Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Influence of Fermionic Dark Matter on the Structural and Tidal Properties of Neutron Stars

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-fluid model shows that fermionic dark matter mixed into a neutron star can account for only about 20 percent of its mass before the star's radius and tidal deformability fall outside observed ranges.

desk verdict The M-R half is a competent scan of a known model; the tidal half is built on an unjustified single-fluid application and the f≤0.2 exclusion from Λ is not supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.17905 v3 pith:6SHNT23U submitted 2025-10-19 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Monmoy Molla , Masum Murshid , Mehedi Kalam This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE PACS 04.40.Dg95.35.+d97.60.Jd
keywords fermionicdarkmatterneutronstarstwo-fluidTOVmass-radiusrelationtidaldeformabilityLovenumberidealFermigasEOSadmixed
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether fermionic dark matter can hide inside neutron stars without breaking what we know about them. It models a neutron star as two fluids — ordinary nuclear matter and a zero-temperature ideal Fermi gas of dark matter — coupled only by gravity, and scans dark matter particle mass and mass fraction. The central result is that the star's mass-radius curve and its tidal deformability shift strongly with the dark matter fraction, and only small dark fractions (about f ≤ 0.2) remain compatible with current neutron star mass, radius, and tidal measurements. This matters because it turns neutron stars into a probe that can exclude whole regions of dark matter parameter space, and because the star's response depends on whether the dark matter sits as a compact core or an extended halo.

What carries the argument

The central tool is the relativistic two-fluid stellar-structure (TOV) system: ordinary matter and dark matter each carry their own pressure, energy density, and mass, coupled only through a shared gravitational potential. The dark matter fluid is described by a zero-temperature ideal Fermi gas equation of state, parametrized by particle mass μ and number density. The star's total mass is split into a fraction f of dark matter. The system is completed by the standard differential equation for the quadrupolar tidal Love number, from which the dimensionless tidal deformability Λ is derived. This machinery lets the authors compute mass-radius and Λ–mass curves for each (μ, f) pair and compare t

What would settle it

Recompute the same mass-radius and tidal-deformability curves using any interacting fermionic dark-matter equation of state (for instance, with a repulsive self-interaction). If the f ≈ 0.2 compatibility boundary shifts by more than the observational uncertainty, the paper's exclusion is an artifact of the ideal-gas assumption; if it stays fixed, the constraint is robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the two-fluid picture, dark matter changes neutron star structure in a way controlled mainly by the dark matter particle mass μ and mass fraction f. For fixed compactness, small f produces a dark-matter core (dark-matter radius smaller than the nuclear-matter radius), while larger f produces a dark-matter halo surrounding the baryonic core. As μ grows, the dark-matter equation of state softens, lowering the maximum mass and shifting tidal-deformability curves toward lower masses. When matched against observations — the existence of roughly two-solar-mass pulsars, radius constraints near 1.4 solar masses, and the gravitational-wave tidal bound — only f ≈ 0.2 or less survives for the tested

Load-bearing premise

The entire result depends on treating the dark matter inside the neutron star as a zero-temperature, non-interacting ideal Fermi gas that feels only gravity and has no accretion history — change that assumption and the f ≤ 0.2 ceiling may move.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A neutron star that accumulates more than roughly a fifth of its mass in non-interacting fermionic dark matter would be measurably different: its maximum mass drops, its radius at 1.4 solar masses shrinks, and its tidal deformability falls outside the observed band.
  • For a fixed overall compactness, the dark-matter component switches from a compact core (small f) to an extended halo (larger f), and the two geometries leave different fingerprints on the tidal Love number.
  • Because the maximum mass falls as μ increases, the existence of massive pulsars removes the high-μ corner of the (μ, f) plane.
  • The boundary f ≈ 0.2 is the paper's central quantitative result: below it the admixed star looks almost normal, above it the star begins to resemble a dark-matter star.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ideal Fermi gas is replaced with a self-interacting fermionic dark-matter equation of state, the two-fluid machinery still applies, so the f ≈ 0.2 boundary can be recomputed; the direction of any shift would reveal whether the exclusion is an artifact of the non-interacting assumption.
  • The paper sets f by hand rather than deriving it from accretion. Combining the excluded (μ, f) region with a capture model for dark matter over the neutron star's lifetime would translate the bound into a limit on the dark-matter–nucleon cross-section — a connection the authors leave implicit.
  • The core-to-halo transition suggests a potentially non-monotonic response in the tidal Love number: a concentrated dark-matter core may affect tidal deformability differently than a diffuse halo even at the same total f. The paper's figures hint at this but do not isolate the two contributions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies neutron stars admixed with non-interacting fermionic dark matter (DM) using a two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkhoff (TOV) formalism. For DM particle masses μ = 0.2–1 GeV and DM mass fractions f = 0–0.8, and for the SLy and MPA1 nuclear equations of state, the authors compute mass–radius relations, density profiles, tidal Love numbers k2, and dimensionless tidal deformabilities Λ. These results are compared with constraints from ~2 M⊙ pulsars, NICER radius measurements, and the GW170817 tidal-deformability bounds. The paper concludes that (i) the DM distribution passes from a core to a halo as f increases, (ii) larger μ and f soften the effective equation of state and lower the maximum mass, and (iii) observational constraints exclude large DM fractions, with f ≤ 0.2 remaining consistent with current data.

