REVIEW 3 cited by
How well can we guess theoretical uncertainties?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The problem of estimating the effect of missing higher orders in perturbation theory is analyzed with emphasis in the application to Higgs production in gluon-gluon fusion. Well-known mathematical methods for an approximated completion of the perturbative series are applied with the goal to not truncate the series, but complete it in a well-defined way, so as to increase the accuracy - if not the precision - of theoretical predictions. The uncertainty arising from the use of the completion procedure is discussed and a recipe for constructing a corresponding probability distribution function is proposed.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Scale Variations: Perturbative Theory Uncertainties from Nuisance Parameters
A framework that turns missing higher-order perturbative coefficients into fit-able theory nuisance parameters, giving correlated and statistically meaningful theory uncertainties.
-
Numerical computation of Fox functions
A numerical toolkit, based on Sinc methods plus contiguity shifts of lambda, is presented for evaluating multivariate Fox functions representing Feynman integrals.
-
Next-to-leading order evolution of structure functions without PDFs
The authors build a complete NLO momentum-space DGLAP evolution for a six-observable physical basis of DIS structure functions and compare its numerical results with conventional PDF-based evolution.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.