Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 50 references

Resonant spin amplification and accumulation in MAPbI$_3$ single crystals

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 20-micrometre MAPbI3 perovskite single crystal keeps electron spins coherent for 21 nanoseconds at 1.6 K, the longest such time reported in any lead halide perovskite, and long enough that spins from successive laser pulses add up and…

desk verdict First RSA in lead halide perovskites reports a record 21 ns electron dephasing; the measurement is plausible but the abstract overstates T1 and the zero-field peak is not checked against DNP effects. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06495 v1 pith:6UIUCRTP submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Erik Kirstein , Dmitri R. Yakovlev , Evgeny A. Zhukov , Nataliia E. Kopteva , Bekir Turedi , Maksym V. Kovalenko , Manfred Bayer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords leadhalideperovskitesMAPbI3carrierspindynamicstime-resolvedKerrellipticityresonantamplificationaccumulationinertiaspintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that electron spins in a 20-micrometre MAPbI3 perovskite single crystal remain coherent for about $T_{2,e}^{*}=21$ ns at 1.6 K, the longest transverse spin dephasing time reported so far for any lead halide perovskite, and that the longitudinal spin relaxation time $T_1$ reaches about 30 ns in a 20 mT field. Because these lifetimes exceed the 13.2 ns period of the 76 MHz laser pulses, the spin polarization created by one pulse survives until the next pulse arrives, producing spin accumulation. The authors use that accumulation to perform resonant spin amplification, polarization recovery, and spin inertia measurements, extracting electron and hole g-factors, spin dephasing times, a small g-factor spread for the electron ensemble, and nuclear Overhauser fields from dynamic nuclear polarization. The paper's point is to show that lead halide perovskites support the coherent spin phenomena previously seen in conventional III-V and II-VI semiconductors, establishing them as a platform for spintronic and spin-based quantum technologies.

What carries the argument

The experiments detect spin precession through time-resolved Kerr ellipticity, the change in elliptical polarization of a linearly polarized probe beam after reflection from the spin-polarized sample. The load-bearing mechanism is resonant spin amplification (RSA): when the spin dephasing time $T_2^*$ exceeds the laser repetition period $T_R = 13.2$ ns, spin polarization from successive pulses adds coherently, and the detected Kerr ellipticity is amplified whenever the Larmor precession frequency $\omega_L$ satisfies the phase synchronization condition $\omega_L = n\,\omega_R$ with $\omega_R = 2\pi/T_R$. The paper sums the pulse train analytically in Equation (4), which gives the RSA peak shape and its magnetic-field-dependent amplitude; for sharp peaks and long spin memory this reduces to Equation (5), a Lorentzian in the detuning $\omega_L T_R - 2\pi n$ whose width is set by $T_R/T_2^*$. To reproduce the decay of peak amplitude at higher fields, the paper averages Equation (4) over a Gaussian distribution of electron g-factors, extracting the median g-factor $g_{e,0}=2.676$ and the spread $\Delta g_e = 0.006$. Supporting techniques are the polarization recovery curve (Equation (8)), which separates electron and hole hyperfine couplings; the spin inertia frequency response (Equation (11)), which yields $T_1$; and the pump-helicity dependence of Larmor frequencies (Equation (13)), which gives the nuclear Overhauser fields. The RSA peaks are spaced by about 2 mT, reflecting the electron g-factor.