Significance. If the computational framework is valid, the paper would provide a useful systematic scan of the fermionic-DM parameter space (μ, f) for DM-admixed neutron stars, connecting two nuclear equations of state to NICER and gravitational-wave constraints. Its qualitative findings—smaller maximum masses, smaller radii, and lower Λ for larger f—are plausible and consistent with earlier literature. The paper does not introduce new formalism or provide reproducible code, but it does present a clear set of figures and correctly quotes the standard ideal Fermi gas EOS and single-fluid TOV equations. The value of the work depends on the correctness of the two-fluid hydrostatic and tidal calculations; the central quantitative claim (the f ≤ 0.2 exclusion) rests on the tidal-deformability curves, where the manuscript currently has a load-bearing technical gap.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (20) and final paragraph] The tidal Love number calculation is not valid for a two-fluid star as written. Equation (20) contains (ρ+p)/(dp/dρ), the single-fluid barotropic sound speed. In the two-fluid model p_tot = p_nm(ρ_nm) + p_dm(ρ_dm), with ρ_tot = ρ_nm + ρ_dm, but ρ_nm(r) and ρ_dm(r) are independent functions obtained from the separate TOV equations (7)–(10). Hence p_tot is not a function of ρ_tot alone and dp_tot/dρ_tot is undefined without an additional assumption. The linearized perturbation equations require separate displacement fields for the two fluids and two sound speeds; the single-fluid Hinderer equation cannot be applied by simply summing masses, densities, and pressures. The manuscript neither derives the two-fluid tidal equations nor cites a source for the reduction. Since Figs. 11 and 12, and the resulting statement that f ≥ 0.4 is excluded by GW170817 (and f ≤ 0.2 is consistent), are based o
  2. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (4), (7), and (11)] There is a factor-of-2 inconsistency in the definition of dν/dr. Equation (4) gives dν/dr = 2(m + 4πr^3 p)/(r(r−2m)), which is the standard relation for the metric exponent e^ν. In the two-fluid system, Eq. (11) gives dν/dr = (m_tot + 4πr^3 p_tot)/(r(r−2m_tot)) without the factor of 2, and Eq. (7) uses dP_nm/dr = −(P_nm + ρ_nm) dν/dr. If the equations are taken literally, the hydrostatic equilibrium equations are not the standard two-fluid TOV equations, and the ν′^2 term in Eq. (20) is inconsistent by a factor of 4. This must be corrected or explicitly clarified; all numerical results, including the mass–radius curves, are affected if the code follows the equations as written.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.5] Typo: 'IN GeV' should read 'in GeV'.
  2. [Figs. 5 and 6] The panels are labelled (a), (b), (c) in the captions, but the text refers to them as 'fig.5a' and similar. Please use standard subfigure references (e.g., 'Fig. 5a').
  3. [Sec. 2.3] The text states that four nuclear EOSs (SLy, MPA1, ENG, AP3) are used, but the admixed-star results are shown only for SLy and MPA1. Clarify why ENG and AP3 are not used in the DM-admixed analysis (or state that they are only used for the pure neutron-star comparison).
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption mentions a 'black horizontal line' indicating the 1.4 M⊙ radius span 11–13 km, but the figure appears to show a horizontal or vertical band. Please make the description of the plotted constraint explicit.
  5. [Sec. 4] The conclusion states that 'for f = 0.2, all of the Λ−M curves match the observational limitations of GW170817', but Figs. 11–12 display only μ = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 GeV. Indicate whether this statement holds for the full scanned μ range (0.2–1 GeV) or only for the plotted cases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: (µ, f) are scanned against external constraints, not fitted; the two-fluid tidal substitution in Sec. 2.2 is an unproven reduction, not a circular one.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation is not circular. The two-fluid TOV system (Eqs. 7-11) follows from the stated gravitational-only coupling (Eqs. 5-6); the DM EOS (Eqs. 25-29) is the standard zero-temperature ideal Fermi gas EOS cited to Oppenheimer and Volkoff, not fitted to NICER/GW170817 data. The parameters µ and f are scanned across a grid and then compared with external constraints (2 Msun pulsars, NICER radii, GW170817 Λ), so the conclusion that f ≤ 0.2 is a constraint statement, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The only load-bearing step that is internally unsupported is in Sec. 2.2: 'The parameters such as mass, energy density, and pressure involved in eq.(20) and eq.(22) are substituted by summation of nm and dm components when we consider the two-fluid model.' Because Eq. (20) contains (ρ+p)/(dp/dρ), the single-fluid adiabatic sound speed, this substitution is not defined for two independent fluids with two sound speeds, and the paper does not derive the two-fluid tidal equations or apply the existing two-fluid tidal formalism (e.g., Ref. [23]). This is a correctness/derivation gap in the tidal Love-number calculation, not a circular reduction: the resulting Λ-M curves are not equivalent to the paper's inputs by construction and are not forced by any self-citation. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central results rest on: (1) the gravitational-only two-fluid interaction, (2) the zero-temperature ideal Fermi gas DM EOS, (3) the validity of the four chosen nuclear EOSs, and (4) the unstated assumption that the standard single-fluid tidal Love number formalism extends to two-fluid stars by using summed density/pressure. Free parameters are µ, f (and the implied central DM density per star). The paper does not fit parameters to the constraints it uses, but it also does not provide an independent falsifiable prediction beyond the constraint region itself.

