Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Hot Carrier Dynamics in Operational Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bias and illumination geometry control how fast hot carriers cool in an operating triple-halide perovskite solar cell, with current extraction shortening cooling times and open-circuit conditions preserving them.

desk verdict Bias-resolved hot-carrier TA on a working perovskite cell is a real step forward, but the cooling-time numbers hinge on an admittedly 'qualitative' tail fit with no error bars; worth refereeing, not deserting. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13745 v1 pith:6SRBFWBE submitted 2024-11-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hadi Afshari , Varun Mapara , Shashi Sourabh , Megh N. Khanal , Vincent R. Whiteside , Rebecca A. Scheidt , Matthew C. Beard , Giles E. Eperon
show 2 more authors
Ian R. Sellers Madalina Furis
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hotcarriersperovskitesolarcellstransientabsorptionspectroscopycarriercoolingphononbottleneckthermalizationdynamicstriple-halideoperatingbias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hot carriers—high-energy electrons and holes created when a solar cell absorbs above-band-gap light—usually dump their excess energy as heat within picoseconds, and that loss is one of the biggest penalties in photovoltaics. This paper reports that in a working triple-halide perovskite solar cell, how fast those carriers cool is not fixed: it depends on the electrical operating point and on which side of the device the light enters. Using high-power transient absorption under biases matching short-circuit, maximum-power, and open-circuit conditions, the authors find that extracting current shortens the carrier cooling time, while open-circuit conditions keep the carriers hot longer. They also find that illumination through the front (hole-transport) side produces visibly hotter carrier distributions than illumination through the back (electron-transport) side. If correct, this means hot-carrier behavior measured on uncontacted films is only part of the story, and device-level operation must be included to know whether hot-carrier solar cells can actually work.

What carries the argument

The central object is the carrier temperature Tc extracted from the high-energy tail of the transient absorption (TA) spectrum using a Maxwell-Boltzmann tail fit (Eq. 2), a standard readout for hot-carrier populations. This fit converts the slope of the TA tail into a single effective temperature at each pump-probe delay, and the time decay of Tc is then fit with a biexponential to yield two cooling times, τ1 (fast intraband relaxation) and τ2 (slow heat dissipation). The other load-bearing element is the device itself: a full triple-halide perovskite solar cell with transport layers, contacted and biased at Jsc, Vmax, and Voc, and illuminated from either the front (through the hole transport layer) or the back (through the electron transport layer). These choices let the authors separate material-level thermalization from device-level extraction and transport effects.

What would settle it

The central claim would be falsified if, in a device where the extracted current is changed while the applied bias is held constant (by varying illumination intensity at fixed voltage), the carrier cooling times remained unchanged; that would show bias, not current extraction, controls thermalization. A simpler check is to measure cooling times on the same perovskite film without transport layers under an applied electric field: if the bias dependence disappears, the effect requires the full device interfaces, not the perovskite alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that carrier thermalization in operational triple-halide perovskite (FA0.8Cs0.2Pb1.02I2.4Br0.6Cl0.02) solar cells is modulated by external bias and excitation geometry. Carrier temperatures Tc extracted from the high-energy tail of transient absorption spectra reach about 5000 K at 0.4 ps for the highest fluence (20 W/cm2), then relax through a fast component of 3–5 ps and a slower component of 10–120 ps. At high power, both cooling times are shorter when the cell is biased near short circuit (VJsc ≈ 0.02 V) or at the maximum power point (Vmax ≈ 0.8 V) than when the cell is left at open circuit with no extracted current; VJsc gives the shortest cooling time. Front-side illumination yields higher carrier temperatures than back-side illumination at the same fluence (e.g., ~4700 K vs ~3600 K at 0.4 ps and 20 W/cm2), which the authors attribute to greater absorption in the perovskite and a stronger carrier-density-dependent hot-phonon bottleneck. The paper interprets these results as a complex interplay among carrier density, field-assisted transport, extraction, and non-equivalent electron/hole thermalization in the full device architecture.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the high-energy tail of the transient absorption signal is a faithful, linear measure of the hot-carrier distribution, so fitting it with a single Maxwell-Boltzmann temperature gives a true carrier temperature; if that tail is contaminated by other optical effects, the cooling times extracted from it would not describe carrier thermalization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At a device's maximum power point, current extraction measurably shortens hot-carrier cooling, so hot-carrier harvesting schemes must account for the operating bias, not just the absorber material.
  • Open-circuit conditions preserve hot carriers longer, meaning hot-carrier lifetime measurements on uncontacted films or at Voc overestimate the carrier populations available during power-producing operation.
  • Front-side vs back-side illumination changes both the peak carrier temperature and the cooling times, so reported hot-carrier parameters for a device depend on which interface the light enters.
  • The power dependence of the fast cooling component (longer τ1 at higher fluence) is consistent with a hot-phonon bottleneck that can be weakened by extracting carriers before they sustain the phonon population.
  • At high excitation, the maximum-power bias can even produce higher carrier temperatures at 0.4 ps than open circuit, indicating that early-time carrier-carrier interactions and band-gap renormalization are also bias-sensitive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's bias dependence suggests a design tension: hot carriers survive best near open circuit, but useful power is extracted near Vmax or short circuit, so a hot-carrier perovskite cell may need to slow cooling by other means (e.g., phonon engineering or selective contacts) rather than relying on operating point alone.
  • Because back-side illumination produces cooler carriers but longer cooling times, the published literature's hot-carrier numbers for perovskite solar cells likely mix different interfaces; comparing studies will require specifying illumination geometry as a standard parameter.
  • A clean test would be to vary the extracted current independently of the applied voltage (e.g., by tuning light intensity while holding bias fixed); if cooling times track extracted current rather than voltage, the extraction-driven phonon-bottleneck picture is confirmed.
  • If hot-carrier extraction is indeed more efficient when carriers stay hot longer, then electron- and hole-selective contacts with asymmetric hot-carrier collection could exploit the front/back asymmetry reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports transient absorption measurements on operational triple-halide perovskite solar cells at biases corresponding to VJsc, Vmax, and Voc, for both front- and back-side illumination. Carrier temperatures are extracted from the high-energy tail of the TA spectra using a Maxwell-Boltzmann tail fit (Eq. 2), and the time dependence of Tc is fit with multi-exponential decays to obtain fast (τ1) and slow (τ2) cooling times. The main claims are that cooling times are shorter when current is extracted (VJsc and Vmax) than at open circuit, and that front-side illumination yields faster cooling than back-side illumination; these trends are attributed to the interplay of carrier density, phonon bottleneck, transport, and extraction.

Significance. The work addresses a relevant question—hot-carrier dynamics under realistic operating bias—and provides rare full-device data with both illumination geometries, along with transfer-matrix calculations that support the interpretation of differential absorption. The tail-fitting method is an external standard in the hot-carrier community, and the bias-dependent dataset is potentially valuable. However, the quantitative headline ordering of cooling times is not yet supported with statistical rigor, and the paper's own 'qualitative' caveat plus the known PIA contamination leave the central metric only weakly secured.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Figure 5 and S3 caption] The central bias- and geometry-dependent cooling times are extracted from multi-exponential fits whose order is chosen post hoc: the S3 caption explicitly permits tri- or tetra-exponential fits when a biexponential is not possible, and no residuals, fit ranges, or confidence intervals are shown for τ1 and τ2 in Figure 5. Because τ1 spans 3–5 ps and τ2 spans 10–120 ps across conditions, the apparent ordering (shorter cooling with current extraction, faster cooling for front-side illumination) cannot be distinguished from fit ambiguity. The authors should provide fit statistics, uncertainties, and a fixed fitting protocol, or restrict the claims to qualitative trends.
  2. [Results, Eq. (2) and Fig. 3(a)] The extraction of Tc relies on the assumption that the high-energy tail of ΔT/T is a linear measure of the hot-carrier occupation with a single quasi-Fermi level, yet the paper calls this 'simple tail fitting' giving a 'qualitative assessment' and notes the presence of above-band-gap PIA attributed to refractive-index changes in the same spectral region. If the fitted window contains PIA, the slope is not 1/kBTc and the reported Tc(t) curves lose quantitative meaning. Please add a sensitivity analysis of the fit window, exclude or model the PIA contribution, or explicitly downgrade the quantitative cooling-time claims.
  3. [Results, Figure 5(b),(d)] The text states that only the fast component τ1 relates to hot-carrier dynamics, while τ2 may reflect lattice heating and the low thermal conductivity of the perovskite, yet τ2 is presented in Figure 5 as a cooling time and is included in the bias-dependent comparison. The paper should clarify whether the claim 'carrier thermalization is modulated by carrier extraction' refers to τ1 alone; if so, the τ2 comparisons should be presented as a separate, non-hot-carrier observation rather than as part of the central cooling-time result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) appears to have a sign error: writing -ΔA(ℏω) = -A0(ℏω) exp(...) implies ΔA = A0 exp(...), which is inconsistent with the text's convention that the high-energy tail of the bleach decays with increasing energy; this should be corrected.
  2. [Data Availability] The data availability statement contains the placeholder 'xmlui.XMLWorkflow.default.def-editstep.claimaction' rather than a working repository link; please provide the actual SHAREOK URL.
  3. [References] Reference 49 is an MRS meeting abstract with incomplete author information; if it is the only support for the 'non-equivalent carrier dynamics' of HTL/perovskite and ETL/perovskite substacks, please cite the published version or provide full details.
  4. [Figure 1(c) caption] The figure caption does not specify whether the J-V curves are measured under 1-sun AM1.5G in the same operating configuration as the TA bias points; please state whether forward/reverse scans and the indicated voltages refer to this specific device.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bias- and geometry-dependent cooling times are empirical extractions from TA tail fits, not predictions forced by the model's inputs.

