Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Information geometric regularization of unidimensional pressureless Euler equations yields global strong solutions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Entropic regularization gives global smooth solutions to 1D pressureless Euler, converging to entropy shocks as the barrier shrinks.

desk verdict The paper's global regularity theorem rests on a false identity for nonuniform densities; the variational existence and Gamma-convergence parts look salvageable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15121 v3 pith:6VIUET53 submitted 2024-11-22 math.AP math.DGmath.OC

Ruijia Cao , Florian Schäfer This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.DGmath.OC MSC 35L6549Q2249J4558B2076L05
keywords informationgeometricregularizationpressurelessEulerequationsshockwavesentropysolutionsGamma-convergencegeodesiccompletenessKullback-Leiblerdivergencevariationalmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that information geometric regularization (IGR) prevents shock formation in the one-dimensional pressureless Euler equations: instead of losing smoothness in finite time, the regularized flow has global strong solutions whose regularity matches the initial data. The key idea is to replace the standard geodesic motion of the deformation map on the diffeomorphism manifold by a 'dual' geodesic driven by a logarithmic barrier, which penalizes the collapse of particle trajectories. The paper also shows that as the regularization parameter α tends to zero, these smooth solutions converge to the entropy (sticky-particle) solutions of the unregularized pressureless Euler system. This is the first rigorous step toward understanding IGR, whose numerical experiments had suggested that it tames shocks without artificial viscosity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the convex functional $F^{{v,μ}}$_α(Φ)=∫((Φ(x)−x)^2/2 − Φ(x)v(x))dμ(x) + α D_KL(Φ#μ∥μ), minimized over monotone maps Φ of [a,b] to itself (the Helly space). The KL-divergence term, equivalent to −α∫log(∂xΦ)dμ for regular maps, is the barrier that makes collision energetically prohibitive: as two particles approach, D_KL blows up, so the minimizer stays injective and absolutely continuous. The proof then works by: existence via Helly compactness and lower semicontinuity of D_KL; a delicate variation argument (Lemma 4.1) forcing a uniform lower bound on the pushed-forward density; a second variation (Lemma 4.3) giving a uniform lower bound on ∂xΦ; the identity 1/∂xΦ = c + (1/(α μ(x)))∫_a^x (v(s)−(Φ(s)−s))dμ(s), which allows bootstrapping Sobolev regularity of Φ from regularity of v; and finally differentiability in the data to take two time derivatives, yielding the Eulerian PDE.

What would settle it

Compute the IGR flow for a well-resolved compression test — e.g., u0(x)=x on [0,1] with uniform μ and fixed α>0 — and check whether the deformation map Φt remains bijective and the Eulerian density stays in $W^{{1,∞}}$ for all t. If a finite-time blow-up, non-injectivity of Φt, or loss of absolute continuity appears under the theorem's hypotheses, Theorem 5.9 would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.9: for k≥0, if the initial density μ is a probability measure with density in $W^{{k+1,∞}}$([a,b]) and the initial velocity u0 is in $W^{{k+2,∞}}$, then the minimizers Φt of the entropic barrier functional $F^{{t f^{u0}}$_α, μ}_α produce Eulerian fields u(x,t)=Φ̇_t($Φ_t^{{-1}}$(x)) and ρ(x,t)=(μ/∂xΦ_t)($Φ_t^{{-1}}$(x)) that lie in $C^{1}$([0,∞); $W^{{k+2,∞}}$(μ)) and $C^{1}$([0,∞); $W^{{k+1,∞}}$(μ)) respectively and solve the IGR system (1.3) with the given initial data. In the author's terms, the path t↦Φt is the dual geodesic associated with the convex potential ψ(Φ)=∫[(Φ−x)^2/2 − α log(∂xΦ)]dμ, and global existence of these smooth solutions is exactly geodesic completeness of the diffeomorphism manifold under that geometry. Alongside, the paper proves via Γ-convergence that as α→0 the variational solutions converge to the sticky-particle entropy solutions of the pressureless Euler equations, matching the shock speeds of the original problem.

