Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Kernel-phase analysis: aperture modeling prescriptions that minimize calibration errors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.02032 v1 pith:6TH6OGYD submitted 2020-03-04 astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords apertureerrorsanalysiskernel-phasecalibrationdetectiondominatedmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Kernel-phase is a data analysis method based on a generalization of the notion of closure-phase invented in the context of interferometry, but that applies to well corrected diffraction dominated images produced by an arbitrary aperture. The linear model upon which it relies theoretically leads to the formation of observable quantities robust against residual aberrations. In practice, detection limits reported thus far seem to be dominated by systematic errors induced by calibration biases not sufficiently filtered out by the kernel projection operator. This paper focuses on the impact the initial modeling of the aperture has on these errors and introduces a strategy to mitigate them, using a more accurate aperture transmission model. The paper first uses idealized monochromatic simulations of a non trivial aperture to illustrate the impact modeling choices have on calibration errors. It then applies the outlined prescription to two distinct data-sets of images whose analysis has previously been published. The use of a transmission model to describe the aperture results in a significant improvement over the previous type of analysis. The thus reprocessed data-sets generally lead to more accurate results, less affected by systematic errors. As kernel-phase observing programs are becoming more ambitious, accuracy in the aperture description is becoming paramount to avoid situations where contrast detection limits are dominated by systematic errors. Prescriptions outlined in this paper will benefit any attempt at exploiting kernel-phase for high-contrast detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools