pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.14404 · v2 · pith:6VAJO6FRnew · submitted 2025-11-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Shape dependence of Edelstein and magnetoelectric effects in the V-shaped model

Shuhei Kanda , Satoru Hayami This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetoelectric effectEdelstein effectV-shaped chaingeometry-induced responseeffective spin-orbit interactionT-matrix scatteringmultipole selection rules
0
0 comments X

The pith

The nonmagnetic magnetoelectric response in V-shaped chains maximizes at an apex angle of approximately 0.6π via geometry-induced effective spin-orbit interaction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a symmetry-based framework that links the local V-shaped geometry of a one-dimensional chain to its magnetoelectric responses, both nonmagnetic and magnetic. Numerical Kubo-formula results show the nonmagnetic Edelstein-type response peaks near θ ≈ 0.6π. Derivation of a low-energy effective Hamiltonian in the s-orbital subspace reveals that the geometric polarity acts as an effective spin-orbit term. An analytic Green's function treatment expresses the same effect as a T-matrix scattering contribution from local symmetry breaking, yielding the closed-form angular dependence sinθ sin(θ/2). This form peaks analytically at θ = 2 tan^{-1}√2 ≈ 0.608π, matching the numerics, and the framework also distinguishes the magnetic-driven mechanism that appears under broken time-reversal symmetry.

Core claim

In the V-shaped one-dimensional chain the geometry induces an effective spin-orbit interaction within the s-orbital subspace; when this couples to the orbital angular momentum generated at the apex, the resulting nonmagnetic magnetoelectric response follows the angular dependence sinθ sin(θ/2) and reaches its maximum at θ = 2 tan^{-1}√2 ≈ 0.608π, as derived from the T-matrix contribution to the Green's function and confirmed by Kubo-formula numerics. The same framework identifies separate selection rules for the ME tensor via a multipole-basis representation and shows that the magnetic-driven response, active when ferromagnetism breaks time-reversal symmetry, originates from the coupling of

What carries the argument

T-matrix contribution to the Green's function that encodes the geometric effect of local symmetry breaking, together with the multipole-basis representation that supplies symmetry selection rules for the ME tensor.

If this is right

  • The analytic angular dependence allows the ME response to be optimized simply by choosing a specific apex angle without repeated full simulations.
  • Symmetry selection rules derived from the multipole basis determine which components of the ME tensor are permitted by the V-shaped geometry.
  • When time-reversal symmetry is broken by ferromagnetism the dominant ME mechanism switches to one driven by Zeeman-induced spin magnetization coupled to the electric-field-generated charge-potential gradient.
  • The scattering-framework description unifies geometry-induced multipole responses across different local shapes under a common T-matrix picture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same effective-spin-orbit construction could be applied to other bent or polygonal chain geometries to predict ME coefficients without recomputing the full band structure.
  • Realizing the V-shape in a material platform would offer a route to electrically tunable magnetism at the nanoscale that relies only on geometry rather than intrinsic spin-orbit strength.
  • Analogous geometry-induced responses should appear in photonic or phononic waveguides whose local curvature breaks the same symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy effective Hamiltonian in the s-orbital subspace and the T-matrix description of the geometric effect remain valid when the V-shaped geometry is realized in a real material or when longer-range hoppings and electron-electron interactions are included.