Load-bearing premise

The initial density must be bounded away from zero and infinity (0 < ess inf dμ/dL ≤ ess sup dμ/dL < ∞); without this, the lower-bound lemmas that give absolute continuity and derivative control fail, and uniqueness, stability, and higher regularity can break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For smooth initial data, the regularized pressureless Euler system (1.3) never forms shocks: u and ρ remain as regular as the initial conditions, for all time.
  • Taking α→0 recovers the conventional entropy solutions of the pressureless Euler system, so the regularization matches the correct shock behavior in the vanishing-regularization limit.
  • The result implies geodesic completeness of the unidimensional diffeomorphism manifold with the dual affine connection induced by the barrier ψ: every geodesic extends indefinitely.
  • Because solutions stay smooth, one can use high-order numerical methods on grids of size proportional to √α, without shock-capturing limiters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same barrier idea is likely to extend to pressures and to multiple dimensions only through a more PDE-style argument, since the variational formulation used here relies on one-dimensional monotonicity of Φ.
  • For discontinuous or rough initial data, the 'regularized variational solution' path implicitly smooths u0 through the elliptic operator in f^{u0}_α, suggesting a weak-solution framework for data outside the theorem's assumptions.
  • The lower-bound constant in Lemma 4.1 scales like exp(c/α), hinting that as α shrinks the deformation map becomes stiff; quantitative convergence rates in α, rather than just Γ-convergence, are the natural next milestone for numerics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a variational framework for the information-geometric regularization (IGR) of the one-dimensional pressureless Euler system. It defines a relaxed functional F in terms of squared L2 displacement plus α times the KL divergence of the pushforward of the initial measure, proves existence of minimizers, claims uniqueness and Lipschitz stability, establishes Γ-convergence as α→0 to sticky-particle entropy solutions, and then—by identifying minimizers of F with minimizers of a log-barrier functional—bootstraps spatial regularity and differentiability in time to obtain global strong solutions of the IGR equations (1.3)/(2.1). The main theorems are Theorems 2.6, 2.9, 3.3, 4.6, 5.8, and 5.9.

