arXiv:1701.04857,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95. 072009. CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 79

    2017 doi arXiv

  166. [184]

    Devan et al

    J. Devan et al. Measurements of the Inclusive Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged Current Cross Sections in MINERvA Using the Low-νFlux Method.Phys. Rev. D, 94(11):112007, 2016.arXiv:1610.04746,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94. 112007

    2016 doi arXiv

  167. [185]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurement of inclusive double-differentialν µ charged-current cross section with improved acceptance in the T2K off-axis near detector.Phys. Rev. D, 98:012004, 2018. arXiv:1801.05148,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.012004

    2018 doi arXiv

  168. [186]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First Measurement of Inclusive Muon Neutrino Charged Current Differential Cross Sections on Argon at Eν ∼0.8 GeV with the MicroBooNE Detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(13):131801, 2019.arXiv:1905.09694,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.131801

    2019

  169. [187]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Measurement of ¯νµ andν µ charged current inclusive cross sections and their ratio with the T2K off-axis near detector. Phys. Rev. D, 96(5):052001, 2017.arXiv:1706.04257,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.052001

    2017 doi arXiv

  170. [188]

    Klustová et al

    A. Klustová et al. Measurement of Inclusive Charged-Current ¯νµ Scattering on C, CH, Fe, and Pb at⟨E ¯ν ⟩ ∼6 GeV with MINERvA. 4 2026.arXiv:2604.07091

    2026 arXiv

  171. [189]

    Gran et al

    R. Gran et al. Antineutrino Charged-Current Reactions on Hydrocarbon with Low Momentum Transfer.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(22):221805, 2018.arXiv:1803.09377,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.221805

    2018 arXiv

  172. [190]

    M. A. Acero et al. Measurement of d2σ/d|q→|dEavail in charged currentν µ-nucleus interactions at⟨Eν⟩=1.86 GeV using the NOvA Near Detector.Phys. Rev. D, 111(5):052009, 2025.arXiv:2410.05526,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111. 052009

    2025 doi

  173. [191]

    Abubakar et al

    S. Abubakar et al. First inclusive triple-differential measurement of the muon-antineutrino charged-current cross section using the NOvA Near Detector. 3 2026.arXiv:2603.06718,doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18867876

    2026 doi

  174. [192]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of three-dimensional inclusive muon-neutrino charged-current cross sections on argon with the MicroBooNE detector.Phys. Lett. B, 870:139939, 2025.arXiv:2307.06413,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2025.139939

    2025 doi

  175. [193]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Inclusive cross section measurements in final states with and without protons for charged-currentν µ- Ar scattering in MicroBooNE.Phys. Rev. D, 110(1):013006, 2024.arXiv:2402.19216,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110. 013006

    2024 doi

  176. [194]

    M. A. Acero et al. Measurement of theν e−Nucleus Charged- Current Double-Differential Cross Section at ⟨Eν ⟩ =2.4 GeV using NOvA.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(5):051802, 2023.arXiv: 2206.10585,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.051802

    2023 doi

  177. [195]

    Henry et al

    S. Henry et al. Measurement of electron neutrino and antineutrino cross sections at low momentum transfer.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):092008, 2024.arXiv:2312.16631,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.092008

    2024

  178. [197]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurement of the flux-averaged inclusive charged-current electron neutrino and antineutrino cross section on argon using the NuMI beam and the MicroBooNE detector. Phys. Rev. D, 104(5):052002, 2021.arXiv:2101.04228,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.052002

    2021 doi

  179. [198]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. First measurement of inclusive electron-neutrino and antineutrino charged current differential cross sections in charged lepton energy on argon in MicroBooNE.Phys. Rev. D, 105(5):L051102, 2022.arXiv:2109.06832,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.L051102

    2022

  180. [199]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurements of the electron neutrino-argon differential cross section without pions in the final state in MicroBooNE. 3 2026.arXiv:2603.13593

    2026 arXiv

  181. [200]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. Measurements of differential charged-current cross sections on argon for electron neutrinos with final-state protons in MicroBooNE. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.17342,doi: 10.1103/lwrr-98vx