full rationale

The paper's chain is: transient absorption spectra at fixed delays; extraction of Tc from the high-energy tail slope using the externally established Maxwell-Boltzmann relation (Eqs. 1-2); biexponential fitting of Tc(t) to obtain tau1 and tau2; and comparison of those fitted times across bias and illumination side. At no point is the conclusion (faster cooling at VJsc/Vmax than at Voc, or front vs back differences) used to define or constrain the extracted temperatures or time constants. The tail-fitting procedure is a standard measurement model with an explicit 'qualitative assessment' caveat, so any concern about PIA contamination or the single-temperature assumption is a validity/correctness issue, not a circularity. The transfer-matrix simulation (Fig. S4) independently supports the front/back absorption interpretation. Citations to the authors' prior work ([27], [33], [49]) provide context and supporting observations but are not load-bearing: none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the source of the central fitted parameters. Thus the central empirical claims stand on the data analysis itself, and no step reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative results are fit parameters (Tc, tau1, tau2). The physical interpretation depends on the domain assumption that TA tail fitting yields a meaningful carrier temperature in a full device stack.

free parameters (5)
  • Tc (carrier temperature) = ~1000-5000 K depending on power, delay, and bias
    Fitted to the high-energy tail of each TA spectrum using Eq. (2).
  • EF (quasi-Fermi level) = Not reported
    The tail fit in Eq. (2) requires EF; the paper does not specify how EF is set or fitted.
  • tau1 (fast cooling time) = ~3-5 ps
    Extracted from exponential fits to the Tc(t) decay.
  • tau2 (slow cooling time) = ~10-120 ps
    Extracted from exponential fits to the Tc(t) decay; the paper later questions whether it represents hot-carrier dynamics or lattice heating.
  • Fit order (bi/tri/tetra-exponential) = 2, 3, or 4 chosen per dataset
    Figure S3 caption states that if a biexponential fit is not possible, triexponential or four-exponential functions are used.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The high-energy tail of the transient absorption signal is proportional to the hot carrier occupation and follows a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with a single temperature Tc.
    Used in Eq. (2) and tail fits in Fig. 3(a); the paper calls it 'simple tail fitting' and says it gives a 'qualitative assessment'.
  • domain assumption The TA response is a linear probe of carrier population without significant contributions from photobleach narrowing, photo-induced absorption, or transport during the measurement window.
    Assumed in interpreting the TA heat maps, though the text acknowledges competing effects such as Burstein-Moss and band gap renormalization.
  • domain assumption Applied bias values VJsc=0.02 V and Vmax=0.8 V from 1-sun J-V correspond to the short-circuit and maximum-power operating points under high-fluence pulsed excitation.
    The TA measurements use a 442 nm pulsed pump at up to 20 W/cm2, much higher fluence than 1-sun AM1.5, so the device operating point may differ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hot Carrier Dynamics in Operational Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6SRBFWBE