What would settle it

Measure the same zero-field RSA peak with a two-pulse spin echo or Hahn echo sequence: if the echo-derived homogeneous dephasing time is clearly longer than $T_2^* = 21$ ns, then the RSA Lorentzian width is broadened partly by inhomogeneous nuclear Overhauser fields and the quoted value is a lower bound. A complementary check is to compare the zero-field RSA peak width with the width predicted by Equation (5) and to repeat the measurement at fields of tens of millitesla, where the polarization recovery data show nuclear fluctuations are suppressed; a narrowing beyond the g-factor dispersion model would confirm the nuclear contribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a thin, structurally high-quality MAPbI3 single crystal in its low-temperature orthorhombic phase supports electron spin coherence lasting $T_{2,0,e}^{*}=21$ ns, with a Lorentzian fit of the zero-field resonant spin amplification peak giving 19.4 ns, which the paper identifies as the longest electron spin dephasing time reported for lead halide perovskites. The long-lived spin component is assigned to localized electrons based on the electron g-factor $g_{e,0}=2.676$ obtained by modeling the RSA pattern with Equation (4) averaged over a Gaussian distribution of g-factors of width $\Delta g_e = 0.006$; the hole component dephases much faster, with $T_{2,h}^{*}\approx 0.8$ ns. Longitudinal spin relaxation, measured by the spin inertia technique, increases from about 20 ns at zero field to about 30 ns at $B_F = 20$ mT, so the paper concludes $T_1 \ge 30$ ns. The experiments also expose the nuclear spin bath: the polarization recovery curve contains components at 3 mT and 21 mT assigned to electrons and holes, and circularly polarized pumping in a tilted magnetic field produces nuclear Overhauser fields of about $+3.3$ mT on electrons and $-17.2$ mT on holes. In the authors' interpretation, these results make spin accumulation and resonant spin amplification workable tools for halide perovskites and position MAPbI3 as a candidate platform for spin-based quantum technologies.

Load-bearing premise

The 21 ns coherence claim rests on assuming the zero-field resonant spin amplification peak has a purely Lorentzian, exponential-dephasing shape and that random magnetic fields from nuclear spins do not materially broaden it; if those nuclear field fluctuations do broaden the peak, the extracted time would be an underestimate and the lineshape model would be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 21 ns electron dephasing time is correct, MAPbI3 thin single crystals hold electron spin coherence about twice as long as the previous best single-crystal value of 11 ns, and far longer than the sub-nanosecond times typical of perovskite films.
  • Because $T_1 \approx 30$ ns and $T_2^* \approx 21$ ns both exceed the 13.2 ns laser period, spin accumulation is accessible with a standard 76 MHz pulsed laser, so resonant spin amplification, polarization recovery, and spin inertia measurements do not require a special low-repetition-rate source.
  • The measured g-factor spread $\Delta g_e/g_e \approx 0.2\%$ shows that the electron spin ensemble is highly homogeneous, which the paper attributes to the structural quality of the thin single crystal and which underlies the sharp RSA peaks.
  • The demonstration transfers established resonant spin amplification and spin inertia protocols from III-V and II-VI semiconductors to lead halide perovskites, and the paper expects similarly long spin times in other high-quality perovskite compositions.
  • Dynamic nuclear polarization produces measurable Overhauser fields on both electrons and holes, so the nuclear spin bath in these crystals can be addressed and read out through carrier spin precession.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quoted 21 ns value is extracted from the zero-field RSA peak width under an exponential-dephasing assumption; if random nuclear Overhauser fields inhomogeneously broaden that peak, the true homogeneous dephasing time could be longer, making 21 ns a lower bound rather than the limiting coherence time.
  • A two-pulse spin echo or Hahn echo measurement on the same crystal would separate homogeneous from inhomogeneous contributions to $T_2^*$ and directly test whether nuclear spin fluctuations set the zero-field linewidth.
  • The same RSA protocol could be transferred to perovskite nanocrystals and two-dimensional halide perovskites, where shorter spin times and different g-factor tunability would change the resonance pattern but the same phase synchronization condition should still govern the spin accumulation.
  • The weak hole spin signal (about one fifth of the electron amplitude) suggests a sample-specific resident hole population; surface treatments or doping that alter the hole density should change the hole RSA and polarization recovery amplitudes in a testable way.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved Kerr ellipticity studies of carrier spin dynamics in a 20-µm-thick MAPbI3 single crystal at 1.6 K. It claims a zero-field electron spin dephasing time T2,0,e* = 21 ns obtained from resonant spin amplification (RSA), a longitudinal spin relaxation time T1 reaching 30 ns at BF = 20 mT from spin inertia, a small electron g-factor dispersion Δge = 0.006, and dynamic nuclear polarization with Overhauser fields up to +3.3 mT for electrons and -17.2 mT for holes. The paper introduces RSA and spin-inertia techniques to lead halide perovskites and demonstrates spin accumulation with a 76 MHz pulsed laser.