    2025 doi

  182. [201]

    Neutrino-nucleus CC0πcross-section tuning in GENIE v3.Phys

    Julia Tena-Vidal et al. Neutrino-nucleus CC0πcross-section tuning in GENIE v3.Phys. Rev. D, 106(11):112001, 2022.arXiv: 2206.11050,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.112001

    2022 doi

  183. [202]

    M. A. Acero et al. Adjusting neutrino interaction models and evaluating uncertainties using NOvA near detector data.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(12):1119, 2020.arXiv:2006.08727,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08577-5

    2020 doi

  184. [203]

    Abratenko et al

    P. Abratenko et al. NewCC0πGENIE model tune for MicroBooNE.Phys. Rev. D, 105(7):072001, 2022.arXiv: 2110.14028,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.072001

    2022 doi

  185. [204]

    Belusevic and D

    R. Belusevic and D. Rein. Neutrino Reactions in the Low Y Region.Phys. Rev. D, 38:2753–2757, 1988.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.38.2753

    1988

  186. [205]

    Neutrino Scattering Measurements on Hydrogen and Deuterium: A Snowmass White Paper

    Luis Alvarez-Ruso et al. Neutrino Scattering Measurements on Hydrogen and Deuterium: A Snowmass White Paper. 3 2022. arXiv:2203.11298

    2022

  187. [206]

    Bubble Chamber Detectors with Light Nuclear Targets: A Snowmass 2021 White Paper

    Luis Alvarez-Ruso et al. Bubble Chamber Detectors with Light Nuclear Targets: A Snowmass 2021 White Paper. 3 2022. arXiv:2203.11319

    2021

  188. [207]

    Duyang, B

    H. Duyang, B. Guo, S. R. Mishra, and R. Petti. A novel approach to neutrino–hydrogen measurements.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 139(11):1014, 2024.arXiv:1809.08752,doi:10. 1140/epjp/s13360-024-05783-y

    2024

  189. [208]

    Duyang, B

    H. Duyang, B. Guo, S. R. Mishra, and R. Petti. A Precise Determination of (Anti)neutrino Fluxes with (Anti)neutrino- Hydrogen Interactions.Phys. Lett. B, 795:424–431, 2019. arXiv:1902.09480,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06. 003

    2019 doi arXiv

  190. [209]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. T2K ND280 Upgrade – Technical Design Report. 1 2019.arXiv:1901.03750

    2019

  191. [210]

    The 2x2 Demonstrator - A demonstrator for the DUNE ND-LAr Near Detector based on the ArgonCube Design

    Brooke Russell. The 2x2 Demonstrator - A demonstrator for the DUNE ND-LAr Near Detector based on the ArgonCube Design. PoS, TAUP2023:221, 2024.doi:10.22323/1.441.0221

    2024 doi

  192. [211]

    An Intermediate Water Cherenkov Detector at J- PARC.JPS Conf

    Mark Scott. An Intermediate Water Cherenkov Detector at J- PARC.JPS Conf. Proc., 12:010039, 2016.arXiv:1603. 01251,doi:10.7566/JPSCP.12.010039

    2016 doi

  193. [212]

    Deep Underground Neutrino Experi- ment (DUNE) Near Detector Conceptual Design Report.Instru- ments, 5(4):31, 2021.arXiv:2103.13910,doi:10.3390/ instruments5040031

    Adam Abed Abud et al. Deep Underground Neutrino Experi- ment (DUNE) Near Detector Conceptual Design Report.Instru- ments, 5(4):31, 2021.arXiv:2103.13910,doi:10.3390/ instruments5040031

    2021

  194. [213]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. The Hyper-Kamiokande experiment: input to the update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. 6 2025. arXiv:2506.16641

    2025

  195. [214]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Search for proton decay viap→e +π0 andp→µ +π0 in 0.31 megaton·years exposure of the Super-Kamiokande water Cherenkov detector.Phys. Rev. D, 95(1):012004, 2017.arXiv: 1610.03597,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.012004

