Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A simple and practical adaptive trust-region method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.02079 v3 pith:6RYOOUAS submitted 2024-12-03 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords methodtrust-regiongradientepsilonmethodsadaptiveboundcompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present an adaptive trust-region method for unconstrained optimization that allows inexact solutions to the trust-region subproblems. Our method is a simple variant of the classical trust-region method of \citet{sorensen1982newton}. The method achieves the best possible convergence bound up to an additive log factor, for finding an $\epsilon$-approximate stationary point, i.e., $O( \Delta_f L^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1)$ iterations where $L$ is the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian, $\Delta_f$ is the optimality gap, and $\epsilon$ is the termination tolerance for the gradient norm. This improves over existing trust-region methods whose worst-case bound is at least a factor of $L$ worse. We compare our performance with state-of-the-art trust-region (TRU) and cubic regularization (ARC) methods from the GALAHAD library on the CUTEst benchmark set on problems with more than 100 variables. We use fewer function, gradient, and Hessian evaluations than these methods. For instance, our algorithm's median number of gradient evaluations is $23$ compared to $36$ for TRU and $29$ for ARC. Compared to the conference version of this paper \cite{hamad2022consistently}, our revised method includes several practical enhancements. These modifications dramatically improved performance, including an order of magnitude reduction in the shifted geometric mean of wall-clock times. We also show it suffices for the second derivatives to be locally Lipschitz to guarantee that either the minimum gradient norm converges to zero or the objective value tends towards negative infinity, even when the iterates diverge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Universality of Simple Trust-Region Algorithms

    math.OC 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Classical and modified-ratio trust-region methods reach the optimal O(ε^{-1/(1+ν)}) convex and O(ε^{-(2+ν)/(1+ν)}) nonconvex complexity for any Hölder ν∈[0,1] without knowing ν.

  2. Accelerating Trust-Region Methods: An Attempt to Balance Global and Local Efficiency

    math.OC 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An accelerated trust-region method with a dual-variable local detector claims O~(ε^{-1/3}) global oracle complexity with quadratic local convergence, but the key estimate-sequence inequality is off by a factor of 8.

Pith tools