Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

One-at-a-time: A Meta-Learning Recommender-System for Recommendation-Algorithm Selection on Micro Level

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.12118 v3 pith:6SN7SORY submitted 2018-05-30 cs.IR

One-at-a-time: A Meta-Learning Recommender-System for Recommendation-Algorithm Selection on Micro Level

classification cs.IR
keywords algorithmapproachdatasetsevaluationrmsealgorithmsbestlevel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The effectiveness of recommendation algorithms is typically assessed with evaluation metrics such as root mean square error, F1, or click through rates, calculated over entire datasets. The best algorithm is typically chosen based on these overall metrics. However, there is no single-best algorithm for all users, items, and contexts. Choosing a single algorithm based on overall evaluation results is not optimal. In this paper, we propose a meta-learning-based approach to recommendation, which aims to select the best algorithm for each user-item pair. We evaluate our approach using the MovieLens 100K and 1M datasets. Our approach (RMSE, 100K: 0.973; 1M: 0.908) did not outperform the single-best algorithm, SVD++ (RMSE, 100K: 0.942; 1M: 0.887). We also develop a distinction between meta-learners that operate per-instance (micro-level), per-data subset (mid-level), and per-dataset (global level). Our evaluation shows that a hypothetically perfect micro-level meta-learner would improve RMSE by 25.5% for the MovieLens 100K and 1M datasets, compared to the overall-best algorithms used.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RouteRec: Strict Evaluation of Recommender-Agent Selection and Aggregation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    On MovieLens-1M, request-level hard selection of recommender agents underperforms BM25, while item-level learned shortlist aggregation matches or beats it and improves further with gated LLM use.