free parameters (3)
  • DM particle mass µ = scanned 0.2–1 GeV (text shows 0.5–0.7 GeV in figures)
    A free parameter of the model; the DM EOS (Eqs. 25-29) depends on µ and the paper scans over it. It is not fitted to the target data, but it is a free input.
  • DM mass fraction f = 0.0–0.8 in figures
    Ratio of DM mass to total star mass; treated as an adjustable parameter in the two-fluid construction and scanned to compare against constraints.
  • Central DM density ρ_c,dm (implied by f) = not stated explicitly
    The boundary condition (Eq. 15) must be tuned per star to achieve a target f; the paper gives no explicit mapping between f and ρ_c,dm, so this is an implicit free parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Two-fluid TOV equations: dark matter and baryonic matter interact only gravitationally (Eqs. 7-11)
    Sec. 2.1: the central modeling assumption. No non-gravitational interactions between DM and BM are allowed, which determines the whole structure calculation.
  • domain assumption Dark matter is an ideal, zero-temperature, non-interacting Fermi gas (Eqs. 25-29)
    Sec. 2.4: the DM EOS is the zero-temperature ideal Fermi gas EOS. This is a strong physical assumption that determines the DM density profiles and is arguably the reason for the paper's exclusion statement.
  • standard math Spherical symmetry and static equilibrium (Eq. 1)
    Sec. 2.1: the metric is static and spherically symmetric; standard for TOV.
  • domain assumption The four nuclear EOSs (SLy, MPA1, ENG, AP3) are valid representations of NM for the full stellar range
    Sec. 2.3: the paper inherits the nuclear EOSs from prior literature without assessing their uncertainty or extrapolation validity.
  • standard math Tidal deformability formalism of Hinderer / Damour-Nagar applies to two-fluid stars with summed energy density and pressure in Q(r)
    Sec. 2.2: the paper states 'the parameters ... are substituted by summation of nm and dm components' but does not justify that the standard single-fluid tidal equation remains valid for two interpenetrating fluids; this is an unproven extension.
invented entities (1)
  • No new entities are invented
    purpose: N/A
    The paper does not introduce a new particle, force, or conserved quantity; it uses existing fermionic DM candidates and existing nuclear matter models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of Fermionic Dark Matter on the Structural and Tidal Properties of Neutron Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6SHNT23U

@misc{pith2026251017905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of Fermionic Dark Matter on the Structural and Tidal Properties of Neutron Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6SHNT23U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.17905}
}
abstract

We investigate the influence of ideal Fermi gas dark matter on the observable properties of neutron stars (NSs). Our analysis considers dark matter (DM) particle masses ($\mu$) ranging from $0.2$ GeV to $1$ GeV and various DM mass fractions ($f$). By examining the coexistence of DM and baryonic matter (BM), we explore the formation of either a dense DM core or an extended dark halo within NSs. Our findings indicate that the resulting DM distribution depends critically on both $\mu$ and $f$. We systematically explore the parameter space of the fermionic DM model using two representative BM equations of state (EoSs) by applying constraints from NS radius measurements by the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER), observations of $2M_{\odot}$ NSs, and tidal deformability limits from the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration. This comprehensive analysis enables us to exclude specific ranges of $\mu$ and $f$, demonstrating that the amount of accumulated DM must be relatively small to satisfy current astrophysical constraints.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Imprints of Higgs-portal fermionic dark matter on neutron-star tidal deformability and the mass-radius slope

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dark matter inside a neutron star would push the tidal deformability at 1.4 solar masses below the nucleonic model band by 7.5-7.8 times the band width.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Rotation curves of spiral galaxies.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 39(1):137–174, 2001

    Yoshiaki Sofue and Vera Rubin. Rotation curves of spiral galaxies.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 39(1):137–174, 2001

    2001

  2. [2]

    The dark matter of gravitational lensing

    Richard Massey, Thomas Kitching, and Johan Richard. The dark matter of gravitational lensing. Reports on Progress in Physics, 73(8):086901, 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    Cosmic microwave background anisotropies.Annual Review of Astron- omy and Astrophysics, 40(1):171–216, 2002

    Wayne Hu and Scott Dodelson. Cosmic microwave background anisotropies.Annual Review of Astron- omy and Astrophysics, 40(1):171–216, 2002. 10

    2002

  4. [4]

    Search for coherent elastic scattering of solar b 8 neutrinos in the xenon1t dark matter experiment.Physical review letters, 126(9):091301, 2021

    Elena Aprile, Jelle Aalbers, F Agostini, S Ahmed Maouloud, M Alfonsi, L Althueser, FD Amaro, S Andaloro, Vasile C Antochi, E An- gelino, et al. Search for coherent elastic scattering of solar b 8 neutrinos in the xenon1t dark matter experiment.Physical review letters, 126(9):091301, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    First dark matter search results from the lux-zeplin (lz) experiment.Physical review letters, 131(4):041002, 2023

    Jelle Aalbers, DS Akerib, CW Akerlof, AK Al Musalhi, F Alder, A Alqahtani, SK Al- sum, CS Amarasinghe, A Ames, TJ Anderson, et al. First dark matter search results from the lux-zeplin (lz) experiment.Physical review letters, 131(4):041002, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Ex- otic dark matter search with the cdex-10 exper- iment at china’s jinping underground laboratory

    WH Dai, LP Jia, H Ma, Q Yue, KJ Kang, YJ Li, HP An, JP Chang, YH Chen, JP Cheng, et al. Ex- otic dark matter search with the cdex-10 exper- iment at china’s jinping underground laboratory. Physical Review Letters, 129(22):221802, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Masses, radii, and the equation of state of neutron stars.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54(1):401–440, 2016

    Feryal ¨Ozel and Paulo Freire. Masses, radii, and the equation of state of neutron stars.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54(1):401–440, 2016

    2016

  8. [8]

    Neutron-star tidal de- formability and equation-of-state constraints.Gen- eral Relativity and Gravitation, 52(11):109, 2020

