Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Transformation of Mean Opinion Scores to Avoid Misleading of Ranked based Statistical Techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.11490 v1 pith:6YB634F6 submitted 2020-04-23 cs.MM

Transformation of Mean Opinion Scores to Avoid Misleading of Ranked based Statistical Techniques

classification cs.MM
keywords rankscoresstatisticaltechniquesmisleadingopinionappliedcoefficients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The rank correlation coefficients and the ranked-based statistical tests (as a subset of non-parametric techniques) might be misleading when they are applied to subjectively collected opinion scores. Those techniques assume that the data is measured at least at an ordinal level and define a sequence of scores to represent a tied rank when they have precisely an equal numeric value. In this paper, we show that the definition of tied rank, as mentioned above, is not suitable for Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) and might be misleading conclusions of rank-based statistical techniques. Furthermore, we introduce a method to overcome this issue by transforming the MOS values considering their $95\%$ Confidence Intervals. The rank correlation coefficients and ranked-based statistical tests can then be safely applied to the transformed values. We also provide open-source software packages in different programming languages to utilize the application of our transformation method in the quality of experience domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.