Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 97 references

MeshMamba: State Space Models for Articulated 3D Mesh Generation and Reconstruction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read MeshMamba shows that Mamba state space models, with a body-aware vertex ordering, can generate and reconstruct dense articulated 3D meshes with more than 10,000 vertices, including clothing and hands.

desk verdict A genuine Mamba-for-meshes architecture with credible whole-body HMR results, but the generation SOTA claim rests on a thin margin over the authors' own baseline with no error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15212 v1 pith:6TGAWKC7 submitted 2025-07-21 cs.CV

Yusuke Yoshiyasu , Leyuan Sun , Ryusuke Sagawa This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords articulatedmeshgenerationstatespacemodelsMambahumanrecoverydiffusionvertexserializationwhole-bodyposeestimationclothedmeshes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that Mamba state space models, previously used for long sequences in language and vision, can serve as the backbone for dense articulated 3D meshes if the mesh vertices are serialized in an order that respects body structure. The proposed MeshMamba architecture scales to meshes with over 10,000 vertices, which transformer-based vertex approaches could not handle without upsampling, and it supports both unconditional generation of clothed bodies with grasping hands and single-image whole-body mesh recovery. If the claim holds, Mamba offers a near-linear-complexity alternative to transformers for vertex-level 3D shape modeling, making dense whole-body avatars practical in near real time.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is vertex serialization: mesh vertices are sorted into a one-dimensional sequence using DensePose body-part IUV maps or template xyz coordinates (with axis-order variations), so the selective scanning of Mamba can exploit body structure. The architecture stacks Mamba blocks with skip connections, uses the v-prediction diffusion objective for generation, and for smooth surfaces solves a Poisson system that blends generated vertex positions with predicted per-vertex normals.

What would settle it

Train MeshMamba on a dataset of raw scans or garment meshes that do not share topology, with no template fitting step. If generation or reconstruction quality collapses compared to the template-registered case, the fixed-connectivity ordering assumption is confirmed as the key constraint; conversely, if it survives with a generic spatial ordering, the ordering prior is not the crucial ingredient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MeshMamba demonstrates that a selective state space model can learn to generate and regress full-resolution articulated meshes—SMPL at 6,890 vertices and SMPL-X at 10,475 vertices—provided the vertices are ordered by body-part UV maps or by the sorted 3D coordinates of a template mesh. On the SURREAL benchmark, the diffusion variant MambaDiff3D achieves a 1-NNA of 53.1% versus 54.4% for DiffSurf, and the recovery variant Mamba-HMR reaches 26.3 mm PA-MVE on UBody whole-body reconstruction, below prior parametric and non-parametric baselines. The authors also show that combining vertex positions with surface normals through a Poisson solve removes local noise while preserving global shape, and that Mamba is 6-9 times faster than a transformer at 10,475 tokens during DDIM sampling.

