Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0511431 v1 pith:6SXIWG2Z submitted 2005-11-15 astro-ph

Masses and Radii of Low-Mass Stars: Theory versus Observations

classification astro-ph
keywords massesobservedradiistarsbinarieseclipsingm-typemsun
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Eclipsing binaries with M-type components are still rare objects. Strong observational biases have made that today only a few eclipsing binaries with component masses below 0.6 Msun and well-determined fundamental properties are known. However, even in these small numbers the detailed comparison of the observed masses and radii with theoretical predictions has revealed large disagreements. Current models seem to predict radii of stars in the 0.4-0.8 Msun range to be some 5-15% smaller than observed. Given the high accuracy of the empirical measurements (a few percent in both mass and radius), these differences are highly significant. I review all the observational evidence on the properties of M-type stars and discuss a possible scenario based on stellar activity to explain the observed discrepancies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Testing the reliability of magnetic field strength measurements for M dwarfs

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Synthetic spectra tests show Zeeman broadening recovers M dwarf magnetic field strengths more reliably with joint abundance fitting and WAIC selection than with free line strengths or BIC/AIC, which underestimate by 3...