Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Quantitative estimates for high-contrast random media

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For high-contrast random media, the scale where homogenization sets in is shown to have stretched-exponential tails under a quantitative decorrelation bound.

desk verdict Serious work, genuine gap: the main theorem's concentration step uses an unbounded F_T in a bounded-variable lemma, and the proof is only sketched. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09493 v2 pith:6RO2SI4U submitted 2025-02-13 math.AP math-phmath.MPmath.PR

Peter Bella , Matteo Capoferri , Mikhail Cherdantsev , Igor Velčić This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 35J7060H2535B2735B4074A4074Q05
keywords stochastichomogenizationhigh-contrastmediaperforateddomainsregularityradiuscorrectorestimatespectralgapinequalitydoubleporosityquantitativeerrorestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to prove quantitative stochastic homogenization for elliptic equations whose coefficient field vanishes in a random collection of holes. Its central claim is that, when the random environment satisfies a multi-scale spectral gap inequality and the holes are separated, the regularity radius r_* — the scale at which large-scale regularity of solutions sets in — has stretched-exponential tails: E[exp(r_*^{min{d/2,β}}/C)] ≤ 2. From this tail bound the paper derives sublinear growth of the homogenization corrector and a two-scale expansion error estimate for the homogenized solution. The results matter because they extend the quantitative theory from uniformly elliptic random media to the high-contrast, perforated setting that arises in double-porosity models and composite materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the regularity radius r_* defined by (2.15): the smallest scale from which the normalized square mean of the pair (extended corrector, flux corrector) minus its average stays below 1/C on every larger ball. The load-bearing inequality is the multi-scale spectral gap inequality (2.18), which bounds the variance of a random variable by an L-scale, weighted average of its local oscillations; combined with a concentration lemma for approximately sqrt(T)-local functionals, it converts local sensitivity estimates into exponential-moment bounds for r_*. Supporting mechanisms are the extension theorem (Theorem 2.5), which extends Sobolev functions across holes with uniform constants under the geometric separation assumption, and the perforated-domain hole-filling lemma (Lemma A.3), which propagates energy estimates across scales.

What would settle it

Construct a stationary ergodic hole ensemble that satisfies the geometric separation but whose local statistics decorrelate only polynomially, e.g. hole radii drawn from a long-range correlated field on the centers; then check whether the variance bound (2.18) holds for every L≥1 with weight c exp(-l^β/c). A failure of the uniform-in-L inequality at some L, or a numerical tail P(r_* > R) decaying slower than exp(-c $R^{{min{d/2,β}}$}) for every c>0, would falsify Theorem 3.1's exponential-moment bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the full quantitative machinery of regularity theory for stochastic homogenization survives when the coefficient a vanishes on random inclusions, provided the geometry is controlled and the randomness is quantified by a multi-scale spectral gap. The main theorem (Theorem 3.1) states: if the probability measure P satisfies the Multi-scale Spectral Gap Inequality (2.18) with weight π(l)=c exp(-l^β/c), then for some C depending only on d, a±, β, E[exp(r_*^{min{d/2,β}}/C)] ≤ 2; under the ordinary spectral gap one may take β=∞, giving a stretched-exponential exponent d/2. The random variable r_* is defined in (2.15) as the first radius such that, on every larger ball, the normalized L2 fluctuation of the extended corrector and flux corrector is at most 1/C. The proof builds the analogue, for perforated domains, of the large-scale Schauder estimates and the massive-corrector concentration argument, with two new ingredients: an extension theorem for Sobolev functions across the holes and a hole-filling lemma in the perforated domain.

Load-bearing premise

The results are conditional on the Multi-scale Spectral Gap Inequality (Assumption 2.11) holding with the exponential weight π(l)=c exp(-l^β/c) and with a constant uniform in the scale L, together with the uniform geometric separation of the holes (Assumption 2.2(iii)); if the environment decorrelates on longer scales or the separation fails, the stretched-exponential bound on r_* is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 3.1 holds, the regularity radius is finite almost surely with all moments, so large-scale Lipschitz and Schauder estimates hold everywhere except on a set of stretched-exponentially small probability.
  • Theorem 3.2 yields sublinear growth of the extended corrector: on unit balls, the L2-mean of |φ|² is controlled by its average plus a random prefactor with stretched-exponential moments times a slowly growing factor π(|x|).
  • Corollary 3.3 gives an explicit two-scale expansion error: the L2 gradient error between u_ε and the first-order expansion is bounded by ε‖∇g‖ plus an ε-dependent random factor, so the homogenization error converges in a quantitative, annealed sense.
  • In the ordinary spectral-gap case, β=∞, so the tail exponent becomes d/2, which is the same stretched-exponential rate as in uniformly elliptic stochastic homogenization.
  • The estimates are suboptimal and can be upgraded with more refined corrector analysis, as the authors note; the value here is that the high-contrast and perforated case is brought into the same quantitative framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same machinery should give annealed large-scale C^{1,α} regularity for a-harmonic functions with nonzero data; the propositions in Section 4 already contain the needed ingredients, though the theorem statements stop at corrector growth and two-scale error.
  • If the multi-scale spectral gap held with a polynomial rather than exponential weight, the same proof would presumably replace min{d/2, β} by a smaller exponent; testing this would identify exactly where the decorrelation rate enters the regularity radius.
  • One could test the sharpness of the exponent by constructing ensembles with beta-dependent hole correlations and measuring the tail of r_* numerically; a rate faster than exp(-C r_*^{min{d/2,β}}) would show the bound is not optimal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies quantitative homogenization for elliptic equations whose coefficient field vanishes on a random perforation, i.e. a_ω = χ_{M_ω} a_ω with a_ω uniformly elliptic on the matrix M_ω. Under geometric assumptions on the holes (Assumption 2.2) and a Multi-scale Spectral Gap Inequality (Assumption 2.11), the main result Theorem 3.1 asserts stretched-exponential tails for the regularity radius r_* with exponent min{d/2, β}: E[exp(r_*^{min{d/2,β}}/C)] ≤ 2. From this the paper derives sublinear growth of the corrector (Theorem 3.2) and a two-scale expansion error estimate (Corollary 3.3). The proof follows the Gloria–Neukamm–Otto buckling strategy, replacing the uniform ellipticity input by an extension theorem, a hole-filling lemma, and large-scale Schauder estimates adapted to perforated domains.