Significance. If correct, the result would be a significant step: it would give global strong solutions for an inviscid regularization with convergence to entropy solutions, and geodesic completeness of the regularized diffeomorphism manifold. The Γ-convergence part (Section 3) and the direct-method existence for the KL functional are appealing and are independent of the disputed identity. However, the key bridge between the KL functional and the log-barrier functional is false for nonuniform initial densities, and the regularity and Eulerian-solution theorems rest on that bridge. The central claim is therefore not established as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 and Theorem 2.9] The asserted identity D_KL(Φ#μ∥μ)=−∫log(∂xΦ)dμ is false for nonconstant μ. With f=dμ/dL the change of variables yields D_KL(Φ#μ∥μ)=−∫log(∂xΦ)dμ+∫log f dμ−∫(log f)∘Φ dμ. The extra terms do not cancel in general; for [0,1], μ(dx)=2x dx and Φ(x)=x², one obtains D_KL=1−log2 while −∫log(∂xΦ)dμ=1/2−log2. Since Theorem 2.9 uses this identity to prove uniqueness and 1-strong convexity, and Definition 2.1/Theorem 2.10 rely on uniqueness, the well-posedness of variational solutions is not established for nonuniform μ.
  2. [§4.3–4.4, Lemmas 4.3 and 4.4] The first-order optimality condition ∫φΦ* − α∂xφ/∂xΦ* dμ = ∫φ(x+v)dμ is derived from the log-barrier functional, not from F. The correct variation of F at Φ contains the extra term −∫ f'(Φ)ψ dμ after integration by parts. At Φ=Id and v=0, Id is a minimizer of F, but Lemma 4.4 would imply α∫ψ' dμ=0 for every ψ∈C_c^∞, which holds only for constant f. Consequently Lemma 4.3 (lower bound on ∂xΦ*), Lemma 4.5 (formula for 1/∂xΦ*), and Lemma 4.6 (higher regularity) do not apply to the minimizers of Definition 2.1.
  3. [§5, Theorems 5.4, 5.6, 5.8, 5.9] The time-derivative existence and the Lagrangian/Eulerian PDE results are obtained by differentiating the false optimality condition of Lemma 4.4 (see the elliptic equation in Theorem 5.4 and the Lagrangian PDE in Theorem 5.6). Since minimizers of F do not satisfy that condition for nonconstant μ, the C^2-in-time and W^{k+2,∞} regularity asserted in Theorem 5.8, and hence the Eulerian solution statement of Theorem 5.9, are not proved. Restricting to μ proportional to Lebesgue measure would make the identity true but would fall far short of the theorem's stated generality (μ∈W^{k+1,∞}).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 2.7] The notation µ[x2,x1] should be µ([x1,x2]).
  2. [Lemma 2.8] The letter H is used both for the Helly space and for the Hilbert space in the lemma statement, and the line 'F : H →R :=R ∪ {∞}' contains a typo.
  3. [Lemma 4.1] After defining ρ and ildeρ, the final sentence concludes a lower bound on ildeρ although the lemma statement is about ρ; the argument needs to divide by ess sup μ to close the statement.
  4. [Theorems 5.6 and 5.8] The repeated phrase 'the analog result holds' lists inconsistent space pairs (e.g., 'W^{k+1,∞}, W2,∞ replaced with C^{k+1}, C^{k+2}'); these should be stated uniformly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the existence, uniqueness, regularity, and Gamma-convergence claims are derived self-contained from the variational functional, and the only self-citation imports the model definition rather than the theorem.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce its conclusions to its inputs. Existence of variational solutions is obtained by the direct method (Theorem 2.6); uniqueness and Lipschitz stability are proven via strong convexity (Theorem 2.9); Gamma-convergence to the pressureless Euler functional and convergence to entropy solutions are established in Section 3, relying on independent references for the entropy-solution theory of the nominal problem. The regularity bootstrap in Section 4 derives absolute continuity, uniform derivative bounds, and higher-order regularity from the first-order optimality condition of the variational problem, not from an assumed smoothness conclusion. The time-differentiability argument in Section 5 uses elliptic regularity and parameter-differentiability results proven in the paper, and Theorem 5.9 is a translation of the Lagrangian result into Eulerian coordinates. The self-citations to the authors' prior work [12] supply the form of the IGR equation and the barrier functional psi; they do not supply existence, uniqueness, regularity, or convergence, and no step of the proof invokes the target result as an input. The correctness concern raised by the skeptic, namely that the identity D_KL(Phi#mu || mu) = - integral log(d_x Phi) d mu used in Section 2.2 / Theorem 2.9 is not valid for nonconstant mu, would be a serious mathematical flaw if correct, but it is a false equivalence of functionals rather than a circular reduction of the conclusion to the hypothesis. It therefore does not increase the circularity score under the stated rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard convex analysis, measure theory, and known entropy solution theory for pressureless Euler. The only domain-specific input is the equation itself imported from the authors' prior numerical paper [12]; no free parameters are fitted. The non-degeneracy assumptions on μ are hypotheses, not free parameters.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Helly space H = {Φ:[a,b]→[a,b] monotone, Φ(a)=a, Φ(b)=b} is compact in the topology of pointwise convergence and first countable (Lemma 2.4).
    Used to extract convergent subsequences of minimizing sequences in Corollary 2.5 and Theorem 2.6. Cited from [52].
  • standard math The KL divergence DKL(ν||μ) is weakly lower semicontinuous (Posner's theorem).
    Used in Theorem 2.6 to pass to the limit in the entropic term for minimizing sequences.
  • standard math Change of variables formula for monotone (possibly only BV) maps: if Φ is injective and ρ = dΦ#μ/dx, then ρ∘Φ = 1/∂xΦ μ-a.e. (Villani, Theorem 11.1).
    Used in Theorem 2.9 and Corollary 4.2 to relate pushforward density to the derivative of Φ, and in Theorem 3.3 to bound the KL divergence of recovery sequences.
  • standard math Jessen-Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund theorem on Lebesgue points of integrable functions (Lemma 4.1).
    Used in the key contradiction argument to find a point y0 where the pushforward density attains an arbitrarily small value.
  • domain assumption The optimality criterion for the unregularized problem, t→P_H(tu0), gives entropy solutions of pressureless Euler as established in [24,43,14,32,33,13,44].
    Used in Section 3 to identify the Γ-limit functional F^{tu0,μ}_0 with entropy solutions of the nominal pressureless Euler equation.
  • standard math Lax-Milgram and standard elliptic regularity in one dimension for the operator θμ - α∂x(A∂xθ μ) = vμ (Lemma 5.3).
    Used in Section 5 to establish existence and regularity of time derivatives Φ̇t.
  • standard math Convex analysis results on strong convexity and Lipschitz continuity of minimizers (Lemma 2.8, from [26]).
    Used in Theorem 2.9 to prove uniqueness and L2 stability of minimizers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Information geometric regularization of unidimensional pressureless Euler equations yields global strong solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6VIUET53