Significance. If the central claim holds, 21 ns is the longest electron spin dephasing time reported for lead halide perovskites and would strengthen the case for these materials in spin-based technologies. The paper has notable strengths: the zero-field RSA peak width is independently fit by a Lorentzian (19.4 ns) and by the full RSA model (21 ns), and these values are quantitatively consistent with the 3.3 ns dephasing measured at 0.5 T through Eq. (6). The first demonstration of RSA in perovskites and the explicit measurements of Overhauser fields are valuable. The main uncertainties concern the nuclear-spin-state dependence of the RSA peak and the uncontrolled comparison underlying the 'longest reported' claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [II C, Eqs. (4)-(5), and II F] The record value T2,0,e* = 21 ns is extracted from the zero-field RSA peak using Eq. (4) and the Lorentzian approximation Eq. (5), both of which assume a single spin dephasing time and no nuclear-spin feedback. The RSA experiment is performed with an amplitude-modulated pump of fixed helicity (Sec. V), so a helicity-dependent Overhauser field can accumulate over the 76 MHz pulse train. The authors themselves demonstrate strong dynamic nuclear polarization in this material (Sec. II F, Fig. 8) and note that nuclear frequency focusing can modify coherent carrier spin dynamics. If the pumped nuclear bath reduces transverse Overhauser-field fluctuations, the zero-field RSA peak would be narrowed and T2,0,e* would reflect the nuclear spin state rather than the intrinsic electron dephasing. Conversely, if the nuclear-field distribution simply broadens the peak, the extracted value is an upper bound on the homogeneous dephasing time. Because the abstract's claim is explicitly comparative ('longest reported so far'), this possibility must be excluded or stated as a condition of the measurement. A control comparing RSA with opposite helicities, with helicity modulation, or with scan-direction/hysteresis checks would address this.
  2. [II C] The statement that T2,0,e* = 21 ns is 'the longest reported so far for lead halide perovskite semiconductors' compares a zero-field value with literature values (11.5 ns for FAPbBr3 [16], 11 ns for MAPbI3 [15]) without specifying the magnetic fields at which those values were obtained. Since T2* in this work decreases strongly with field (Eq. (6), Fig. 5d), a zero-field value is not directly comparable with a finite-field value unless the field is stated. The record claim should be restricted to the same field condition or reformulated with the field dependence explicitly stated.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract and II E] The abstract reports 'T1 = 30 ns' without stating that this is the spin inertia time Ts measured at BF = 20 mT and without the Ts ≈ T1 caveat from Eq. (10); the zero-field value from the same method is about 20 ns (Fig. 7d). Please state the field and the Ts/T1 distinction.
  2. [II B and Fig. 2] The hole spin dephasing time is reported as 0.35 ns from the time-domain fit but about 1.0 ns from the FFT linewidth (Δωh = 6.03 rad/ns); this factor-of-three discrepancy is not discussed.
  3. [II C, text near Eq. (6)] The sentence 'The spin dephasing time is decreasing with magnetic field due to the decreasing impact of the g-factor dispersion' should read 'increasing impact', since the g-factor dispersion has a larger effect at higher fields.
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] The word 'Lorenzian' should be 'Lorentzian'.
  5. [II B] The phrase 'Vice verse' should be 'Vice versa'.
  6. [V] In the sample synthesis description, 'PI2' presumably should be 'PbI2'.
  7. [II D and Fig. 7d] The zero-field KE decay gives T1 = 26 ns (Fig. 2a), while spin inertia gives Ts ≈ 20 ns at zero field; the origin of this 30% difference is not commented on.
  8. [Eqs. (6) and (14)] The symbol T2,0* is used both for the zero-field dephasing time in Eq. (6) and for the temperature-independent dephasing time in Eq. (14); these are different quantities and using separate symbols would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the reported spin lifetimes are fit parameters with independent cross-checks, not outputs of assumptions containing the target values.

full rationale

The paper's central results (T2,e*=21 ns, T1=30 ns) are obtained by standard least-squares fits of measured RSA and spin-inertia data to model equations (Eqs. 4, 5, 11, 16). No target value is inserted as an assumption and then recovered: the zero-field RSA peak is first fit with the Lorentzian Eq. (5), giving 19.4 ns, and the full RSA trace is then modeled with Eq. (4) using ge,0=2.676, delta_ge=0.006, and tau_s=21 ns, where these are fit parameters, not outputs of a derivation containing the record claim. The g-factor dispersion estimate from the 1.5 meV pump spectral width via Eq. (7) (about 0.004) independently agrees with the fitted delta_ge=0.006, providing external consistency. The RSA theory Eq. (4) is cited to ref. 31, whose authors overlap with the present paper, but the theory is a standard closed-form summation of decaying Larmor precession and is not constructed to produce the measured 21 ns. Likewise, PR assignments and g-factor ranges cited from refs. 7, 13, and 36 are comparative anchors, not inputs that force the reported lifetimes. The possible influence of dynamic nuclear polarization on the zero-field RSA peak is a correctness or modeling risk, since the paper itself demonstrates DNP in Section II F, but it is not a circular reduction: the paper does not define T2* in terms of the Overhauser field, nor does it use DNP to derive the peak width. The paper also states open limitations, such as the unresolved broad PR component (delta_PR,3=123 mT) and the conclusion T1>=30 ns, but these are stated uncertainties, not circular steps. Hence no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard spin dynamics models (RSA, spin inertia, hyperfine interaction) and on component identification via prior g-factor values, mostly from the same group's earlier work on other perovskite crystals. The key numbers (T2*, T1) are fit outputs, not derived from first principles. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • electron g-factor dispersion Δg_e = 0.006
    Fitted by simulating the RSA amplitude decay vs magnetic field with a Gaussian g-factor distribution (Fig 5b); used in Eq. (6) for T2*(B).
  • median electron g-factor g_e,0 = 2.676
    Chosen in the RSA simulation to match the RSA peak positions; consistent with the prior range 2.46-2.98 from ref [7].
  • zero-field spin dephasing time T2,0* = 21 ns (19.4 ns from Lorentzian fit)
    Extracted from the RSA peak width via Eq. (5) and used in the RSA simulation; it is the central record claim.
  • longitudinal spin relaxation time T1 (spin inertia) = 20 ns at zero field, 30 ns at BF=20 mT
    Extracted from the frequency dependence of the KE amplitude fit to Eq. (11), Fig 7c-d; the abstract reports 30 ns without the field condition.
  • PR Lorentzian widths δPR,1, δPR,2, δPR,3 = 3, 21, 123 mT
    Fitted to the polarization recovery curve with Eq. (8), Fig 6a; assigned to electrons, holes, and an unidentified mechanism.
  • Arrhenius parameters (w, EA, T2,0*) for T2*(T) = 0.032 ns/K, 5 meV, 2.4 ns
    Fitted with Eq. (14), Fig 9c; secondary to the central claim.
  • Elliott-Yafet momentum scattering time τP = 9.5 ns (with AEY=1 fixed)
    Fitted with Eq. (15); the authors note AEY and τP are interdependent.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Kerr ellipticity signal is proportional to the electron/hole spin polarization generated by circularly polarized pump pulses.
    Section II B; standard assumption of the pump-probe Kerr technique that the measured ellipticity reflects the spin dynamics without back-action.
  • domain assumption Optical selection rules for lead halide perovskites: a σ+ photon creates an electron and a hole both with spin +1/2.
    Section II B; based on the band structure of lead halide perovskites, cited to ref [8].
  • domain assumption The two oscillating components in the Kerr dynamics correspond to independent electron and hole spin populations with g-factors in the previously reported ranges (ge = +2.46 to +2.98, gh = -0.28 to -0.71).
    Section II B; used to decompose the dynamics; relies on prior g-factor measurements by the same group (ref [7]) rather than an in-situ determination.
  • domain assumption RSA spin accumulation follows the infinite-sum model of Eq. (3) with identical pulses and a single spin dephasing time τs.
    Section II C; taken from ref [31]; the model treats spins as indistinguishable and ignores pulse-to-pulse variations.
  • domain assumption The nuclear Overhauser field fluctuations are the dominant source of low-field spin relaxation, and polarization recovery in a longitudinal field suppresses them.
    Section II D; standard model for localized carriers in III-V/II-VI semiconductors, applied here to perovskites; supported by refs [36, 41].
  • domain assumption In the spin inertia experiment, the generation rate G is small enough that Ts ≈ T1.
    Section II E; the authors state the excitation density is low, but no quantitative estimate of G/n0 is given; the exactness of T1 = 30 ns depends on this.
  • ad hoc to paper The PR component widths can be transferred from FA0.9Cs0.1PbI2.8Br0.2 (δPR,e=5 mT, δPR,h=19 mT) to MAPbI3 to assign δPR,1=3 mT to electrons and δPR,2=21 mT to holes.
    Section II D; the assignment is by analogy with a different perovskite composition measured by the same group (ref [36]), not by a specific measurement in this sample.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonant spin amplification and accumulation in MAPbI$_3$ single crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6UIUCRTP

@misc{pith2026250206495,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonant spin amplification and accumulation in MAPbI$_3$ single crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6UIUCRTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06495}
}
abstract

Quantum technologic and spintronic applications require reliable semiconducting materials that enable a significant, long-living spin polarization of electronic excitations and offer the ability to manipulate it optically in an external field. Due to the specifics of band structure and remarkable spin-dependent properties, the lead halide perovskite semiconductors are suitable candidates for that. Here, the carrier spin dynamics in a MAPbI$_3$ (MA = methylammonium) perovskite single crystal with thickness of 20 $\mu$m are studied by the time-resolved Kerr ellipticity technique at cryogenic temperatures. Long times of longitudinal electron spin relaxation $T_1 = 30$ ns and transverse electron spin dephasing $T_{2,e}^*=21$ ns are found. The spin dynamics lasting longer than the applied laser pulse repetition period give rise to spin accumulation effects. We exploit them through the resonant spin amplification, polarization recovery, and spin inertia techniques to study the electron and hole spin systems coupled with the nuclear spins. These results establish the lead halide perovskite semiconductors as suitable platform for quantum technologies relying on spin-dependent phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06495 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Optical properties of MAPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spin dynamics in the MAPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spin dynamics at various pump powers, measured at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Resonant spin amplification effect. Sketch explaining [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Resonant spin amplification of electrons in the MAPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Polarization recovery. (a) Kerr ellipticity measured at the small negative time delay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spin inertia. (a) Polarization recovery curves measured at the negative delay of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dynamic nuclear polarization. (a) KE dynamics measured with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Temperature dependence of spin dynamics. (a) KE dynamics at different temperatures. The dynamics are fitted with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    U. N. Huynh, Y. Liu, A. Chanana, D. R. Khanal, P. C. Sercel, J. Huang, and Z. V. Vardeny, Transient quantum beatings of trions in hybrid organic tri-iodine perovskite single crystal. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1428

    work page 2022

  2. [15]

    Kirstein, D

    E. Kirstein, D. R. Yakovlev, E. A. Zhukov, J. H¨ ocker, V. Dyakonov, and M. Bayer, Spin dynamics of electrons and holes interacting with nuclei in MAPbI 3 perovskite single crystals. ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 1375–1384

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    At cryogenic temperatures below 160 K the crystal structure changes to orthorhombic

    axis. At cryogenic temperatures below 160 K the crystal structure changes to orthorhombic. The sample code is M2-5. The sample has a size of 2 × 2 × 0.02 mm. An X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis performed at room temperature confirmed the crystallographic orientation of the sample surface normal which is collinear to the light wave vector, k ∥ [001] (c-axi...

    work page

  4. [2]

    Z. V. Vardeny, and M. C. Beard (eds.), Hybrid Organic Inorganic Perovskites: Physical Properties and Applica- tions, World Scientific, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [3]

    Vinattieri, and G

    A. Vinattieri, and G. Giorgi (eds.), Halide Perovskites for Photonics, AIP Publishing, Melville, New York, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [4]

    J. P. Martinez-Pastor, P. P. Boix, and G. Xing (eds.), Halide Perovskites for Generation, Manipulation and De- tection of Light, Elsevier, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [5]

    Privitera, M

    A. Privitera, M. Righetto, F. Cacialli, and M. K. Riede, Perspectives of organic and perovskite-based spintronics, Adv. Optical Mater.2021, 2100215

    work page 2021

  8. [6]

    J. Wang, C. Zhang, H. Liu, R. McLaughlin, Y. Zhai, S. R. Vardeny, X. Liu, S. McGill, D. Semenov, H. Guo, R. Tsuchikawa, V. V. Deshpande, D. Sun, and Z. V. Vardeny, Spin-optoelectronic devices based on hybrid organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 129

    work page 2019

Show all 50 references
  1. [7]

    Y.-H. Kim, Y. Zhai, H. Lu, X. Pan, C. Xiao, E. A. Gauld- ing, S. P. Harvey, J. J. Berry, Z. V. Vardeny, J. M. Luther, and M. C. Beard, Chiral-induced spin selectivity enables a room-temperature spin light-emitting diode. Science 2021, 371, 1129

    2021

  2. [8]

    Kirstein, D

    E. Kirstein, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, E. A. Zhukov, D. Kudlacik, I. V. Kalitukha, V. F. Sapega, G. S. Dim- itriev, M. A. Semina, M. O. Nestoklon, E. L. Ivchenko, N. E. Kopteva, D. N. Dirin, O. Nazarenko, M. V. Ko- valenko, A. Baumann, J. H¨ ocker, V. Dyakonov, and M. Baye...

    2022

  3. [9]

    N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Yalcin, I. A. Akimov, M. O. Nestoklon, M. M. Glazov, M. Kotur, D. Kudlacik, E. A. Zhukov, E. Kirstein, O. Hordiichuk, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Highly-polarized emis- sion provided by giant optical orientation of exciton spin...

    2024

  4. [10]

    D. D. Awschalom, D. Loss, and N. Samarth (eds.), Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation (Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    2002

  5. [11]

    D. R. Yakovlev and M. Bayer, in: Spin Physics in Semiconductors, 2nd edition, edited by M. I. Dyakonov (Springer International Publishing, 2017), Chap. 6, p. 155

    2017

  6. [12]

    V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, P. S. Grigoryev, M. Hussain, J. Rautert, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in CsPbBr 3 perovskite crystals. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 673

    2019

  7. [13]

    U. N. Huynh, T. Feng, D. R. Khanal, H. Liu, P. Bailey, R. Bodin, P. C. Sercel, J. Huang, and Z. V. Vardeny, Transient and steady state magneto-optical studies of the CsPbBr3 crystal, Phys. Rev. B2022, 106, 094306

  8. [14]

    Kirstein, D

    E. Kirstein, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, E. Evers, E. A. Zhukov, V. V. Belykh, N. E. Kopteva, D. Kud- lacik, O. Nazarenko, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Lead-dominated hyperfine interaction impact- ing the carrier spin dynamics in halide perovskites. Adv. Mater...

    2022

  9. [17]

    Kirstein, E

    E. Kirstein, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, N. E. Kopteva, E. Yalcin, I. A. Akimov, O. Hordiichuk, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer. Coherent carrier spin dynamics in F APbBr3 perovskite crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024, 15, 2893-2903

    2024

  10. [18]

    U. N. Huynh, R. Bodin, X. Pan, P. Bailey, H. Liu, S. McGill, D. Semenov, P. C. Sercel, and Z. V. Var- deny, Hybrid organic/inorganic perovskite: The case of methylammonium lead bromide, Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 014316

    2024

  11. [19]

    P. S. Grigoryev, V. V. Belykh, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Lhuil- lier, and M. Bayer, Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in CsPbBr 3 colloidal nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 8481-8487

    2021

  12. [20]

    L. M. Jacoby, M. J. Crane, and D. R. Gamelin, Coherent spin dynamics in vapor-deposited CsPbBr 3 perovskite thin films, Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 1937-1945

    2022

  13. [21]

    Odenthal, W

    P. Odenthal, W. Talmadge, N. Gundlach, R. Wang, C. Zhang, D. Sun, Z.-G. Yu, V. Z. Vardeny, and Y. S. Li, Spin-polarized exciton quantum beating in hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites. Nature Physics 2017, 13, 14 894

    2017

  14. [22]

    Garcia-Arellano, G

    G. Garcia-Arellano, G. Tripp´ e-Allard, L. Legrand, T. Barisien, D. Garrot, E. Deleporte, F. Bernardot, C. Testelin, and M. Chamarro, Energy tuning of electronic spin coherent evolution in methylammonium lead iodide perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.2021, 12, 8272

    2021

  15. [23]