    Katerina Chatziioannou. Neutron-star tidal de- formability and equation-of-state constraints.Gen- eral Relativity and Gravitation, 52(11):109, 2020

    2020

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Shapiro delay measurement of a two solar mass neutron star

    Paul Demorest, Tim Pennucci, Scott Ransom, Mal- lory Roberts, and Jason Hessels. Shapiro delay measurement of a two solar mass neutron star. arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.5788, 2010

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Gw170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical review letters, 119(16):161101, 2017

    Benjamin P Abbott, Rich Abbott, TDea Abbott, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical review letters, 119(16):161...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Neutron skins and neutron stars in the multimessenger era.Physical Review Letters, 120(17):172702, 2018

    FJ Fattoyev, J Piekarewicz, and Charles J Horowitz. Neutron skins and neutron stars in the multimessenger era.Physical Review Letters, 120(17):172702, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    New con- straints on radii and tidal deformabilities of neu- tron stars from gw170817.Physical Review Letters, 120(26):261103, 2018

    Elias R Most, Lukas R Weih, Luciano Rez- zolla, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich. New con- straints on radii and tidal deformabilities of neu- tron stars from gw170817.Physical Review Letters, 120(26):261103, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    Critical ex- amination of constraints on the equation of state of dense matter obtained from gw170817.Physical Review C, 98(4):045804, 2018

    I Tews, J Margueron, and S Reddy. Critical ex- amination of constraints on the equation of state of dense matter obtained from gw170817.Physical Review C, 98(4):045804, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Gw190814: Gravitational waves from the co- alescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object.The Astrophysical Jour- nal Letters, 896(2):L44, 2020

    Richard Abbott, TD Abbott, S Abraham, Fausto Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, Rana X Adhikari, VB Adya, Christoph Affeldt, Michail Agathos, et al. Gw190814: Gravitational waves from the co- alescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object.The Astrophysi...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Gw190814 as a massive rapidly rotating neutron star with exotic degrees of freedom.Phys- ical Review C, 103(2):025808, 2021

    V Dexheimer, RO Gomes, T Kl¨ ahn, S Han, and M Salinas. Gw190814 as a massive rapidly rotating neutron star with exotic degrees of freedom.Phys- ical Review C, 103(2):025808, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Gw190814’s sec- ondary component with mass 2.50–2.67m ⊙ as a superfast pulsar.The Astrophysical Journal, 902(1):38, 2020

    Nai-Bo Zhang and Bao-An Li. Gw190814’s sec- ondary component with mass 2.50–2.67m ⊙ as a superfast pulsar.The Astrophysical Journal, 902(1):38, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Could the 2.6m ⊙ object in gw190814 be a primordial black hole?Physical Review D, 102(6):061301, 2020

    Kyriakos Vattis, Isabelle S Goldstein, and Savvas M Koushiappas. Could the 2.6m ⊙ object in gw190814 be a primordial black hole?Physical Review D, 102(6):061301, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Was gw190814 a black hole– strange quark star system?Physical Review Let- ters, 126(16):162702, 2021

    I Bombaci, A Drago, D Logoteta, G Pagliara, and I Vida˜ na. Was gw190814 a black hole– strange quark star system?Physical Review Let- ters, 126(16):162702, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    A nicer view of psr j0030+ 0451: millisecond pulsar parame- ter estimation.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887(1):L21, 2019

    Thomas E Riley, Anna L Watts, Slavko Bogdanov, Paul S Ray, Renee M Ludlam, Sebastien Guillot, Zaven Arzoumanian, Charles L Baker, Anna V Bilous, Deepto Chakrabarty, et al. A nicer view of psr j0030+ 0451: millisecond pulsar parame- ter estimation.The Astrophysical Journal Lett...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Psr j0030+ 0451 mass and ra- dius from nicer data and implications for the prop- erties of neutron star matter.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887(1):L24, 2019

    MC Miller, Frederick K Lamb, AJ Dittmann, Slavko Bogdanov, Zaven Arzoumanian, Keith C Gendreau, S Guillot, AK Harding, WCG Ho, JM Lattimer, et al. Psr j0030+ 0451 mass and ra- dius from nicer data and implications for the prop- erties of neutron star matter.The Astrophysical J...