    2017 doi arXiv

  196. [215]

    Coloma and P

    P. Coloma and P. Huber. Impact of nuclear effects on the extraction of neutrino oscillation parameters.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(22):221802, 2013.arXiv:1307.1243,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.111.221802

    2013 arXiv

  197. [216]

    Neutrino-nucleus interaction models and their impact on oscillation analyses.Phys

    Pilar Coloma, Patrick Huber, Chun-Min Jen, and Camillo Mariani. Neutrino-nucleus interaction models and their impact on oscillation analyses.Phys. Rev. D, 89(7):073015, 2014. arXiv:1311.4506,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.073015

    2014 doi arXiv

  198. [217]

    Ankowski, Pilar Coloma, Patrick Huber, Camillo Mariani, and Erica Vagnoni

    Artur M. Ankowski, Pilar Coloma, Patrick Huber, Camillo Mariani, and Erica Vagnoni. Missing energy and the measurement of the CP-violating phase in neutrino oscillations.Phys. Rev. D, 92(9):091301, 2015.arXiv:1507.08561,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.92.091301

    2015 arXiv

  199. [218]

    C. M. Jen, A. Ankowski, O. Benhar, A. P. Furmanski, L. N. Kalousis, and C. Mariani. Numerical Implementation of lepton-nucleus interactions and its effect on neutrino oscillation analysis.Phys. Rev. D, 90(9):093004, 2014.arXiv:1402. 6651,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.093004

    2014 doi

  200. [219]

    Ankowski, Omar Benhar, Pilar Coloma, Patrick Huber, Chun-Min Jen, Camillo Mariani, Davide Meloni, and Erica CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 80 Vagnoni

    Artur M. Ankowski, Omar Benhar, Pilar Coloma, Patrick Huber, Chun-Min Jen, Camillo Mariani, Davide Meloni, and Erica CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 80 Vagnoni. Comparison of the calorimetric and kinematic methods of neutrino energy reconstruction in disappearance experime...

    2015 doi

  201. [220]

    Ankowski, Omar Benhar, Camillo Mariani, and Erica Vagnoni

    Artur M. Ankowski, Omar Benhar, Camillo Mariani, and Erica Vagnoni. Effect of the 2p2hcross-section uncertainties on an analysis of neutrino oscillations.Phys. Rev. D, 93(11):113004, 2016.arXiv:1603.01072,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93. 113004

    2016 doi arXiv

  202. [221]

    Systematic uncertainties in long-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments.J

    Artur M Ankowski and Camillo Mariani. Systematic uncertainties in long-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments.J. Phys. G, 44(5):054001, 2017.arXiv:1609.00258,doi:10.1088/ 1361-6471/aa61b2

    2017 arXiv

  203. [223]

    Srishti Nagu, Jaydip Singh, Jyotsna Singh, and R. B. Singh. Impact of Cross-Sectional Uncertainties on DUNE Sensitivity due to Nuclear Effects.Nucl. Phys. B, 951:114888, 2020.arXiv: 1905.13101,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114888

    2020 doi

  204. [224]

    Nuclear Effects and CP Sensitivity at DUNE.Adv

    Srishti Nagu, Jaydip Singh, and Jyotsna Singh. Nuclear Effects and CP Sensitivity at DUNE.Adv. High Energy Phys., 2020:5472713, 2020.arXiv:1906.02190,doi:10.1155/ 2020/5472713

    2020

  205. [225]

    Influence of Cross- Sectional Uncertainty on Sensitivity Studies of DUNE and T2HK Experiments.Int

    Ritu Devi, Jaydip Singh, and Baba Potukuchi. Influence of Cross- Sectional Uncertainty on Sensitivity Studies of DUNE and T2HK Experiments.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 61(10):243, 2022. arXiv:2201.08040,doi:10.1007/s10773-022-05228-1

    2022 doi

  206. [226]

    Coyle, Shirley Weishi Li, and Pedro A

    Nina M. Coyle, Shirley Weishi Li, and Pedro A. N. Machado. Neutrino-nucleus cross section impacts on neutrino oscillation measurements.Phys. Rev. D, 111(9):093010, 2025.arXiv: 2502.19467,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.093010