    Garcia-Arellano, G

    G. Garcia-Arellano, G. Tripp´ e-Allard, T. Campos, F. Bernardot, L. Legrand, D. Garrot, E. Deleporte, C. Testelin, and M. Chamarro, Unexpected anisotropy of the electron and hole Land´ e g-factors in perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 polycrystalline films. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1399

    2022

  16. [24]

    Lag¨ ue, F

    G. Lag¨ ue, F. Bernardot, V. Guilloux, L. Legrand, T. Barisien, J. S´ anchez-Diaz, S. Galve-Lahoz, I. Saidi, K. Boujdaria, J. P. Martinez-Pastor, C. Testelin, I. Mora- Ser´ o, and M. Chamarro, Spin coherence and relaxation dynamics of localized electrons and holes in F APbI3 f...

    2024

  17. [25]

    N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Kirstein, E. A. Zhukov, D. Kudlacik, I. V. Kalitukha, V. F. Sapega, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, A. Baumann, J. H¨ ocker, V. Dyakonov, S. A. Crooker, and M. Bayer, Weak dis- persion of exciton Land´ e factor with band gap energy in lead halid...

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. M. Kikkawa and D. D. Awschalom, Resonant spin am- plification in n-type GaAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 4313

    1998

  19. [27]

    L. V. Fokina, I. A. Yugova, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, I. A. Akimov, A. Greilich, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, and M. Bayer, Spin dynamics of electrons and holes in InGaAs/GaAs quantum wells at millikelvin tem- peratures. Phys. Rev. B2010, 81, 195304

  20. [28]

    E. A. Zhukov, O. A. Yugov, I. A. Yugova, D. R. Yakovlev, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, J. Kossut, and M. Bayer, Resonant spin amplification of resident elec- trons in CdTe/(Cd,Mg)Te quantum wells subject to tilted magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B2012, 86, 245314

  21. [29]

    Greilich, D

    A. Greilich, D. R. Yakovlev, A. Shabaev, Al. L. Efros, I. A. Yugova, R. Oulton, V. Stavarache, D. Reuter, A. Wieck, and M. Bayer, Mode locking of electron spin co- herences in singly charged quantum dots. Science 2006, 313, 341

    2006

  22. [30]

    D. S. Smirnov, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Kirstein, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Theory of spin inertia in singly charged quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B2018, 98, 125306

  23. [31]

    Kirstein, N

    E. Kirstein, N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, E. A. Zhukov, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, V. V. Belykh, I. A. Yugova, M. M. Glazov, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich. Mode locking of hole spin coherences in CsPb(Cl,Br)3 perovskite nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 699

    2023

  24. [32]

    I. A. Yugova, M. M. Glazov, D. R. Yakovlev, A. A. Sokolova, and M. Bayer, Coherent spin dynamics of elec- trons and holes in semiconductor quantum wells and quantum dots under periodical optical excitation: Reso- nant spin amplification versus spin mode locking. Phys. Rev. B 2...

    2012

  25. [33]

    N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Yalcin, I. A. Akimov, M. O. Nestoklon, M. M. Glazov, M. Kotur, D. Kudlacik, E. A. Zhukov, E. Kirstein, O. Hordiichuk, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. Bayer, Effect of crystal sym- metry of lead halide perovskites on the optical orienta- t...

    2025 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    N. E. Kopteva, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Yalcin, I. A. Aki- mov, M. Kotur, B. Turedi, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Ko- valenko, and M. Bayer, Optical orientation of excitons and carriers in perovskite MAPbI 3 single crystal in or- thorhombic phase, CondMat ArXive 07 February 2025. http://arxiv...

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Galkowski, A

    K. Galkowski, A. Mitioglu, A. Miyata, P. Plochocka, O. Portugall, G. E. Eperon, J. T.-W. Wang, T. Stergiopou- los, S. D. Stranks, H. J. Snaith, and R. J. Nicholas, Determination of the exciton binding energy and effec- tive masses for methylammonium and formamidinium lead tri-...