    2019

  13. [21]

    A nicer view of psr j0030+ 0451: Implications for the dense matter equa- tion of state.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887(1):L22, 2019

    Geert Raaijmakers, Thomas E Riley, Anna L Watts, SK Greif, SM Morsink, Kai Hebeler, Achim Schwenk, Tanja Hinderer, Samaya Nissanke, Se- bastien Guillot, et al. A nicer view of psr j0030+ 0451: Implications for the dense matter equa- tion of state.The Astrophysical Journal Lett...

    2019

  14. [22]

    Dark- matter admixed neutron stars.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(10):107301, 2011

    S-C Leung, M-C Chu, and L-M Lin. Dark- matter admixed neutron stars.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(10):107301, 2011

    2011

  15. [23]

    Tidal deformability of dark mat- ter admixed neutron stars.Physical Review D, 105(12):123010, 2022

    Kwing-Lam Leung, Ming-chung Chu, and Lap- Ming Lin. Tidal deformability of dark mat- ter admixed neutron stars.Physical Review D, 105(12):123010, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Dark matter admixed neutron stars

    Ben Kain. Dark matter admixed neutron stars. Physical Review D, 103(4):043009, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Dark matter effects on neutron star properties.Physical Review D, 97(12):123007, 2018

    John Ellis, Gert H¨ utsi, Kristjan Kannike, Luca Marzola, Martti Raidal, and Ville Vaskonen. Dark matter effects on neutron star properties.Physical Review D, 97(12):123007, 2018. 11

    2018

  18. [26]

    Effects of fermionic dark mat- ter on properties of neutron stars.Physical Review C, 89(2):025803, 2014

    Qian-Fei Xiang, Wei-Zhou Jiang, Dong-Rui Zhang, and Rong-Yao Yang. Effects of fermionic dark mat- ter on properties of neutron stars.Physical Review C, 89(2):025803, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Effects of dark matter on the nu- clear and neutron star matter.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 495(4):4893–4903, 2020

    Harish Chandra Das, Ankit Kumar, Bharat Ku- mar, S Kumar Biswal, Takashi Nakatsukasa, Ang Li, and SK Patra. Effects of dark matter on the nu- clear and neutron star matter.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 495(4):4893–4903, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neu- tron stars.Physical Review D, 96(8):083004, 2017

    Grigorios Panotopoulos and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neu- tron stars.Physical Review D, 96(8):083004, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Tidal deforma- bility as a probe of dark matter in neutron stars

    Davood Rafiei Karkevandi, Soroush Shakeri, Vio- letta Sagun, and Oleksii Ivanytskyi. Tidal deforma- bility as a probe of dark matter in neutron stars. In The Sixteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Re- cent Developments in Theoretical and Experimen- tal General Relativity, Astro...

    2021

  22. [30]

    Dark mat- ter effects on the properties of neutron stars: Com- pactness and tidal deformability.Physical Review D, 110(2):023024, 2024

    Hong-Ming Liu, Jin-Biao Wei, Zeng-Hua Li, GF Burgio, HC Das, and H-J Schulze. Dark mat- ter effects on the properties of neutron stars: Com- pactness and tidal deformability.Physical Review D, 110(2):023024, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    On massive neutron cores.Physical Review, 55(4):374, 1939

    J Robert Oppenheimer and George M Volkoff. On massive neutron cores.Physical Review, 55(4):374, 1939

    1939

  24. [32]

    Have neutron stars a dark matter core?Physics Letters B, 695(1- 4):19–21, 2011

    Paolo Ciarcelluti and Fredrik Sandin. Have neutron stars a dark matter core?Physics Letters B, 695(1- 4):19–21, 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    The Effects of Dark Matter upon Neutron Stars’ Properties.HNPS Adv

    Michael Vikiaris. The Effects of Dark Matter upon Neutron Stars’ Properties.HNPS Adv. Nucl. Phys., 29:208–214, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Tidal love numbers of neutron stars.The Astrophysical Journal, 677(2):1216, 2008

    Tanja Hinderer. Tidal love numbers of neutron stars.The Astrophysical Journal, 677(2):1216, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    Relativis- tic tidal properties of neutron stars.Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology, 80(8):084035, 2009