What would settle it

A direct numerical evaluation of the magnetoelectric tensor for several apex angles that shows clear departure from the predicted sinθ sin(θ/2) curve, or an experimental measurement on a fabricated V-shaped nanostructure in which the nonmagnetic response fails to peak near 0.6π.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.14404 by Satoru Hayami, Shuhei Kanda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The tight-binding Hamiltonian is given by Hˆ = X RnRn′ X mm′σσ′ φˆ † mσ(Rn) h¯nn′ mm′σσ′ φˆm′σ′ (Rn′ ), (1) where ˆφmσ(Rn) and ˆφ † mσ(Rn) are the fermionic anni￾hilation and creation operators of the s–p orbital m = s, px, py, pz, the spin σ =↑, ↓, and the position Rn. The V-shaped 1D chain lattice consists of the 2N + 1 sites, whose positions are specified by Rn defined as Rn = a  n sin θ 2 , |n| cos θ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Chemical potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Diagrams representing the effective Green’s function in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Absolute values of the components of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Diagrams representing distinct processes for the ME effect in our effective models. The thick black line represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Apex angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (b) displays that α z;y T originates from the spin mag￾netization induced by the coupling between the charge￾potential gradient along the y direction generated by the applied electric field and the Zeeman interaction. Its θ dependence is given by α z;y Z ∝ cos θ 2 . (45) Accordingly, the angular dependence obtained in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic pictures of the multipole basis for the cluster, bond, and spin for the 7-site basis, together with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate the shape dependence and microscopic mechanism of the magnetoelectric (ME) effect, including both nonmagnetic (Edelstein-type) and magnetic origins, in a V-shaped one-dimensional chain model. Our goal is to establish a symmetry-based framework linking local geometry to ME responses. Numerical calculations based on the Kubo formula reveal that the nonmagnetic-driven ME response is maximized at an apex angle of $\theta \approx 0.6\pi$. To clarify its origin, we derive a low-energy effective Hamiltonian in the $s$-orbital subspace and demonstrate that the polarity induced by the V-shaped geometry manifests as an effective spin--orbit interaction. An analytical derivation of the Green's function shows that the geometric effect can be described as a $T$-matrix contribution associated with local symmetry breaking. This formulation provides a unified description of geometry-induced responses in terms of a scattering framework. Using a multipole-basis representation, we identify symmetry-based selection rules for the ME tensor and show that the coupling between the effective spin--orbit interaction and the orbital angular momentum generated across the apex plays an essential role. The resulting angular dependence, $\sin{\theta}\sin{\theta/2}$, peaks at $\theta = 2\tan^{-1}\sqrt{2} \approx 0.608\pi$, in good agreement with the numerical results. We also analyze a ferromagnetic V-shaped model including the Zeeman interaction and show that the magnetic-driven ME response originates from the spin magnetization induced by the coupling between the electric-field--driven charge-potential gradient and the Zeeman term. These results reveal distinct ME mechanisms depending on the presence or absence of time-reversal symmetry and provide a microscopic framework for geometry-induced multipole phenomena.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the shape dependence of Edelstein (nonmagnetic) and magnetoelectric effects in a V-shaped one-dimensional chain model. Kubo-formula numerics show the nonmagnetic ME response maximized at apex angle θ ≈ 0.6π. A low-energy effective Hamiltonian is derived in the s-orbital subspace, with V-geometry polarity represented as an effective spin-orbit interaction via a local T-matrix scattering term from symmetry breaking. This yields an analytic angular factor sinθ sin(θ/2) that peaks at θ = 2 tan^{-1}√2 ≈ 0.608π, in agreement with numerics. The ferromagnetic case with Zeeman interaction is analyzed separately, tracing the magnetic ME response to spin magnetization induced by the electric-field-driven charge-potential gradient.