    2025 doi

  207. [227]

    Modelling neutrino interactions for the t2k experiment, October 2022

    Stephen Dolan. Modelling neutrino interactions for the t2k experiment, October 2022. URL:https://indico.cern. ch/event/881216/contributions/5048753

    2022

  208. [228]

    Systematic Uncertainties in the NOvA Neutrino Oscillation Analysis, November 2020.doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4253085

    Miranda Elkins and Tomas Nosek. Systematic Uncertainties in the NOvA Neutrino Oscillation Analysis, November 2020.doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4253085

    2020 doi

  209. [229]

    Abed Abud et al

    A. Abed Abud et al. Snowmass neutrino frontier: Dune physics summary. 3 2022.arXiv:2203.06100

    2022

  210. [230]

    Abed Abud et al

    A. Abed Abud et al. A Gaseous Argon-Based Near Detector to Enhance the Physics Capabilities of DUNE. 3 2022.arXiv: 2203.06281

    2022

  211. [231]

    The role of final- state interaction modeling in neutrino energy reconstruction and oscillation measurements

    Yinrui Liu, Laura Munteanu, and Stephen Dolan. The role of final- state interaction modeling in neutrino energy reconstruction and oscillation measurements. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.03964

    2025 arXiv

  212. [232]

    van der Meer

    S. van der Meer. A Directive Device for Charged Particles and Its use in an Enhanced Neutrino Beam. 1961

    1961

  213. [233]

    Accelerator-Based Neutrino Beams

    Laura Fields and Sudeshna Ganguly. Accelerator-Based Neutrino Beams. 12 2025.arXiv:2512.20470

    2025

  214. [234]

    Sacha E. Kopp. Accelerator-based neutrino beams.Phys. Rept., 439:101–159, 2007.arXiv:physics/0609129,doi:10. 1016/j.physrep.2006.11.004

    2007 arXiv

  215. [235]

    Apollonio et al

    M. Apollonio et al. Forward production of charged pions with incident pi+- on nuclear targets measured at the CERN PS. Nucl. Phys. A, 821:118–192, 2009.arXiv:0902.2105,doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.01.080

    2009 doi arXiv

  216. [236]

    The Main Injector Particle Physics Experiment (MIPP FNAL E-907) at Fermilab: Status and plans.Nucl

    Rajendran Raja. The Main Injector Particle Physics Experiment (MIPP FNAL E-907) at Fermilab: Status and plans.Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 175-176:17–24, 2008.arXiv:hep-ex/ 0612007,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2007.10.003

    2008 doi

  217. [237]

    Measurements of Cross Sections and Charged Pion Spectra in Proton-Carbon Interactions at 31 GeV/c.Phys

    N Abgrall et al. Measurements of Cross Sections and Charged Pion Spectra in Proton-Carbon Interactions at 31 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. C, 84:034604, 2011.arXiv:1102.0983,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.84.034604

    2011 arXiv

  218. [238]

    Abgrall et al

    N. Abgrall et al. Measurement of Production Properties of Positively Charged Kaons in Proton-Carbon Interactions at 31 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. C, 85:035210, 2012.arXiv:1112.0150, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035210

    2012 doi arXiv

  219. [239]

    Abgrall et al

    N. Abgrall et al. Measurements of production properties ofK 0 S mesons andΛhyperons in proton-carbon interactions at 31 GeV/ c.Phys. Rev. C, 89(2):025205, 2014.arXiv:1309.1997, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.025205

    2014 doi arXiv

  220. [241]

    Abgrall et al

    N. Abgrall et al. Pion emission from the T2K replica target: method, results and application.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 701:99–114, 2013.arXiv:1207.2114,doi:10.1016/j. nima.2012.10.079

    2013 doi arXiv

  221. [242]

    Abgrall et al

    N. Abgrall et al. Measurements ofπ ± ,K ± and proton double differential yields from the surface of the T2K replica target for incoming 31 GeV/c protons with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(2):100, 2019.arXiv: 1808.04927,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-...

    2019 doi arXiv

  222. [243]

    Acharya et al

    A. Acharya et al. Measurement of the production cross section of 31 GeV/cprotons on carbon via beam attenuation in a 90- cm-long target.Phys. Rev. D, 103(1):012006, 2021.arXiv: 2010.11819,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.012006

    2021 doi

  223. [244]

    Aduszkiewicz et al

    A. Aduszkiewicz et al. Measurements of total production cross sections forπ ++C,π ++Al,K ++C, andK ++Al at 60 GeV/c and π ++C andπ ++Al at 31 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. D, 98(5):052001, 2018.arXiv:1805.04546,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98. 052001

    2018 doi

  224. [245]

    Aduszkiewicz et al

    A. Aduszkiewicz et al. Measurements of production and inelastic cross sections for p+C , p+Be , and p+Al at 60 GeV/c and p+C and p+Be at 120 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. D, 100(11):112001, 2019.arXiv:1909.03351,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100. 112001

    2019 doi

  225. [246]

    Aduszkiewicz et al

    A. Aduszkiewicz et al. Measurements of hadron production in π + + C andπ + + Be interactions at 60 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. D, 100(11):112004, 2019.arXiv:1909.06294,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.100.112004

    2019

  226. [247]

    Adhikary et al

    H. Adhikary et al. Measurements of KS0,Λ, andΛ¯production in 120 GeV/c p+C interactions.Phys. Rev. D, 107(7):072004, 2023.arXiv:2211.00183,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107. 072004

    2023 doi

  227. [248]

    Adhikary et al

    H. Adhikary et al. Measurements ofπ +,π −,p, ¯p,K + andK − production in 120 GeV/cp + C interactions.Phys. Rev. D, 108(7):072013, 2023.arXiv:2306.02961,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.072013

    2023

  228. [249]

    D. Yu. Bardin and V . A. Dokuchaeva. Muon Energy Spectrum in InverseµDecay.Nucl. Phys., B287:839–851, 1987.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90131-3

    1987 doi

  229. [250]

    Marciano and Zohreh Parsa

    William J. Marciano and Zohreh Parsa. Neutrino electron scattering theory.J. Phys., G29:2629–2645, 2003.arXiv: hep-ph/0403168,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/29/11/013

    2003 doi arXiv

  230. [251]

    The Weak Neutral Current.Prog

    Jens Erler and Shufang Su. The Weak Neutral Current.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 71:119–149, 2013.arXiv:1303.5522,doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.03.004

    2013 doi arXiv

  231. [252]

    Oleksandr Tomalak and Richard J. Hill. Theory of elastic neutrino- electron scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 101(3):033006, 2020.arXiv: 1907.03379,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.033006

    2020 doi

  232. [253]

    Hill, Kevin S

    Oleksandr Tomalak, Kaushik Borah, Richard J. Hill, Kevin S. McFarland, and Daniel Ruterbories. Radiative corrections to inverse muon decay for accelerator neutrinos.Phys. Rev. D, 107(9):093005, 2023.arXiv:2211.15947,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.093005

    2023

  233. [254]

    Marshall, Kevin S

    Chris M. Marshall, Kevin S. McFarland, and Callum Wilkinson. Neutrino-electron elastic scattering for flux determination at the DUNE oscillation experiment.Phys. Rev. D, 101(3):032002, 2020.arXiv:1910.10996,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101. 032002

    2020 doi

  234. [255]

    Valencia et al

    E. Valencia et al. Constraint of the MINERνA medium energy neutrino flux using neutrino-electron elastic scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 100(9):092001, 2019.arXiv:1906.00111,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.100.092001. CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 81

    2019

  235. [256]

    Park et al

    J. Park et al. Measurement of Neutrino Flux from Neutrino- Electron Elastic Scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 93(11):112007, 2016. arXiv:1512.07699,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.112007

    2016 doi arXiv

  236. [257]

    Ruterbories et al

    D. Ruterbories et al. Constraining the NuMI neutrino flux using inverse muon decay reactions in MINERvA.Phys. Rev. D, 104(9):092010, 2021.arXiv:2107.01059,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.092010

    2021

  237. [258]

    S. R. Mishra. Probing Nucleon Structure with neutrino-N Experiments. InWorkshop on Hadron Structure Functions and Parton Distributions, volume 84, page 84. World Scientific, 1990

    1990

  238. [259]

    Auchincloss et al

    Priscilla S. Auchincloss et al. Measurement of the Inclusive Charged Current Cross-section for Neutrino and Anti-neutrino Scattering on Isoscalar Nucleons.Z. Phys. C, 48:411–432, 1990.doi:10.1007/BF01572022

    1990 doi

  239. [260]

    PhD thesis, Nevis Labs, Columbia U., 1997.doi:10.2172/ 1421736

    William Glenn Seligman.A Next-to-Leading Order QCD Analysis of Neutrino - Iron Structure Functions at the Tevatron. PhD thesis, Nevis Labs, Columbia U., 1997.doi:10.2172/ 1421736

    1997

  240. [261]

    Belusevic and D

    R. Belusevic and D. Rein. Is There a Way to Measure the Deep Inelastic Cross-Section Using Wide Band Neutrino Beams? FERMILAB-PUB-87-019-E, 1 1987.doi:10.2172/6698002

    1987 doi

  241. [262]

    Tzanov et al

    M. Tzanov et al. Precise measurement of neutrino and anti- neutrino differential cross sections.Phys. Rev. D, 74:012008, 2006.arXiv:hep-ex/0509010,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 74.012008

    2006 doi arXiv

  242. [263]

    R. Petti. Cross-section measurements in the NOMAD experiment. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 159:56–62, 2006.arXiv:hep-ex/ 0602022,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2006.08.026

    2006 doi

  243. [264]

    PhD thesis, Pittsburgh U., 2009.doi:10.2172/ 952653

    Debdatta Bhattacharya.Neutrino and antineutrino inclusive charged-current cross section measurement with the MINOS near detector. PhD thesis, Pittsburgh U., 2009.doi:10.2172/ 952653

    2009

  244. [265]

    Bashyal et al

    A. Bashyal et al. Use of Neutrino Scattering Events with Low Hadronic Recoil to Inform Neutrino Flux and Detector Energy Scale.JINST, 16:P08068, 2021.arXiv:2104.05769,doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/08/P08068

    2021 doi

  245. [266]

    Low-νmethod with LHC neutrinos.Phys

    Callum Wilkinson and Alfonso Garcia Soto. Low-νmethod with LHC neutrinos.Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):033010, 2024.arXiv: 2310.06520,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.033010

    2024 doi

  246. [267]

    Neutrino-hydrogen interactions with a high-pressure time projection chamber.Phys

    Philip Hamacher-Baumann, Xianguo Lu, and Justo Martín- Albo. Neutrino-hydrogen interactions with a high-pressure time projection chamber.Phys. Rev. D, 102(3):033005, 2020.arXiv:2005.05252,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102. 033005

    2020 doi

  247. [268]

    P. A. Amaudruz et al. The T2K Fine-Grained Detectors.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 696:1–31, 2012.arXiv:1204.3666,doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.08.020

    2012 doi arXiv

  248. [269]

    R. Petti. Precision Measurements of Fundamental Interactions with (Anti)Neutrinos. In27th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, 10 2019.arXiv: 1910.05995

    2019

  249. [270]

    Mun Jung Jung, Vishvas Pandey, Gray Putnam, and David W. Schmitz. Neutrino Induced Charged Current Coherent Pion Production for Constraining the Muon Neutrino Flux at DUNE. 2 2025.arXiv:2502.02576

    2025

  250. [271]

    Longhin, L

    A. Longhin, L. Ludovici, and F. Terranova. A novel technique for the measurement of the electron neutrino cross section. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(4):155, 2015.arXiv:1412.5987,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3378-9

    2015 doi arXiv

  251. [272]