Load-bearing premise

All training and test meshes must share the exact connectivity of a template mesh, and point-to-point correspondences must be known, so the vertex ordering is only defined for registered, template-fitted surfaces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Transformer-based vertex methods that cap around 500 tokens can be replaced by Mamba backbones, removing the need for upsampling stages and preserving fingers and face detail.
  • Whole-body mesh recovery from a single image can run at near real time (around 22 FPS) while directly regressing more than 10,000 vertices, enabling interactive avatar and AR/VR applications.
  • Dense cloth deformation and hand grasps, previously only representable via parametric fits, can be generated directly as vertex coordinates.
  • MambaDiff3D's near-linear scaling suggests generation latency will remain manageable as mesh resolution increases beyond SMPL-X.
  • The same serialization-then-scan recipe may apply to other articulated objects, as the paper's experiments on Animal3D show.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method's generality is tied to having a template with known correspondences; an interesting test would be applying it to meshes with varying topology, such as loose clothing, after an automatic canonicalization step, and measuring how much the body-part prior helps versus a learned ordering.
  • The reported speed advantage is measured on specific GPUs; on hardware without optimized selective-scan kernels the gap is smaller, so the practical gain depends on the deployment hardware.
  • The 1-NNA improvement over DiffSurf is only a few points, so the headline value is arguably the reachable resolution and speed rather than a large accuracy jump.
  • The Poisson post-processing is not end-to-end differentiable with the diffusion model; a fully differentiable version might further improve smoothness and could be a direct follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MeshMamba, a Mamba/SSM backbone for dense articulated meshes. The central technical idea is a vertex serialization derived from DensePose body-part labels or template-mesh xyz coordinates, combined with a position-plus-normal output that is integrated through a Poisson solve. Two applications are presented: MambaDiff3D, a diffusion model for unconditional 3D human mesh generation, and Mamba-HMR, a single-image whole-body mesh regressor. The paper claims state-of-the-art generation on SURREAL (1-NNA 53.1% vs DiffSurf 54.4%) and competitive-to-superior whole-body recovery on UBody (PA-MVE 26.3 mm for the all-body setting), with a 6–9x speed advantage over transformer-based diffusion at roughly 10,000 vertices.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the paper makes a useful and timely contribution: it adapts selective state-space models to a mesh setting with a simple correspondence-based ordering, demonstrates scalability to more than 10,000 vertices, and includes ablations that isolate the network block and serialization choices. The fixed-template connectivity and known-correspondence assumption is stated explicitly in Section 4 and acknowledged as a limitation in Section 5.7, so it is a genuine scope limit rather than an internal inconsistency. The main weakness is that the quantitative support for the headline generation claim is thin: a 1.3-point 1-NNA margin over the authors' own DiffSurf baseline, with no variance or confidence intervals, and the clothing/hand results that motivate the dense representation are not quantitatively evaluated. These issues are addressable with additional experiments and statistics.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.4, Table 1] The state-of-the-art generation claim is not yet established. MambaDiff3D's 53.1% 1-NNA beats DiffSurf's 54.4% by 1.3 points on a 200-mesh test set, but no error bars, confidence intervals, multiple sampling seeds, or repeated training runs are reported. This margin could easily be sampling noise. Please report bootstrap confidence intervals on 1-NNA over the 200 test meshes and/or variance over DDIM sampling seeds, and preferably results over multiple training runs. Since DiffSurf is also from the same group, an independent implementation or external baseline would make the comparison more convincing.
  2. [§5.3, Figs. 1 and 4] The paper's claims about capturing clothing deformations and grasping hands are not quantitatively supported. Table 1 evaluates body-only SURREAL meshes, while CAPE and GRAB appear only as qualitative examples. Please add quantitative dense-mesh generation metrics, such as 1-NNA or coverage on CAPE/GRAB validation splits, or at least a quantitative distortion/identity measure on the generated dense meshes, so that the central claim of dense clothing and hand geometry can be assessed.
  3. [§5.4, Table 2] The statement in Section 5.4 that Mamba-HMR 'outperforms the SOTA' whole-body HMR approaches is also based on single-run PA-MVE/MVE numbers with no reported variance. Because the UBody protocol and training-data mixes differ across baselines, please clarify the exact comparison protocol (image resolution, backbone, fine-tuning procedure, and evaluation alignment), report uncertainty or repeated-run statistics, or soften the claim to 'competitive' as used in the abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] There is a typo: 'predifined' should be 'predefined'.
  2. [§5.1.2] 'an12×9 feature map' should be 'a 12×9 feature map'.
  3. [§5.1.1] Please clarify whether the 200-mesh SURREAL test set is the reference distribution for 1-NNA and how many generated samples are compared; the metric definition later refers to a 'validation set', which is ambiguous.
  4. [§4.2] Please define λ_t for the cosine variance scheduler and state explicitly how the weighting w_t = e^{-λ_t/2} in Eq. (4) is applied in the v-prediction objective; a derivation or exact citation to the formulation would help reproducibility.
  5. [§5.2] The speed comparison should specify the exact transformer configuration, sequence length, batch size, and GPU/memory settings used for the 6–9x claim, so that the result is reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the only notable signal is a same-group baseline (DiffSurf) in the headline generation comparison, which is an independence/statistics concern rather than circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical and self-contained: MeshMamba uses standard Mamba blocks, a template-based vertex serialization, and standard diffusion/regression losses, with no parameter fitted to the evaluation target and then renamed as a prediction. The central claims are checked against external benchmarks (SURREAL test set, UBody, 3DPW, etc.) using standard metrics (1-NNA, MVE, PA-MVE), so the evaluation does not reduce to the model's own outputs by construction. The fixed-topology and known-correspondence assumption is explicitly stated as an assumption and as a limitation, not used to define away the evaluation. The main self-citation concern is that the closest generation baseline, DiffSurf [85], shares an author with the present paper and the reported advantage is small (53.1% vs. 54.4% 1-NNA), but DiffSurf is a published external method compared on an independent test set, not a citation used to justify the present claim. Lack of error bars or repeated-seed variance is a statistical robustness concern, not circularity. No step in the paper equates an input to an output by definition, and no load-bearing claim is justified solely by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is not a mathematical derivation; it is an empirical architecture result. The main free parameters are architectural and loss weighting choices, several of which are not reported, making exact reproduction difficult. The strongest domain axiom is the fixed-topology and known-correspondence assumption, which limits the method to registered meshes. No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Combination of serialization strategies per layer = 2 (e.g., SMPL x1 + XYZ x1)
    Ablations in Table 3 show that performance changes with the number and type of serialization strategies; two strategies were chosen empirically to balance quality and inference speed.
  • Diffusion sampling steps = 50, 100, 250 tested; 100 used in main results
    Standard DDIM choice; the number of steps affects both quality and speed, and the paper does not report a systematic selection criterion.
  • Loss weights in Mamba-HMR (lambda_V_3D, lambda_J_3D, lambda_J_2D, lambda_edge, lambda_lap, lambda_normal) = not reported
    Equation (5) defines a weighted sum of six loss terms, but the actual weight values are not given, leaving a hidden experimental choice that affects the reported errors.
  • Network depth L and hidden dimension d = not reported
    The architecture is described as L+1 Mamba blocks with hidden channels d, but the specific values are omitted, making exact reproduction impossible.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fixed template topology with known point-to-point correspondences across all meshes
    Sec. 4 'Notation and assumption' states this directly; it underpins the vertex serialization and the diffusion/recovery pipelines. The whole method collapses if this connectivity assumption is violated.
  • domain assumption Mamba captures meaningful structure from vertex sequences if the ordering is semantically structured
    The entire approach rests on the empirical finding that structured ordering works and random ordering fails (Table 3). There is no theoretical guarantee that this serialization is optimal or sufficient.
  • domain assumption DensePose IUV annotations provide consistent body-part labeling for human meshes
    DensePose is one of the two serialization strategies, and it requires that training meshes have consistent body-part UV maps that correlate with the mesh vertices.
  • standard math Standard state space model discretization and convolution equivalence (Eqs. 1-3)
    The background in Sec. 3 borrows the Mamba formulation from prior work; this math is standard and not a new assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MeshMamba: State Space Models for Articulated 3D Mesh Generation and Reconstruction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6TGAWKC7

@misc{pith2026250715212,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MeshMamba: State Space Models for Articulated 3D Mesh Generation and Reconstruction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6TGAWKC7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15212}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce MeshMamba, a neural network model for learning 3D articulated mesh models by employing the recently proposed Mamba State Space Models (Mamba-SSMs). MeshMamba is efficient and scalable in handling a large number of input tokens, enabling the generation and reconstruction of body mesh models with more than 10,000 vertices, capturing clothing and hand geometries. The key to effectively learning MeshMamba is the serialization technique of mesh vertices into orderings that are easily processed by Mamba. This is achieved by sorting the vertices based on body part annotations or the 3D vertex locations of a template mesh, such that the ordering respects the structure of articulated shapes. Based on MeshMamba, we design 1) MambaDiff3D, a denoising diffusion model for generating 3D articulated meshes and 2) Mamba-HMR, a 3D human mesh recovery model that reconstructs a human body shape and pose from a single image. Experimental results showed that MambaDiff3D can generate dense 3D human meshes in clothes, with grasping hands, etc., and outperforms previous approaches in the 3D human shape generation task. Additionally, Mamba-HMR extends the capabilities of previous non-parametric human mesh recovery approaches, which were limited to handling body-only poses using around 500 vertex tokens, to the whole-body setting with face and hands, while achieving competitive performance in (near) real-time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15212 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Denoising diffusion models based on MeshMamba are able to generate dense 3D articulated meshes with around 10,000 vertices, capturing clothing deformations and hand grasp poses. MeshMamba can generate a mesh with 10475 vertices in a few seconds using 100 DDIM sampling steps, which is 6-9× faster than diffusion transformer. Abstract In this paper, we introduce MeshMamba, a neural net￾work model for learning 3D articu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Network block and architectures of MeshMamba. (a) Mamba block with feature permutation based on serialized tokens. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Importance of local geometric regularization in dense [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Unconditional generation results of dense 3D meshes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example results of whole-body 3D human mesh recov [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparisons of mesh representation in 3D generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Shape interpolation. Compared to ARAPReg which en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Neural jaco- bian fields: Learning intrinsic mappings of arbitrary meshes

    Noam Aigerman, Kunal Gupta, Vladimir G Kim, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Jun Saito, and Thibault Groueix. Neural jaco- bian fields: Learning intrinsic mappings of arbitrary meshes. SIGGRAPH, 2022. 2, 4, 5, 8

    2022

  2. [2]

    Geometric disentanglement for generative latent shape models

    Tristan Aumentado-Armstrong, Stavros Tsogkas, Allan Jep- son, and Sven Dickinson. Geometric disentanglement for generative latent shape models. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 8180– 8189, 2019. 2, 6

    2019

  3. [3]

    All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models

    Fan Bao, Shen Nie, Kaiwen Xue, Yue Cao, Chongxuan Li, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. All are worth words: A vit backbone for diffusion models. In CVPR, 2023. 4

    2023

  4. [4]

    Multi-hmr: Multi-person whole-body hu- man mesh recovery in a single shot

    Fabien Baradel*, Matthieu Armando, Salma Galaaoui, Ro- main Br ´egier, Philippe Weinzaepfel, Gr ´egory Rogez, and Thomas Lucas*. Multi-hmr: Multi-person whole-body hu- man mesh recovery in a single shot. In ECCV, 2024. 3, 6, 7

    2024

  5. [5]

    3D multibod- ies: Fitting sets of plausible 3D models to ambiguous image data

    Benjamin Biggs, S ´ebastien Ehrhart, Hanbyul Joo, Benjamin Graham, Andrea Vedaldi, and David Novotny. 3D multibod- ies: Fitting sets of plausible 3D models to ambiguous image data. In NeurIPS, 2020. 2

    2020

  6. [6]

    Bedlam: A synthetic dataset of bodies exhibiting de- tailed lifelike animated motion

    Michael J Black, Priyanka Patel, Joachim Tesch, and Jinlong Yang. Bedlam: A synthetic dataset of bodies exhibiting de- tailed lifelike animated motion. In CVPR, pages 8726–8737,

  7. [7]

    Keep it smpl: Automatic estimation of 3d human pose and shape from a single image

    Federica Bogo, Angjoo Kanazawa, Christoph Lassner, Peter Gehler, Javier Romero, and Michael J Black. Keep it smpl: Automatic estimation of 3d human pose and shape from a single image. In ECCV, pages 561–578. Springer, 2016. 2

    2016

  8. [8]

    Federica Bogo, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J. Black. Dynamic FAUST: Registering human bod- ies in motion. InIEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017. 5

    2017

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Sumner, Mark Pauly, and Markus Gross

    Mario Botsch, Robert W. Sumner, Mark Pauly, and Markus Gross. Deformation transfer for detail-preserving surface editing. 2006. 4

    2006

  2. [10]

    Smpler-x: Scaling up expressive human pose and shape estimation

    Zhongang Cai, Wanqi Yin, Ailing Zeng, Chen Wei, Qing- ping Sun, Yanjun Wang, Hui En Pang, Haiyi Mei, Mingyuan Zhang, Lei Zhang, et al. Smpler-x: Scaling up expressive human pose and shape estimation. In NeurIPs, 2023. 3, 6, 7, 8

    2023

  3. [11]

    Intrinsic-extrinsic preserved gans for unsupervised 3d pose transfer

    Haoyu Chen, Hao Tang, Henglin Shi, Wei Peng, Nicu Sebe, and Guoying Zhao. Intrinsic-extrinsic preserved gans for unsupervised 3d pose transfer. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 8610– 8619, 2021. 2

    2021

  4. [12]

    Bronstein, Yuxiang Zhou, Irene Kotsia, Maja Pantic, and Stefanos Zafeiriou

    Shiyang Cheng, Michael M. Bronstein, Yuxiang Zhou, Irene Kotsia, Maja Pantic, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Mesh- gan: Non-linear 3d morphable models of faces. CoRR, abs/1903.10384, 2019. 2

    1903 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Generative approach for prob- abilistic human mesh recovery using diffusion models, 2023

    Hanbyel Cho and Junmo Kim. Generative approach for prob- abilistic human mesh recovery using diffusion models, 2023. 2

    2023

  6. [14]

    Cross- attention of disentangled modalities for 3d human mesh re- covery with transformers

    Junhyeong Cho, Kim Youwang, and Tae-Hyun Oh. Cross- attention of disentangled modalities for 3d human mesh re- covery with transformers. In ECCV, 2022. 1, 3, 5

    2022

  7. [15]

    Pose2mesh: Graph convolutional network for 3d human pose and mesh recovery from a 2d human pose

    Hongsuk Choi, Gyeongsik Moon, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Pose2mesh: Graph convolutional network for 3d human pose and mesh recovery from a 2d human pose. In ECCV, 2020. 2

    2020

  8. [16]

    Limp: Learning latent shape repre- sentations with metric preservation priors

    Luca Cosmo, Antonio Norelli, Oshri Halimi, Ron Kimmel, and Emanuele Rodol `a. Limp: Learning latent shape repre- sentations with metric preservation priors. In ECCV, page 19–35, 2020. 2, 6

    2020

  9. [17]

    Davydov, A

    A. Davydov, A. Remizova, V . Constantin, S. Honari, M. Salzmann, and P. Fua. Adversarial parametric pose prior. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10987–10995, 2022. 2

    2022

  10. [18]

    Hierarchical kinematic human mesh recovery

    Georgios Georgakis, Ren Li, Srikrishna Karanam, Terrence Chen, Jana Koˇseck´a, and Ziyan Wu. Hierarchical kinematic human mesh recovery. In ECCV, pages 768–784. Springer International Publishing, 2020. 2

    2020

  11. [19]

    Humans in 4D: Reconstructing and tracking humans with transformers

    Shubham Goel, Georgios Pavlakos, Jathushan Rajasegaran, Angjoo Kanazawa*, and Jitendra Malik*. Humans in 4D: Reconstructing and tracking humans with transformers. In ICCV, 2023. 3

    2023

  12. [20]

    Diffpose: Toward more reliable 3d pose estimation

    Jia Gong, Lin Geng Foo, Zhipeng Fan, Qiuhong Ke, Hossein Rahmani, and Jun Liu. Diffpose: Toward more reliable 3d pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) ,

  13. [21]

    Mamba: Linear-time sequence mod- eling with selective state spaces, 2024

    Albert Gu and Tri Dao. Mamba: Linear-time sequence mod- eling with selective state spaces, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  14. [22]

    Efficiently mod- eling long sequences with structured state spaces, 2022

    Albert Gu, Karan Goel, and Christopher R´e. Efficiently mod- eling long sequences with structured state spaces, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  15. [23]

    Nrdf: Neural riemannian distance fields for learning articulated pose priors

    Yannan He, Garvita Tiwari, Tolga Birdal, Jan Eric Lenssen, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Nrdf: Neural riemannian distance fields for learning articulated pose priors. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024. 5, 6, 7

    2024

  16. [24]

    Computation-efficient era: A comprehensive survey of state space models in medical image analysis

    Moein Heidari, Sina Ghorbani Kolahi, Sanaz Karimijafar- bigloo, Bobby Azad, Afshin Bozorgpour, Soheila Hatami, Reza Azad, Ali Diba, Ulas Bagci, Dorit Merhof, et al. Computation-efficient era: A comprehensive survey of state space models in medical image analysis. arXiv e-print...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arxiv:2006.11239,

    2006 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Arapreg: An as-rigid-as possible regularization loss for learning deformable shape generators, 2021

    Qixing Huang, Xiangru Huang, Bo Sun, Zaiwei Zhang, Jun- feng Jiang, and Chandrajit Bajaj. Arapreg: An as-rigid-as possible regularization loss for learning deformable shape generators, 2021. 2, 8

    2021

  19. [27]

    Human3.6m: Large scale datasets and predic- tive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments

    Catalin Ionescu, Dragos Papava, Vlad Olaru, and Cristian Sminchisescu. Human3.6m: Large scale datasets and predic- tive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments. IEEE TPAMI, 36(7):1325–1339, 2014. 6

    2014

  20. [28]

    Disentangled human body embedding based on deep hierar- chical neural network

    Boyi Jiang, Juyong Zhang, Jianfei Cai, and Jianmin Zheng. Disentangled human body embedding based on deep hierar- chical neural network. 2020. 2

    2020

  21. [29]

    Whole-body human pose estimation in the wild

    Sheng Jin, Lumin Xu, Jin Xu, Can Wang, Wentao Liu, Chen Qian, Wanli Ouyang, and Ping Luo. Whole-body human pose estimation in the wild. In ECCV, 2020. 7

    2020

  22. [30]

    Black, David W

    Angjoo Kanazawa, Michael J. Black, David W. Jacobs, and Jitendra Malik. End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose. In CVPR, 2018. 1, 2

    2018

  23. [31]

    Sampling is Mat- ter: Point-guided 3d human mesh reconstruction

    Jeonghwan Kim, Mi-Gyeong Gwon, Hyunwoo Park, Hyuk- min Kwon, Gi-Mun Um, and Wonjun Kim. Sampling is Mat- ter: Point-guided 3d human mesh reconstruction. In CVPR,

  24. [32]

    Understanding diffusion objectives as the elbo with simple data augmentation

    Diederik Kingma and Ruiqi Gao. Understanding diffusion objectives as the elbo with simple data augmentation. In NeurIPS, pages 65484–65516, 2023. 4

    2023

  25. [33]

    Convolutional mesh regression for single-image hu- man shape reconstruction

    Nikos Kolotouros, Georgios Pavlakos, and Kostas Dani- ilidis. Convolutional mesh regression for single-image hu- man shape reconstruction. In CVPR, 2019. 2, 5

    2019

  26. [34]

    Probabilistic modeling for human mesh recovery

    Nikos Kolotouros, Georgios Pavlakos, Dinesh Jayaraman, and Kostas Daniilidis. Probabilistic modeling for human mesh recovery. In ICCV, 2021. 2

    2021

  27. [35]

    Diffhand: End-to-end hand mesh reconstruction via diffusion models, 2023

    Lijun Li, Li’an Zhuo, Bang Zhang, Liefeng Bo, and Chen Chen. Diffhand: End-to-end hand mesh reconstruction via diffusion models, 2023. 2

    2023

  28. [36]

    Pointmamba: A simple state space model for point cloud analysis

    Dingkang Liang, Xin Zhou, Wei Xu, Xingkui Zhu, Zhikang Zou, Xiaoqing Ye, Xiao Tan, and Xiang Bai. Pointmamba: A simple state space model for point cloud analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10739, 2024. 2, 3, 4

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    One-stage 3d whole-body mesh recovery with compo- nent aware transformer

    Jing Lin, Ailing Zeng, Haoqian Wang, Lei Zhang, and Yu Li. One-stage 3d whole-body mesh recovery with compo- nent aware transformer. 2023. 3, 6, 7

    2023

  30. [38]

    Mesh graphormer

    Kevin Lin, Lijuan Wang, and Zicheng Liu. Mesh graphormer. In ICCV, 2021. 2, 5

    2021

  31. [39]

    End-to-end hu- man pose and mesh reconstruction with transformers

    Kevin Lin, Lijuan Wang, and Zicheng Liu. End-to-end hu- man pose and mesh reconstruction with transformers. In CVPR, 2021. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7

    2021

  32. [40]

    Belongie, Lubomir D

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, Lubomir D. Bourdev, Ross B. Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ar, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. CoRR, abs/1405.0312,

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Distribution-aligned diffusion for human mesh recovery

    Hossein Rahmani Jun Liu Lin Geng Foo, Jia Gong. Distribution-aligned diffusion for human mesh recovery. In ICCV, 2023. 2, 5, 8

    2023

  34. [42]

    Point mamba: A novel point cloud backbone based on state space model with octree-based ordering strategy, 2024

    Jiuming Liu, Ruiji Yu, Yian Wang, Yu Zheng, Tianchen Deng, Weicai Ye, and Hesheng Wang. Point mamba: A novel point cloud backbone based on state space model with octree-based ordering strategy, 2024. 3, 4

    2024

  35. [43]

    Egohmr: Egocentric human mesh recovery via hierarchical latent diffusion model

    Yuxuan Liu, Jianxin Yang, Xiao Gu, Yao Guo, and Guang- Zhong Yang. Egohmr: Egocentric human mesh recovery via hierarchical latent diffusion model. In 2023 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 9807–9813, 2023. 2

    2023

  36. [44]

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Ger- ard Pons-Moll, and Michael J. Black. SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model. ACM Trans. Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia), 34(6):248:1–248:16, 2015. 1

    2015

  37. [45]

    Dposer: Diffusion model as robust 3d human pose prior, 2024

    Junzhe Lu, Jing Lin, Hongkun Dou, Ailing Zeng, Yue Deng, Yulun Zhang, and Haoqian Wang. Dposer: Diffusion model as robust 3d human pose prior, 2024. 2

    2024

  38. [46]

    Diffusion probabilistic models for 3d point cloud generation

    Shitong Luo and Wei Hu. Diffusion probabilistic models for 3d point cloud generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2021. 2

    2021

  39. [47]

    Qianli Ma, Jinlong Yang, Anurag Ranjan, Sergi Pujades, Gerard Pons-Moll, Siyu Tang, and Michael J. Black. Learn- ing to dress 3d people in generative clothing. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020. 2, 5

    2020

  40. [48]

    Qianli Ma, Jinlong Yang, Siyu Tang, and Michael J. Black. The power of points for modeling humans in clothing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 10974–10984, 2021. 1

    2021

  41. [49]

    3d human mesh estimation from virtual mark- ers

    Xiaoxuan Ma, Jiajun Su, Chunyu Wang, Wentao Zhu, and Yizhou Wang. 3d human mesh estimation from virtual mark- ers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 534– 543, 2023. 2

    2023

  42. [50]

    Troje, Ger- ard Pons-Moll, and Michael J

    Naureen Mahmood, Nima Ghorbani, Nikolaus F. Troje, Ger- ard Pons-Moll, and Michael J. Black. Amass: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019. 5

    2019

  43. [51]

    Sanjeev Muralikrishnan, Niladri Shekhar Dutt, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Noam Aigerman, Vladimir Kim, Matthew Fisher, and Niloy J. Mitra. Temporal residual jacobians for rig-free motion transfer, 2024. 4, 8

    2024

  44. [52]

    Efficiently combining positions and nor- mals for precise 3d geometry

    Diego Nehab, Szymon Rusinkiewicz, James Davis, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. Efficiently combining positions and nor- mals for precise 3d geometry. ACM Trans. Graph., 24(3): 536–543, 2005. 4

    2005

  45. [53]

    Huang, Joachim Tesch, David T

    Priyanka Patel, Chun-Hao P. Huang, Joachim Tesch, David T. Hoffmann, Shashank Tripathi, and Michael J. Black. AGORA: Avatars in geography optimized for regres- sion analysis. In Proceedings IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2021. 6

    2021

  46. [54]

    Mamba-360: Survey of state space models as transformer alternative for long sequence modelling: Methods, appli- cations, and challenges

    Badri Narayana Patro and Vijay Srinivas Agneeswaran. Mamba-360: Survey of state space models as transformer alternative for long sequence modelling: Methods, appli- cations, and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16112 ,

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed A. A. Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 20...

    2019

  48. [56]

    Black, Vasileios Choutas, Georgios Pavlakos, Timo Bolkart, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Timo Bolkart, Dim- itrios Tzionas, Michael J. Black, Vasileios Choutas, Georgios Pavlakos, Timo Bolkart, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Monocular expressive body regression through body- driven attention. ECCV, 2020. 3

    2020

  49. [57]

    Anurag Ranjan, Timo Bolkart, Soubhik Sanyal, and Michael J. Black. Generating 3D faces using convolutional mesh autoencoders. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 725–741, 2018. 2

    2018

  50. [58]

    Dense- pose: Dense human pose estimation in the wild.arXiv, 2018

    Guler Riza, Neverova Natalia, and Kokkinos Iasonas. Dense- pose: Dense human pose estimation in the wild.arXiv, 2018. 2, 4

    2018

  51. [59]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2

    2022

  52. [60]

    Frankmocap: A monocular 3d whole-body pose estimation system via re- gression and integration

    Yu Rong, Takaaki Shiratori, and Hanbyul Joo. Frankmocap: A monocular 3d whole-body pose estimation system via re- gression and integration. In ICCVW, 2021. 3

    2021

  53. [61]

    Nadine Rueegg, Silvia Zuffi, Konrad Schindler, and Michael J. Black. Barc: Learning to regress 3d dog shape from images by exploiting breed information. In Proceed- ings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), 2022. 5

    2022

  54. [62]

    Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models, 2022

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models, 2022. 4

    2022

  55. [63]

    Neural localizer fields for continuous 3d human pose and shape estimation

    Istv ´an S´ar´andi and Gerard Pons-Moll. Neural localizer fields for continuous 3d human pose and shape estimation. 2024. 1, 3, 6, 7