@misc{pith2026241115121,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Information geometric regularization of unidimensional pressureless Euler equations yields global strong solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6VIUET53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15121}
}
abstract

Partial differential equations describing compressible fluids are prone to the formation of shock singularities, arising from faster upstream fluid particles catching up to slower, downstream ones. In geometric terms, this causes the deformation map to leave the manifold of diffeomorphisms. Information geometric regularization addresses this issue by changing the manifold geometry to make it geodesically complete. Empirical evidence suggests that this results in smooth solutions without adding artificial viscosity. This work makes a first step towards understanding this phenomenon rigorously, in the setting of the unidimensional pressureless Euler equations. It shows that their information geometric regularization has smooth global solutions. By establishing $\Gamma$-convergence of its variational description, it proves convergence of these solutions to entropy solutions of the nominal problem, in the limit of vanishing regularization parameter. A consequence of these results is that manifolds of unidimensional diffeomorphisms with information geometric regularization are geodesically complete.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Compression-Directional Entropic Stress Method for Shock-Regularized Compressible Flow

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CoDeS supplies a compression-aligned tensor stress from a modified-Helmholtz solve that activates only at shocks and remains inactive in expansions, contacts, and shear.

  2. Information geometric regularization for computing sensitivities of flows with shocks

    math.NA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper derives forward and adjoint sensitivity equations for the information geometrically regularized Euler equations and numerically verifies them against finite differences and automatic differentiation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Information geometry and its applications , volume 194

    Shun-ichi Amari. Information geometry and its applications , volume 194. Springer, 2016

    2016

  2. [2]

    Methods of information geometry , volume 191

    Shun-ichi Amari and Hiroshi Nagaoka. Methods of information geometry , volume 191. American Mathematical Soc., 2000

    2000

  3. [3]

    Sur la g´ eom´ etrie diff´ erentielle des groupes de lie de dimension infinie et ses applications ` a l’hydrodynamique des fluides parfaits

    Vladimir Arnold. Sur la g´ eom´ etrie diff´ erentielle des groupes de lie de dimension infinie et ses applications ` a l’hydrodynamique des fluides parfaits. In Annales de l’institut Fourier , volume 16, pages 319–361, 1966

    work page 1966

  4. [4]

    Shock capturing with pde-based artificial viscosity for dgfem: Part i

    Garrett E Barter and David L Darmofal. Shock capturing with pde-based artificial viscosity for dgfem: Part i. formulation. Journal of Computational Physics , 229(5):1810–1827, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    A Hamiltonian regularization of the Burgers equation

    Harish S Bhat and Razvan C Fetecau. A Hamiltonian regularization of the Burgers equation. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 16:615–638, 2006. 30 RUIJIA CAO AND FLORIAN SCH ¨AFER

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    On a regularization of the compressible Euler equations for an isothermal gas

    HS Bhat and RC Fetecau. On a regularization of the compressible Euler equations for an isothermal gas. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications , 358(1):168–181, 2009

    2009

  7. [7]

    The Riemann problem for the leray–burgers equation

    HS Bhat and RC Fetecau. The Riemann problem for the leray–burgers equation. Journal of Differential Equations , 246(10):3957–3979, 2009

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Measure theory, volume 1

    Vladimir Igorevich Bogachev and Maria Aparecida Soares Ruas. Measure theory, volume 1. Springer, 2007

    work page 2007

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    A handbook of γ-convergence

    Andrea Braides. A handbook of γ-convergence. In Handbook of Differential Equations: stationary partial differential equations, volume 3, pages 101–213. Elsevier, 2006

    2006

  2. [10]

    Sticky particle dynamics with interactions

    Yann Brenier, Wilfrid Gangbo, Giuseppe Savar´ e, and Michael Westdickenberg. Sticky particle dynamics with interactions. Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 99(5):577–617, 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    FC-based shock-dynamics solver with neural-network localized artificial-viscosity assignment

    Oscar P Bruno, Jan S Hesthaven, and Daniel V Leibovici. FC-based shock-dynamics solver with neural-network localized artificial-viscosity assignment. Journal of Computational Physics: X , 15:100110, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Information geometric regularization of the barotropic Euler equation

    Ruijia Cao and Florian Sch¨ afer. Information geometric regularization of the barotropic Euler equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14127, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Equivalence of entropy solutions and gradient flows for pressureless 1d Euler systems