    Torti et al

    M. Torti et al. A high precision narrow-band neutrino beam: The ENUBET project.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 35(34n35):2044017, 2020.doi:10.1142/S0217751X20440170

    2020 doi

  252. [273]

    Acerbi et al

    F. Acerbi et al. Design and performance of the ENUBET monitored neutrino beam.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(10):964, 2023.arXiv: 2308.09402,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12116-3

    2023 doi

  253. [274]

    NuTag: a proof-of-concept study for a long-baseline neutrino beam.Eur

    Anna Baratto-Roldán, Mathieu Perrin-Terrin, Elisabetta Giulia Parozzi, Marc Andre Jebramcik, and Nikolaos Charitonidis. NuTag: a proof-of-concept study for a long-baseline neutrino beam.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(10):1024, 2024.arXiv:2401. 17068,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13324-1

    2024 doi

  254. [276]

    Acerbi et al

    F. Acerbi et al. nuSCOPE: A short-baseline neutrino beam at CERN for high-precision cross-section measurements. 3 2025. arXiv:2503.21589

    2025

  255. [277]

    Improving the robustness of theδ CP determination withνSCOPE

    João Paulo Pinheiro and Salvador Urrea. Improving the robustness of theδ CP determination withνSCOPE. 4 2026.arXiv: 2604.20956

    2026 arXiv

  256. [278]

    Kyberd et al

    P. Kyberd et al. nuSTORM - Neutrinos from STORed Muons: Letter of Intent to the Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee. 6 2012.arXiv:1206.0294

    2012 arXiv

  257. [279]

    Alvarez Ruso et al

    L. Alvarez Ruso et al. Neutrinos from Stored Muons (nuSTORM). InSnowmass 2021, 3 2022.arXiv:2203.07545

    2021

  258. [280]

    Towards a muon collider.Eur

    Carlotta Accettura et al. Towards a muon collider.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(9):864, 2023. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)].arXiv:2303.08533,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11889-x

    2023 doi

  259. [281]

    Energy and Flavor Discrimination Using Precision Time Structure in On-Axis Neutrino Beams.Phys

    Evan Angelico, Jonathan Eisch, Andrey Elagin, Henry Frisch, Sergei Nagaitsev, and Matthew Wetstein. Energy and Flavor Discrimination Using Precision Time Structure in On-Axis Neutrino Beams.Phys. Rev. D, 100(3):032008, 2019.arXiv: 1904.01611,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.032008

    2019 doi

  260. [282]

    Henry J. Frisch. Adding Stroboscopic Muon Information For Reduction of Systematic Uncertainties in DUNE. 12 2022. arXiv:2212.09524

    2022

  261. [283]

    Sudeshna Ganguly, Katsuya Yonehara, Chandrashekhara M. Bhat, A. Kent Triplett, Robert Ainsworth, Clara Hinds, and Maan Abdelhamid. Time Slicing of Neutrino Fluxes in Oscillation Experiments at Fermilab. 10 2024.arXiv:2410.18256,doi: 10.2172/2474964

    2024 doi

  262. [284]

    Bhadra et al

    S. Bhadra et al. Letter of Intent to Construct a nuPRISM Detector in the J-PARC Neutrino Beamline. 12 2014.arXiv:1412.3086

    2014 arXiv

  263. [285]

    Abbaslu et al

    S. Abbaslu et al. Towards mono-energetic virtualνbeam cross- section measurements: A feasibility study ofν-Ar interaction analysis with DUNE-PRISM. 9 2025.arXiv:2509.07664

    2025

  264. [286]

    Julia Gehrlein, Joachim Kopp, Margot MacMahon, and George A. Parker. A LENS on DUNE-PRISM: Characterizing a Neutrino Beam with Off-Axis Measurements. 10 2025.arXiv:2510. 09546

    2025

  265. [287]

    Bourguille, J

    B. Bourguille, J. Nieves, and F. Sánchez. Inclusive and exclusive neutrino-nucleus cross sections and the reconstruction of the interaction kinematics.JHEP, 04:004, 2021.arXiv:2012. 12653,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)004

    2021 doi

  266. [288]

    Neutrino-nucleus quasi-elastic and 2p2h interactions up to 10 gev.Physical Review D, 88(11):113007, 2013

    Richard Gran, J Nieves, F Sanchez, and MJ Vicente Vacas. Neutrino-nucleus quasi-elastic and 2p2h interactions up to 10 gev.Physical Review D, 88(11):113007, 2013

    2013

  267. [289]

    PYTHIA 5.6 and JETSET 7.3: Physics and manual

    Torbjorn Sjostrand. PYTHIA 5.6 and JETSET 7.3: Physics and manual. 5 1992

    1992

  268. [290]

    Graczyk and Jan T

    Krzysztof M. Graczyk and Jan T. Sobczyk. Form Factors in the Quark Resonance Model.Phys. Rev. D, 77:053001, 2008. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 079903 (2009)].arXiv:0707.3561, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.079903

    2008 doi arXiv

  269. [291]

    Graczyk and Jan T

    Krzysztof M. Graczyk and Jan T. Sobczyk. Lepton mass effects in weak charged current single pion production.Phys. Rev. D, 77:053003, 2008.arXiv:0709.4634,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.77.053003

    2008 arXiv

  270. [292]

    Kuzmin, Vladimir V

    Konstantin S. Kuzmin, Vladimir V . Lyubushkin, and Vadim A. Naumov. Lepton polarization in neutrino nucleon interactions. Phys. Part. Nucl., 35:S133–S138, 2004.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0312107,doi:10.1142/S0217732304016172

    2004 doi

  271. [293]

    Sobczyk, Artur M

    Hemant Prasad, Jan T. Sobczyk, Artur M. Ankowski, J. Luis Bonilla, Rwik Dharmapal Banerjee, Krzysztof M. Graczyk, and Beata E. Kowal. Developments in NuWro Monte Carlo generator. 1 2025.arXiv:2501.11470

    2025

  272. [294]

    Nowak, and Jan T

    Cezary Juszczak, Jaroslaw A. Nowak, and Jan T. Sobczyk. Spectrum of outgoing nucleons in quasielastic neutrino nucleus interactions. 11 2003.arXiv:nucl-th/0311051. CP-violation or Nuclear Excitation? 82

    2003 arXiv

  273. [295]

    Lalakulich, U

    O. Lalakulich, U. Mosel, and K. Gallmeister. Energy reconstruc- tion in quasielastic scattering in the MiniBooNE and T2K exper- iments.Phys. Rev. C, 86:054606, 2012.arXiv:1208.3678, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054606

    2012 doi arXiv

  274. [296]

    J. S. O’ Connell, T. W. Donnelly, and J. D. Walecka. Semileptonic weak interactions withC 12.Phys. Rev., C6:719–733, 1972. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.6.719

    1972 doi

  275. [297]

    Bodek and M

    A. Bodek and M. E. Christy. Extraction of the Coulomb sum rule, transverse enhancement, and longitudinal quenching from an analysis of all available e-C12 and e-O16 cross section data. Phys. Rev. C, 106(6):L061305, 2022.arXiv:2208.14772, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L061305

    2022 doi

  276. [298]

    Understanding neutrino pion production with the GiBUU model.Phys

    Qiyu Yan, Kaile Wen, Kai Gallmeister, Xianguo Lu, Ulrich Mosel, and Yangheng Zheng. Understanding neutrino pion production with the GiBUU model.Phys. Rev. D, 112(9):093007, 2025. arXiv:2507.20539,doi:10.1103/yzqx-7ttd

    2025 doi

  277. [299]

    Tina J. Leitner. Neutrino-nucleus interactions in a coupled-channel hadronic transport model. Other thesis, 10 2009

    2009

  278. [300]

    Drechsel, S

    D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, and L. Tiator. Unitary Isobar Model - MAID2007.Eur. Phys. J. A, 34:69–97, 2007.arXiv:0710. 0306,doi:10.1140/epja/i2007-10490-6

    2007 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.