@misc{pith2026241113745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hot Carrier Dynamics in Operational Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6SRBFWBE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13745}
}
read the original abstract

One of the main approaches to inhibit carrier cooling in semiconductor systems enabling the study of hot carrier solar cell protocols is the use of concentrated illumination to obtain high power densities and create a phonon bottleneck. This, however, typically also increases the lattice temperature of the solar cells significantly. Accordingly, the solar cells subject to high concentration illumination also need to withstand high operating temperatures. Having previously demonstrated the high temperature tolerance of the triple halide perovskite (FA0.8Cs0.2Pb1.02I2.4Br0.6Cl0.02) solar cells, here the hot carrier relaxation dynamics are studied in these devices using high power transient absorption (TA) measurements. In addition to monitoring TA spectra obtained at different time delays, the thermalization mechanisms of hot carriers is mapped with power dependent TA to extract the carrier cooling time in this system under in-operando conditions at various bias conditions that reflect the Jsc, Vmax and Voc of these structures, and subsequently deconvolve the underlying physics of carrier relaxation; as well as track the dynamics of the thermalization close to working conditions of the solar cells. These measurements uncover a complex interaction of hot carrier thermalization involving the temporal carrier density, transport, and extraction, and apparent non-equivalent contributions with respect to non-equilibrium photogenerated electrons and holes in these metal halide perovskite solar cell architectures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Comptes Rendus Physique, 2017

    Lincot, D., The new paradigm of photovoltaics: From powering satellites to powering humanity. Comptes Rendus Physique, 2017. 18(7-8): p. 381-390

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Fraas, L.M. and L.D. Partain, Solar cells and their applications. 2010: John Wiley & Sons

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Toledo, C. and A. Scognamiglio, Agrivoltaic systems design and assessment: A critical review, and a descriptive model towards a sustainable landscape vision (three -dimensional agrivoltaic patterns). Sustainability, 2021. 13(12): p. 6871

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021

    Trommsdorff, M., et al., Combining food and energy production: Design of an agrivoltaic system applied in arable and vegetable farming in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021. 140: p. 110694

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Solar energy, 2016

    Birnie III, D.P., Analysis of energy capture by vehicle solar roofs in conjunction with workplace plug -in charging. Solar energy, 2016. 125: p. 219-226

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Journal of Solar Energy Research, 2018

    Mohammadi, F., Design, analysis, and electrification of a solar -powered electric vehicle. Journal of Solar Energy Research, 2018. 3(4): p. 293-299

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    2023, SAE Technical Paper

    Miyamoto, Y., et al., Development of 2nd-Generation Solar Charging System and Generating Performance in the USA. 2023, SAE Technical Paper

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Hirst, L.C. and N.J. Ekins‐Daukes, Fundamental losses in solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2011. 19(3): p. 286-293

    work page 2011

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Kirchartz, T. and U. Rau, What makes a good solar cell? Advanced energy materials, 2018. 8(28): p. 1703385

    2018

  2. [10]

    Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2021

    Zhang, Y., et al., A review on thermalization mechanisms and prospect absorber materials for the hot carrier solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2021. 225: p. 111073

    2021

  3. [11]

    Journal of Applied Physics, 2021

    Yamaguchi, M., et al., Multi-junction solar cells paving the way for super high-efficiency. Journal of Applied Physics, 2021. 129(24)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Dimroth, F. and S. Kurtz, High-efficiency multijunction solar cells. MRS bulletin, 2007. 32(3): p. 230-235

    2007

  5. [13]

    Nature Energy, 2020

    Esmaielpour, H., et al., Exploiting intervalley scattering to harness hot carriers in III –V solar cells. Nature Energy, 2020. 5(4): p. 336-343

    2020

  6. [14]

    Whiteside, and I.R

    Ferry, D.K., V.R. Whiteside, and I.R. Sellers, Pathways to hot carrier solar cells. Journal of Photonics for Energy, 2022. 12(2): p. 022204-022204