Significance. If Theorem 3.1 is fully established, the result is an important quantitative homogenization statement for high-contrast random media: it gives the first stretched-exponential control of the regularity radius in a genuinely perforated random setting and is a natural input for double-porosity models, as the relation to [16] is honestly discussed. The paper contains several valuable building blocks proved in detail, in particular the Extension Theorem 2.5, Lemma A.3 (hole filling), Proposition 4.2 (large-scale Schauder estimates) and Proposition 4.15 (sensitivity estimate). However, the central theorem is currently supported by a sketched final argument, and the application of Lemma 4.14 to an unbounded random variable is a genuine gap that must be repaired before the main claim can be regarded as proved.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, proof of Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 4.14] The final step of the proof of Theorem 3.1 is not a proof as written. Lemma 4.14 is quoted from [25, Proposition 4.3] and requires F_t to be a bounded random variable, whereas the natural candidate F_T in (4.108) is unbounded: it contains ω_T (T^{-1} φ_T^2 + |∇φ_T|^2 + |∇g_T|^2) and only stationary second moments and an almost-sure local bound (Corollary 4.9) are established. The text says that Lemma 4.14 applies 'after we subtract E[F_t]', but no truncation, stopping-time, or approximation argument is supplied to bridge the missing boundedness. Since the stretched-exponential tail (4.154) is exactly the input from which (3.1) is derived, this is a load-bearing gap in the central claim.
  2. [§4, Proposition 4.4] Proposition 4.4 is the step that converts sublinear growth of massive correctors into sublinear growth of the corrector and bounds r_* by C r_**. Its proof states that it 'follows verbatim' from [31, Proof of Proposition 2] except for Step 3, and then only sketches the Campanato iteration and the reduction argument. Since Theorem 3.1 depends on (4.67) and on the inequality r_* ≤ C r_**, the paper should either reproduce the iteration in the perforated setting or state precisely which numbered assertions of [31] carry over without modification; the current sketch does not allow the reader to verify that all constants are independent of the perforation ω.
  3. [§3, Theorem 3.2 and Corollary 3.3] Both results are stated as main consequences but their proofs are deferred by reference: Theorem 3.2 'retraces the steps of [12, Theorem 1.13]' and Corollary 3.3 'follows a classical argument', so details are omitted. The adaptation is not entirely routine because the corrector is nonstationary, is used through its extension, and the exponential moment (3.2) must be uniform in the random field C(x). Please provide the proof or a precise statement of the theorem in [12] from which each estimate follows, and justify the two-scale expansion in Corollary 3.3 in the present nonstationary, perforated setting.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Assumption 2.11, Eq. (2.18)] The weight is defined as π(l) := c exp(l^β/c), which is increasing and non-integrable; there should be a minus sign, π(l) := c exp(-l^β/c), consistently with the stretched-exponential decay used in Lemma 4.14 and Remark 2.12(a).
  2. [Eq. (4.108)] In the definition of F_T(a), the term '1/T g_T' should read '1/T |g_T|^2'; as written the expression is dimensionally inconsistent and conflicts with the integral of a scalar function.
  3. [Eq. (4.111)] The reduced estimate contains the typo 'ϕ_1^2 − ϕ_1^2'; it should be 'ϕ_1^2 − ϕ_2^2'.
  4. [Proof of Lemma 4.6] The sentence 'Hence (4.106) follows from (4.95) and (4.96)' refers to the wrong display; the intended target is the almost-sure bound (4.92).
  5. [Eqs. (4.117)–(4.118)] The phrase 'the LHS of (4.121)' should refer to the left-hand side of (4.117), since (4.121) is introduced only later.
  6. [§2.2.1, Example 3] The 'random parking measure' is not formally defined and no precise statement from [26] is cited for the asserted Multi-scale Spectral Gap Inequality; please give the definition and the exact reference, including the parameters of the weight π.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main estimate is derived from the stated Multi-scale Spectral Gap assumption via external concentration and regularity results, with no fitted quantity renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 3.1, is a conditional statement: under Assumption 2.11 (Multi-scale Spectral Gap) it bounds exponential moments of the regularity radius r_*, defined in (2.15) in terms of corrector and flux-corrector fluctuations. The proof uses Proposition 4.5 to dominate r_** by a weighted L2 average of massive corrector and flux data, Corollary 4.13 to control the expectation, and Lemma 4.14 (quoted from Duerinckx--Gloria [25]) to obtain stretched-exponential concentration for approximately sqrt(t)-local random variables. Proposition 4.10 establishes the required locality for F_T. None of these steps defines r_* or the tail estimate in terms of the MSG constant in a way that makes the conclusion an identity; the MSG is an input, not a consequence of the estimate. The corrector/regularity "buckling" iteration mentioned in the introduction is a standard bootstrap, not a logical circle, since the one-step estimates are proved independently. Self-citations ([17], [21], [18]) supply geometric extension and spectral background; these are auxiliary tools with assumptions that do not include the target estimate, so they do not constitute load-bearing circularity. The final proof is admittedly a retracing of [31, Theorem 2] and is sketched rather than fully written out; that is an exposition/completeness issue, not a circularity. Similarly, any concern that Lemma 4.14 is applied to the unbounded F_T of (4.108) without an explicit truncation is a proof-gap/correctness concern, not a circularity. There are no fitted parameters called predictions and no known result renamed as new organization.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on geometric separation and minimal smoothness, stationarity and ergodicity, and a multiscale spectral gap assumption, plus imported extension and concentration results. No free parameters are fitted; the theorem is conditional on these hypotheses.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.2 (geometry): holes are disjoint, diam < 1/2, separated by distance > rho*diam, and uniformly minimally smooth.
    Needed for the Extension Theorem 2.5 (imported) and the paper's Hole Filling Lemma A.3; all subsequent estimates use these.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.4: stationarity and ergodicity of the hole process.
    Used to define stationary correctors and massive correctors, and to invoke qualitative homogenization convergence in Proposition 4.4.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.11: Multi-scale Spectral Gap Inequality (2.18) with weight pi(l)=c exp(l^beta/c), typeset without minus sign and intended as exp(-l^beta/c).
    The main Theorem 3.1 is conditional on this; examples are verified only by citation to [26], and the inequality is required for every L>=1.
  • domain assumption Theorem 2.5: linear bounded extension operator for W^{1,2} across holes, imported from [17,21].
    Used throughout (e.g., Prop 4.1, Lemma 4.8, Prop 4.15); the paper states it but does not prove it.
  • standard math Lemma 4.14: exponential concentration for approximately sqrt(t)-local random variables, imported from [25, Prop 4.3].
    Used as a black box in the Proof of Theorem 3.1 to convert locality of F_T into stretched-exponential tails.
  • domain assumption Qualitative homogenization: massive correctors phi_T and fluxes q_T converge to phi and q as T goes to infinity.
    Used in the final reduction of Proposition 4.4; standard in stochastic homogenization (see [33]).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantitative estimates for high-contrast random media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6RO2SI4U

