REVIEW 4 cited by
CodeMMLU: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Assessing Code Understanding & Reasoning Capabilities of CodeLLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in Code Large Language Models (CodeLLMs) have primarily focused on open-ended code generation, often overlooking the crucial aspect of code understanding and reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce CodeMMLU, a comprehensive multiple-choice benchmark designed to evaluate the depth of software and code comprehension in LLMs. CodeMMLU includes nearly 20,000 questions spanning diverse domains, including code analysis, defect detection, and software engineering principles across multiple programming languages. Unlike traditional benchmarks that emphasize code generation, CodeMMLU assesses a model's ability to reason about programs across a wide-range of tasks such as code repair, execution reasoning, and fill-in-the-blank challenges. Our extensive evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle with CodeMMLU, highlighting significant gaps in comprehension beyond generation. By emphasizing the essential connection between code understanding and effective AI-assisted development, CodeMMLU provides a critical resource for advancing more reliable and capable coding assistants.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models
RepoReasoner is a repository-level code-reasoning benchmark with output-prediction and call-chain tasks; the best LLM reaches only 69.1% Pass@1 even with oracle context, with low recall in dependency tracing.
-
FrontendBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Front-End Development via Automatic Evaluation
A new benchmark adds 148 interactive front-end development tasks with automated sandbox tests, reporting a 90.54% agreement rate with human evaluation across four LLMs.
-
Code Reasoning for Software Engineering Tasks: A Survey and A Call to Action
A survey of test-time reasoning methods for code tasks, with a taxonomy and comparisons showing that structure-aware and execution-aware approaches tend to outperform plain chain-of-thought.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applications
A survey of 80+ Deep Research systems that proposes a four-layer taxonomy (foundation models, tool use, planning, synthesis) and compares commercial and open-source implementations.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.