Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Abominable greenhouse gas bookkeeping casts serious doubts on climate intentions of oil and gas companies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.11906 v1 pith:6SQX73S7 submitted 2023-05-17 physics.soc-ph physics.ao-ph

Abominable greenhouse gas bookkeeping casts serious doubts on climate intentions of oil and gas companies

classification physics.soc-ph physics.ao-ph
keywords companiessectorbookkeepingbreakdownsclimatedatadisclosureemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The Paris Agreement aims to reach net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the second half of the 21st century, and the Oil & Gas sector plays a key role in achieving this transition. Understanding progress in emission reductions in the private sector relies on the disclosure of corporate climate-related data, and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) is considered a leader in this area. Companies report voluntarily to CDP, providing total emissions and breakdowns into categories. How reliable are these accounts? Here, we show that their reliability is likely very poor. A significant proportion of Oil & Gas companies' emission reports between 2010 and 2019 fail a 'simple summation' mathematical test that identifies if the breakdowns add up to the totals. Companies' reports reflect unbalanced internal bookkeeping in 38.9% of cases, which suggests worryingly low quality standards for data guiding the private sector's contribution to halting climate change.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scope3Trace: Evidence-Based Identification and Extraction of Scope 3 GHG Emissions from Sustainability Reports

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Scope3Trace extracts Scope 1–3 emissions from ESG reports with page-level evidence links, and ships a dual-level organization/building dataset.