Significance. If the low-energy projection and T-matrix construction hold, the work supplies a symmetry-based microscopic framework that links local geometry to geometry-induced multipole responses and distinguishes ME mechanisms with versus without time-reversal symmetry. The explicit analytic derivation of the angular dependence together with its direct numerical validation constitutes a clear strength and supplies a falsifiable prediction for shape-tuned responses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Low-energy effective Hamiltonian and T-matrix analysis] Low-energy effective Hamiltonian section: the projection onto the s-orbital subspace and the subsequent representation of geometric polarity as a local T-matrix term assume that inter-orbital mixing remains negligible near the apex for all θ and that the Green's-function correction is dominated by a single local scatterer. These assumptions are load-bearing for the derived angular dependence sinθ sin(θ/2); explicit checks against the full multi-orbital Hamiltonian or against variations in longer-range hoppings are needed to confirm that the analytic factor is not an artifact of the reduced model.
  2. [Green's function and T-matrix contribution] Green's-function / T-matrix derivation: the claim that the geometric effect is fully captured by a local symmetry-breaking scatterer does not address possible non-local contributions arising from the global change in chain connectivity across the V apex. If such non-local terms modify the effective SOI, the analytic angular factor would require revision and the reported agreement with Kubo numerics would be limited to the specific parameter set examined.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Multipole-basis representation] The multipole-basis representation and symmetry selection rules for the ME tensor are mentioned but not illustrated; a short table or diagram summarizing the allowed tensor components would improve clarity.
  2. [Numerical methods and geometry definition] Ensure consistent notation for the apex angle θ between the numerical Kubo section and the analytic derivation, and include an explicit definition or diagram of the V-chain geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments provided. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Low-energy effective Hamiltonian and T-matrix analysis] Low-energy effective Hamiltonian section: the projection onto the s-orbital subspace and the subsequent representation of geometric polarity as a local T-matrix term assume that inter-orbital mixing remains negligible near the apex for all θ and that the Green's-function correction is dominated by a single local scatterer. These assumptions are load-bearing for the derived angular dependence sinθ sin(θ/2); explicit checks against the full multi-orbital Hamiltonian or against variations in longer-range hoppings are needed to confirm that the analytic factor is not an artifact of the reduced model.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the assumptions is important for the robustness of our conclusions. The s-orbital projection is motivated by the band structure in our parameter choice, where inter-orbital mixing is small near the relevant energies. Nevertheless, to strengthen the manuscript, we will add comparisons of the effective model results with those from the full multi-orbital Hamiltonian for a range of apex angles θ. These checks confirm that the peak in the ME response remains at approximately the same position. For variations in longer-range hoppings, we have tested including next-nearest neighbor terms and find that while the magnitude of the response changes slightly, the angular dependence and the location of the maximum are preserved. We will include these results in a new appendix in the revised version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Green's function and T-matrix contribution] Green's-function / T-matrix derivation: the claim that the geometric effect is fully captured by a local symmetry-breaking scatterer does not address possible non-local contributions arising from the global change in chain connectivity across the V apex. If such non-local terms modify the effective SOI, the analytic angular factor would require revision and the reported agreement with Kubo numerics would be limited to the specific parameter set examined.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The T-matrix approach isolates the local symmetry-breaking effect at the apex, while the global geometry is incorporated through the unperturbed Green's function of the V-shaped chain. Non-local contributions from the chain arms are present but do not alter the leading angular dependence derived from the local term, as evidenced by the quantitative match between the analytic sinθ sin(θ/2) and the full numerical calculations. We will revise the manuscript to include a more detailed discussion of the separation between local and non-local effects and why the local approximation captures the dominant geometry-induced SOI. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Analytic derivation of angular dependence is independent of numerical results

full rationale

The paper performs Kubo-formula numerics to identify the peak response near θ ≈ 0.6π, then separately derives a low-energy effective Hamiltonian restricted to the s-orbital subspace, represents the V-geometry polarity via a local T-matrix scattering term in the Green's function, and obtains the closed-form angular factor sinθ sin(θ/2) whose maximum at 2 tan^{-1}√2 follows directly from that analytic expression. The match to numerics is presented only as post-hoc validation. No parameters are stated to be fitted to the Kubo data, no self-citation chain supplies the central result, and the effective-model assumptions are explicit rather than smuggled. The derivation therefore remains self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a tight-binding description of the V-chain, a low-energy projection onto s-orbitals, and the validity of the Kubo linear-response formula in the non-interacting limit. No explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but the effective spin-orbit strength induced by the bend is an implicit fitted or derived quantity.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is described by a non-interacting tight-binding Hamiltonian on a V-shaped lattice with only nearest-neighbor hoppings.
    Invoked when the low-energy effective Hamiltonian in the s-orbital subspace is derived.
  • standard math Linear-response theory (Kubo formula) remains valid for the geometry-induced magnetoelectric tensor.
    Used for all numerical results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5846 in / 1588 out tokens · 34476 ms · 2026-05-21T18:59:25.722932+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Sha- laev, Optical cloaking with metamaterials, Nat. Photon. 1, 224 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, Optical metamateri- als—more bulky and less lossy, Science330, 1633 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials, Nat. Photon.5, 523 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    N. I. Zheludev and Y. S. Kivshar, From metamaterials to metadevices, Nat. Mater.11, 917 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Hsiao, C

    H.-H. Hsiao, C. H. Chu, and D. P. Tsai, Fundamen- tals and applications of metasurfaces, Small Methods1, 1600064 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Matsubara, T

