Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Calibrated Adaptive Probabilistic ODE Solvers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.08202 v2 pith:6QZFUFJO submitted 2020-12-15 math.NA cs.LGcs.NAstat.ML

classification math.NAcs.LGcs.NAstat.ML
keywords errorestimateadaptivedemonstrateefficientlyexplicitnumericalprobabilistic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Probabilistic solvers for ordinary differential equations assign a posterior measure to the solution of an initial value problem. The joint covariance of this distribution provides an estimate of the (global) approximation error. The contraction rate of this error estimate as a function of the solver's step size identifies it as a well-calibrated worst-case error, but its explicit numerical value for a certain step size is not automatically a good estimate of the explicit error. Addressing this issue, we introduce, discuss, and assess several probabilistically motivated ways to calibrate the uncertainty estimate. Numerical experiments demonstrate that these calibration methods interact efficiently with adaptive step-size selection, resulting in descriptive, and efficiently computable posteriors. We demonstrate the efficiency of the methodology by benchmarking against the classic, widely used Dormand-Prince 4/5 Runge-Kutta method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools