REVIEW 3 cited by
What Can We Learn from the Rising Lightcurves of Radioactively-Powered Supernovae?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
What Can We Learn from the Rising Lightcurves of Radioactively-Powered Supernovae?
read the original abstract
The lightcurve of the explosion of a star with a radius <10-100Rsun is powered mostly by radioactive decay. Observationally such events are dominated by hydrogen deficient progenitors and classified as Type I supernovae: white dwarf thermonuclear explosions (Type Ia) and core collapses of hydrogen-stripped massive stars (Type Ibc). Transient surveys are finding SNe I in increasing numbers and at earlier times, allowing their early emission to be studied in unprecedented detail. Motivated by these developments, we summarize the physics that produces their rising lightcurves and discuss how observations can be utilized to study these exploding stars. The early radioactive-powered lightcurves probe the shallowest 56Ni deposits. If the amount of 56Ni mixing can be deduced, then it places constraints on the progenitor and properties of the explosive burning. In practice we find it is difficult to disentangle whether the explosion occurred recently and one is seeing 56Ni heating near the surface or whether the explosion began in the past and 56Ni heating is deeper. In the latter case there is a "dark phase" between the moment of explosion and the first light observed from the shallowest layers of 56Ni. Because of this, simply extrapolating a lightcurve from 56Ni back in time is not a reliable method for estimating the explosion time. The best solution is to directly identify the moment of explosion, by either observing shock breakout or shock-heated surface cooling, so the depth being probed by the rising lightcurve is known. Since this is typically not available, we identify other diagnostics that are helpful for deciphering how recently an explosion occurred. As an example we apply these arguments to the SN Ic PTF 10vgv. We demonstrate that just a single measurement of the photospheric velocity and temperature during the rise places constraints on its explosion time, radius, and 56Ni mixing.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ZTF SN Ia DR2 follow-up: early excess in Type Ia supernova light curves
Up to about a quarter of Type Ia supernovae may have an early light-curve bump, but the candidate list depends strongly on the detection method and neither leading explosion model is clearly preferred.
-
Optical observations on the young Type Ia SN 2021fxy with detached high velocity features
In SN 2021fxy, the high-velocity Si II λ6355 absorption declines as roughly t^−0.1, much shallower than the t^−0.22 expected from standard outer ejecta, pointing to detached density structures.
-
Probing a new subclass of llGRB-SN transients: Insights from EP250304a and its associated supernova
EP250304a/SN 2025fhm is presented as a member of an emerging subclass of shocked cocoon-dominated low-luminosity GRB-SNe based on spectral, photometric, and light-curve modeling comparisons to prior events.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.