    2024

  56. [64]

    Diffusion-based 3d human pose estimation with multi- hypothesis aggregation

    Wenkang Shan, Zhenhua Liu, Xinfeng Zhang, Zhao Wang, Kai Han, Shanshe Wang, Siwei Ma, and Wen Gao. Diffusion-based 3d human pose estimation with multi- hypothesis aggregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11579 ,

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Denois- ing diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denois- ing diffusion implicit models. arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 4

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Score-guided diffusion for 3d human recovery, 2024

    Anastasis Stathopoulos, Ligong Han, and Dimitris Metaxas. Score-guided diffusion for 3d human recovery, 2024. 2

    2024

  59. [67]

    Sumner and Jovan Popovi ´c

    Robert W. Sumner and Jovan Popovi ´c. Deformation transfer for triangle meshes. SIGGRAPH, 23(3), 2004. 4, 5, 8

    2004

  60. [68]

    Deep high-resolution representation learning for human pose esti- mation

    Ke Sun, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, and Jingdong Wang. Deep high-resolution representation learning for human pose esti- mation. In CVPR, 2019. 6

    2019

  61. [69]

    Aios: All-in-one-stage expres- sive human pose and shape estimation

    Qingping Sun, Yanjun Wang, Ailing Zeng, Wanqi Yin, Chen Wei, Wenjia Wang, Haiyi Mei, Chi Sing Leung, Ziwei Liu, Lei Yang, and Zhongang Cai. Aios: All-in-one-stage expres- sive human pose and shape estimation. In CVPR, 2024. 3, 6, 7

    2024

  62. [70]

    Black, and Dim- itrios Tzionas

    Omid Taheri, Nima Ghorbani, Michael J. Black, and Dim- itrios Tzionas. GRAB: A dataset of whole-body human grasping of objects. In ECCV, 2020. 5

    2020

  63. [71]

    Vari- ational autoencoders for deforming 3d mesh models

    Qingyang Tan, Lin Gao, Yu-Kun Lai, and Shihong Xia. Vari- ational autoencoders for deforming 3d mesh models. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 5841–5850, 2018. 2

    2018

  64. [72]

    Efficient transformers: A survey

    Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Dara Bahri, and Donald Metzler. Efficient transformers: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv., 2022. 1

    2022

  65. [73]

    Recovering 3d human mesh from monocular images: A sur- vey

    Yating Tian, Hongwen Zhang, Yebin Liu, and Limin Wang. Recovering 3d human mesh from monocular images: A sur- vey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01923, 2022. 1, 2

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Pose-ndf: Modeling human pose manifolds with neural distance fields

    Garvita Tiwari, Dimitrije Antic, Jan Eric Lenssen, Nikolaos Sarafianos, Tony Tung, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Pose-ndf: Modeling human pose manifolds with neural distance fields. In ECCV, 2022. 5, 6, 7

    2022

  67. [75]

    Black, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid

    G ¨ul Varol, Javier Romero, Xavier Martin, Naureen Mah- mood, Michael J. Black, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. Learning from synthetic humans. In CVPR, 2017. 5

    2017

  68. [76]

    State space model for new-generation network alternative to transformers: A sur- vey, 2024

    Xiao Wang, Shiao Wang, Yuhe Ding, Yuehang Li, Wentao Wu, Yao Rong, Weizhe Kong, Ju Huang, Shihao Li, Haox- iang Yang, Ziwen Wang, Bo Jiang, Chenglong Li, Yaowei Wang, Yonghong Tian, and Jin Tang. State space model for new-generation network alternative to transformers: A sur- ...

    2024

  69. [77]

    Context-aware skeletal shape deformation

    Ofir Weber, Olga Sorkine, Yaron Lipman, and Craig Gots- man. Context-aware skeletal shape deformation. Computer Graphics Forum, 26(3):265–274, 2007. 4

    2007

  70. [78]

    Learning semantic-aware disentangled representation for flexible 3d human body edit- ing

    Xiongzheng Li Jinsong Zhang Yu-Kun Lai Jingyu Yang Kun Li Xiaokun Sun, Qiao Feng. Learning semantic-aware disentangled representation for flexible 3d human body edit- ing. In CVPR, 2023. 2

    2023

  71. [79]

    Yuliang Xiu, Jinlong Yang, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. ICON: Implicit Clothed humans Obtained from Normals. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 13296–13306, 2022. 8

    2022

  72. [80]

    Ghum & ghuml: Generative 3d human shape and articulated pose models

    Hongyi Xu, Eduard Gabriel Bazavan, Andrei Zanfir, William T Freeman, Rahul Sukthankar, and Cristian Smin- chisescu. Ghum & ghuml: Generative 3d human shape and articulated pose models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages...

    2020

  73. [81]

    Animal3d: A comprehensive dataset of 3d ani- mal pose and shape

    Jiacong Xu, Yi Zhang, Jiawei Peng, Wufei Ma, Artur Jesslen, Pengliang Ji, Qixin Hu, Jiehua Zhang, Qihao Liu, Jiahao Wang, et al. Animal3d: A comprehensive dataset of 3d ani- mal pose and shape. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11737, 2023. 5

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Pointflow: 3d point cloud generation with continuous normalizing flows

    Guandao Yang, Xun Huang, Zekun Hao, Ming-Yu Liu, Serge Belongie, and Bharath Hariharan. Pointflow: 3d point cloud generation with continuous normalizing flows. arXiv, 2019. 6

    2019

  75. [83]

    Neural Pose Representation Learning for Generating and Transferring Non-Rigid Object Poses

    Seungwoo Yoo, Juil Koo, Kyeongmin Yeo, and Minhyuk Sung. Neural Pose Representation Learning for Generating and Transferring Non-Rigid Object Poses. InNeurIPS, 2024. 4, 8

    2024

  76. [84]

    Deformable mesh transformer for 3d hu- man mesh recovery

    Yusuke Yoshiyasu. Deformable mesh transformer for 3d hu- man mesh recovery. In CVPR, pages 17006–17015, 2023. 2

    2023

  77. [85]

    Diffsurf: A transformer- based diffusion model for generating and reconstructing 3d surfaces in pose

    Yusuke Yoshiyasu and Leyuan Sun. Diffsurf: A transformer- based diffusion model for generating and reconstructing 3d surfaces in pose. In ECCV, 2024. 4, 6, 8

    2024

  78. [86]

    Gator: Graph-aware transformer with motion- disentangled regression for human mesh recovery from a 2d pose

    Yingxuan You, Hong Liu, Xia Li, Wenhao Li, Ti Wang, and Runwei Ding. Gator: Graph-aware transformer with motion- disentangled regression for human mesh recovery from a 2d pose. In ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICAS...

    2023

  79. [87]

    Mesh variational autoencoders with edge con- traction pooling

    Yu-Jie Yuan, Yu-Kun Lai, Jie Yang, Qi Duan, Hongbo Fu, and Lin Gao. Mesh variational autoencoders with edge con- traction pooling. In CVPRW, pages 274–275, 2020. 2

    2020

  80. [88]

    Freeman, Rahul Sukthankar, and Cristian Smin- chisescu

    Andrei Zanfir, Eduard Gabriel Bazavan, Hongyi Xu, William T. Freeman, Rahul Sukthankar, and Cristian Smin- chisescu. Weakly supervised 3d human pose and shape re- construction with normalizing flows. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, pages 465–481, 2020. 2

    2020

  81. [89]

    Lion: Latent point diffusion models for 3d shape generation

    Xiaohui Zeng, Arash Vahdat, Francis Williams, Zan Gojcic, Or Litany, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Lion: Latent point diffusion models for 3d shape generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022. 2

    2022

  82. [90]

    Pymaf: 3d human pose and shape regression with pyramidal mesh alignment feedback loop

    Hongwen Zhang, Yating Tian, Xinchi Zhou, Wanli Ouyang, Yebin Liu, Limin Wang, and Zhenan Sun. Pymaf: 3d human pose and shape regression with pyramidal mesh alignment feedback loop. In ICCV, 2021. 1, 2

    2021

  83. [91]

    Pymaf-x: To- wards well-aligned full-body model regression from monoc- ular images

    Hongwen Zhang, Yating Tian, Yuxiang Zhang, Mengcheng Li, Liang An, Zhenan Sun, and Yebin Liu. Pymaf-x: To- wards well-aligned full-body model regression from monoc- ular images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06400, 2022. 1

    2022

  84. [92]

    Rohm: Robust human motion reconstruction via diffusion,

    Siwei Zhang, Bharat Lal Bhatnagar, Yuanlu Xu, Alexan- der Winkler, Petr Kadlecek, Siyu Tang, and Federica Bogo. Rohm: Robust human motion reconstruction via diffusion,

  85. [93]

    Point cloud mamba: Point cloud learning via state space model

    Tao Zhang, Xiangtai Li, Haobo Yuan, Shunping Ji, and Shuicheng Yan. Point cloud mamba: Point cloud learning via state space model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00762, 2024. 2, 3, 4

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Black, and Otmar Hilliges

    Yufeng Zheng, Wang Yifan, Gordon Wetzstein, Michael J. Black, and Otmar Hilliges. Pointavatar: Deformable point- based head avatars from videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023. 1

    2023

  87. [95]

    Scalable diffusion models with state space backbone

    Changqian Yu Jusnshi Huang Zhengcong Fei, Mingyuan Fan. Scalable diffusion models with state space backbone. arXiv preprint, 2024. 2, 4

    2024

  88. [96]

    Unsupervised shape and pose disentanglement for 3d meshes

    Keyang Zhou, Bharat Lal Bhatnagar, and Gerard Pons- Moll. Unsupervised shape and pose disentanglement for 3d meshes. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2020. 2

    2020

  89. [97]

    Vision mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model

    Lianghui Zhu, Bencheng Liao, Qian Zhang, Xinlong Wang, Wenyu Liu, and Xinggang Wang. Vision mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09417, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.