    2016

  28. [36]

    C. Yang, J. Yin, H. Li, K. Almasabi, L. Guti´ errez- Arzaluz, I. Gereige, J.-L. Br´ edas, O. M. Bakr, and O. F. Mohammed, Engineering surface orientations for ef- ficient and stable hybrid perovskite single-crystal solar cells. ACS Energy Lett.2022, 7, 1544–1552

    2022

  29. [37]

    Kudlacik, N

    D. Kudlacik, N. E. Kopteva, M. Kotur, D. R. Yakovlev, K. V. Kavokin, C. Harkort, M. Karzel, E. A. Zhukov, E. Evers, V. V. Belykh, and M. Bayer. Optical spin ori- entation of localized electrons and holes interacting with nuclei in a F A0.9Cs0.1PbI2.8Br0.2 perovskite crystal, A...

    2024

  30. [38]

    D. W. deQuilettes, K. Frohna, D. Emin, T. Kirchartz, V. Bulovic, D. S. Ginger, and S. D. Stranks, Charge-carrier recombination in halide perovskites. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 11007–11019

    2019

  31. [39]

    A. D. Wright, R. L. Milot, G. E. Eperon, H. J. Snaith, M.B Johnston, and L. M. Herz, Band-tail recombina- tion in hybrid lead iodide perovskite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1700860

    2017

  32. [40]

    I. A. Yugova, M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, A. L. Efros, Faraday rotation and ellipticity in an ensemble of singly charged quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B2009, 80, 104436

  33. [41]

    E. A. Zhukov, E. Kirstein, N. E. Kopteva, F. Heis- terkamp, I. A. Yugova, V. L. Korenev, D. R. Yakovlev, A. Pawlis, M. Bayer, A. Greilich, Discretization of the total magnetic field by the nuclear spin bath in fluorine-doped ZnSe. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–8

    2018

  34. [42]

    M. M. Glazov, Electron and Nuclear Spin Dynamics in Semiconductor Nanostructures, Oxford University Press, UK, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    D. S. Smirnov, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, E. Kirstein, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Spin polarization recovery and Hanle effect for charge carriers interacting with nu- clear spins in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 235413

    2020

  36. [44]

    Heisterkamp, E

    F. Heisterkamp, E. A. Zhukov, A. Greilich, D. R. Yakovlev, V. L. Korenev, A. Pawlis, and M. Bayer, Lon- gitudinal and transverse spin dynamics of donor-bound electrons in fluorine-doped ZnSe: Spin inertia versus Hanle effect. Phys. Rev. B2015, 91, 235432

  37. [45]

    E. A. Zhukov, E. Kirstein, D. S. Smirnov, D. R. Yakovlev, M. M. Glazov, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, M. Bayer, and A. Greilich, Spin inertia of resident and photoexcited carri- ers in singly charged quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B2018, 98, 121304(R)

  38. [46]

    Kirstein, D

    E. Kirstein, D. S. Smirnov, E. A. Zhukov, D. R. Yakovlev, N. E. Kopteva, D. N. Dirin, O. Hordiichuk, M. V. Ko- valenko, and M. Bayer. The squeezed dark nuclear spin 15 state in lead halide perovskites. Nat. Commun.2023, 14, 6683

    2023

  39. [47]

    S. R. Meliakov, V. V. Belykh, E. A. Zhukov, E. V. Kolobkova, M. S. Kuznetsova, M. Bayer, and D. R. Yakovlev, Hole spin precession and dephasing induced by nuclear hyperfine fields in CsPbBr3 and CsPb(Cl,Br)3 nanocrystals in a glass matrix. Phys. Rev. B2024, 110, 235301

  40. [48]

    Greilich, A

    A. Greilich, A. Shabaev, D. R. Yakovlev, Al. L. Efros, I. A. Yugova, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, and M. Bayer, Nuclei-induced frequency focusing of electron spin coher- ence. Science 2007, 317, 1896

    2007

  41. [49]

    M. A. P´ erez-Osorio, Q. Lin, R. T. Phillips, R. L. Milot, L. M. Herz, M. B. Johnston, and F. Giustino, Ra- man spectrum of the organic–inorganic halide perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 from first principles and high-resolution low-temperature Raman measurement. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 38, 21703

    2018

  42. [50]

    Meier and B

    F. Meier and B. P. Zakharchenya (eds.), Optical Orien- tation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984. S1 Supporting Information: Resonant spin amplification and accumulation in MAPbI 3 single crystals I. SPIN ACCUMULA TION IN PR CUR VES 0 5 10 0 Time (ns) Kerr ellipticity 20 ns 30 ns w/o ...

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.