    Jos´ e Antonio Carrillo and Sondre Tesdal Galtung. Equivalence of entropy solutions and gradient flows for pressureless 1d Euler systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04932 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    A simple proof of global existence for the 1d pressureless gas dynamics equations

    Fabio Cavalletti, Marc Sedjro, and Michael Westdickenberg. A simple proof of global existence for the 1d pressureless gas dynamics equations. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 47(1):66–79, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    The formation of shocks in 3-dimensional fluids , volume 2

    Demetrios Christodoulou. The formation of shocks in 3-dimensional fluids , volume 2. European Mathematical Society, 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    The shock development problem

    Demetrios Christodoulou. The shock development problem . 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    The global nonlinear stability of the Minkowski space

    Demetrios Christodoulou and Sergiu Klainerman. The global nonlinear stability of the Minkowski space. S´ eminaire ´Equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles (Polytechnique) dit aussi” S´ eminaire Goulaouic-Schwartz”, pages 1–29, 1993

    1993

  10. [18]

    Compressible flow and Euler’s equations , volume 9

    Demetrios Christodoulou and Shuang Miao. Compressible flow and Euler’s equations , volume 9. International Press Somerville, MA, 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Non-dispersive conservative regularisation of nonlinear shallow water (and isentropic Euler equations)

    Didier Clamond and Denys Dutykh. Non-dispersive conservative regularisation of nonlinear shallow water (and isentropic Euler equations). Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation , 55:237–247, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Entropic regularization of continuous optimal transport problems

    Christian Clason, Dirk A Lorenz, Hinrich Mahler, and Benedikt Wirth. Entropic regularization of continuous optimal transport problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 494(1):124432, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Hyperviscosity for shock-turbulence interactions

    Andrew W Cook and William H Cabot. Hyperviscosity for shock-turbulence interactions. Journal of Computational Physics, 203(2):379–385, 2005

    2005

  14. [22]

    Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport

    Marco Cuturi. Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport. Advances in neural information processing systems, 26, 2013

    2013

  15. [23]

    Direct methods in the calculus of variations , volume 78

    Bernard Dacorogna. Direct methods in the calculus of variations , volume 78. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  16. [24]

    Probabilistic interpretation of sticky particle model

    Azzouz Dermoune. Probabilistic interpretation of sticky particle model. The Annals of Probability, 27(3):1357–1367, 1999

    1999

  17. [25]

    On some aspects of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws

    V ´ ıt Dolejˇ s ´ ı, Miloslav Feistauer, and Christoph Schwab. On some aspects of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , 61(3-6):333–346, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Convex analysis and variational problems

    Ivar Ekeland and Roger Temam. Convex analysis and variational problems . SIAM, 1999

    1999

  19. [27]

    An artificial nonlinear diffusivity method for supersonic reacting flows with shocks

    Benoit Fiorina and Sanjiva K Lele. An artificial nonlinear diffusivity method for supersonic reacting flows with shocks. Journal of Computational Physics , 222(1):246–264, 2007

    2007

  20. [28]

    Hamiltonian regularisation of the unidimensional barotropic Euler equations

    Billel Guelmame, Didier Clamond, and St´ ephane Junca. Hamiltonian regularisation of the unidimensional barotropic Euler equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications , 64:103455, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws

    Jean-Luc Guermond, Richard Pasquetti, and Bojan Popov. Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics , 230(11):4248–4267, 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Viscous regularization of the Euler equations and entropy principles

    Jean-Luc Guermond and Bojan Popov. Viscous regularization of the Euler equations and entropy principles. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 74(2):284–305, 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III

    Ami Harten, Bjorn Engquist, Stanley Osher, and Sukumar R Chakravarthy. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. Journal of computational physics , 131(1):3–47, 1997

    1997

  24. [32]

    Lagrangian coordinates for the sticky particle system

    Ryan Hynd. Lagrangian coordinates for the sticky particle system. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 51(5):3769– 3795, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    A trajectory map for the pressureless Euler equations

    Ryan Hynd. A trajectory map for the pressureless Euler equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 373(10):6777–6815, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Note on the differentiability of multiple integrals

    Børge Jessen, Jan Marcinkiewicz, and Antoni Zygmund. Note on the differentiability of multiple integrals. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 25(1):217–234, 1935

    1935

  27. [35]

    Proximal Galerkin: A structure-preserving finite element method for pointwise bound constraints