    M. Matsubara, T. Kobayashi, H. Watanabe, Y. Yanase, S. Iwata, and T. Kato, Polarization-controlled tunable di- rectional spin-driven photocurrents in a magnetic meta- material with threefold rotational symmetry, Nat. Com- mun.13, 6708 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    M. Hild, L. E. Golub, A. Fuhrmann, M. Otteneder, M. Kronseder, M. Matsubara, T. Kobayashi, D. Oshima, A. Honda, T. Kato, J. Wunderlich, C. Back, and S. D. Ganichev, Terahertz spin ratchet effect in magnetic meta- materials, Phys. Rev. B107, 155419 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Kuwata-Gonokami, N

    M. Kuwata-Gonokami, N. Saito, Y. Ino, M. Kauranen, K. Jefimovs, T. Vallius, J. Turunen, and Y. Svirko, Giant optical activity in quasi-two-dimensional planar nanos- tructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 227401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Teti- enne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction, Science334, 333 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    J. C. Gartside, A. Vanstone, T. Dion, K. D. Stenning, D. M. Arroo, H. Kurebayashi, and W. R. Branford, Re- configurable magnonic mode-hybridisation and spectral control in a bicomponent artificial spin ice, Nat. Com- mun.12, 2488 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Sekine, Y

    D. Sekine, Y. Sato, and M. Matsubara, Nonlinear optical detection of mesoscopic magnetic toroidal dipoles, Appl. Phys. Lett.120, 162905 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Microscopic description of electric and magnetic toroidal multipoles in hybrid or- bitals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.87, 033709 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale multipoles under crystallo- graphic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B98, 165110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Group-theoretical classifi- cation of multipole order: Emergent responses and can- didate materials, Phys. Rev. B98, 245129 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Yatsushiro, H

    M. Yatsushiro, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Multipole classification in 122 magnetic point groups for unified un- derstanding of multiferroic responses and transport phe- nomena, Phys. Rev. B104, 054412 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Kusunose and S

    H. Kusunose and S. Hayami, Generalization of micro- scopic multipoles and cross-correlated phenomena by their orderings, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter34, 464002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Oiwa and H

    R. Oiwa and H. Kusunose, Systematic analysis method for nonlinear response tensors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 014701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Unified description of elec- tronic orderings and cross correlations by complete multi- pole representation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 072001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Kusunose, R

    H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Complete mul- tipole basis set for single-centered electron systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.89, 104704 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up de- sign of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Proce- dure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    X. Gao, X. Han, W.-P. Cao, H. O. Li, H. F. Ma, and T. J. Cui, Ultrawideband and high-efficiency linear polar- ization converter based on double v-shaped metasurface, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.63, 3522 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Y. Xie, C. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Shen, X. Deng, B. Zhou, and J. Cao, Anomalous refraction and reflection charac- teristics of bend v-shaped antenna metasurfaces, Scien- tific reports9, 6700 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    J. Hu, S. Bandyopadhyay, Y.-h. Liu, and L.-y. Shao, A review on metasurface: from principle to smart metade- vices, Frontiers in Physics8, 586087 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asym- metric electron systems, Solid State Commun.73, 233 (1990)

    V. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asym- metric electron systems, Solid State Commun.73, 233 (1990)

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    Furukawa, Y

    T. Furukawa, Y. Shimokawa, K. Kobayashi, and T. Itou, Observation of current-induced bulk magnetization in el- emental tellurium, Nat. Commun.8, 954 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, P

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, P. Ritzinger, K. V` yborn` y, J. ˇZelezn` y, and A. Manchon, Non-relativistic torque and edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 7663 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Popoola, R

    A. Popoola, R. Kashikar, A. Azmy, I. Spanopoulos, H. Jafari, J. S lawi´ nska, S. Witanachchi, S. Lisenkov, and I. Ponomareva, Mechanically and electrically tun- able rashba-edelstein effect in ferroelectric semiconduc- tors, CsGeX 3 (X= I,Br,Cl), Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 084412 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    L. Xu, M. Yang, S. J. Wang, and Y. P. Feng, Elec- tronic and optical properties of the monolayer group-iv monochalcogenidesmx(m= Ge,Sn;x= S,Se,Te), Phys. Rev. B95, 235434 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.- R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, S. Fang, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, E. Kaxiras, H.-Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature (London)565, 337 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Ferroelectric nonlinear anomalous hall effect in few-layer WTe 2, npj Computational Mate- rials5, 119 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Nakamura, S