    2022

  7. [15]

    Nature Photonics, 2016

    Yang, Y., et al., Observation of a hot-phonon bottleneck in lead-iodide perovskites. Nature Photonics, 2016. 10(1): p. 53-59

    2016

  8. [16]

    ACS Energy Letters, 2023

    Lin, W., et al., Carrier Cooling in Lead Halide Perovskites: A Perspective on Hot Carrier Solar Cells. ACS Energy Letters, 2023. 9(1): p. 298-307

    2023

  9. [17]

    Kahmann, S. and M.A. Loi, Hot carrier solar cells and the potential of perovskites for breaking the Shockley– Queisser limit. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2019. 7(9): p. 2471-2486

    2019

  10. [18]

    Esmaielpour, H., Type-II Quantum Well Hot Carrier Solar Cells. 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2024

    Esmaielpour, H., et al., Strong Dimensional and Structural Dependencies of Hot Carrier Effects in InGaAs Nanowires: Implications for Photovoltaic Solar Cells. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    ACS nano, 2023

    Baker, H., et al., Breaking phonon bottlenecks through efficient auger processes in perovskite nanocrystals. ACS nano, 2023. 17(4): p. 3913-3920

    2023

  13. [21]

    11(7): p

    Lim, J.W.M., et al., Hot carriers in halide perovskites: How hot truly? The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2020. 11(7): p. 2743-2750

    2020

  14. [22]

    Tailoring hot carrier effects in semiconductor nanowires by spatial confinement

    Esmaielpour, H., et al. Tailoring hot carrier effects in semiconductor nanowires by spatial confinement. in Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices XIII. 2024. SPIE

    2024

  15. [23]

    Physical Review B, 2024

    Esmaielpour, H., et al., Influence of Auger heating and Shockley -Read-Hall recombination on hot -carrier dynamics in InGaAs nanowires. Physical Review B, 2024. 109(23): p. 235303. 17

    2024

  16. [24]

    Science advances, 2020

    Wang, T., et al., Protecting hot carriers by tuning hybrid perovskite structures with alkali cations. Science advances, 2020. 6(43): p. eabb1336

    2020

  17. [25]

    Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2015

    Conibeer, G., et al., Hot carrier solar cell absorber prerequisites and candidate material systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2015. 135: p. 124-129

    2015

  18. [26]

    Science, 2013

    Xing, G., et al., Long-range balanced electron -and hole -transport lengths in organic -inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science, 2013. 342(6156): p. 344-347

    2013

  19. [27]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2024

    Sourabh, S., et al., Evidence of hot carrier extraction in metal halide perovskite solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    ACS Energy Letters, 2024

    van de Ven, L.J., et al., Cation Influence on Hot -Carrier Relaxation in Tin Triiodide Perovskite Thin Films. ACS Energy Letters, 2024. 9: p. 992-999

    2024

  21. [29]

    Energy & Environmental Science, 2024

    Gong, S., et al., A hot carrier perovskite solar cell with efficiency exceeding 27% enabled by ultrafast hot hole transfer with phthalocyanine derivatives. Energy & Environmental Science, 2024. 17(14): p. 5080 - 5090

    2024

  22. [30]

    Diroll, B.T. and R.D. Schaller, Intraband cooling in all‐inorganic and hybrid organic –inorganic perovskite nanocrystals. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019. 29(37): p. 1901725

    2019

  23. [31]

    Physical Review B, 2018

    Mondal, A., et al., Ultrafast exciton many-body interactions and hot-phonon bottleneck in colloidal cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Physical Review B, 2018. 98(11): p. 115418

    2018

  24. [32]

    Nature communications, 2018

    Fang, H.-H., et al., Long-lived hot-carrier light emission and large blue shift in formamidinium tin triiodide perovskites. Nature communications, 2018. 9(1): p. 243

    2018

  25. [33]

    ACS Energy Letters, 2023

    Afshari, H., et al., FACsPb Triple Halide Perovskite Solar Cells with Thermal Operation over 200° C. ACS Energy Letters, 2023. 8(5): p. 2408-2413

    2023

  26. [34]

    Nature communications, 2017

    Fu, J., et al., Hot carrier cooling mechanisms in halide perovskites. Nature communications, 2017. 8(1): p. 1-9

    2017

  27. [35]

    IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2020

    Chauhan, K.K., et al., Hot phonon and auger heating mediated slow intraband carrier relaxation in mixed halide perovskite. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2020. 57(1): p. 1-8

    2020

  28. [36]

    Nanomaterials, 2020

    Franco, C.V., et al., Charge Carrier Relaxation in Colloidal FAPbI3 Nanostructures Using Global Analysis. Nanomaterials, 2020. 10(10): p. 1897

    2020

  29. [37]

    Nature communications, 2017

    Yang, J., et al., Acoustic-optical phonon up -conversion and hot -phonon bottleneck in lead -halide perovskites. Nature communications, 2017. 8(1): p. 14120

    2017

  30. [38]

    Nature communications, 2021

    Yin, J., et al., Manipulation of hot carrier cooling dynamics in two -dimensional Dion –Jacobson hybrid perovskites via Rashba band splitting. Nature communications, 2021. 12(1): p. 3995

    2021

  31. [39]

    Nature communications, 2015

    Price, M.B., et al., Hot-carrier cooling and photoinduced refractive index changes in organic–inorganic lead halide perovskites. Nature communications, 2015. 6(1): p. 8420

    2015

  32. [40]

    Monte Carlo simulation of ultrafast carrier relaxation in type I and type II InAs-based quantum wells

    Baranowski, I., et al. Monte Carlo simulation of ultrafast carrier relaxation in type I and type II InAs-based quantum wells. in Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices XII. 2023. SPIE

    2023

  33. [41]

    Journal of Applied Physics, 2020

    Giteau, M., et al., Identification of surface and volume hot-carrier thermalization mechanisms in ultrathin GaAs layers. Journal of Applied Physics, 2020. 128(19)

    2020

  34. [42]

    IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2012

    Le Bris, A., et al., Hot carrier solar cells: controlling thermalization in ultrathin devices. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2012. 2(4): p. 506-511

    2012

  35. [43]

    Physical Review Materials, 2021

    Sourabh, S., et al., Hot carrier redistribution, electron -phonon interaction, and their role in carrier relaxation in thin film metal-halide perovskites. Physical Review Materials, 2021. 5(9): p. 095402

    2021

  36. [44]

    Johnston, M.B. and L.M. Herz, Hybrid perovskites for photovoltaics: charge -carrier recombination, diffusion, and radiative efficiencies. Accounts of chemical research, 2016. 49(1): p. 146-154

    2016

  37. [45]

    Advanced Photonics Research, 2022

    Furasova, A., et al., Nanophotonics for perovskite solar cells. Advanced Photonics Research, 2022. 3(9): p. 2100326

    2022

  38. [46]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020

    Esmaielpour, H., et al., Role of Exciton Binding Energy on LO Phonon Broadening and Polaron Formation in (BA) 2PbI4 Ruddlesden–Popper Films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020. 124(17): p. 9496-9505. 18

    2020

  39. [47]

    Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 2020

    Sourabh, S., et al., Hot Carrier Dynamics in Bulk and 2D Perovskites. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 2020. 65

    2020

  40. [48]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications,

    Zhang, Y., et al., Review of the mechanisms for the phonon bottleneck effect in III –V semiconductors and their application for efficient hot carrier solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications,

  41. [49]

    Rebecca Scheidt, B. and G.E. Wieliczka, Ian R. Sellers, Joseph Luther and Matthew C. Beard, Exploring the Effects of Dimensionality and In Situ Solar Cell Behavior on Hot Carriers in Lead Halide Perovskites. MRS Spring Meeting, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018

    Brown, C., et al., Potential of high-stability perovskite solar cells for low-intensity–low-temperature (LILT) outer planetary space missions. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018. 2(1): p. 814-821

    2018

  43. [51]

    Afshari, H., et al., Temperature-Dependent Carrier Extraction and the Effects of Excitons on Emission and Photovoltaic Performance in Cs0. 05FA0. 79MA0. 16Pb (I0. 83Br0. 17) 3 Solar Cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022. 14(39): p. 44358-44366. 19 Supporting Informat...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.