    Brendan Keith and Thomas M Surowiec. Proximal Galerkin: A structure-preserving finite element method for pointwise bound constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12444 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Geometric hydrodynamics and infinite-dimensional Newton’s equations

    Boris Khesin, Gerard Misio lek, and Klas Modin. Geometric hydrodynamics and infinite-dimensional Newton’s equations. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 58(3):377–442, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Essai sur le mouvement d’un fluide visqueux emplissant l’espace

    J Leray. Essai sur le mouvement d’un fluide visqueux emplissant l’espace. Acta Math., 63(1):193–248, 1934

    1934

  30. [38]

    A kernel formula for regularized Wasserstein proximal operators

    Wuchen Li, Siting Liu, and Stanley Osher. A kernel formula for regularized Wasserstein proximal operators. Research in the Mathematical Sciences , 10(4):43, 2023. UNIDIMENSIONAL PRESSURELESS IGR YIELDS GLOBAL STRONG SOLUTIONS 31

    2023

  31. [39]

    Fast randomized entropically regularized semidefinite programming

    Michael Lindsey. Fast randomized entropically regularized semidefinite programming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12133 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Well-posedness and derivative blow-up for a dispersionless regularized shallow water system

    Jian-Guo Liu, Robert L Pego, and Yue Pu. Well-posedness and derivative blow-up for a dispersionless regularized shallow water system. Nonlinearity, 32(11):4346, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes

    Xu-Dong Liu, Stanley Osher, and Tony Chan. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of computational physics, 115(1):200–212, 1994

    1994

  34. [42]

    Suitability of artificial bulk viscosity for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks

    Ali Mani, Johan Larsson, and Parviz Moin. Suitability of artificial bulk viscosity for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks. Journal of Computational Physics , 228(19):7368–7374, 2009

    2009

  35. [43]

    A Wasserstein approach to the one-dimensional sticky particle system

    Luca Natile and Giuseppe Savar´ e. A Wasserstein approach to the one-dimensional sticky particle system. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis , 41(4):1340–1365, 2009

    2009

  36. [44]

    Pressureless Euler/Euler–Poisson systems via adhesion dynamics and scalar conservation laws

    Truyen Nguyen and Adrian Tudorascu. Pressureless Euler/Euler–Poisson systems via adhesion dynamics and scalar conservation laws. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis , 40(2):754–775, 2008

    2008

  37. [45]

    Random coding strategies for minimum entropy

    Edward Posner. Random coding strategies for minimum entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 21(4):388– 391, 1975

    1975

  38. [46]

    Weakly singular shock profiles for a non-dispersive regular- ization of shallow-water equations

    Yue Pu, Robert L Pego, Denys Dutykh, and Didier Clamond. Weakly singular shock profiles for a non-dispersive regular- ization of shallow-water equations. Communications in Mathematical Sciences , 16(5), 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Numerical entropy production for central schemes

    Gabriella Puppo. Numerical entropy production for central schemes. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 25(4):1382– 1415, 2004

    2004

  40. [48]

    An artificial neural network as a troubled-cell indicator

    Deep Ray and Jan S Hesthaven. An artificial neural network as a troubled-cell indicator. Journal of computational physics, 367:166–191, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Theory of the Integral

    Stanis law Saks. Theory of the Integral . Hafner Publishing Company, 1937

    1937

  42. [50]

    Chi-Wang Shu. Advanced numerical approximation of nonlinear hyperbolic equations, chapter essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, 1998

    1998

  43. [51]

    Formation of singularities in three-dimensional compressible fluids

    Thomas C Sideris. Formation of singularities in three-dimensional compressible fluids. Communications in mathematical physics, 101(4):475–485, 1985

    1985

  44. [52]

    Counterexamples in topology

    LA Steen. Counterexamples in topology. Springer-Verlag, 1978

    1978

  45. [53]

    On the Lagrangian description and uniqueness for the one-dimensional Pressureless Euler system

    Mark David Suder. On the Lagrangian description and uniqueness for the one-dimensional Pressureless Euler system . West Virginia University, 2021

    2021

  46. [54]

    Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme

    Bram Van Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of computational Physics , 32(1):101–136, 1979

    1979

  47. [55]

    Optimal transport: old and new , volume 338

    C´ edric Villani et al. Optimal transport: old and new , volume 338. Springer, 2009

    2009

  48. [56]

    A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks

    John VonNeumann and Robert D Richtmyer. A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks. Journal of applied physics , 21(3):232–237, 1950

    1950

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.