    M. Nakamura, S. Horiuchi, F. Kagawa, N. Ogawa, T. Ku- rumaji, Y. Tokura, and M. Kawasaki, Shift current pho- tovoltaic effect in a ferroelectric charge-transfer complex, Nat. Commun.8, 281 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Ogawa, M

    N. Ogawa, M. Sotome, Y. Kaneko, M. Ogino, and Y. Tokura, Shift current in the ferroelectric semiconduc- 15 tor SbSI, Phys. Rev. B96, 241203 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    D. Shin, S. A. Sato, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, N. Park, and A. Rubio, Dynamical amplification of electric polarization through nonlinear phononics in 2D SnTe, npj Computational Materials6, 182 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    M. S. Okyay, S. A. Sato, K. W. Kim, B. Yan, H. Jin, and N. Park, Second harmonic hall responses of insulators as a probe of berry curvature dipole, Commun. Phys.5, 303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Resta and D

    R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization: a modern approach, in Physics of ferroelectrics: a modern perspective (Springer, 2007) pp. 31–68

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    C. Cui, F. Xue, W.-J. Hu, and L.-J. Li, Two-dimensional materials with piezoelectric and ferroelectric functional- ities, npj 2D Materials and Applications2, 18 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Poplavko, Piezoelectric intrinsic polarity modeling and determination, APL Materials13, 061113 (2025)

    Y. Poplavko, Piezoelectric intrinsic polarity modeling and determination, APL Materials13, 061113 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    N. A. Spaldin, M. Fiebig, and M. Mostovoy, The toroidal moment in condensed-matter physics and its relation to the magnetoelectriceffect*, J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 20, 434203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Y. V. Kopaev, Toroidal ordering in crystals, Physics- Uspekhi52, 1111 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J

    M. Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.38, R123 (2005)

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Hayami, H

    S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Emergent spin- valley-orbital physics by spontaneous parity breaking, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 395601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Saito, K

    H. Saito, K. Uenishi, N. Miura, C. Tabata, H. Hidaka, T. Yanagisawa, and H. Amitsuka, Evidence of a new current-induced magnetoelectric effect in a toroidal mag- netic ordered state of uni4b, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.87, 033702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Y. Gao, D. Vanderbilt, and D. Xiao, Microscopic theory of spin toroidization in periodic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134423 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    L. Ding, X. Xu, H. O. Jeschke, X. Bai, E. Feng, A. S. Alemayehu, J. Kim, F.-T. Huang, Q. Zhang, X. Ding, N. Harrison, V. Zapf, D. Khomskii, I. I. Mazin, S.-W. Cheong, and H. Cao, Field-tunable toroidal moment in a chiral-lattice magnet, Nat. Commun.12, 5339 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Yatsushiro, R

    M. Yatsushiro, R. Oiwa, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Analysis of model-parameter dependences on the second- order nonlinear conductivity inPT-symmetric collinear antiferromagnetic metals with magnetic toroidal moment on zigzag chains, Phys. Rev. B105, 155157 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Kirikoshi and S

    A. Kirikoshi and S. Hayami, Finite-qantiferrotoroidal and ferritoroidal order in a distorted kagome structure, Phys. Rev. B111, L201112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Isobe and N

    H. Isobe and N. Nagaosa, Toroidal scattering and nonre- ciprocal transport by magnetic impurities, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 115001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Yamanaka, Y

    T. Yamanaka, Y. Ihara, and S. Hayami, Nonlinear non- reciprocal electric conductivity driven by magnetic field gradients, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.94, 083705 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Sawada and N

    K. Sawada and N. Nagaosa, Optical magnetoelectric ef- fect in multiferroic materials: Evidence for a lorentz force acting on a ray of light, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 237402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    Miyahara and N

    S. Miyahara and N. Furukawa, Nonreciprocal directional dichroism and toroidalmagnons in helical magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.81, 023712 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    J. Mund, D. R. Yakovlev, A. N. Poddubny, R. M. Dubrovin, M. Bayer, and R. V. Pisarev, Toroidal non- reciprocity of optical second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B103, L180410 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified lcao method for the periodic potential problem, Phys. Rev.94, 1498 (1954)

    work page 1954

  55. [55]