@misc{pith2026250209493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantitative estimates for high-contrast random media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6RO2SI4U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09493}
}
abstract

This paper studies quantitative homogenization of elliptic equations with random, uniformly elliptic coefficients that vanish in a union of random holes. Assuming an upper bound on the size of the holes and a separation condition between them, we derive optimal bounds for the regularity radius $r_*$ and suboptimal growth estimates for the corrector. These results are key ingredients for error analysis in stochastic homogenization and serve as crucial input for recent developments in the double-porosity model, such as those by Bonhomme, Duerinckx, and Gloria (arXiv:2502.02847).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Bella and M

    P. Bella and M. Kniely, Regularity of random elliptic operators with degenerate coefficients and applications to stochastic homogenization,Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 12 (2024) 2246–2288. DOI: 10.1007/s40072-023-00322-9.☞ pp. 5, 14, 35, and 38

    work page doi:10.1007/s40072-023-00322-9 2024

  2. [31]

    Gloria, S

    A. Gloria, S. Neukamm and F. Otto, A Regularity Theory for Random Elliptic Operators. Milan J. Math.88, 99–170 (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s00032-020-00309-4☞ pp. 4, 11, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 26, 29, and 34 Quantitative estimates for high-contrast random media P. Bella, M. Capoferri, M. Cherdantsevand I. Velčić Page 43

    doi:10.1007/s00032-020-00309-4 2020

  3. [16]

    Bonhomme, M

    E. Bonhomme, M. Duerinckx and A. Gloria, Homogenization of the stochastic double- porosity model. Preprint arXiv:2502.02847 (2025).☞ p. 5

    arXiv 2025

  4. [1]

    Allaire, Homogenization of the Navier-Stokes equations in open sets perforated with tiny holes

    G. Allaire, Homogenization of the Navier-Stokes equations in open sets perforated with tiny holes. I. Abstract framework, a volume distribution of holes,Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 113 (1990) 209–259. DOI: 10.1007/BF00375066.☞ p. 4

    doi:10.1007/bf00375066 1990

  5. [2]

    Armstrong, A

    S.N. Armstrong, A. Bou-Rabee and T. Kuusi, Superdiffusive central limit theorem for a Brownian particle in a critically-correlated incompressible random drift. Preprint arXiv.2404.01115 (2024). ☞ p. 5

    arXiv 2024

  6. [3]

    Armstrong and P

    S.N. Armstrong and P. Dario, Elliptic regularity and quantitative homogenization on per- colation clusters,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.71 (2018) 1717–1849. DOI: 10.1002/cpa.21726. ☞ p. 5

    doi:10.1002/cpa.21726 2018

  7. [4]

    Armstrong and T

    S.N. Armstrong and T. Kuusi, Renormalization group and elliptic homogenization in high contrast Preprint arXiv:2405.10732 (2025).☞ p. 5

    arXiv 2025

  8. [5]

    Armstrong, T

    S.N. Armstrong, T. Kuusi and J.-C. Mourrat, Quantitative stochastic homogenization and regularity theory of parabolic equations, Anal. PDE 9 no. 2 (2016) 363–418. DOI: 10.2140/apde.2018.11.1945. ☞ p. 5

    work page doi:10.2140/apde.2018.11.1945 2016

Show all 37 references
  1. [6]

    Armstrong, T

    S.N. Armstrong, T. Kuusi and J.-C. Mourrat, The additive structure of elliptic homogen- ization, Invent. Math.208 (2017) 999–1154. DOI: 10.1007/s00222-016-0702-4.☞ p. 5

    2017 doi

  2. [7]

    Armstrong, T

    S.N. Armstrong, T. Kuusi and J.-C. Mourrat,Quantitative stochastic homogenization and large-scale regularity, Grundlehren Math. Wiss.352, Springer (2019). DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 030-15545-2. ☞ p. 5

    2019 doi

  3. [8]

    Armstrong and C.K

    S.N. Armstrong and C.K. Smart, Quantitative stochastic homogenization of convex integral functionals, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. Ser. 4 49 (2016) 423–481. DOI: 10.24033/asens.2287. ☞ p. 5

    2016 doi

  4. [9]

    Avellaneda and F.-H

    M. Avellaneda and F.-H. Lin. Compactness methods in the theory of homogenization. Comm. Pure Appl. Math.40 (1987), no. 6, 803–847. 10.1002/cpa.3160400607☞ p. 5

    1987 doi

  5. [10]

    Bella, B

    P. Bella, B. Fehrman and F. Otto, A Liouville theorem for elliptic systems with degenerate ergodic coefficients,Ann. Appl. Probab.28 (2018) 1379–1422. DOI: 10.1214/17-AAP1332. ☞ p. 5

    2018 doi

  6. [11]

    Bella, E

    P. Bella, E. Feireisl and F. Oschmann,Γ-convergence for nearly incompressible fluids,J. Math. Phys.64 (2023) 091507. DOI: 10.1063/5.0138650.☞ p. 4

    2023 doi

  7. [13]

    Bella and F

    P. Bella and F. Oschmann, Inverse of divergence and homogenization of compressible Navier-Stokes equations in randomly perforated domains,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.247 (2023) 14. DOI: 10.1007/s00205-023-01847-y☞ p. 4

    2023 doi

  8. [14]

    Bella and M

    P. Bella and M. Schäffner, Quenched invariance principle for random walks among ran- dom degenerate conductances, Ann. Probab.48 no. 1 (2020) 296–316. DOI: 10.1214/19- AOP1361. ☞ p. 5

    2020 doi

  9. [15]

    Bella and M

    P. Bella and M. Schäffner, Non-uniformly parabolic equations and applications to the random conductance model, Probab. Theory Related Fields 182 (2022) 353–397. DOI: 10.1007/s00440-021-01081-1. ☞ p. 5 Quantitative estimates for high-contrast random media P. Bella, M. Capoferri...

    2022 doi

  10. [17]

    Capoferri, M

    M. Capoferri, M. Cherdantsev and I. Velčić, Eigenfunctions localised on a defect in high-contrast random media, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 55 no. 6 (2023) 7449–7489. DOI: 10.1137/21M1468486. ☞ p. 7

    2023 doi

  11. [18]

    Capoferri, M

    M. Capoferri, M. Cherdantsev and I. Velčić, High-contrast random systems of PDEs: homogenisation and spectral theory, Commun. Contemp. Math. , to appear. DOI: 10.1142/S0219199725500294. ☞ p. 3

    doi

  12. [19]

    Chatzigeorgiou, P

    G. Chatzigeorgiou, P. Morfe, F. Otto and L. Wang, The Gaussian free-field as a stream function: asymptotics of effective diffusivity in infra-red cut-off,Ann. Probab., to appear. ☞ p. 5

  13. [20]

    Cherdantsev, K

    M. Cherdantsev, K. Cherednichenko and I. Velčić, Stochastic homogenisation of high-contrast media, Applicable Analysis 98 no. 1-2 (2019) 91–117. DOI: 10.1080/00036811.2018.1495327. ☞ p. 3

    2019

  14. [21]

    Cherdantsev, K

    M. Cherdantsev, K. Cherednichenko and I. Velčić, High-contrast random composites: ho- mogenisation framework and new spectral phenomena. Preprint arXiv:2110.00395v5 (2021). ☞ pp. 3, 8, and 10

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Cioranescu and F

    D. Cioranescu and F. Murat, Un terme étrange venu d’ailleurs, H. Brézis and J.L. Lions (Eds.), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications, Collège de France Seminar, Research Notes in Math. 60 and 70, Vol. II and III, Pitman, London (1982) 98–138. ☞ p. 3

    1982

  16. [23]

    Clozeau, A

    N. Clozeau, A. Gloria and S. Qi, Quantitative homogenization for log-normal coefficients, Preprint arXiv:2403.0016 (2024).☞ p. 5

    2024

  17. [24]

    Dario, Optimal corrector estimates on percolation cluster,Ann

    P. Dario, Optimal corrector estimates on percolation cluster,Ann. Appl. Probab.31(1): 377-431 (February 2021). DOI: 10.1214/20-AAP1593.☞ p. 5

    2021 doi

  18. [25]

    Duerinckx and A

    M. Duerinckx and A. Gloria, Multiscale functional inequalities: Concentration properties, ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.17 (2020) 133–157. DOI: 10.30757/ALEA.v17-06. ☞ pp. 4, 12, and 34

    2020 doi

  19. [26]

    Duerinckx and A

    M. Duerinckx and A. Gloria, Multiscale functional inequalities: Constructive approach, Ann. H. Lebesgue3 no. 2 (2020) 825–872. DOI: 10.5802/ahl.47.☞ pp. 4, 12, and 13

    2020 doi

  20. [27]

    Duerinckx and A

    M. Duerinckx and A. Gloria, On Einstein’s effective viscosity formula,Mem. Eur. Math. Soc.7 (2023). DOI: 10.4171/MEMS/7. ☞ p. 4

    2023 doi

  21. [28]

    Evans, and R.F

    L.C. Evans, and R.F. Gariepy,Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, Revised Edition (1st ed.), Chapman and Hall (2015).☞ p. 15

    2015

  22. [29]

    Giaquinta, Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems, Annals of Mathematics Studies105, Princeton University Press (1983).☞ p

    M. Giaquinta, Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlinear elliptic systems, Annals of Mathematics Studies105, Princeton University Press (1983).☞ p. 17

    1983

  23. [30]

    Gloria, S

    A. Gloria, S. Neukamm and F. Otto, A regularity theory for random elliptic operators, preprint arXiv:1409.2678v2 (version 2).☞ p. 35

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gloria and F

    A. Gloria and F. Otto, Quantitative results on the corrector equation in stochastic homo- genization, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)14 no. 5 (2012) 1267–1304. DOI: 10.4171/jems/745. ☞ pp. 3 and 13

    2012 doi

  25. [33]

    Jikov, S.M

    V.V. Jikov, S.M. Kozlov and O.A. Oleinik, Homogenization of Differential Operators and Integral Functionals, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1994).☞ p. 10

    1994

  26. [34]

    Papanicolaou and S.R.S

    G.C. Papanicolaou and S.R.S. Varadhan, Diffusion in regions with many small holes, In: B. Grigelionis (Eds.) Stochastic Differential Systems Filtering and Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences25, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1980). DOI: 10.1007/BFb0004010. ☞ p. 4

    1980 doi

  27. [35]

    Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton Math- ematical Series30, Princeton University Press (1970).☞ p

    E.M. Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton Math- ematical Series30, Princeton University Press (1970).☞ p. 7

    1970

  28. [36]

    Functional analysis and numerical analysis

    L. Tartar, Quelques remarques sur l’homogénéisation,Proc. of the Japan-France seminar 1976 "Functional analysis and numerical analysis", Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (1978) 469–482. ☞ p. 3

    1978

  29. [37]

    B. Tóth. Diffusive and super-diffusive limits for random walks and diffusions with long memory, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 2018)(2019) 3039–3058. DOI: 10.1142/9789813272880_0171. ☞ p. 5 Quantitative estimates for high-contrast random media

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.