    Thibault Damour and Alessandro Nagar. Relativis- tic tidal properties of neutron stars.Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology, 80(8):084035, 2009

    2009

  28. [36]

    Tidal love numbers of neutron and self- bound quark stars.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 82(2):024016, 2010

    Sergey Postnikov, Madappa Prakash, and James M Lattimer. Tidal love numbers of neutron and self- bound quark stars.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 82(2):024016, 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2014

    Eric Poisson and Clifford M Will.Gravity: Newto- nian, post-newtonian, relativistic. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2014

    2014

  30. [38]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel. A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 380:151–167, 2001

    2001

  31. [39]

    The nuclear symmetry energy in relativistic brueckner- hartree-fock calculations.Physics Letters B, 199(4):469–474, 1987

    H M¨ uther, M Prakash, and TL Ainsworth. The nuclear symmetry energy in relativistic brueckner- hartree-fock calculations.Physics Letters B, 199(4):469–474, 1987

    1987

  32. [40]

    Asymmetric nuclear matter and neutron star properties.arXiv preprint nucl- th/9509016, 1995

    L Engvik, G Bao, M Hjorth-Jensen, E Osnes, and E Oestaard. Asymmetric nuclear matter and neutron star properties.arXiv preprint nucl- th/9509016, 1995

    1995

  33. [41]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Raven- hall. Equation of state of nucleon matter and neu- tron star structure.Physical Review C, 58:1804– 1828, 1998

    1998

  34. [42]

    Psr j0952- 0607: The fastest and heaviest known galactic neutron star.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 934(2):L17, 2022

    Roger W Romani, D Kandel, Alexei V Filippenko, Thomas G Brink, and WeiKang Zheng. Psr j0952- 0607: The fastest and heaviest known galactic neutron star.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 934(2):L17, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Re- fined mass and geometric measurements of the high-mass psr j0740+ 6620.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 915(1):L12, 2021

    Emmanuel Fonseca, H Thankful Cromartie, Tim- othy T Pennucci, Paul S Ray, A Yu Kirichenko, Scott M Ransom, Paul B Demorest, Ingrid H Stairs, Zaven Arzoumanian, Lucas Guillemot, et al. Re- fined mass and geometric measurements of the high-mass psr j0740+ 6620.The Astrophysical ...

    2021

  36. [44]

    A massive pul- sar in a compact relativistic binary.Science, 340(6131):1233232, 2013

    John Antoniadis, Paulo CC Freire, Norbert Wex, Thomas M Tauris, Ryan S Lynch, Marten H Van Kerkwijk, Michael Kramer, Cees Bassa, Vik S Dhillon, Thomas Driebe, et al. A massive pul- sar in a compact relativistic binary.Science, 340(6131):1233232, 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state.Physical review letters, 121(16):161101, 2018

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, TD Ab- bott, F Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, T Adams, P Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state.Physical review letters, 121(16):161101, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Are small radii of com- pact stars ruled out by gw170817/at2017gfo?The Astrophysical Journal, 860(2):139, 2018

    GF Burgio, Alessandro Drago, Giuseppe Pagliara, H-J Schulze, and J-B Wei. Are small radii of com- pact stars ruled out by gw170817/at2017gfo?The Astrophysical Journal, 860(2):139, 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+ 6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918(2):L27, 2021

    Thomas E Riley, Anna L Watts, Paul S Ray, Slavko Bogdanov, Sebastien Guillot, Sharon M Morsink, Anna V Bilous, Zaven Arzoumanian, Devarshi Choudhury, Julia S Deneva, et al. A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+ 6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy....

    2021

  40. [48]

    The radius of psr j0740+ 6620 from nicer and xmm- newton data.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 12 918(2):L28, 2021

    M Coleman Miller, FK Lamb, AJ Dittmann, S Bog- danov, Z Arzoumanian, KC Gendreau, S Guillot, WCG Ho, JM Lattimer, M Loewenstein, et al. The radius of psr j0740+ 6620 from nicer and xmm- newton data.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 12 918(2):L28, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Annala et al

    E. Annala et al. Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter equation of state.Physical Review Letters, 120:172703, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.