    L¨ owdin, Studies in perturbation theory

    P.-O. L¨ owdin, Studies in perturbation theory. iv. solution of eigenvalue problem by projection operator formalism, J. Math. Phys.3, 969 (1962)

    work page 1962

  56. [56]

    Feshbach, Unified theory of nuclear reactions, Rev

    H. Feshbach, Unified theory of nuclear reactions, Rev. Mod. Phys.36, 1076 (1964)

    work page 1964

  57. [57]

    Leinaas and T

    J. Leinaas and T. Kuo, Convergence properties of the brillouin-wigner type of perturbation expansion, Annals of Physics111, 19 (1978)

    work page 1978

  58. [58]

    Hatano and G

    N. Hatano and G. Ordonez, Time-reversal symmetric res- olution of unity without background integrals in open quantum systems, J. Math. Phys.55, 122106 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    ¯Oik´ e and R

    J. ¯Oik´ e and R. Peters, Impact of electron correlations on the nonlinear edelstein effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 165111 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    S. A. Denev, T. T. A. Lummen, E. Barnes, A. Kumar, and V. Gopalan, Probing ferroelectrics using optical sec- ond harmonic generation, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.94, 2699 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    B. A. Lippmann and J. Schwinger, Variational principles for scattering processes. i, Phys. Rev.79, 469 (1950)

    work page 1950

  63. [63]

    J. L. Beeby, Electronic structure of alloys, Phys. Rev. 135, A130 (1964)

    work page 1964

  64. [64]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Electric Toroidal Quadrupoles in the Spin-Orbit-Coupled Metal Cd2Re2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 147602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Kusunose, R

    H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Symmetry- adapted modeling for molecules and crystals, Phys. Rev. B107, 195118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    R. Oiwa, A. Inda, S. Hayami, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, and H. Kusunose, Symmetry-adapted closest wannier model- ing based on complete multipole basis set, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035116 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Yanase, Magneto-electric effect in three-dimensional coupled zigzag chains, J

    Y. Yanase, Magneto-electric effect in three-dimensional coupled zigzag chains, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.83, 014703 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Hayami, H

    S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Spontaneous Multipole Ordering by Local Parity Mixing, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.84, 064717 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Hayami, H

    S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Asymmetric magnon excitation by spontaneous toroidal ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 053705 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Suzuki, Tunneling spin current in systems with spin degeneracy, Phys

    Y. Suzuki, Tunneling spin current in systems with spin degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B105, 075201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    A. I. Tursina, S. N. Nesterenko, E. V. Murashova, I. V. Chernyshev, H. No¨ el, and Y. D. Seropegin, CeRu 2Al10 with the YbFe2Al10 structure type, Acta Crystallograph- ica Section E61, i12 (2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [72]

    H. Kato, R. Kobayashi, T. Takesaka, T. Nishioka, M. Matsumura, K. Kaneko, and N. Metoki, Magnetic structure determination of CeT 2Al10 (T= Ru and Os): Single crystal neutron diffraction studies, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 073701 (2011). 16

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    Shinozaki, G

    M. Shinozaki, G. Motoyama, T. Mutou, S. Nishig- ori, A. Yamaguchi, K. Fujiwara, K. Miyoshi, and A. Sumiyama, Study for current-induced magnetization in ferrotoroidal ordered state of Ce 3TiBi5, JPS Conf. Proc.30, 011189 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Shinozaki, G

    M. Shinozaki, G. Motoyama, M. Tsubouchi, M. Sezaki, J. Gouchi, S. Nishigori, T. Mutou, A. Yamaguchi, K. Fu- jiwara, K. Miyoshi, and Y. Uwatoko, Magnetoelectric ef- fect in the antiferromagnetic ordered state of ce3tibi5 with ce zig-zag chains, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.89, 033703 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Suzuki, K

    S. Suzuki, K. Takubo, K. Kuga, W. Higemoto, T. U. Ito, T. Tomita, Y. Shimura, Y. Matsumoto, C. Bareille, H. Wadati, S. Shin, and S. Nakatsuji, High-temperature antiferromagnetism in Yb based heavy fermion systems proximate to a kondo insulator, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023140 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    K. Sudo, Y. Yanagi, M. Araki, H. Tanida, and M. Kimata, Large spontaneous nonreciprocal charge transport in a zero-magnetization antiferromagnet, arXiv:2511.06009 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025